Background. Audiology services are an integral part of providing hearing healthcare to the Mauritian population. Aims/Objectives. This study aimed to identify audiologists’ perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of implementing an audiology service delivery model in Mauritius. Material and Methods. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured telephonic interviews. Data obtained were scribed and transcribed, and inductive thematic analyses were used to identify themes and subthemes. Using convenience sampling, four audiologists from Mauritius’ public healthcare sector were selected as the study sample. Results. The following main themes were identified during data analysis: infrastructure and resources—human and clinical resources and audiological settings; knowledge—administering tests and further training; protocol and guidelines—audiological norms and referral pathways; appointments—waiting list; technology—information systems and technological devices, and communication—explanation of test results and communication strategies. The results showed that the participants were aware of the various resources available for audiology services, but there were concerns regarding the implementation of standardized guidelines in audiology practice. Conclusion. Overall, the findings suggest that the public healthcare sector’s sizeable availability of resources is conducive to early hearing detection and intervention, which in turn calls for changes to improve healthcare services to the Mauritian population by introducing an early hearing detection and intervention program consistent with international norms and guidelines.
Published in | International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20 |
Page(s) | 40-49 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Audiology, Barriers, Facilitators, Service, Public Healthcare Sector
[1] | WHO (World Health Organization). (2021). “World Report on Hearing.” Accessed March 20, 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240020481 |
[2] | Haile, Lydia M., Kaloyan Kamenov, Paul S. Briant, Aislyn U. Orji, Jaimie D. Steinmetz, Amir Abdoli, Mohammad Abdollahi, et al. (2021). “Hearing Loss Prevalence and Years Lived with Disability, 1990–2019: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.” The Lancet 397 (10278): 996–1009. doi: 10.1016/S01406736(21)00516-X. |
[3] | Coco, Laura, Alyssa Davidson & Nicole Marrone. (2020). “The Role of Patient-Site Facilitators in Teleaudiology: A Scoping Review.” American Journal of Audiology 29 (3S): 661–675. doi: 10.1044/2020_AJA-19-00070. |
[4] | Zuriekat, Margaret, Hannah Semeraro, Victoria Watson, Daniel Rowan & Sarah Kirby. (2021). “Hearing Healthcare for Workers with Hearing Loss: Audiologists’ Experiences and Views.” Disability and Rehabilitation 44 (25): 7861–7871. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2021.2001053. |
[5] | Ekberg, Katie, Simone Schuetz, Barbra Timmer & Louise Hickson. (2020). “Identifying Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Family-centred Care in Adult Audiology Practices: A COM-B Interview Study Exploring Staff Perspectives.” International Journal of Audiology 59 (6): 464–474. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2020.1745305. |
[6] | Naidoo, Naedene & Nasim B. Khan. (2022). “Analysis of Barriers and Facilitators to Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.” South African Journal of Communication Disorders 69 (1): a839. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v69i1.839. |
[7] | Babbie, Earl R. (2021). The Practice of Social Research. 15th ed. Boston: Cengage Learning. |
[8] | Manchaiah, Vinaya, Eldré W. Beukes & Ross J. Roeser. (2022). Evaluating and Conducting Research in Audiology. San Diego: Plural Publishing. |
[9] | Parmar, Bhavisha J., Kinjal Mehta, Deborah A. Vickers & Jennifer K. Bizley. (2022). “Experienced Hearing Aid Users’ Perspectives of Assessment and Communication within Audiology: A Qualitative Study using Digital Methods.” International Journal of Audiology 61 (11): 956–964. doi: 10.1080/14992027.2021.1998839. |
[10] | Sebothoma, Ben & Katijah Khoza-Shangase. (2021). “Undergraduate Audiology Students’ Perceived Competence and Confidence in Conducting Otoscopic Examination Following Video Otoscopic Training.” BMC Medical Education 21 (1), 1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12909-021-02924-0. |
[11] | Teixeira, Leanne & Karin Joubert. (2014). “Availability of Audiological Equipment and Protocols for Paediatric Assessment and Hearing Aid Fitting in Gauteng, South Africa.” South African Journal of Communication Disorders 61 (1): a58. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v61i1.58. |
[12] | McGill, Nicole, Sharynne McLeod, Kathryn Crowe, Cen Wang & Suzanne C. Hopf. (2021). “Waiting Lists and Prioritization of Children for Services: Speech-language Pathologists’ Perspectives.” Journal of Communication Disorders 91: 106099. doi: 10.1016/j.jcomdis.2021.106099. |
[13] | Kiyimba, Nikki, Jessica Nina Lester & Michelle O’reilly. (2019). Using Naturally Occurring Data in Qualitative Health Research: A Practical Guide. Cham: Springer International Publishing. |
[14] | Braun, Virginia & Victoria Clarke. (2006). “Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology.” Qualitative Research in Psychology 3 (2): 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa. |
[15] | Khoza-Shangase, Katijah. (2022). “In Pursuit of Increasing the Application of Tele-audiology in South Africa: COVID-19 Puts on the Alert for Patient Site Facilitator Training.” The South African Journal of Communication Disorders 69 (2): 900. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v69i2.900. |
[16] | Pillay, Mershen, Ritika Tiwari, Harsha Kathard & Usuf Chikte. (2020). “Sustainable Workforce: South African Audiologists and Speech Therapists.” Human Resources for Health 18 (1): 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12960-020-00488-6. |
[17] | MOFEPD (Ministry of Finance, Economic Planning and Development). (2023). “Budget Corner.” Accessed April 1, 2023. https://mof.govmu.org/Pages/default.aspx |
[18] | Musango, Laurent, Maryam Timol, Premduth Burhoo, Faisal Shaikh, Philippe Donnen, & Joses M. Kirigia. (2020). “Assessing Health System Challenges and Opportunities for Better Noncommunicable Disease Outcomes: The Case of Mauritius.” BMC Health Services Research 20: 1–21. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-5039-4. |
[19] | Mauritius Institute of Health (MIH). (2023). “Training.” Accessed March 9, 2023. https://mih.govmu.org/mih/?page_id=2683 |
[20] | MOHW (Ministry of Health and Wellness). (2021). “Civil Service.” Accessed March 20, 2023. |
[21] | Khoza-Shangase, Katijah & Amisha Kanji. (2021). “Best Practice in South Africa for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention.” Early Detection and Intervention in Audiology: An African Perspective, 264. |
[22] | Bhamjee, Aaqilah, Talita le Roux, Kurt Schlemmer, Marien A. Graham & Faheema Mahomed-Asmail. (2022a). “Audiologists’ Perceptions of Hearing Healthcare Resources and Services in South Africa’s Public Healthcare System.” Health Services Insights 15: 11786329221135424. doi: 10.1177/11786329221135424. |
[23] | Allafrica Global Media. (2022). “Mauritius: New Audiology Services Launched at Floreal Mediclinic by Health Minister.” March 30, 2023. https://allafrica.com/stories/202203300669.html. |
[24] | JCIH (Joint Committee on Infant Hearing). (2019). “Year 2019 Position Statement: Principles and Guidelines for Early Hearing Detection and Intervention Programs.” Journal of Early Hearing Detection and Intervention 4 (2): 1–44. doi: 10.15142/fptk-b748. |
[25] | Brown, Lisa, Faheema Mahomed-Asmail, Karina C. D. Sousa & De W. Swanepoel. (2019). “Performance and Reliability of a Smartphone Digits-in-Noise Test in the Sound Field.” American Journal of Audiology 28 (3S): 736–741. doi: 10.1044/2019_AJA-HEAL18-18-0161. |
[26] | Khoza-Shangase, Katijah, Amisha Kanji & Fatima Ismail. (2021). “What are the Current Practices Employed by Audiologists in Early Hearing Detection and Intervention in the South African Healthcare Context?” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 141: 110587. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110587. |
[27] | Aggarwal, Komal, Dhanshree R. Gunjawate, Krishna Yerraguntla & Rohit Ravi. (2022). “Impact of COVID-19 Pandemic on Audiology Practice: A Scoping Review.” Clinical Epidemiology and Global Health 13: 100939. doi: 10.1016/j.cegh.2021.100939. |
[28] | Kanji, Amisha. (2022). “Newborn and Infant Hearing Screening at Primary Healthcare Clinics in South Africa Designated as National Health Insurance Pilot Sites: An Exploratory Study.” South African Journal of Communication Disorders 69 (1): 840. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v69i1.840. |
[29] | Bhamjee, Aaqilah, Talita le Roux, De W. Swanepoel, Marien A. Graham, Kurt Schlemmer & Faheema Mahomed-Asmail. (2022b). “Perceptions of Telehealth Services for Hearing Loss in South Africa’s Public Healthcare System.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19: 7780. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137780. |
[30] | Khoza-Shangase, Katijah, Nomfundo Monroe & Ben Sebothoma. (2022). “Conducting Clinical Research in the Era of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Challenges and Lessons for Speech-language Pathology and Audiology Research.” South African Journal of Communication Disorders 69 (2): 898. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v69i2.898. |
[31] | Khoza-Shangase, Katijah & Munyane Mophosho. (2021). “Language and Culture in Speech language and Hearing Professions in South Africa: Re-imagining Practice.” South African Journal of Communication Disorders 68 (1): 1–9. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v68i1.793. |
[32] | Homans, Nienke C. & Jantien L. Vroegop. (2021). “Impact of Face Masks in Public Spaces during COVID-19 Pandemic on Daily Life Communication of Cochlear Implant Users.” Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology 6 (3): 531–539. doi: 10.1002/lio2.578. |
[33] | Bezuidenhout, Jacqueline K., Katijah Khoza-Shangase, Tim D. Maayer & Renate Strehlau. (2021). “Outcomes of Newborn Hearing Screening at an Academic Secondary Level Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa.” South African Journal of Communication Disorders 68 (1): a741. doi: 10.4102/sajcd.v68i1.741. |
[34] | De Kock, Tersia, De W. Swanepoel & James W. Hall III. (2016). “Newborn Hearing Screening at a Community-based Obstetric Init: Screening and Diagnostic Outcomes.” International Journal of Pediatric Otorhinolaryngology 84: 124–131. doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2016.02.031. |
APA Style
Foondun, T., Pottas, L., Soer, M. (2023). Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing an Audiology Service Delivery Model in Mauritius’ Public Healthcare Sector. International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 9(2), 40-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20
ACS Style
Foondun, T.; Pottas, L.; Soer, M. Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing an Audiology Service Delivery Model in Mauritius’ Public Healthcare Sector. Int. J. Otorhinolaryngol. 2023, 9(2), 40-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20
AMA Style
Foondun T, Pottas L, Soer M. Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing an Audiology Service Delivery Model in Mauritius’ Public Healthcare Sector. Int J Otorhinolaryngol. 2023;9(2):40-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20
@article{10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20, author = {Taslima Foondun and Lidia Pottas and Maggi Soer}, title = {Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing an Audiology Service Delivery Model in Mauritius’ Public Healthcare Sector}, journal = {International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology}, volume = {9}, number = {2}, pages = {40-49}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijo.20230902.20}, abstract = {Background. Audiology services are an integral part of providing hearing healthcare to the Mauritian population. Aims/Objectives. This study aimed to identify audiologists’ perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of implementing an audiology service delivery model in Mauritius. Material and Methods. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured telephonic interviews. Data obtained were scribed and transcribed, and inductive thematic analyses were used to identify themes and subthemes. Using convenience sampling, four audiologists from Mauritius’ public healthcare sector were selected as the study sample. Results. The following main themes were identified during data analysis: infrastructure and resources—human and clinical resources and audiological settings; knowledge—administering tests and further training; protocol and guidelines—audiological norms and referral pathways; appointments—waiting list; technology—information systems and technological devices, and communication—explanation of test results and communication strategies. The results showed that the participants were aware of the various resources available for audiology services, but there were concerns regarding the implementation of standardized guidelines in audiology practice. Conclusion. Overall, the findings suggest that the public healthcare sector’s sizeable availability of resources is conducive to early hearing detection and intervention, which in turn calls for changes to improve healthcare services to the Mauritian population by introducing an early hearing detection and intervention program consistent with international norms and guidelines. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Barriers to and Facilitators of Implementing an Audiology Service Delivery Model in Mauritius’ Public Healthcare Sector AU - Taslima Foondun AU - Lidia Pottas AU - Maggi Soer Y1 - 2023/12/22 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20 DO - 10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20 T2 - International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology JF - International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology JO - International Journal of Otorhinolaryngology SP - 40 EP - 49 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2472-2413 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijo.20230902.20 AB - Background. Audiology services are an integral part of providing hearing healthcare to the Mauritian population. Aims/Objectives. This study aimed to identify audiologists’ perceptions of the barriers to and facilitators of implementing an audiology service delivery model in Mauritius. Material and Methods. A qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured telephonic interviews. Data obtained were scribed and transcribed, and inductive thematic analyses were used to identify themes and subthemes. Using convenience sampling, four audiologists from Mauritius’ public healthcare sector were selected as the study sample. Results. The following main themes were identified during data analysis: infrastructure and resources—human and clinical resources and audiological settings; knowledge—administering tests and further training; protocol and guidelines—audiological norms and referral pathways; appointments—waiting list; technology—information systems and technological devices, and communication—explanation of test results and communication strategies. The results showed that the participants were aware of the various resources available for audiology services, but there were concerns regarding the implementation of standardized guidelines in audiology practice. Conclusion. Overall, the findings suggest that the public healthcare sector’s sizeable availability of resources is conducive to early hearing detection and intervention, which in turn calls for changes to improve healthcare services to the Mauritian population by introducing an early hearing detection and intervention program consistent with international norms and guidelines. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -