Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend

Eke - Ejiofor Joy; Beleya Ellen Aswei; Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17

| Peer-Reviewed

Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend

Eke - Ejiofor Joy, Beleya Ellen Aswei, Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas

Published in International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 1)

Received: 9 January 2016 Accepted: 19 January 2016 Published: 1 February 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Granola was produced using three varieties of maize namely, yellow, white and pop and oat as control. Coconut was added to the granola sample in order to replace walnut in the control. They were subjected to sensory, chemical and functional evaluation. Sensory analysis showed that there was significant difference in their color and taste, while flavor, texture, crispness and overall acceptability showed no significant difference (p≥0.05). Chemical analysis result showed that oat based granola had the highest value for fat, protein, energy, sugar, starch and amylopectin, while yellow maize granola had the highest value for moisture content and carbohydrate and white maize granola had the highest value for crude fibre and amylose. Granola produced from pop maize had the highest value for ash. There was no significant difference (P≥0.05) in ash, protein energy and amylopectin between oat granola (control) and maize based granola samples. Functional analysis of the samples showed that oat granola had the highest value for water absorption capacity and swelling power. Yellow maize granola had the highest value for dispersibility and bulk density. Pop corn granola had the highest value for solubility. There was no significant difference (P≥0.05) in bulk density and water absorption capacity.

Published in	International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17
Page(s)	47-52
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Granola, Substitution, Preparation, Evaluation, Maize, Coconut, Breakfast - Cereal

References

[1]	Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC), 1990. Official Method of Analysis, 17th Edition. Washington DC, USA.
[2]	Anneliss Eaigster (2009). Physicochemical and sensory properties of resistant starch based cereal products and effects on postprandial glycemic and oxidation stress responses in Hispanic women. J Nutr. 27: 23-30.
[3]	Aranco, R. N. (1999). Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook Study: Asiedu, J. J., 1989. Processing tropical Crops – A Technological Approach. The Macmillan Press Ltd.
[4]	Barrett, A., Cardello, A., Maguire, P., Richardson, M., Kaletunc, G. and Lesher, L. (2002). Effects of sucrose ester, dough conditioner and storage temperature on long-term textural stability of shelf-stable bread. Cereal Chemistry 79: 806–811.
[5]	Eke J. (2006): Chemical, functional and pasting properties of starch and tapioca produced from selected hybrid cassava (manihot esculenta crantz) cultivars. Unpublished Ph. D Thesis.
[6]	Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO), 2009. Economic and Social Department: The Statistical Division.
[7]	Finney, K. F (1994). Contribution of individual chemical constituents to the functional (bread making) properties of wheat in cereals 78 better Nutrition for the World Million Minnesota. American Association of Cereal Chemist Inc.
[8]	George Pamplona-Roger and Ester Malaxetxebarria (2003). Recipes for Healing and Prevention. 3^rd Edition in English.
[9]	Grimwood, B. E. (1975) Coconut Palm Products. FAO, Rome.
[10]	Hari, P. K, Gargs, S; Garys, S. K (1989). Gelatinization of starch and modified starch. Starch 41(3): 88-91.
[11]	Houssou, P. and G. S Ayemor (2002). Appropriate processing and food functional property of maize flour. African Journal of Science and Technology 3: 126-131p.
[12]	Jelfrey, A. Gwirts and Maria Nieves Garcia-Casal (2011). “Processing maize flour and corn meal food product.” Department of Grain Science and Industry Kansa State university Kansa. J. Food Science and technology. 28: 39-45
[13]	Kulkarni, k. D, kulkarni, D. N and Ingle, U. M. (1991): “Sorghum malt-based weaning formulation, preparation, functional properties and nutritive Values”. Food and nutrition bulletin 13(4): 322-327.
[14]	Kurup G. T. (1994). Tuber crop starches central Tuber crops Research Institute Sreekariyam. Thiruvananihapuram, Kerala India. Tech Bulletin series 18.
[15]	Larmond, E., (1977): Laboratory methods for sensory Evaluation of food, Canda Pept Agric-Pub.
[16]	Mahgoub, S. E. O., (1999). “Production and evaluation of hydrolysate from an oilseed flour mixture. Food weaning foods based on sorghum and legumes” Chem., 106: 1166-1174. Plants Foods Hum. Nutr. 54: 29-42.
[17]	Muhammed Madeem, Salim-ur-Rahman, Faqir Muhammad Anjum, Mian Anjum Murtaza and Ghulam Mueen-ud-Din(2012). “Development characterisation and optimization of protein level in Date Bars using Response Surface Methodology”. Institute food Sc & Nut. University of Sargodha, Sargodha, Pakistan J. food science 50: 19-24.
[18]	Narayana, K and Narasinga, Rao M. S (1984): Effect of partial proteolysis on the functional properties of winged pea (Psophocapustetragonolobus) flour. Journal of Food Science, 49: 944-947.
[19]	Niba LL, Bokanga MM, Jackson FL, Schlimme D, Li BW (2001) Physicochemical properties and starch granular characteristics of flour from various manihot esculeata genotypes. J. Food Sci. 67: 51-56.
[20]	Paniappan G. C (2002). Chemical compositions, antioxidant capacities and antiproliferative activities of coconut flours. J. Agric. Food. Chem. 54: 3773-3778.
[21]	Richard; J. R, Asaoka M. A, Blanshard J. M. V (1991). The physico-chemical properties of cassava starch. Trop. Sci. 31: 189207.
[22]	Safo-Kantanka K. O, Acquistucci R (1996). The physico-chemical properties of cassava starch in relation to the texture of cooked root. Ghana J. Agric. Sci. 28 (29): 69-90.
[23]	Steel, R. G. D and Torrie, J. H (1980): Principles and procedures of statistics. MC Graw Hill Pub. Comp. Inc. New York UNE (Una Norma Espanola). (1974). 34-074-74.
[24]	Sosulski, F. N. (1962): “The centrifugal method for determining flour absorptivity chemistry 39: 344-346. State University Ames, Iowa.
[25]	Takashi, S. and Sieb, P. A. (1988): Paste and gel properties of prime corn and wheat starches with and without native Lipids”. Cereal chemistry 65: 474-475.
[26]	Tizazu H., Emire S. A (2010). “Chemical composition, physicochemical and functional properties of Lupin(Lupinusalbus) seed grown in Ethiopia”. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 10(8). Pp 3029-3046.
[27]	Trimidad PT., H. Y Divinagracia, C. M. Aida, C. A Faarida, S. M Angelica, T. C Modesta, C. A. Askali, A. S Loyola and D. B Masa (2001) “Coconut flour from residue: A good source of Dietary fibre”. Indian coconut journal Nutr. 26: 430-435.
[28]	Watson S. A (1987): Structures & Composition pp 33 – 80. In Watson S. A and Ramstad R. E (Ed) Corn Chemistry and Technology Am Soc. Cereal chem. 68: 372-378.
[29]	Williams, P. C. Kuzina, F. D. and Hlynka, I. A. (1970): “A rapid calorimetric procedure for estimating he amylase content of starches and starch”. Cereal Chemistry 47(4): 411-413.
[30]	Zhao Z. Y, K Glassman, V. Sewalt, N Wang, M. Miller, S. Chang, T. Thompson and Y. Jung (2003). Nutritionally improved transgenic sorghum. In: Vasil I. K. (ed) Plant biotechnology 2002 and beyond. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 413.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Eke - Ejiofor Joy, Beleya Ellen Aswei, Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas. (2016). Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 5(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Eke - Ejiofor Joy; Beleya Ellen Aswei; Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas. Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 5(1), 47-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Eke - Ejiofor Joy, Beleya Ellen Aswei, Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas. Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2016;5(1):47-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17,
  author = {Eke - Ejiofor Joy and Beleya Ellen Aswei and Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas},
  title = {Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend},
  journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {47-52},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20160501.17},
  abstract = {Granola was produced using three varieties of maize namely, yellow, white and pop and oat as control. Coconut was added to the granola sample in order to replace walnut in the control. They were subjected to sensory, chemical and functional evaluation. Sensory analysis showed that there was significant difference in their color and taste, while flavor, texture, crispness and overall acceptability showed no significant difference (p≥0.05). Chemical analysis result showed that oat based granola had the highest value for fat, protein, energy, sugar, starch and amylopectin, while yellow maize granola had the highest value for moisture content and carbohydrate and white maize granola had the highest value for crude fibre and amylose. Granola produced from pop maize had the highest value for ash. There was no significant difference (P≥0.05) in ash, protein energy and amylopectin between oat granola (control) and maize based granola samples. Functional analysis of the samples showed that oat granola had the highest value for water absorption capacity and swelling power. Yellow maize granola had the highest value for dispersibility and bulk density. Pop corn granola had the highest value for solubility. There was no significant difference (P≥0.05) in bulk density and water absorption capacity.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend
AU - Eke - Ejiofor Joy
AU - Beleya Ellen Aswei
AU - Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas
Y1 - 2016/02/01
PY - 2016
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17
DO - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17
T2 - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JF - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JO - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
SP - 47
EP - 52
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2327-2716
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17
AB - Granola was produced using three varieties of maize namely, yellow, white and pop and oat as control. Coconut was added to the granola sample in order to replace walnut in the control. They were subjected to sensory, chemical and functional evaluation. Sensory analysis showed that there was significant difference in their color and taste, while flavor, texture, crispness and overall acceptability showed no significant difference (p≥0.05). Chemical analysis result showed that oat based granola had the highest value for fat, protein, energy, sugar, starch and amylopectin, while yellow maize granola had the highest value for moisture content and carbohydrate and white maize granola had the highest value for crude fibre and amylose. Granola produced from pop maize had the highest value for ash. There was no significant difference (P≥0.05) in ash, protein energy and amylopectin between oat granola (control) and maize based granola samples. Functional analysis of the samples showed that oat granola had the highest value for water absorption capacity and swelling power. Yellow maize granola had the highest value for dispersibility and bulk density. Pop corn granola had the highest value for solubility. There was no significant difference (P≥0.05) in bulk density and water absorption capacity.
VL - 5
IS - 1
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Eke - Ejiofor Joy

Department of Food Science and Technology, Rivers State University of Science and Technology Nkpolu, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Beleya Ellen Aswei

Department of Food Science and Technology, Rivers State University of Science and Technology Nkpolu, Port Harcourt, Nigeria
Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas

Department of Food Science and Technology, Rivers State University of Science and Technology Nkpolu, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Eke - Ejiofor Joy, Beleya Ellen Aswei, Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas. (2016). Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 5(1), 47-52. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Eke - Ejiofor Joy; Beleya Ellen Aswei; Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas. Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 5(1), 47-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Eke - Ejiofor Joy, Beleya Ellen Aswei, Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas. Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2016;5(1):47-52. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17,
  author = {Eke - Ejiofor Joy and Beleya Ellen Aswei and Gbarasogo Mbarabari Nicholas},
  title = {Preparation and Evaluation of Granola – a Breakfast Cereal, Sustituted with Maize (Zea May) and Coconut (Cocos Nucifera) Blend},
  journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
  volume = {5},
  number = {1},
  pages = {47-52},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160501.17},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20160501.17},
  abstract = {Granola was produced using three varieties of maize namely, yellow, white and pop and oat as control. Coconut was added to the granola sample in order to replace walnut in the control. They were subjected to sensory, chemical and functional evaluation. Sensory analysis showed that there was significant difference in their color and taste, while flavor, texture, crispness and overall acceptability showed no significant difference (p≥0.05). Chemical analysis result showed that oat based granola had the highest value for fat, protein, energy, sugar, starch and amylopectin, while yellow maize granola had the highest value for moisture content and carbohydrate and white maize granola had the highest value for crude fibre and amylose. Granola produced from pop maize had the highest value for ash. There was no significant difference (P≥0.05) in ash, protein energy and amylopectin between oat granola (control) and maize based granola samples. Functional analysis of the samples showed that oat granola had the highest value for water absorption capacity and swelling power. Yellow maize granola had the highest value for dispersibility and bulk density. Pop corn granola had the highest value for solubility. There was no significant difference (P≥0.05) in bulk density and water absorption capacity.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download