High yield production and juice quality is essential in commercial sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) production. And this is possible is partly influenced by fertilizers. However, especially the effect of phosphorus and blended fertilizers was not known at study area. Field experiment was conducted at Fincha Sugar Estate, Ethiopia in 2018-2019 aiming to determine the effect of blended fertilizers and levels of phosphorus on yield and juice quality of sugarcane. The treatments were arranged in factorial combinations of three blended fertilizers (NPS, NPSB, and NPSBZn) and five phosphorus levels (0, 57, 76, 114, and 152 kg ha-1) and the experiment was laid out in randomized complete block (RCB) design with three replications. Data on sugarcane yield and juice quality parameters (Brix%, pol%, purity) and sugar yield were collected and analyzed. The result revealed that the main effect and interaction effects of blended fertilizers at different levels of phosphorus were highly significantly (p<0.001) for all parameters studied except for cane yield and Brix%. Accordingly, maximum cane yield was recorded in blended fertilizer NPSBZn at levels of phosphorus 152 and 114 kg ha-1 producing 242.5 and 233 t ha-1, respectively. Thus, cane yield ranged from 106.04 to 242.5 t ha-1 depending on blended fertilizers and levels of phosphorus. The juice quality Brix%, pol%, purity and sugar yields of NPSBZn at a level of 114 kg ha-1 phosphorus was superior. Therefore, the finding show the application of blended fertilizer NPSBZn with a level of 114 kg ha-1 phosphorus was resulted in high cane yield and juice quality of sugarcane.
Published in | International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology (Volume 4, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11 |
Page(s) | 21-29 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Sugarcane, Cane Yield, Juice Quality, Sugar Yield
[1] | Ademe, Adnew, 2001. Summary of Metrological Data (1979-2000), Fincha, Research Station. Fincha, Ethiopia. http://www.innspub.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/10/JBES-Vol3No11-p31-47.pdf. |
[2] | Afghan, S, Ghous, G, Ali, K, Hussain, K, Hasnain, Z. and Mushtaq, M.S. 2014. Impact of blended vs straight fertilizer on growth, yield and quality of sugarcane. Sugar cane international, month/month 2004, 22 (X): 10-12. |
[3] | Bokhtail, S. M and Sakurai, K. 2003. Sugarcane Response to Soil Phosphorus. Better Crops International. 17 (1): 20–25. http://www.ipni.net/publication/bci.nsf/0/2785C36FB3C7C15F85257BBA0064B64C/$FILE/Better%20Crops%20International%202003-1%20p20.pdf. |
[4] | Bokhtiar, S. M., Paul, G. C and Kabir, M. L 2001. Effect of sulfur fertilization on the yield of sugarcane in char land. Bangladesh Journal of Training and Development 14 (1/2): 57-62. http://www.ipni.net/publication/bci.nsf/0/2785C36FB3C7C15F85257BBA0064B64C/$FILE/Better%20Crops%20International%202003-1%20p20.pdf. |
[5] | Chapman, H. D., 1965. Cation Exchange capacity. Black, CA, Ensminger LE, Clark FE (eds). Method of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, pp. 891-901, Madison Wisconsin, USA. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2. |
[6] | Dewis, J and Freitas, P. 1970. Physical and chemical methods of soil and analysis FAO Bulletin No. 10. Rome. 175p. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19711901105. |
[7] | ESISC (Ethiopian Sugar Industry Support Center Share Company. 014. Investment Opportunity in Sugar Cane Plantation In Ethiopia. 7 pp. http://www.ethiopianembassy.org.in/investment/Opportunity%20in%20Sugar%20Cane%20Plantation%202014.pdf. |
[8] | FAO, 2000. Fertilizers and their use: A pocket guide for extension officers. 4th edition International fertilizer industry association FAO, Rome, Italy. http://www.fao.org/tempref/agl/agll/docs/fertuse.pdf. |
[9] | Farias, C. H. A.; Fernandes, P. D.; Gheyi, H. R and Dantas Neto, J. 2009. Effect of micronutrients on sugarcane quality parameters in Brazil sugarcane estates, v. 13, p. 419-428. HTTP:// dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1415-43662009000400008. |
[10] | Fincha Sugar Factory, 2016. Operational Standard procedure for sugarcane production in Fincha Sugar Estate. https://www.ethiopiansugar.com/finchaa-sugar-factory/. |
[11] | Franco, H. C J, Franco, Eduardo Mariano, Andre´ C. Vitti, Carlos E. Faroni, Rafael Otto, Paulo C. O. Trivelin, 2011. Sugarcane Response to Boron and Zinc in Southeastern Brazil. Sugar Tech (Jan-Mar 2011) 13 (1): 86–95. DOI 10.1007/s12355-010-0057-x. |
[12] | Ghaffar, A, Ehsanullah, N Akbar, S. H, Khan, K, Jabran, R. Q, Iqbal, H. A and Ali, M. A. 2012. Effect of trench spacing and micronutrients on growth and yield of sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.). Australian Journal of Crop Sciences, 6 (1): 1-9. |
[13] | Girma, A. 2012. Prospects and Challenges of Bio Ethanol Production from Molasses in the Ethiopian Sugar Industry, MSc thesis, Indra Gandhi National Open University, India. 80. p. |
[14] | Godheja. J, Sudhir, K. S, and Modi,. D. R. 2014. The Standardization of Protocol for large-scale production of sugarcane (co-86032) through micro propagation. International Journal of Plant, animal, and environmental Sciences 4 (4). https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/THE-STANDARDIZATION-OF-PROTOCOL-FOR-LARGE-SCALE-OF-Godheja-Shekhar/057c5855719607194bcc35b4d935a28182c3b16a. |
[15] | Jackson, M. L. 1958. Soil Chemical Analysis. Prentice Hall, inc. Englewood, cliff, N. J. 372-374. |
[16] | Jiang, Y. M, 2004. Modern Sugarcane Cultivation Technology. Sugarcane Industry Research Institute. Guangzhou, China. Soils misconceptions and knowledge gaps: Plant and soil 248, 31-41. https://cdn.intechopen.com/pdfs/59391.pdf. |
[17] | Khan, S. A, Rashid, H, Chaudhary, Chaudhry, M. F, Chaudhry Z, Fatima Z, Sadar Uddin Siddiqui, S. U, Zia, M 2009. Effect of Cytokinin on Shoot Multiplication in Three Elite Sugarcane Varieties. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 41: 1651-1658. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/Effect_of_cytokinins_on_shoot_multiplication_in_th.pdf. |
[18] | Khan, I. A., Javed, M. A., Khatri, A., Siddiqui, M. A,. Khan M. K. R, Dahar, NA., Khanzada M. H, and Khan,. R. 2002. Performance of exotic sugarcane clones at NIA, Tando Jam. Asian Journal of. Plant Scence, 1: 238-240. DOI: 10.3923/ajps.2002.238.240. |
[19] | Majeedamo, H. I., Minhas,. Y. J, Jarwa, A. D., Tunio, S. D and Puno, H. P. 2003. Effect of phosphorus levels and methods of application on sugarcane yield. Pakistan Sugar Journal. 18 (4): 17 – 19. file:///C:/Users/HP/Downloads/Pakistan_Sugar_Journal.pdf. |
[20] | Malie, S. A.,. Parwar, K. R and Barulkar, D. N, 2015. Yield contributing characters of three varieties of seasonal sugarcane as Influenced by Nitrogen and phosphorus, Indian Sugar 32: 95-104. http://repository.sustech.edu/bitstream/handle/123456789/21676/Research.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y. |
[21] | Mangrio, N, Kandhro, M. N, Soomro, A. A, Mari, N. and Shah, Z. H. 2020. Growth, yield and sucrose percent response of sugarcane t zinc and boron application. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture, 36 (2): 459-469. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2020/36.2.459.469. |
[22] | Mariano, F. H., Vitti, E, Faroni, A, Otto, C and Paulo, R. T 2011. Sugarcane Response to Boron and Zinc in Southeastern Brazil. Sugar Tech, 13 (1): 86-95.10.1007/s12355-010-0057-x. |
[23] | Olsen, S. R., Cole, C. W., Watanabe, F. S, and Dean, L. A. 1954. Estimation of available phosphorous in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate circular 939, US. Department of agriculture. https://www.worldcat.org/title/estimation-of-available-phosphorus-in-soils-by-extraction-with-sodium-bicarbonate/oclc/17316676. |
[24] | Omollo, J. O, and Abayo. G. O. 2011. Effect of phosphorus sources and rates on sugarcane yield and quality in Kibos, Nyando Zone. Springer Science+Business Media B. V., DOI. 10.1007/978-90-481-2543-2_55https://landmatrix.org/media/uploads/sinfonaplresourcebwmeta1elementspringer-395fbdea-72c0-3c30-93a2-64e96f43aeaf.pdf. |
[25] | Page, A. L, 1982. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison. https://www.cabdirect.org/cabdirect/abstract/19841981415. |
[26] | Pannu, B. S., Dang, Y. P, Verma, K. S, and Verma,. S. S, 1985. Effect of phosphorus on the yield and quality of sugarcane. India Sugar. 35: 263–265. |
[27] | Sahlemedhin Sertsu., 1999. Draft guidelines for regional soil testing laboratories. NFIA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. 10.4172/2329-8863.1000411. |
[28] | Sarwar, M. A., Husain, F, Ghaffar, A, and, Nadeem, M. A. 2011. Effect of some newly introduced fertilizers in sugarcane. Pakistan Sugar Kournal. 26: (.01): 2-7. |
[29] | SAS. 2004. Statistical Analysis Software version 9.0, SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA. |
[30] | Shrivastava, A. K, 2006. Sugarcane at glance. International Book Distributing Co. (IBDC) Lucknow, U. P. India. https://www.sapnaonline.com/books/sugarcane-glance-k-srivastava-8181890981-9788181890986. |
[31] | Singh, A. K, Shukla, M.S. Gilt,. Sharma, S. K and Tiwari,. K. N. 2008. Improving sugarcane productivity through Balanced nutrients with potassium, sulfur, and magnesium. Better crops India, Uttar Pradesh, pp. 1-14. HTTP://www.ipni.net/publication/BCA.nsf/0/06ABF64813A367B3852579A4007A9E5D/$FILE/Sugarcane%2008095%20BC%20India.pdf. |
[32] | Singh,. R. K, Pandey, R. N, Singh, S. P, Rastogi,. J and Sharma,. M. L, 2014. Early assessment Of Genetic fidelity in sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum) plantlets regenerated through direct organogenesis with RAPD and SSR markers. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 6 (4): 618-624. http://www.cropj.com/singh_6_4_2012_618_624.pdf. |
[33] | Sugar Corporation, 2018. Annual Report of Finchaa Sugar Factory in Finchaa, Ethiopia. https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.ethiopian_sugar_corporation.4d3bd344ca983a31ac1b42d8a575b729.html. |
[34] | Sugar Corporation,. 2017. Annual Report of Ethiopian Sugar Corporation in Addis Abeba, Ethiopia. https://www.dnb.com/business-directory/company-profiles.ethiopian_sugar_corporation.4d3bd344ca983a31ac1b42d8a575b729.html. |
[35] | Swapna, M. and Srivastava, S. 2012. Molecular Marker Applications for Improving Sugar Content in Sugarcane, Springer Briefs in Plant Science, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2257 0_1. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007%2F978-1-4614-2257-0. |
[36] | Tisedale, R, 009. The effect of different rates of Nitrogen and Phosphorus fertilizer on sugarcane yield. International Book Distributing Co. Lucknow, India. |
[37] | Toomsan, B and Limpinuntana, V, 2005. Effect of phosphorus on physiological and agronomic parameters of sugarcane cultivars in Thailand. Pro. Int. Soil. Sci. Technol. 25: 126 – 131 https://staff.futminna.edu.ng/SLM/content/journal/PF0906/32.pdf. |
[38] | Worku Burayu, 2005. Agroecological conditions and background information on Finchaa Sugar Factory, Finchaa Research Station, Ethiopia. |
APA Style
Negesse Birhanie, Hirpa Legesse, Zerihun Jalata. (2020). Effect of Blended Fertilizer and Levels of Phosphorus on Yield and Juice Quality of Sugarcane at Fincha Sugar Estate, Ethiopia. International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, 4(2), 21-29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11
ACS Style
Negesse Birhanie; Hirpa Legesse; Zerihun Jalata. Effect of Blended Fertilizer and Levels of Phosphorus on Yield and Juice Quality of Sugarcane at Fincha Sugar Estate, Ethiopia. Int. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2020, 4(2), 21-29. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11
AMA Style
Negesse Birhanie, Hirpa Legesse, Zerihun Jalata. Effect of Blended Fertilizer and Levels of Phosphorus on Yield and Juice Quality of Sugarcane at Fincha Sugar Estate, Ethiopia. Int J Photochem Photobiol. 2020;4(2):21-29. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11, author = {Negesse Birhanie and Hirpa Legesse and Zerihun Jalata}, title = {Effect of Blended Fertilizer and Levels of Phosphorus on Yield and Juice Quality of Sugarcane at Fincha Sugar Estate, Ethiopia}, journal = {International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology}, volume = {4}, number = {2}, pages = {21-29}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijpp.20200402.11}, abstract = {High yield production and juice quality is essential in commercial sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) production. And this is possible is partly influenced by fertilizers. However, especially the effect of phosphorus and blended fertilizers was not known at study area. Field experiment was conducted at Fincha Sugar Estate, Ethiopia in 2018-2019 aiming to determine the effect of blended fertilizers and levels of phosphorus on yield and juice quality of sugarcane. The treatments were arranged in factorial combinations of three blended fertilizers (NPS, NPSB, and NPSBZn) and five phosphorus levels (0, 57, 76, 114, and 152 kg ha-1) and the experiment was laid out in randomized complete block (RCB) design with three replications. Data on sugarcane yield and juice quality parameters (Brix%, pol%, purity) and sugar yield were collected and analyzed. The result revealed that the main effect and interaction effects of blended fertilizers at different levels of phosphorus were highly significantly (p-1 producing 242.5 and 233 t ha-1, respectively. Thus, cane yield ranged from 106.04 to 242.5 t ha-1 depending on blended fertilizers and levels of phosphorus. The juice quality Brix%, pol%, purity and sugar yields of NPSBZn at a level of 114 kg ha-1 phosphorus was superior. Therefore, the finding show the application of blended fertilizer NPSBZn with a level of 114 kg ha-1 phosphorus was resulted in high cane yield and juice quality of sugarcane.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Blended Fertilizer and Levels of Phosphorus on Yield and Juice Quality of Sugarcane at Fincha Sugar Estate, Ethiopia AU - Negesse Birhanie AU - Hirpa Legesse AU - Zerihun Jalata Y1 - 2020/12/16 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11 T2 - International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology JF - International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology JO - International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology SP - 21 EP - 29 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-429X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpp.20200402.11 AB - High yield production and juice quality is essential in commercial sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) production. And this is possible is partly influenced by fertilizers. However, especially the effect of phosphorus and blended fertilizers was not known at study area. Field experiment was conducted at Fincha Sugar Estate, Ethiopia in 2018-2019 aiming to determine the effect of blended fertilizers and levels of phosphorus on yield and juice quality of sugarcane. The treatments were arranged in factorial combinations of three blended fertilizers (NPS, NPSB, and NPSBZn) and five phosphorus levels (0, 57, 76, 114, and 152 kg ha-1) and the experiment was laid out in randomized complete block (RCB) design with three replications. Data on sugarcane yield and juice quality parameters (Brix%, pol%, purity) and sugar yield were collected and analyzed. The result revealed that the main effect and interaction effects of blended fertilizers at different levels of phosphorus were highly significantly (p-1 producing 242.5 and 233 t ha-1, respectively. Thus, cane yield ranged from 106.04 to 242.5 t ha-1 depending on blended fertilizers and levels of phosphorus. The juice quality Brix%, pol%, purity and sugar yields of NPSBZn at a level of 114 kg ha-1 phosphorus was superior. Therefore, the finding show the application of blended fertilizer NPSBZn with a level of 114 kg ha-1 phosphorus was resulted in high cane yield and juice quality of sugarcane. VL - 4 IS - 2 ER -