This empirical study in global education was conducted over a decade ago at a time when the Mixed Methods Research (MMR) methodology, a new paradigm in education research, was emerging. The global education research community was slow to this new phenomenon. This paper discusses MMR as a viable alternate method of inquiry in global education research. The paper contributes to the discourse and promotes the values of MMR in global education research. The study combines quantitative and qualitative research elements to answer critical questions about secondary school teachers’ lack of global knowledge, global mindedness, and teaching skills. Secondary school teachers’ lack of global education undermines their ability to develop programs and activities that will become the foundation for local and national consciousness for global engagement and community service activism. The MMR becomes a metaphor for a new concept in global citizenship education, in a complex, rapidly changing world, where students continually see themselves and the world through the lenses of human abuses, insecurity, prejudice and intolerance leading to various violent and destructive engagements.
Published in | International Journal of Secondary Education (Volume 2, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12 |
Page(s) | 52-60 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2014. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Global Education, Secondary Education, Global Mindedness, Mixed Methods Research, Qualitative Research, Quantitative Research, and Global Pedagogy
[1] | Abdullahi, S.A. (2010). Rethinking global education in the Twenty-first century. In J. Zajda (Ed.). Global pedagogies: schooling for the future (pp. 23-34). Dordrecht, New York: Springer. |
[2] | Abdullahi, S.A. (2004). Teacher’s knowledge, awareness, and pedagogy of global education in secondary schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida International University, Miami, FL. |
[3] | American Forum for Global Education (2002). Annual Report. New York: Author |
[4] | Anderson, L. F. (1990). A rationale for global education. In K.A. Tye (Ed.), Global education: From thought to action (pp. 13-34). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum De-velopment. |
[5] | Educational Testing Service. (1981). Global Knowledge Scale. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service. |
[6] | Friedman, L. T. (1999). The lexus and the olive tree: Understanding globalization. New York: Farrar, Straus & Giroux. |
[7] | Global Education First Initiative (2011). Retrieved June 25, 2014, from http://www.globaleducationfirst.org html. |
[8] | Gutek, L. G. (2006). American education in a global society: International and comparative perspectives (2nd edition). Long Grove, IL: Waveland, Press, Inc |
[9] | Hanvey, R. (1976). An attainable global perspective. New York: Center for Global Perspectives. |
[10] | Hett, J. E. (1993). The development of an instrument to measure global-mindedness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of San Diego, San Diego: CA. |
[11] | Jackson, R .J. (2003). Annual edition: Global issues. Boston: McGraw-Hill. |
[12] | Jackson, R .J. (2013). Annual edition: Global issues. Boston: McGraw-Hill. |
[13] | Kirkwood, T. F. (2001, January/February). Our global age requires global education: Cla-rifying definitional ambiguities. The Social Studies, 92, 10-15. |
[14] | Merryfield, M. (1991). Preparing American secondary social studies teachers to teach from a global perspective: Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 11-20. |
[15] | Merryfield, M. (1992). Preparing social studies teachers for the twenty-first century: Perspectives on effectiveness from a study of six exemplary teacher education programs in global education. Theory and Research in Social Education 20, 17-46. |
[16] | Merryfield, M. (1995). Institutionalizing cross-cultural experiences and international expertise in teacher education: The development and potential of a global education PDS network. Journal of Teacher Education, 46, 19-29. |
[17] | Merryfield, M. (2001). Moving the center of global education: From imperial world views that divide the world to double consciousness, contrapuntal pedagogy, hybridist, and cross-cultural competence. In B.W. Stanley (Ed.), Critical issues in social studies for the 21st century (pp. 179-208). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing. |
[18] | Merryfield, M., & Kasai, M. (2004). How are teachers responding to globalization? Research and Practice Social Education. 68, 354-359. |
[19] | Onwuegbuzie A.J. & Johnson RB 2006. The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13:48-63. |
[20] | SPSS (2003). SPSS for Windows 11.1 [computer software]. Chicago: SPSS Inc. |
[21] | Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. |
[22] | Tashakkori, A & Teddlie C (eds) 2003. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. |
[23] | Tucker, J. L. (1991). Global education is essential to secondary school social studies. Bulletin, NASSE 75, 43-51. |
[24] | Tucker, J. L. (1993). Global perspectives for teachers: An urgent priority. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 3-10. |
[25] | Tucker, J. L. (1990). Global change and American citizenship education: The vital role of history. Social Education, 54, 312-315. |
[26] | Tucker, J. L. (1991). Global education is essential to secondary school social studies. Bulletin, NASSE 75, 43-51. |
[27] | Tucker, J. L. (1993). Global perspectives for teachers: An urgent priority. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 3-10. |
[28] | Zajda, J. (2010). Global pedagogies: schooling for the future. Dordrecht, New York: Springer. |
[29] | Zajda, J. (Ed.) (2010a). Globalization, education and social justice. Dordrecht: Springer. |
[30] | Zajda, J. (2005). The international handbook on globalization, education and policy research. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer. |
APA Style
Sadiq Abubakar, Abdullahi, Mohammed Kabiru, Farouk. (2014). Mixed Methods Research in Global Education: Towards a New Paradigm for Global Citizenship Education. International Journal of Secondary Education, 2(3), 52-60. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12
ACS Style
Sadiq Abubakar; Abdullahi; Mohammed Kabiru; Farouk. Mixed Methods Research in Global Education: Towards a New Paradigm for Global Citizenship Education. Int. J. Second. Educ. 2014, 2(3), 52-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12
AMA Style
Sadiq Abubakar, Abdullahi, Mohammed Kabiru, Farouk. Mixed Methods Research in Global Education: Towards a New Paradigm for Global Citizenship Education. Int J Second Educ. 2014;2(3):52-60. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12
@article{10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12, author = {Sadiq Abubakar and Abdullahi and Mohammed Kabiru and Farouk}, title = {Mixed Methods Research in Global Education: Towards a New Paradigm for Global Citizenship Education}, journal = {International Journal of Secondary Education}, volume = {2}, number = {3}, pages = {52-60}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsedu.20140203.12}, abstract = {This empirical study in global education was conducted over a decade ago at a time when the Mixed Methods Research (MMR) methodology, a new paradigm in education research, was emerging. The global education research community was slow to this new phenomenon. This paper discusses MMR as a viable alternate method of inquiry in global education research. The paper contributes to the discourse and promotes the values of MMR in global education research. The study combines quantitative and qualitative research elements to answer critical questions about secondary school teachers’ lack of global knowledge, global mindedness, and teaching skills. Secondary school teachers’ lack of global education undermines their ability to develop programs and activities that will become the foundation for local and national consciousness for global engagement and community service activism. The MMR becomes a metaphor for a new concept in global citizenship education, in a complex, rapidly changing world, where students continually see themselves and the world through the lenses of human abuses, insecurity, prejudice and intolerance leading to various violent and destructive engagements.}, year = {2014} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Mixed Methods Research in Global Education: Towards a New Paradigm for Global Citizenship Education AU - Sadiq Abubakar AU - Abdullahi AU - Mohammed Kabiru AU - Farouk Y1 - 2014/06/30 PY - 2014 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12 T2 - International Journal of Secondary Education JF - International Journal of Secondary Education JO - International Journal of Secondary Education SP - 52 EP - 60 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7472 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsedu.20140203.12 AB - This empirical study in global education was conducted over a decade ago at a time when the Mixed Methods Research (MMR) methodology, a new paradigm in education research, was emerging. The global education research community was slow to this new phenomenon. This paper discusses MMR as a viable alternate method of inquiry in global education research. The paper contributes to the discourse and promotes the values of MMR in global education research. The study combines quantitative and qualitative research elements to answer critical questions about secondary school teachers’ lack of global knowledge, global mindedness, and teaching skills. Secondary school teachers’ lack of global education undermines their ability to develop programs and activities that will become the foundation for local and national consciousness for global engagement and community service activism. The MMR becomes a metaphor for a new concept in global citizenship education, in a complex, rapidly changing world, where students continually see themselves and the world through the lenses of human abuses, insecurity, prejudice and intolerance leading to various violent and destructive engagements. VL - 2 IS - 3 ER -