Local parks serve not only as recreational venues but are often an engine of communities’ economic development. Economic impact analyses provide tangible estimates of economic interdependencies and a better understanding of who benefits from and pays for tourism. Accordingly, this study quantified the economic impacts of visitor expenditures at local parks in Mississippi operated by the Pat Harrison Waterway District (PHWD). Both intercept and online survey methods were employed to collect visitor data from eight parks, and the data were analyzed with the IMPLAN software package to determine economic impacts attributable to visitor spending. On average, per visitor spending at the PHWD parks was $126.28. Visitors’ total local purchasing in the PHWD areas was estimated to be approximately $5.1 million annually. Visitor spending in the PHWD areas was expected to generate: $4.4 million of output, representing revenue plus certain taxes; 68.48 jobs with $1.4 million of labor income; $2.9 million of value added to the gross regional product. The results indicated that visitor expenditures are a significant economic stimulus in a region. In particular, the dollars spent on recreational equipment and supplies, followed by campgrounds and groceries, provided a strong boost to the local economy. The implications of the study are also addressed on the basis of the results.
| Published in | International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12 |
| Page(s) | 37-44 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Local Park, Visitor Expenditure, Economic Impact
| [1] | Bailey, A. W., & Hungenberg, E. (2020). Managing the rock-climbing economy: A case from Chattanooga. Annals of Leisure Research, 23 (2): 165-183. |
| [2] | Blanck, H. M., Allen, D., Bashir, Z., Gordon, N., Goodman, A., Merriam, D., & Rutt, C. (2012). Let’s go to the park today: The role of parks in obesity prevention and improving the public’s health. Childhood Obesity, 8 (5): 423-428. |
| [3] | Bonn, M. A., & Harrington, J. (2008). A comparison of three economic impact models for applied hospitality and tourism research. Tourism Economics, 14 (4): 769-789. |
| [4] | Brabyn, L., & Sutton, S. (2013). A population based assessment of the geographical accessibility of outdoor recreation opportunities in New Zealand. Applied Geography, 41, 124-131. |
| [5] | Chalkias, C., Papadopoulos, A. G., Kalogeropoulos, K., Tambalis, K., Psarra, G., & Sidossis, L. (2013). Geographical heterogeneity of the relationship between childhood obesity and socio-environmental status: Empirical evidence from Athens, Greece. Applied Geography, 37, 34-43. |
| [6] | Crompton, J. L. (2006). Economic impact studies: Instruments for political shenanigans? Journal of Travel Research, 45 (1): 67-82. |
| [7] | Crompton, J. L., Lee, S., & Shuster, T. J. (2001). A guide for undertaking economic impact studies: The Springfest example. Journal of Travel Research, 40 (1): 79-87. |
| [8] | Fish, T. E. (2009). Assessing economic impacts of national parks. Park Science, 26 (2): 20-57. |
| [9] | Gabe, T., & McConnon, J. C. (2018). Popping the question: The influence of survey design on estimated visitor spending in a region. Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 48 (4): 9-24. |
| [10] | Gatrell, J. D., & Jensen, R. R. (2002). Growth through greening: Developing and assessing alternative economic development programmes. Applied Geography, 22 (4): 331-350. |
| [11] | Goodwin, H. (2002). Local community involvement in tourism around national parks: Opportunities and constraints. Current Issues in Tourism, 5 (3-4): 338-360. |
| [12] | Jeong, J. Y., & Crompton, J. L. (2015). Measuring the economic impact of a state park system. Managing Sport and Leisure, 20 (4): 238-257. |
| [13] | Job, H. (2008). Estimating the regional economic impact of tourism to national parks: Two case studies from Germany. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 17 (1): 134-142. |
| [14] | Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15 (3): 169-182. |
| [15] | Kwiatkowski, G., Diedering, M., & Oklevik, O. (2018). Profile, patterns of spending and economic impact of event visitors: Evidence from Warnemünder Woche in Germany. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 18 (1): 56-71. |
| [16] | Lazarus, W. F., Platas, D. E., & Morse, G. W. (2002). IMPLAN’s weakest link: Production functions or regional purchase coefficients? Journal of Regional Analysis & Policy, 32 (1): 33-49. |
| [17] | Lin, I.-H., Wu, C., & De Sousa, C. (2013). Examining the economic impact of park facilities on neighboring residential property values. Applied Geography, 45, 322-331. |
| [18] | Maas, J., van Dillen, S. M. E., Verheij, R. A., & Groenewegen, P. P. (2009). Social contacts as a possible mechanism behind the relation between green space and health. Health & Place, 15, 586-595. |
| [19] | Magnini, V. P., Uysal, M. (2017, January). Virginia State parks economic impact report 2016. Virginia Tech Pamplin College of Business. https://www.dcr.virginia.gov/state-parks/document/2016-economic-impact-study.pdf |
| [20] | Mayer, M., Müller, M., Woltering, M., Arnegger, J., & Job, H. (2010). The economic impact of tourism in six German national parks. Landscape and Urban Planning, 97 (2): 73-82. |
| [21] | McHenry, P., Sanderson, A. R., & Siegfried, J. J. (2007). The economic impact of colleges and universities. Economics of Education Review, 26 (5): 546-558. |
| [22] | Mowen, A. J., Graefe, A. R., Barrett, A. G., Roth, K., & Godbey, G. C. (2016). Americans’ broad-based support for local recreation and park services: Results from a nationwide study. Ashburn, VA: National Recreation and Park Association. |
| [23] | Mules, T. (2005). Economic impacts of national park tourism on gateway communities: The case of Kosciuszko National Park. Tourism Economics, 11 (2): 247-259. |
| [24] | National Recreation and Park Association [NRPA] (2020). The economic impact of parks. https://www.nrpa.org/siteassets/research/economic-impact-study-summary-2020.pdf |
| [25] | Nowak, D. J., & Heisler, G. M. (2010). Air quality effects of urban trees and parks. Research Series. National Recreation and Park Association. 1-48. |
| [26] | Obua, J., & Harding, D. M. (1996). Visitor characteristics and attitudes towards Kibale National Park, Uganda. Tourism Management, 17 (7): 495-505. |
| [27] | Payne, L. L., Orsega-Smith, E., Roy, M., & Godbey, G. C. (2005). Local park use and personal health among older adults: An exploratory study. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 23 (2): 1-20. |
| [28] | Saayman, N., & Saayman, A. (2006). Estimating the economic contribution of visitor spending in the Kruger National Park to the regional economy. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 14 (1): 67-81. |
| [29] | Saayman, M., Saayman, A., & Ferreira, M. (2009). The socio-economic impact of the Karoo National Park. African Protected Area Conservation and Science, 51 (1): 1-10. |
| [30] | Stynes, D. J. (1997). Economic Impact of Tourism: A Handbook for Tourism Professionals. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois. Tourism Research Laboratory. |
| [31] | Stynes, D. J., & Sun, Y. Y. (2003). Economic impacts of national park visitor spending on gateway communities: Systemwide estimates for 2001. National Park Service and Department of Park, Recreation and Tourism Resources at Michigan State University. http://npshistory.com/publications/social-science/mgm2/economic-impacts-2001.pdf |
| [32] | Stynes, D. J., & White, E. M. (2006). Reflection on measuring recreation and travel spending. Journal of Travel Research, 45 (1): 8-16. |
| [33] | Vaughan, D. R., Farr, H., & Slee, R. W. (2000). Estimating and interpreting the local economic benefits from visitor spending: An explanation. Leisure Studies 19, 95-118. |
| [34] | Wanhill, S. (1994). The measurement of tourist income multipliers. Tourism Management, 15 (4): 281-283. |
| [35] | Weisbrod, G., & Weisbrod, B. (1997). Assessing the economic impacts of transportation projects: How to choose the appropriate technique for your project. Transportation Research Circular, 477, 1-33. |
APA Style
Juwon Choi, Hyeongjin Jeon. (2021). Economic Impacts of Local Park Visitor Spending on Local Communities: A Case of Mississippi Parks. International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management, 5(2), 37-44. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12
ACS Style
Juwon Choi; Hyeongjin Jeon. Economic Impacts of Local Park Visitor Spending on Local Communities: A Case of Mississippi Parks. Int. J. Hosp. Tour. Manag. 2021, 5(2), 37-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12
AMA Style
Juwon Choi, Hyeongjin Jeon. Economic Impacts of Local Park Visitor Spending on Local Communities: A Case of Mississippi Parks. Int J Hosp Tour Manag. 2021;5(2):37-44. doi: 10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12,
author = {Juwon Choi and Hyeongjin Jeon},
title = {Economic Impacts of Local Park Visitor Spending on Local Communities: A Case of Mississippi Parks},
journal = {International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management},
volume = {5},
number = {2},
pages = {37-44},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijhtm.20210502.12},
abstract = {Local parks serve not only as recreational venues but are often an engine of communities’ economic development. Economic impact analyses provide tangible estimates of economic interdependencies and a better understanding of who benefits from and pays for tourism. Accordingly, this study quantified the economic impacts of visitor expenditures at local parks in Mississippi operated by the Pat Harrison Waterway District (PHWD). Both intercept and online survey methods were employed to collect visitor data from eight parks, and the data were analyzed with the IMPLAN software package to determine economic impacts attributable to visitor spending. On average, per visitor spending at the PHWD parks was $126.28. Visitors’ total local purchasing in the PHWD areas was estimated to be approximately $5.1 million annually. Visitor spending in the PHWD areas was expected to generate: $4.4 million of output, representing revenue plus certain taxes; 68.48 jobs with $1.4 million of labor income; $2.9 million of value added to the gross regional product. The results indicated that visitor expenditures are a significant economic stimulus in a region. In particular, the dollars spent on recreational equipment and supplies, followed by campgrounds and groceries, provided a strong boost to the local economy. The implications of the study are also addressed on the basis of the results.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Economic Impacts of Local Park Visitor Spending on Local Communities: A Case of Mississippi Parks AU - Juwon Choi AU - Hyeongjin Jeon Y1 - 2021/08/24 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12 T2 - International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management JF - International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management JO - International Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Management SP - 37 EP - 44 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1800 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijhtm.20210502.12 AB - Local parks serve not only as recreational venues but are often an engine of communities’ economic development. Economic impact analyses provide tangible estimates of economic interdependencies and a better understanding of who benefits from and pays for tourism. Accordingly, this study quantified the economic impacts of visitor expenditures at local parks in Mississippi operated by the Pat Harrison Waterway District (PHWD). Both intercept and online survey methods were employed to collect visitor data from eight parks, and the data were analyzed with the IMPLAN software package to determine economic impacts attributable to visitor spending. On average, per visitor spending at the PHWD parks was $126.28. Visitors’ total local purchasing in the PHWD areas was estimated to be approximately $5.1 million annually. Visitor spending in the PHWD areas was expected to generate: $4.4 million of output, representing revenue plus certain taxes; 68.48 jobs with $1.4 million of labor income; $2.9 million of value added to the gross regional product. The results indicated that visitor expenditures are a significant economic stimulus in a region. In particular, the dollars spent on recreational equipment and supplies, followed by campgrounds and groceries, provided a strong boost to the local economy. The implications of the study are also addressed on the basis of the results. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -
Information
Email: