Research on issues of academic ethics from the perspective of ethics committees has been the subject of specialized literature, especially for Research Ethics Commissions and to a lesser degree for committees that investigate and sanction the unethical behavior - Ethical Sanctioning Commissions. The sanctioning commissions play a very important role in maintaining the ethical climate of higher education institutions, by raising awareness amongst the members in the academic community on the effects of committing unethical deeds. Also, legal regulations have a significant impact on the maintain and enforce of an ethical climate in higher education institutions and any other institution or organization. This study: (i) starting with concrete problems facing these ethics commissions in Romania, in the backdrop of the legislation in force and the national jurisprudence and (ii) taking into account the actions taken by the authors, during the period of 2019-2021, to solve these problems, (iii) propose a useful model of actions for all those ethics committees that find themselves in similar situations. The proposed model of action follows the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, but in seven steps. In this cycle, the final step, the seventh, may be the first in case of partially solved of the previously ethical issues identified. The presented vision of the ESC's activity opens up new directions of research, at least in terms of conducting comparative studies either on the role and place of these commissions or on the related legislation and even finding new solutions to the problems presented.
| Published in | International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 5, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25 |
| Page(s) | 134-142 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ethics, Academic Ethics, Ethics Commission, Ethical Sanctions, High Education Institutions, Legal Regulation, Model of Action
| [1] | Cross, T.; Don, A. Ethics, and Gifted Minds; Cross, T., Don, A., Eds.; Springer, Boston, MA, 2009. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-89368-6. |
| [2] | Jeong, C.; Han, H. Exploring the Relationship Between Virtue Ethics and Moral Identity. Ethics Behav.2013, 23 (1). https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2012.714245. |
| [3] | Gillon, R. Medical Ethics: Four Principles plus Attention to Scope. BMJ1994, 309 (184), 6948. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.309.6948.184. |
| [4] | Wilkinson, D., Savulescu, J., Hope, T., & Hendrick, J. Medical Ethics and Law: The Core Curriculum, second.; Elsevier Health Sciences, 2008. |
| [5] | Laurie, G. H., Dove, E. Mason and McCall Smith’s Law and Medical Ethics. 2018. |
| [6] | Engelhardt, H. T. The Foundations of Bioethics, second.; Oxford University Press, 1996. |
| [7] | Gert, B.; Culver, C. M.; Clouser, K. D. Bioethics: A Return to Fundamentals; Oxford University Press, 2006. |
| [8] | Veatch, R. M.; Guidry-Grimes, L. K. The Basics of Bioethics, fourth.; Routledge, 2020. |
| [9] | Pavarini, G.; McMillan, R.; Robinson, A.; Singh, I. Design Bioethics: A Theoretical Framework and Argument for Innovation in Bioethics Research. Am. J. Bioeth. 2021, 21 (6), 31–50. https://doi.org/:10.1080/15265161.2020.1863508. |
| [10] | Abbasi, M.; Majdzadeh, R.; Zali, A.; Karimi, A.; Akrami, F. The Evolution of Public Health Ethics Frameworks: Systematic Review of Moral Values and Norms in Public Health Policy. Med. Heal. Care Philos. 2018, 21 (3), 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-017-9813-y. |
| [11] | Hess, J. L.; Fore, G. A Systematic Literature Review of US Engineering Ethics Interventions. Sci. Eng. Ethics2018, 24 (2), 551–583. |
| [12] | Miñano Rubio, R.; Uribe, D.; Moreno-Romero, A.; Yáñez, S. Embedding Sustainability Competences into Engineering Education. The Case of Informatics Engineering and Industrial Engineering Degree Programs at Spanish Universities. Sustain. 2019, 11 (20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205832. |
| [13] | Longo, F.; Padovano, A.; Umbrello, S. Value-Oriented and Ethical Technology Engineering in Industry 5.0: A Human-Centric Perspective for the Design of the Factory of the Future. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10 (12), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/APP10124182. |
| [14] | Phillips, F. Ethics of the Legal Profession, First.; Routledge-Cavendish, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781843148180. |
| [15] | Des Jardins, J. R. Environmental Ethics, 5th Editio.; Cengage Learning, 2012. |
| [16] | Verma, A. K. Sustainable Development and Environmental Ethics. Int. J. Environ. Sci. 2019, 10 (1), 1–5. |
| [17] | Atala, F. G. The Law and Ethics of Journalism in a Changing World: New Professional Realities and Challenges for Communication Professionals. In Handbook of Communication Rights, Law, and Ethics; Sons, John Wiley &, 2021; pp 247–256. |
| [18] | Velasquez, M. G.; Velazquez, M. Business Ethics: Concepts and Cases; Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2002. |
| [19] | Ferrell, O. C.; Fraedrich, J. Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making & Cases; Cengage Learning, 2016. |
| [20] | Setó-Pamies, D.; Papaoikonomou, E. Sustainable Development Goals: A Powerful Framework for Embedding Ethics, CSR, and Sustainability in Management Education. Sustain. 2020, 12 (5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051762. |
| [21] | Stonkute, E.; Vveinhardt, J.; Sroka, W. Training the CSR Sensitive Mind-Set: The Integration of CSR into the Training of Business Administration Professionals. Sustain. 2018, 10 (3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10030754. |
| [22] | Benos, D. J.; Fabres, J.; Farmer, J.; Gutierrez, J. P.; Hennessy, K.; Kosek, D.; Joo, H. L.; Olteanu, D.; Russell, T.; Shaikh, F.; Wang, K. Ethics and Scientific Publication. Am. J. Physiol. - Adv. Physiol. Educ. 2005, 29 (2), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00056.2004. |
| [23] | Pupovac, V.; Fanelli, D. Scientists Admitting to Plagiarism: A Meta-Analysis of Surveys. Sci. Eng. Ethics2015, 21 (5), 1331–1352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9600-6. |
| [24] | Bar-Ilan, J.; Halevi, G. Post Retraction Citations in Context: A Case Study. Scientometrics2017, 113 (1), 547–565. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2242-0. |
| [25] | Bramstedt, K. A. The Carnage of Substandard Research during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Call for Quality. J. Med. Ethics 2020, 46 (12), 803–807. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2020-106494. |
| [26] | Hafsa, N. Plagiarism: A Global Phenomenon. J. Educ. Pract. 2021, 12 (3), 53–59. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/12-3-08. |
| [27] | Vâtcă, S. D.; Dârja, M.; Salcă Rotaru, C. M.; Giurgiuman, T. Research Ethics in Universities. Etică şi Deontol. 2021, 1 (1), 52–59. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52744/RED.2021.01.07. |
| [28] | Vaidyanathan, B.; Khalsa, S.; Ecklund, E. H. Gossip as Social Control: Informal Sanctions on Ethical Violations in Scientific Workplaces. Soc. Probl. 2016, 63 (4), 554–572. https://doi.org/10.1093/socpro/spw022. |
| [29] | De Jong, J. P.; van Zwieten, M. C. B.; Willems, D. L. Ethical Review from the inside: Repertoires of Evaluation in Research Ethics Committee Meetings. Sociol. Heal. Illn. 2012, 34 (7), 1039–1052. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2012.01458.x. |
| [30] | Ibingira, B. R.; Ochieng, J. Knowledge about the Research and Ethics Committee at Makerere University, Kampala. Afr. Health Sci. 2013, 13 (4), 1041–1046. https://doi.org/10.4314/ahs.v13i4.26. |
| [31] | Wassenaar, D. R.; Slack, C. M. How to Learn to Love Your Research Ethics Committee: Recommendations for Psychologists. South African J. Psychol. 2016, 46 (3), 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1177/0081246316654348. |
| [32] | Kasule, M.; Wassenaar, D. R.; Ijsselmuiden, C.; Mokgatla, B. Silent Voices: Current and Future Roles of African Research Ethics Committee Administrators. IRB Ethics Hum. Res. 2016, 38 (1), 13–18. |
| [33] | Hunt, M.; Tansey, C. M.; Anderson, J.; Boulanger, R. F.; Eckenwiler, L.; Pringle, J.; Schwartz, L. The Challenge of Timely, Responsive and Rigorous Ethics Review of Disaster Research: Views of Research Ethics Committee Members. PLoS One2016, 11 (6), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157142. |
| [34] | Bottrell, M. M.; Simon, A.; Geppert, C.; Chang, E. T.; Asch, S. M.; Rubenstein, L. Facilitating Ethical Quality Improvement Initiatives: Design and Implementation of an Initiative-Specific Ethics Committee. Healthcare2020, 8 (2), 100425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2020.100425. |
| [35] | Davies, S. E. H. The Introduction of Research Ethics Review Procedures at a University in South Africa: Review Outcomes of a Social Science Research Ethics Committee. Res. Ethics2020, 16 (1–2), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016119898408. |
| [36] | O’Fallon, M. J.; Butterfield, K. D. A Review of the Empirical Ethical Decision-Making Literature: 1996-2003. J. Bus. Ethics2005, 59 (4), 375–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-2929-7. |
| [37] | Thielmann, I.; Hilbig, B. E. Daring Dishonesty: On the Role of Sanctions for (Un)Ethical Behavior. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2018, 79 (June), 71–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.06.009. |
| [38] | Khekhoyan, T. Hovhannisyan, G. Code of Ethics as a Tool of Management in Academic Environment: Case of Armenia. Etică şi Deontol. 2021, 1 (1), 10–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52744/RED.2021.01.02. |
| [39] | Yip, C.; Han, N. L. R.; Sng, B. L. Legal and Ethical Issues in Research. Indian J. Anaesth. 2016, 60 (9), 684–688. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.190627. |
| [40] | Parliament. National Education Law Nr 1 from 2011; Monitorul Oficial nr. 18 / 10.01.2011: Romania, 2011. |
| [41] | Parliament. Law Nr. 206 from 2006 on Good Conduct in Scientific Research, Technological Development and Innovation; Monitorul Oficial nr. 505 / 4 iunie 2004: Romania, 2006. |
| [42] | Bouriaud, L.; Drăguşin, M.; Pătraşcu, V. Analiza Critică a Cadrului Legal Şi Instituţional de Implementare a Legii Nr. 206/2004. In Etică şi integritate în educaţie şi cercetare; Antonio, S., Popoveniuc, B., Eds.; Tritonic: Bucureşti, 2018; [pp 437–451. |
| [43] | Salca Rotaru, C. M. The Legality Aspects from the Content of Decision No. 4 of 28 January 2021 of CNECSDTI. Universul Juridic2021, 22. |
| [44] | Salcă Rotaru, C. Role of Ethics and Ethics Commissions in Quality Assurance in Romanian Higher Education. Qual. Assur. Rev. High. Educ. 2018, 8 (2), 25–40. |
| [45] | Ivan, A. S.; Slabu, E. Consideraţii Privind Aplicarea Normelor de Etică În Activitatea Didactică Universitară. Revista Etică Şi Deontologie. Etică şi Deontol. 2021, 1 (1), 18–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52744/RED.2021.01.03. |
| [46] | Edwards, S. J.; Stone, T.; Swift, T. Differences between Research Ethics Committees. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care2007, 23 (1), 17–23. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266462307051525. |
| [47] | Salcă Rotaru, C. M.; Manea, L. Breviar: Propuneri de Modificări Legislative Privind Etica Universitară: Forma Autorilor şi Forma Aprobată de CEMU. Etică şi Deontol. 2021, 1 (1), 117–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.52744/RED.2021.01.14. |
| [48] | Ispas, O. Reflecţii Critice Cu Privire La Aplicarea Art. 11 (3) Din Legea Nr. 201/2005 În Domeniul Învăţământului Superior. Universul Juridic2018, No. 7, 97–104. |
| [49] | Manea, L.; Salcă Rotaru, C. The Legal Regime of the Decisions of University Ethics Commissions in the Current Jurisprudential Interpretation. Bull. Transilv. Univ. Braşov2019, 12 (61). |
| [50] | Ciulei, T. Analiză Comparativă a Codurilor de Etică Din Universităţile de Top Din România. In Etică şi integritate în educaţie şi cercetare; Antonio, S., Popoveniuc, B., Eds.; Bucureşti, 2018; pp 475–486. |
| [51] | Manea, L.; Salcă Rotaru, C. Proposals for Legislative Amendments Regarding the Establishment of the Legal Regime of the Decisions Issued by the University Ethics Commission - Between Necessity and Urgency. Perspect. Law Public Adm. 2021, 10 (Special issue), 121–132. |
APA Style
Cristina Mihaela Salca Rotaru, Laura Manea. (2022). From Problems to a Model of Action: Romanian University Ethics Commissions - Case Study. International Journal of Law and Society, 5(1), 134-142. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25
ACS Style
Cristina Mihaela Salca Rotaru; Laura Manea. From Problems to a Model of Action: Romanian University Ethics Commissions - Case Study. Int. J. Law Soc. 2022, 5(1), 134-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25
AMA Style
Cristina Mihaela Salca Rotaru, Laura Manea. From Problems to a Model of Action: Romanian University Ethics Commissions - Case Study. Int J Law Soc. 2022;5(1):134-142. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25,
author = {Cristina Mihaela Salca Rotaru and Laura Manea},
title = {From Problems to a Model of Action: Romanian University Ethics Commissions - Case Study},
journal = {International Journal of Law and Society},
volume = {5},
number = {1},
pages = {134-142},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20220501.25},
abstract = {Research on issues of academic ethics from the perspective of ethics committees has been the subject of specialized literature, especially for Research Ethics Commissions and to a lesser degree for committees that investigate and sanction the unethical behavior - Ethical Sanctioning Commissions. The sanctioning commissions play a very important role in maintaining the ethical climate of higher education institutions, by raising awareness amongst the members in the academic community on the effects of committing unethical deeds. Also, legal regulations have a significant impact on the maintain and enforce of an ethical climate in higher education institutions and any other institution or organization. This study: (i) starting with concrete problems facing these ethics commissions in Romania, in the backdrop of the legislation in force and the national jurisprudence and (ii) taking into account the actions taken by the authors, during the period of 2019-2021, to solve these problems, (iii) propose a useful model of actions for all those ethics committees that find themselves in similar situations. The proposed model of action follows the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, but in seven steps. In this cycle, the final step, the seventh, may be the first in case of partially solved of the previously ethical issues identified. The presented vision of the ESC's activity opens up new directions of research, at least in terms of conducting comparative studies either on the role and place of these commissions or on the related legislation and even finding new solutions to the problems presented.},
year = {2022}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - From Problems to a Model of Action: Romanian University Ethics Commissions - Case Study AU - Cristina Mihaela Salca Rotaru AU - Laura Manea Y1 - 2022/03/03 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25 DO - 10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25 T2 - International Journal of Law and Society JF - International Journal of Law and Society JO - International Journal of Law and Society SP - 134 EP - 142 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1908 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20220501.25 AB - Research on issues of academic ethics from the perspective of ethics committees has been the subject of specialized literature, especially for Research Ethics Commissions and to a lesser degree for committees that investigate and sanction the unethical behavior - Ethical Sanctioning Commissions. The sanctioning commissions play a very important role in maintaining the ethical climate of higher education institutions, by raising awareness amongst the members in the academic community on the effects of committing unethical deeds. Also, legal regulations have a significant impact on the maintain and enforce of an ethical climate in higher education institutions and any other institution or organization. This study: (i) starting with concrete problems facing these ethics commissions in Romania, in the backdrop of the legislation in force and the national jurisprudence and (ii) taking into account the actions taken by the authors, during the period of 2019-2021, to solve these problems, (iii) propose a useful model of actions for all those ethics committees that find themselves in similar situations. The proposed model of action follows the Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle, but in seven steps. In this cycle, the final step, the seventh, may be the first in case of partially solved of the previously ethical issues identified. The presented vision of the ESC's activity opens up new directions of research, at least in terms of conducting comparative studies either on the role and place of these commissions or on the related legislation and even finding new solutions to the problems presented. VL - 5 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: