Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District

Farhana Akther; Mst Khodeza Akter; Babu Kanta Sen; Mizanur Rahman; Mesbah Uddin Talukder

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12

| Peer-Reviewed

Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District

Farhana Akther, Mst Khodeza Akter, Babu Kanta Sen, Mizanur Rahman, Mesbah Uddin Talukder

Published in International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 4)

Received: 4 May 2016 Accepted: 26 May 2016 Published: 7 June 2016

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

A cross sectional comparative study was carried out to compare the nutritional status between the vegetarian and non-vegetarian individuals. The study was conducted among 100 respondents (50 vegetarian and 50 non-vegetarian) at Tangail sadar upazilla in Tangail district to assess their nutritional status by collecting anthropometric and socio-demographic data, dietary intake pattern as well as hygienic and clinical information. Among the respondents all the vegetarian were Hindu and majority of the non-vegetarian were Muslim (70%). The study found that nutritional status of 72% vegetarian and 62% non-vegetarian were normal. According to this study 4% vegetarian and 12% non-vegetarian respondents were underweight and 26% non-vegetarian and 24% vegetarian respondents were overweight respectively. Mean heights of vegetarian respondents was 161.62cm and mean weight 59.78 kg whereas mean height and weight of the non-vegetarian respondents were 158.62cm and 57.14 kg respectively. The study observed the food habits of the respondents. Vegetarian respondents consumed more leafy and non-leafy vegetables, pulses, and dairy based products avoiding egg, meat, and fish. Besides 64% non-vegetarian consumed fish and 24% consumed egg daily and 64% consumed meat weekly. The study findings strengthen the notion that the nutritional status of the vegetarian respondents are better than non-vegetarian due to their health consciousness and food intake pattern.

Published in	International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 5, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12
Page(s)	241-245
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2016. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Nutritional Status, Vegetarian, Non-vegetarian, Bmi, Tangail

References

[1]	Michalak, J., X. C. Zhang, and F. Jacobi (2012). Vegetarian diet and mental disorders: results from a representative community survey International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 9
[2]	Elmadfa, I. and I. Singer, (2009) Vitamin B-12 and homocysteine status among vegetarians: a global perspective, Am J ClinNutr, 89: 1693S-1698S.
[3]	Craig, W. J. (2009) Health effects of vegan diets, Am J ClinNutr, 89: 1627S-1633S.
[4]	Nakamoto, K., et al. (2009) A new Japanese vegetarian food guide, Asia Pac J Public Health, 21: 160-9.
[5]	Dunham, L. and L. M. Kollar (2006) Vegetarian eating for children and adolescents, J Pediatr Health Care, 20: 27-34.
[6]	Povey, R., B. Wellens, and M. Conner (2001) Attitudes towards following meat, vegetarian and vegan diets: an examination of the role of ambivalence, Appetite, 37: 15-26.3-6.
[7]	Forouzanfar, M. H., et al. (2012) Assessing the global burden of ischemic heart disease, part 2: analytic methods and estimates of the global epidemiology of ischemic heart disease in 2010, Glob Heart, 7: 331-342.
[8]	Murray, C. J., et al. (2012) Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010, Lancet, 380: 2197-223.
[9]	Norrving, B. and B. Kissela (2013) The global burden of stroke and need for a continuum of care, Neurology, 80: S5-12.
[10]	Song, S. H. (2012) Emerging type 2 diabetes in young adults, AdvExp Med Biol, 771: 51 61.7-10.
[11]	Walker, P., et al. (2005) Public health implications of meat production and consumption, Public Health Nutr, 8: 348-56.
[12]	Djousse, L., et al. (2004) Fruit and vegetable consumption and LDL cholesterol: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Family Heart Study, Am J ClinNutr, 79: 213-7.
[13]	Higuchi, H., (2005) et al. Effects of the Vegetarian Diet on the Blood Rheology of Middle-aged Women [in Japanese], Memoirs of Osaka Kyoiku University II Social Science and Home Economics, 54: 1-9. 11-13.
[14]	Vitamin B12: Dietary supplementation fact sheet: Office of dietary supplemants. National Instinute of Health. http://ods.od.nih.gov/factsheets/VitaminB12-HealthProfessional/ (accessed on: 02 May, 2013) (June 2011).
[15]	Noncommunicable diseases country profiles 2011. WHO global report in Noncommunicable diseases and mental health 2011, WHO: Genava. p. 209.
[16]	Ramaraj, R. and P. Chellappa (2008) Cardiovascular risk in South Asians, Postgrad Med J, 84: 518-23.5, 16.
[17]	Das, S. K., et al. (2012) Nutrition and lipid profile in general population and vegetarian individuals living in rural Bangladesh, Obesity & Weight Loss Therapy, 2.
[18]	Position paper on the vegetarian approach to eating. J Am Diet Assoc 1980; 77: 61-9
[19]	Ratzin R. Nutritional concerns for the vegetarian recreational athlete. In: Ratzin Jackson C, ed. Nutrition for the recreational athlete. Florida: CRC Press, Inc., 1995: 93-110.
[20]	Worsley A, Skrzypiec G. (1998) Teenage vegetarianism: prevalence, social and cognitive contexts. Appetite 30: 151-70.
[21]	Craig, W. (2009) Health effects of vegan diets. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition. 89 (suppl): p. 1627S-1633S.
[22]	Appleby P., Roddam, A, Allen, N, Key, T (2007) Comparative fracture risk in vegetarians and nonvegetarians in EPIC-Oxford. European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 61 (12): p. 1400-1406.
[23]	Craig, W. Mangels, AR, (2009) Position of the American Dietetic Association: Vegetarian Diets. Journal of the American Dietetic Association, 109 (7): p. 1266-1282.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Farhana Akther, Mst Khodeza Akter, Babu Kanta Sen, Mizanur Rahman, Mesbah Uddin Talukder. (2016). Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 5(4), 241-245. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Farhana Akther; Mst Khodeza Akter; Babu Kanta Sen; Mizanur Rahman; Mesbah Uddin Talukder. Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 5(4), 241-245. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Farhana Akther, Mst Khodeza Akter, Babu Kanta Sen, Mizanur Rahman, Mesbah Uddin Talukder. Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2016;5(4):241-245. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12,
  author = {Farhana Akther and Mst Khodeza Akter and Babu Kanta Sen and Mizanur Rahman and Mesbah Uddin Talukder},
  title = {Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District},
  journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
  volume = {5},
  number = {4},
  pages = {241-245},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20160504.12},
  abstract = {A cross sectional comparative study was carried out to compare the nutritional status between the vegetarian and non-vegetarian individuals. The study was conducted among 100 respondents (50 vegetarian and 50 non-vegetarian) at Tangail sadar upazilla in Tangail district to assess their nutritional status by collecting anthropometric and socio-demographic data, dietary intake pattern as well as hygienic and clinical information. Among the respondents all the vegetarian were Hindu and majority of the non-vegetarian were Muslim (70%). The study found that nutritional status of 72% vegetarian and 62% non-vegetarian were normal. According to this study 4% vegetarian and 12% non-vegetarian respondents were underweight and 26% non-vegetarian and 24% vegetarian respondents were overweight respectively. Mean heights of vegetarian respondents was 161.62cm and mean weight 59.78 kg whereas mean height and weight of the non-vegetarian respondents were 158.62cm and 57.14 kg respectively. The study observed the food habits of the respondents. Vegetarian respondents consumed more leafy and non-leafy vegetables, pulses, and dairy based products avoiding egg, meat, and fish. Besides 64% non-vegetarian consumed fish and 24% consumed egg daily and 64% consumed meat weekly. The study findings strengthen the notion that the nutritional status of the vegetarian respondents are better than non-vegetarian due to their health consciousness and food intake pattern.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District
AU  - Farhana Akther
AU  - Mst Khodeza Akter
AU  - Babu Kanta Sen
AU  - Mizanur Rahman
AU  - Mesbah Uddin Talukder
Y1  - 2016/06/07
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12
T2  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
SP  - 241
EP  - 245
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2716
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12
AB  - A cross sectional comparative study was carried out to compare the nutritional status between the vegetarian and non-vegetarian individuals. The study was conducted among 100 respondents (50 vegetarian and 50 non-vegetarian) at Tangail sadar upazilla in Tangail district to assess their nutritional status by collecting anthropometric and socio-demographic data, dietary intake pattern as well as hygienic and clinical information. Among the respondents all the vegetarian were Hindu and majority of the non-vegetarian were Muslim (70%). The study found that nutritional status of 72% vegetarian and 62% non-vegetarian were normal. According to this study 4% vegetarian and 12% non-vegetarian respondents were underweight and 26% non-vegetarian and 24% vegetarian respondents were overweight respectively. Mean heights of vegetarian respondents was 161.62cm and mean weight 59.78 kg whereas mean height and weight of the non-vegetarian respondents were 158.62cm and 57.14 kg respectively. The study observed the food habits of the respondents. Vegetarian respondents consumed more leafy and non-leafy vegetables, pulses, and dairy based products avoiding egg, meat, and fish. Besides 64% non-vegetarian consumed fish and 24% consumed egg daily and 64% consumed meat weekly. The study findings strengthen the notion that the nutritional status of the vegetarian respondents are better than non-vegetarian due to their health consciousness and food intake pattern.
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Farhana Akther

Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh
Mst Khodeza Akter

Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh
Babu Kanta Sen

Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh
Mizanur Rahman

Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh
Mesbah Uddin Talukder

Department of Food Technology and Nutritional Science, Mawlana Bhashani Science and Technology University, Tangail, Bangladesh

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Farhana Akther, Mst Khodeza Akter, Babu Kanta Sen, Mizanur Rahman, Mesbah Uddin Talukder. (2016). Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 5(4), 241-245. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Farhana Akther; Mst Khodeza Akter; Babu Kanta Sen; Mizanur Rahman; Mesbah Uddin Talukder. Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2016, 5(4), 241-245. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Farhana Akther, Mst Khodeza Akter, Babu Kanta Sen, Mizanur Rahman, Mesbah Uddin Talukder. Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District. Int J Nutr Food Sci. 2016;5(4):241-245. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12,
  author = {Farhana Akther and Mst Khodeza Akter and Babu Kanta Sen and Mizanur Rahman and Mesbah Uddin Talukder},
  title = {Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District},
  journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
  volume = {5},
  number = {4},
  pages = {241-245},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20160504.12},
  abstract = {A cross sectional comparative study was carried out to compare the nutritional status between the vegetarian and non-vegetarian individuals. The study was conducted among 100 respondents (50 vegetarian and 50 non-vegetarian) at Tangail sadar upazilla in Tangail district to assess their nutritional status by collecting anthropometric and socio-demographic data, dietary intake pattern as well as hygienic and clinical information. Among the respondents all the vegetarian were Hindu and majority of the non-vegetarian were Muslim (70%). The study found that nutritional status of 72% vegetarian and 62% non-vegetarian were normal. According to this study 4% vegetarian and 12% non-vegetarian respondents were underweight and 26% non-vegetarian and 24% vegetarian respondents were overweight respectively. Mean heights of vegetarian respondents was 161.62cm and mean weight 59.78 kg whereas mean height and weight of the non-vegetarian respondents were 158.62cm and 57.14 kg respectively. The study observed the food habits of the respondents. Vegetarian respondents consumed more leafy and non-leafy vegetables, pulses, and dairy based products avoiding egg, meat, and fish. Besides 64% non-vegetarian consumed fish and 24% consumed egg daily and 64% consumed meat weekly. The study findings strengthen the notion that the nutritional status of the vegetarian respondents are better than non-vegetarian due to their health consciousness and food intake pattern.},
 year = {2016}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Assessment of Nutritional Status & Health Condition Among Vegetarian and Non-vegetarian Adult at Tangail Sadar Upazila in Tangail District
AU  - Farhana Akther
AU  - Mst Khodeza Akter
AU  - Babu Kanta Sen
AU  - Mizanur Rahman
AU  - Mesbah Uddin Talukder
Y1  - 2016/06/07
PY  - 2016
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12
T2  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JF  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
JO  - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences
SP  - 241
EP  - 245
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2327-2716
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20160504.12
AB  - A cross sectional comparative study was carried out to compare the nutritional status between the vegetarian and non-vegetarian individuals. The study was conducted among 100 respondents (50 vegetarian and 50 non-vegetarian) at Tangail sadar upazilla in Tangail district to assess their nutritional status by collecting anthropometric and socio-demographic data, dietary intake pattern as well as hygienic and clinical information. Among the respondents all the vegetarian were Hindu and majority of the non-vegetarian were Muslim (70%). The study found that nutritional status of 72% vegetarian and 62% non-vegetarian were normal. According to this study 4% vegetarian and 12% non-vegetarian respondents were underweight and 26% non-vegetarian and 24% vegetarian respondents were overweight respectively. Mean heights of vegetarian respondents was 161.62cm and mean weight 59.78 kg whereas mean height and weight of the non-vegetarian respondents were 158.62cm and 57.14 kg respectively. The study observed the food habits of the respondents. Vegetarian respondents consumed more leafy and non-leafy vegetables, pulses, and dairy based products avoiding egg, meat, and fish. Besides 64% non-vegetarian consumed fish and 24% consumed egg daily and 64% consumed meat weekly. The study findings strengthen the notion that the nutritional status of the vegetarian respondents are better than non-vegetarian due to their health consciousness and food intake pattern.
VL  - 5
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download