| Peer-Reviewed

Effect of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Strip Intercropping with Enset on Growth, Yield and Yield Aspects of the Component Crops

Received: 12 April 2021     Accepted: 9 June 2021     Published: 25 June 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Strip intercropping of coffee with enset could be an alternative approach to enhance resource use efficiency and land productivity, which is a common practice Southern Ethiopia. However, the optimum strip ratio of coffee to enset has been limited in the study area. In view of this, a field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center between 2012 and 2018/19 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee to enset on yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to Enset strip intercropping ratio. The experiment was comprised of six treatments: sole coffee, sole Enset, 1C:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1, and laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis of variance revealed that both coffee and enset growth, yield, and yield components were significantly affected by coffee-enset strip intercropping. Coffee to enset ratio of (3:1) was provided the highest pooled mean yield of coffee, closely followed by (sole coffee)) compared with others strip ratios. Concerning the economic yield of enset, sole enset offers the maximum yield related to other treatments. Similarly, the maximum total LER of 1.63 was recorded from the coffee to enset ratio of (3:1) implies a yield advantage of 63% achieved from this strip ratio. Therefore, strip intercropping of coffee to enset at 3:1 ratio could be recommended to the study area as revealed by the highest yield and total LER for sustainable production and productivity.

Published in International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology (Volume 5, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12
Page(s) 7-13
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Coffee, Enset, LER, Strip-Intercropping, Yield Advantage

References
[1] Dariush M, Ahad M, Meysam O. 2006. Assessing the Land Equivalent Ratio (LER) of two corn Zea mays L. varieties intercropping at various nitrogen levels in Karaj, Iran. Journal of Central European Agriculture. 7 (2): 359-364.
[2] Tsubo M, Walker S, Ogindo HO. 2005. A simulation model of cereal–legume intercropping systems for semi-arid regions: I. Model development. Field Crops Research. 93 (1): 10-22.
[3] Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS. 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping. European Journal of Agronomy. 24 (4): 325-332.
[4] Matusso JMM, Mugwe JN, Mucheru-Muna M. 2012. Potential role of cereal-legume intercropping systems in integrated soil fertility management in smallholder farming systems of sub-Saharan Africa Research Application Summary. Third RUFORUM Biennial Meeting 24-28 September 2012, Entebbe, Uganda.
[5] Knudsen MT, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Joernsgaard B, Jensen ES. 2004. Comparison of interspecific competition and N use in pea–barley, faba bean–barley and lupin–barley intercrops grown at two temperate locations. The Journal of Agricultural Science. 142 (06): 617-627.
[6] Birhanu T, 2017. Ethiopian coffee sector strategy and future prospects, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[7] Damenu, T., Coffee production and marketing in Oromiya. In: Girma, A., Bayetta, B., Tesfaye, S., Endale, T. and Taye, K. 2008. Coffee Diversity and Knowledge. Proceedings of a National Workshop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, 485.
[8] Anteneh N., Taye K. and Tesfaye S., 2015. Review of Arabica Coffee Management Research in Ethiopia. Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare. 5 (13): 235-258.
[9] Van Asten P., Wairegi, L., Mukasa, D. and Uringi, N., Agronomic and economic benefits of coffee-banana intercropping in Uganda’s smallholder farming systems. Agricultural Systems, 104: 326–334 (2011).
[10] Amede T, and Diro M,. 2005. Optimizing Soil Fertility Gradients in the Enset (Ensete ventricosum) Systems of the Ethiopian Highlands.
[11] Willey, R, 1985. Evaluation and presentation of intercropping advantages. Experimental Agriculture, 21: 119-133.
[12] Mesfin Kebede & Bayetta Bellachew 2008. Phenotypic diversity in the Harerge coffee (Coffee arabica L.) germplasm for quantitative traits. East African Journal of Sciences. 2: 13-18.
[13] Abdulfeta K, 2018. Characterization and Yield Performance Evaluation of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) germplasm Accessions from Tepi, Southwestern Ethiopia. M. Sc. Thesis Hawassa University College of Agriculture Hawassa, Ethiopia June.
[14] Atinafu G, Mohammed H., 2017. Association and Path Coefficient Analysis of Yield and Yield Attributes of Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Under Sidama Specialty Coffee Growing Area, Awada, Southern Ethiopia. Adv Crop Sci Tech 5: 307. doi: 10.4172/2329-8863.1000307.
[15] Behailu M, Essubalew G, Shiferaw T, Tesfaye S, Anteneh N. 2020. “Intercropping of Coffee with Enset (Enset ventricosum Welw. Cheesman) at Teppi, Southwestern Ethiopia” International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences. 6 (8): 15-22,
[16] Yacob E, Tesfaye S, Alemseged Y, Anteneh N, Takele N, Mohammednur A, Bekele B. 1996. Advances in coffee agronomy research in Ethiopia. 40-45p.
[17] Zhang, G., Yang, Z. and Dong, S., 2011. Interspecific competitiveness affects the total biomass yield in an alfalfa and corn intercropping system. Field Crops Res., 124 (1): 66-73.
[18] Thayamini H. and Brintha, I., 2010. Review on maize based intercropping. Journal of agronomy, 9 (3): 135-145.
[19] Taye, K., Anteneh, N., Tesfaye, S., Endale, T. and Alemseged, Y., 2008. Intercropping coffee with other crops. In: Girma, A., Bayetta, B., Tesfaye, S., Endale, T. and Taye, K. (Ed.). Coffee Diversity and Knowledge. Proceedings of a National Workshop Four Decades of Coffee Research and Development in Ethiopia. Addis Ababa, 485.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie. (2021). Effect of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Strip Intercropping with Enset on Growth, Yield and Yield Aspects of the Component Crops. International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology, 5(1), 7-13. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Leta Ajema; Ashenafi Nigussie. Effect of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Strip Intercropping with Enset on Growth, Yield and Yield Aspects of the Component Crops. Int. J. Photochem. Photobiol. 2021, 5(1), 7-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Leta Ajema, Ashenafi Nigussie. Effect of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Strip Intercropping with Enset on Growth, Yield and Yield Aspects of the Component Crops. Int J Photochem Photobiol. 2021;5(1):7-13. doi: 10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12,
      author = {Leta Ajema and Ashenafi Nigussie},
      title = {Effect of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Strip Intercropping with Enset on Growth, Yield and Yield Aspects of the Component Crops},
      journal = {International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology},
      volume = {5},
      number = {1},
      pages = {7-13},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijpp.20210501.12},
      abstract = {Strip intercropping of coffee with enset could be an alternative approach to enhance resource use efficiency and land productivity, which is a common practice Southern Ethiopia. However, the optimum strip ratio of coffee to enset has been limited in the study area. In view of this, a field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center between 2012 and 2018/19 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee to enset on yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to Enset strip intercropping ratio. The experiment was comprised of six treatments: sole coffee, sole Enset, 1C:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1, and laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis of variance revealed that both coffee and enset growth, yield, and yield components were significantly affected by coffee-enset strip intercropping. Coffee to enset ratio of (3:1) was provided the highest pooled mean yield of coffee, closely followed by (sole coffee)) compared with others strip ratios. Concerning the economic yield of enset, sole enset offers the maximum yield related to other treatments. Similarly, the maximum total LER of 1.63 was recorded from the coffee to enset ratio of (3:1) implies a yield advantage of 63% achieved from this strip ratio. Therefore, strip intercropping of coffee to enset at 3:1 ratio could be recommended to the study area as revealed by the highest yield and total LER for sustainable production and productivity.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effect of Coffee (Coffea Arabica L.) Strip Intercropping with Enset on Growth, Yield and Yield Aspects of the Component Crops
    AU  - Leta Ajema
    AU  - Ashenafi Nigussie
    Y1  - 2021/06/25
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12
    T2  - International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology
    JF  - International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology
    JO  - International Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology
    SP  - 7
    EP  - 13
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-429X
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijpp.20210501.12
    AB  - Strip intercropping of coffee with enset could be an alternative approach to enhance resource use efficiency and land productivity, which is a common practice Southern Ethiopia. However, the optimum strip ratio of coffee to enset has been limited in the study area. In view of this, a field experiment was conducted at Awada Agriculture Research Sub-center between 2012 and 2018/19 to evaluate the effect of strip intercropping ratios of coffee to enset on yield and yield components of both crops and to determine economically optimum coffee to Enset strip intercropping ratio. The experiment was comprised of six treatments: sole coffee, sole Enset, 1C:1, 2:1, 3:1, and 4:1, and laid out in a randomized complete block design with three replications. The analysis of variance revealed that both coffee and enset growth, yield, and yield components were significantly affected by coffee-enset strip intercropping. Coffee to enset ratio of (3:1) was provided the highest pooled mean yield of coffee, closely followed by (sole coffee)) compared with others strip ratios. Concerning the economic yield of enset, sole enset offers the maximum yield related to other treatments. Similarly, the maximum total LER of 1.63 was recorded from the coffee to enset ratio of (3:1) implies a yield advantage of 63% achieved from this strip ratio. Therefore, strip intercropping of coffee to enset at 3:1 ratio could be recommended to the study area as revealed by the highest yield and total LER for sustainable production and productivity.
    VL  - 5
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Ethiopia Institute of Agricultural Research, Wondoget Agricultural Research Center, Awada Agricultural Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Ethiopia Institute of Agricultural Research, Wondoget Agricultural Research Center, Awada Agricultural Research Sub-Center, Yirgalem, Ethiopia

  • Sections