India is a unique example of unity in diversity. The diversity and variety of the language, caste, culture, tribe and religion is remarkably distinguished as a wonderful mosaic of anthropological splendor. Tribal peoples generally prefer having their disputes determined by the customary courts because their procedures are simpler and cheaper compared to formal law courts. The courts are also located near the public and the justice is available at the doorstep of the people. The courts apply orally transmitted rules and norms while rendering decisions. Village Court in Nagaland is unique not only in the country but also in the world. In India, the national justice system is well structured and independent based on the adversarial system of English Common Law. But the justice system of the tribal peoples in Northeast India, specifically in Nagaland, is quite different. In Nagaland, the tribal peoples have a high degree of integrity governed by their customary laws. Customary laws emerged from the community and through them the socio-cultural identity of the tribal community is preserved. Customary laws in Nagaland vary from tribe to tribe and are largely unwritten. The tribal communities cherish their laws as inherent to their identity. Customary laws and practices in Nagaland regulate certain customary rules of behavior and include enforcement procedures and punishment for violations, turning them into a guardian of tribal values and norms. Many aspects of customary laws are good and need to be preserved, such as simplicity of procedures and preference for reconciliation rather than litigation. In recent years, there have been considerable changes in the contents, interpretation, and enforcement of customary laws. Particularly, this seems to appear in the State of Nagaland where the traditional people give them the strict interpretation and resist changes in traditional laws. This paper examines the constitutional and legislative framework within which the customary law and practices operate.
Published in | International Journal of Law and Society (Volume 8, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13 |
Page(s) | 83-102 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Naga, Custom and Customary Law, Legal Pluralism, Tribal Justice System, Customary Courts, Tribal Autonomy, Nehruvian Panchasheel, Traditional Mode of Settlement of Disputes
[1] | Honoring and Empowering the Adivasis of India, Ministry of Tribal Affairs, Press Information Bureau, Government of India, 2022. |
[2] | Shimreichon, Luithui, Naga Peoples Movement for Human Rights, International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA), 2021, pp. 3, 4. |
[3] | The policy of non-interference expressed in different legislative acts and in the recommendation of various commissions. The Assam Frontier Tracts Regulation, 1880, the Scheduled District Act, 1874, The Assam General Clauses Act, 1915, the Montague- Chelmsford Reforms, 1919 and Simon Commission, all adopted the policy of non-interference with the customary laws and practices of the tribes inhabiting Northeast India. Section 92 of the Government of India Act, 1935 provided that no Act of Central or Provincial Legislature should be applicable to the hill areas which were declared ‘excluded areas’ or ‘partially excluded areas.’ Parwez, M., Customary Laws and Practices in Northeast India: Records and Reports, Indian Journal of Applied Research, Vol. 2 Issue 3 (December 2012) at 81. |
[4] | Zhimo, Avitoli G., Indigenous System of Governance and its Implication: The Case of Nagaland, Indian Anthropologist, (2019) 49: 2, 41-56 at 43. |
[5] | Elwin, Verrier, The Nagas in the Nineteenth Century (Oxford University Press, 1969). |
[6] | Cain, Tes Newton, The Incorporation of Customary Law & Principle into Sentencing Decisions in the South Pacific Region, in Anita Jowitt and Dr Tes Newton Cain (eds.), Passage of Change: Law, Society and Governance in the Pacific (The Australian National University Press, 2010), p. 166. |
[7] | Asian Centre for Human Rights (ACHR,) “Who are the Indigenous Peoples in India?” 2010. |
[8] | State of Nagaland v. Ratan Singh, AIR 1967 SC 212; 1967 Cri LJ 265. |
[9] | Every Naga village has its own customary law. Do you agree that these customary laws should be codified? Why? The Morung Express (6th October 1919). |
[10] | Joshi, H. (Ed.), Nagaland: Past and Present (New Delhi: Akansha Publishing House, 2011), pp. 14-15. |
[11] | Goswami, Sanjib, Legal Pluralism and the Administration of Justice in Northeast India, Paper presented at Conference on Non-Adversarial Justice: Implications for the Legal System and Society, organised by AIJA and Faculty of Law, Monash University, May 4-7, 2010. |
[12] | The Constituent Assembly debates on the 6th September, 1949 (Volume IX). |
[13] | The 16 Point Agreement between the Government of India and the Naga People’s Convention (1960), available at: |
[14] | Jamir, S. C., Naga Peoples Convention and Sixteenth Point Agreement (Dimapur: Bright Printers, 2011), pp. 75-78. |
[15] | Das, J. N., A Study of Administration of Justice Among the Tribes and Races of Northeastern Region (Guwahati: The Law Research Institute, Eastern Region, 1987). |
[16] | Justice Lokur, Madan B., Customary Law and Good Governance: Lecture Series on Tribal and Customary Laws (Central University of Jharkhand), Ranchi, 2013), p. 36. |
[17] | Twenty-sixth Report on Demands for Grants (2008-09) of Ministry of Law and Justice, presented to Parliament on 29th April, 2008, p. 76. |
[18] | Walter Fernandes, Melville Pereira and Vizalenu Khatso, Customary Laws of the Northeast: Impact on Women, 24 (National Commission for Women, New Delhi, 2007). |
[19] | Reddy, Marri Channa, Human Resource Development Institute (MCRHDI) National Policy on Tribals, available at: |
[20] | UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, GA Res. 61/295, UNGAOR, 61st Sess., UN Doc. A/RES/47/1 (2007). |
[21] | Lam, Maivan Clech, Remembering the Country of Their Birth: Indigenous Peoples and Territoriality (2004) 57 Journal of International Affairs 129 at 132. |
[22] | Anaya, S. James, International Human Rights and Indigenous Peoples: The Move Toward the Multicultural State (2004) 21 Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law 13 at 15, 24. |
[23] | The UN Declaration sets the minimum standards for the survival, dignity and well-being of the [I] ndigenous peoples of the world that States are expected to enforce (Art. 43.). |
[24] | The Indian Constitution, Articles 15(4) and 46. |
[25] | The Assam Forest Regulation, 1891, Section 10-16. |
[26] | State of Bihar v. Subodh Gopal Bose, AIR 1968 SC 281. |
[27] | State of Sikkim v. Surendra Prasad Sharma, AIR 1994 SC 2342. |
[28] | The Constitution of India, Article 371-A (a) (IV). It was inserted into the Part XXI of the Indian Constitution by the Constitution (Thirteenth Amendment) Act, 1962, s. 2 (w.e.f. 1-12-1963). However, the Nagaland Assembly was given power to make laws contrary to the provisions of Naga customary law. |
[29] | Kikon, Dolly, Political Mobilization of Women in Nagaland: A Sociological Background, in Walter Fernandes and Sanjay Barbora (eds.), The Socio-Economic Situation of Nagaon District: A Study of its Economy, Demography and Immigration (Guwahati: Northeastern Social Science Research Centre, 2002), p. 176. |
[30] | Walter, Fernandes, and Melville Pereira, Land Relations and Ethnic Conflicts: The Case of North Eastern India (Guwahati: North Eastern Social Research Centre, 2005), pp. 27-29. |
[31] | Sub-Section (2) of Section 1 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. |
[32] | Sub-Section (3) (b) of Section 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. |
[33] | The Rules for the Administration of Justice and Police in Nagaland (Amendment) Act, 1974 (Act No. 7 of 1974). Received the assent of the President of India on 8th October, 1974. |
[34] | The Rules for the Administration of Justice and Police in Nagaland (Amendment) Act, 1982 (Act No. 4 of 1982), vide Rule 2. |
[35] | Rule 15AA which provides for the trial of criminal cases was inserted by Section 3 of the Rules for the Administration of Justice and Police in the Nagaland (Second Amendment) Act, 1982. |
[36] | Rule 23A which provides for the trial of civil cases was inserted by Section 4 of the Rules for the Administration of Justice and Police in the Nagaland (Second Amendment) Act, 1982. |
[37] | Atenjenba & Ors. v. The State of Nagaland, AIR 1985 Gauhati 1. |
[38] | The Rules for the Administration of Justice and Police in Nagaland (Amendment) Act, 1984 (Act No. 1 of 1984), vide Rule 30. Also see, Rule 60-63. |
[39] | Rule 60 (Village Court); Rule 62 (Subordinate District Customary Court and District Customary Court). |
[40] | Ao, Moatoshi, A Treatise on Customary and Fundamental Laws of the Nagas in Nagaland 173-174 (Notion Press, Chennai, 2019). |
[41] | Administration of Justice in Northeast India, Law Research Institute, Guwahati, 1987, p. 682. |
[42] | Clause 1 of Rule 40 of the Rules of 1937. |
[43] | The Nagaland Village and Area Council Act, 1978, Section 7. |
[44] | Newme, Widonlule, Tribal Court in North-East India: A Critical Study on the System of Administration of Justice under the Autonomous District Council in North-Cachar Hills (Unpublished Ph. D. Thesis, Assam University, Silchar, India, 2019), pp. 124-126. |
[45] | Pant, Ruchi, Exploring the Role of Community and Customary Law in Natural Resources Management in the Legal Pluralist Societies of Northeast India, Paper prepared for National Biodiversity Strategies and Plans (2003), pp. 12-17. |
[46] | Pant, Ruchi, Customs and Conservation: Traditional and Modern Law in India and Nepal (Kalpavriksh and IIED, 2002). In this study the author critically evaluated the present position of customary laws and usages of local communities and assessed the connection between customary laws and the modern statutory laws in the background of environmental protection in the State of Arunachal Pradesh (India) and the Annapurna Conservation Area in Nepal. |
[47] | The Constitution of India, Article 22 (1). |
[48] | Sale, Naomy, Codification of Naga Customary Law: Need of the Hour? The Morung Express (8th June 2018). |
[49] | Zorzi, Christine, The Irrecognition of Aboriginal Customary Law, Lawyers Information Network (Melbourne, 2004). |
[50] | United Nations Development Program (UNDP), Cultural Liberty in Today’s Diverse World, Human Development Report (Oxford University Press, 2004), pp. 57-59. |
[51] | Care, Jennifer Corrin, Conflict Between Customary Laws and Human Rights in the South Pacific, Paper presented at the 12th Commonwealth Law Conference, September 1, 1999 (Kuala Lumpur). |
[52] | Schacher, Ayelet, Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Differences and Women’s Rights (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001). |
[53] | Section 1 (2) (a) and (b) of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. |
[54] | Section 1 (3) (b) of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. |
[55] | Pienyu, Medonue, The Angami Naga Society: Continuity and Change, Journal of Northeast Indian Cultures, Vol 3(2) 39-57 (2017) at 45. |
[56] | Ao, Moatoshi, Branding and Commercialisation of Traditional Knowledge and Traditional Cultural Expressions: Customary Law of Northeast vis-à-vis Contemporary Law, The Indigenous Peoples’ Journal of Law, Culture & Resistance, 2020: 75 at 81. |
[57] | Pannalal Bansilal v. State of A. P, (1996) 2 SCC 498. |
[58] |
Chigudu, Daniel, Strength in Diversity: An Opportunity for Africa’s Development, Cogent Social Sciences (2018) 4: 1558715. Available at:
http://doi.org/10.1080/23311806.2018.1558715 (accessed 27th July 2023). |
[59] | April, K. and M. Schockley, Diversity in Africa: The Countries of Age of a Continent, (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007). |
[60] | William Q. C. Tetley, Mixed Jurisdictions: Common Law Versus Civil Law (Codified and Uncodified), International Institute for the Unification of Private Law, Rome (1999). |
[61] | Jessymol, M. V., Preservation of Naga Cultural Heritage, International Journal of Creative Research Thoughts, (2021) Vol 9(11) 600-612 at 600. |
APA Style
Singh, S. C. (2025). Recognition of Naga Customary Law and Practices in Northeast India: Convergence or Conflict. International Journal of Law and Society, 8(2), 83-102. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13
ACS Style
Singh, S. C. Recognition of Naga Customary Law and Practices in Northeast India: Convergence or Conflict. Int. J. Law Soc. 2025, 8(2), 83-102. doi: 10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13
@article{10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13, author = {Subhash Chandra Singh}, title = {Recognition of Naga Customary Law and Practices in Northeast India: Convergence or Conflict }, journal = {International Journal of Law and Society}, volume = {8}, number = {2}, pages = {83-102}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijls.20250802.13}, abstract = {India is a unique example of unity in diversity. The diversity and variety of the language, caste, culture, tribe and religion is remarkably distinguished as a wonderful mosaic of anthropological splendor. Tribal peoples generally prefer having their disputes determined by the customary courts because their procedures are simpler and cheaper compared to formal law courts. The courts are also located near the public and the justice is available at the doorstep of the people. The courts apply orally transmitted rules and norms while rendering decisions. Village Court in Nagaland is unique not only in the country but also in the world. In India, the national justice system is well structured and independent based on the adversarial system of English Common Law. But the justice system of the tribal peoples in Northeast India, specifically in Nagaland, is quite different. In Nagaland, the tribal peoples have a high degree of integrity governed by their customary laws. Customary laws emerged from the community and through them the socio-cultural identity of the tribal community is preserved. Customary laws in Nagaland vary from tribe to tribe and are largely unwritten. The tribal communities cherish their laws as inherent to their identity. Customary laws and practices in Nagaland regulate certain customary rules of behavior and include enforcement procedures and punishment for violations, turning them into a guardian of tribal values and norms. Many aspects of customary laws are good and need to be preserved, such as simplicity of procedures and preference for reconciliation rather than litigation. In recent years, there have been considerable changes in the contents, interpretation, and enforcement of customary laws. Particularly, this seems to appear in the State of Nagaland where the traditional people give them the strict interpretation and resist changes in traditional laws. This paper examines the constitutional and legislative framework within which the customary law and practices operate. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Recognition of Naga Customary Law and Practices in Northeast India: Convergence or Conflict AU - Subhash Chandra Singh Y1 - 2025/04/14 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13 T2 - International Journal of Law and Society JF - International Journal of Law and Society JO - International Journal of Law and Society SP - 83 EP - 102 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-1908 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijls.20250802.13 AB - India is a unique example of unity in diversity. The diversity and variety of the language, caste, culture, tribe and religion is remarkably distinguished as a wonderful mosaic of anthropological splendor. Tribal peoples generally prefer having their disputes determined by the customary courts because their procedures are simpler and cheaper compared to formal law courts. The courts are also located near the public and the justice is available at the doorstep of the people. The courts apply orally transmitted rules and norms while rendering decisions. Village Court in Nagaland is unique not only in the country but also in the world. In India, the national justice system is well structured and independent based on the adversarial system of English Common Law. But the justice system of the tribal peoples in Northeast India, specifically in Nagaland, is quite different. In Nagaland, the tribal peoples have a high degree of integrity governed by their customary laws. Customary laws emerged from the community and through them the socio-cultural identity of the tribal community is preserved. Customary laws in Nagaland vary from tribe to tribe and are largely unwritten. The tribal communities cherish their laws as inherent to their identity. Customary laws and practices in Nagaland regulate certain customary rules of behavior and include enforcement procedures and punishment for violations, turning them into a guardian of tribal values and norms. Many aspects of customary laws are good and need to be preserved, such as simplicity of procedures and preference for reconciliation rather than litigation. In recent years, there have been considerable changes in the contents, interpretation, and enforcement of customary laws. Particularly, this seems to appear in the State of Nagaland where the traditional people give them the strict interpretation and resist changes in traditional laws. This paper examines the constitutional and legislative framework within which the customary law and practices operate. VL - 8 IS - 2 ER -