The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary

Inci Kesilmis

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11

| Peer-Reviewed

The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary

Inci Kesilmis

Published in International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education (Volume 2, Issue 3)

Received: 11 June 2017 Accepted: 3 July 2017 Published: 31 July 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

This study aims to compare different dynamic balance ability between soccer players and sedentary. Sixteen soccer players and 18 sedentary participated in the study. Soccer players group participated soccer trainings consisting of different coordinative exercises for 3 years; the sedentary group attended a normal school program. Soccer players’ mean height was 157.81±6.63 cm, mean weight was 44.06±6.81 kg and sedentary mean height was 154.91±7.45 cm, mean weight was 43.46±7.03 kg. Informed consent form signed by the entire participant, their parents and the trainer prior to the study as required by the Helsinki declaration. Dynamic balance ability with Prokin, Y balance and Flamingo balance tests were used. Factorial ANOVA and independent samples t test was used for analyzing the results. For dynamic balance ability; bipedal perimeter length (p=0.019), area gap percentage (p=0.019) and medium speed (p=0.032); right foot perimeter length (p=0.03) and medium speed (p=0.03) values; and for Y balance; right anterior (p=0.001), left anterior (p=0.001), right posteriolateral (p=0.001), left posteriolateral (p=0.008) measurements and also for flamingo balance test both on right-left foot and eyes open-closed results (p≤0.001) are significantly different in favor of soccer players. There were no significant difference for dynamic balance bipedal-right-left forward backward axis and medium lateral axis, right foot area gap percentage, left foot perimeter length, area gap percentage and medium speed and for y balance; right-left foot posteriomedial measurements. The dynamic balance ability of soccer players was clearly different than that of sedentary. According to these results it can be concluded that the effect of extensive soccer skill practice on overall balance control.

Published in	International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education (Volume 2, Issue 3)
DOI	10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11
Page(s)	37-43
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Soccer, Dynamic Balance, Y Balance, Flamingo

References

[1]	Malina RM, Bouchard C. Growth, maturation, and physical activity. Human Kinetics Books Champaign, Illinois, 1991; 2^nd edition, p.217-224.
[2]	Gualtieri D, Cattaneo A, Sarcinella R, Cimadoro G, Alberti G. Relationship between balance capacity and jump ability in amateur soccer players of different ages. Sport Sci Health 2008; 3:73–76.
[3]	Akman N, Karataş M. Temel ve Uygulanan Kinesyoloji, Haberal Eğitim Vakfı, Ankara, 2003; pp 247-288.
[4]	Khuman PR, Kamlesh T, Surbala L. Comparison of static and dynamic balance among collegiate cricket, soccer and volleyball male players. International Journal of Health & Allied Sciences 2014; 3(1): 9-13.
[5]	Faigenbaum AD, Bagley J, Boise S, Farrel A, Bates N, Myer GD. Dynamic balance in children: Performance comparison between two testing devices. Athletic Training & Sports Health Care 2015; 7(4): 160-164.
[6]	Gerbino PG, Griffin ED, Zurakowski D. Comparison of standing balance between female dancers and soccer players. Gait & Posture 2007; 26(4): 501-507.
[7]	Evangelos B, Georgıos K, Konstantınos A, Gissis I, Papadopoulos C, Aristomenis S. Proprioception and balance training can improve amateur soccer players’ technical skills. Journal of Physical Education and Sport 2012; 12(1): 81-89.
[8]	Orchard J. Is there a relationship between ground and climatic  conditions and injuries in football? Sports Med 2002; 32(7): 419-432.
[9]	Bressel E, Yonker JC, Kras J, Heath EM. Comparison of static and dynamic balance in female collegiate soccer, basketball, and  gymnastics athletes. Journal of Athletic Training 2007; 42(1): 42-46.
[10]	Davlin CD. Dynamic balance in high level athletes. Perceptual & Motor Skills 2004; 98(3): 1171-1176.
[11]	Ricotti L. Static and dynamic balance in young athletes. Journal of human sport & exercise 2011; 6(4): 616-628.
[12]	Hrysomallis C, Mclaughlin P, Goodman C. Balance and injury in elite Australian footballers. International Journal of Sports Medicine 2007; 28(10): 844–847.
[13]	Caraffa A, Cerulli G, Projetti M, Aisa G, Rizzo A. Prevention of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in soccer: A prospective controlled study of proprioceptive training. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 1996; 4(1): 19–21.
[14]	Gstöttner M, Neher A, Scholtz A, Millonig M, Lembert S, Raschner C. Balance ability and muscle response of the preferred and nonpreferred leg in soccer players. Motor Control 2009; 13(2): 218-231.
[15]	Mcguıne TA, Greene JJ, Best T, Leverson G. Balance as a predictor of ankle injuries in high school basketball players. Clin J Sport Med 2000;10(4):239-244.
[16]	Soderman K, Alfredson H, Pietila T, Werner S. Risk factors for leg injuries in female soccer players:a prospective investigation during one out-door season. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2001; 9(5): 313-321.
[17]	Tropp H, Ekstrand J, Gıllquıst J. Stabilometry in functional instability of the ankle and its value in predicting injury. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1984; 16 (1): 64-66.
[18]	Beynnon BD, Murphy DF, Alosa DM. Predictive factors for lateral ankle sprains: A Literature Review. Journal of Athletic Training 2002; 37(4) : 376-380.
[19]	Hopper DM, Hopper JL, Elliot, BC. Do selected kinanthropometric and performance variables predict injuries in female netball players? Journal of Sport Sciences 1995; 13(3): 213-222.
[20]	Zemková E. Assessment of balance in sport: Science and reality. Serbian Journal of Sports Sciences 2011; 5(1-4): 127-139.
[21]	Matsuda S, Demura S, Uchiyama M. Center of pressure sway characteristics during static one-legged stance of athletes from different sports. Journal Sport Sciences 2008; 26: 775-779.
[22]	Matsuda S, Demura S, & Demura T. Examining differences between center of pressure sway in one-legged and two-legged stances for soccer players and typical adults. Perceptual and Motor Skills 2010; 110: 751–760.
[23]	Błaszczyk JW, Beck M, Sadowska D. Assessment of postural stability in young healthy subjects based on directional features of posturographic data: Vision and gender effects. Acta Neurobiology Exp. 2014; 74: 433-442.
[24]	Duarte M, Zatsiorsky VM. Effects of body lean and visual information on the equilibrium maintenance during stance. Exp Brain Res 2002; 146: 60-69.
[25]	Malliou P, Gioftsidou A, Pafis G, Beneka A, Godolias G. Proprioseptif training (balance exercises) reduces lower extremity injuries in young soccer players. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation 2004; 17: 101–104.
[26]	Bakhtiari RA. Evaluation of static and dynamic balance and knee proprioception in young professional soccer players. Annals of Biological Research 2012; 3(6): 2867-2873.
[27]	Gökdemir K, Ciğerci AE, Er F, Suveren C, Sever O. The comparison of dynamic and static balance performance of sedentary and different branches athletes. World Applied Sciences Journal 2012; 17(9): 1079-1082.
[28]	Karadenizli Zİ, Erkut O, Ramazanoğlu N, Uzun S, Camlıgüney AF, Bozkurt S, Tiryaki C, Küçük V, Sirmen B. Comparision of dynamic and static balance in adolescents handball and soccer players. Turkish Journal of Sport and Exercise 2014; 16(1): 47-54.
[29]	Kesilmiş İ, Akın M. [The effect of gymnastics trainin on biomotor abilities in four-six years of age children]. Turkiye Klinkleri J Sports Sci 2016; 8(1): 15-21.
[30]	Paillard T, Noe F. Effect of expertise and visual contribution on postural control in soccer. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2006; 16(5): 345-348.
[31]	Paillard T, Noe F, Riviere T, Marion V, Montoya R, Dupui P. Postural performance and strategy in the unipedal stance of soccer players at different levels of competition. Journal of Athletic Training 2006; 41(2): 172-176.
[32]	Hatzitaki V, Zlsi I, Kollias I, Kioumourtzoglou E. Perceptual-motor contributions to static and dynamic balance control in children. Journal of Motor Behavior 2002; 34(2): 161-170.
[33]	Hrysomallis, C. Balance ability and athletic performance. Sports Medicine 2001; 41(3): 221-232.
[34]	Collins J. J the effects of visual input on open-loop and close-loop postural control mechanism. Exp. Brain Res. 1995; 103:151-163.
[35]	Błaszczyk J. W., Lowe D. J., Hansen P. D. Postural sway and perception of the upright stance stability borders. Acta Neurobiology 1997; 57: 49-57.
[36]	Sucan S, Yılmaz A, Can Y, Süer C. The Different Balance Parameters Evaluation of the Active Soccer Players. Journal of Health Sciences 2005; 14(1) 36-42.
[37]	Malliou P, Ispirlidis I, Beneka A, Taxildaris K, Godolias G. Vertical jump and knee extensors isokinetic performance in professional soccer players related to the phase of the training period. Isokinetics And Exercise Science, 2003; 11: 165–169.
[38]	Kligytė I, Ekman LL, Medeiros JM. Relationship between lower extremity muscle strength and dynamic balance in people post-stroke. Medicina 2003; 39(2): 122-128.
[39]	Gioftsidou A, Malliou P, Pafis G, Beneka A, Godolias G, & Maganaris CN. The effects of soccer training and timing of balance training on balance ability. European Journal of Applied Physiology 2006; 96(6): 659-664.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Inci Kesilmis. (2017). The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary. International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education, 2(3), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Inci Kesilmis. The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary. Int. J. Sports Sci. Phys. Educ. 2017, 2(3), 37-43. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Inci Kesilmis. The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary. Int J Sports Sci Phys Educ. 2017;2(3):37-43. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11,
  author = {Inci Kesilmis},
  title = {The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary},
  journal = {International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education},
  volume = {2},
  number = {3},
  pages = {37-43},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsspe.20170203.11},
  abstract = {This study aims to compare different dynamic balance ability between soccer players and sedentary. Sixteen soccer players and 18 sedentary participated in the study. Soccer players group participated soccer trainings consisting of different coordinative exercises for 3 years; the sedentary group attended a normal school program. Soccer players’ mean height was 157.81±6.63 cm, mean weight was 44.06±6.81 kg and sedentary mean height was 154.91±7.45 cm, mean weight was 43.46±7.03 kg. Informed consent form signed by the entire participant, their parents and the trainer prior to the study as required by the Helsinki declaration. Dynamic balance ability with Prokin, Y balance and Flamingo balance tests were used. Factorial ANOVA and independent samples t test was used for analyzing the results. For dynamic balance ability; bipedal perimeter length (p=0.019), area gap percentage (p=0.019) and medium speed (p=0.032); right foot perimeter length (p=0.03) and medium speed (p=0.03) values; and for Y balance; right anterior (p=0.001), left anterior (p=0.001), right posteriolateral (p=0.001), left posteriolateral (p=0.008) measurements and also for flamingo balance test both on right-left foot and eyes open-closed results (p≤0.001) are significantly different in favor of soccer players. There were no significant difference for dynamic balance bipedal-right-left forward backward axis and medium lateral axis, right foot area gap percentage, left foot perimeter length, area gap percentage and medium speed and for y balance; right-left foot posteriomedial measurements. The dynamic balance ability of soccer players was clearly different than that of sedentary. According to these results it can be concluded that the effect of extensive soccer skill practice on overall balance control.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary
AU  - Inci Kesilmis
Y1  - 2017/07/31
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11
T2  - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education
JF  - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education
JO  - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education
SP  - 37
EP  - 43
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1611
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11
AB  - This study aims to compare different dynamic balance ability between soccer players and sedentary. Sixteen soccer players and 18 sedentary participated in the study. Soccer players group participated soccer trainings consisting of different coordinative exercises for 3 years; the sedentary group attended a normal school program. Soccer players’ mean height was 157.81±6.63 cm, mean weight was 44.06±6.81 kg and sedentary mean height was 154.91±7.45 cm, mean weight was 43.46±7.03 kg. Informed consent form signed by the entire participant, their parents and the trainer prior to the study as required by the Helsinki declaration. Dynamic balance ability with Prokin, Y balance and Flamingo balance tests were used. Factorial ANOVA and independent samples t test was used for analyzing the results. For dynamic balance ability; bipedal perimeter length (p=0.019), area gap percentage (p=0.019) and medium speed (p=0.032); right foot perimeter length (p=0.03) and medium speed (p=0.03) values; and for Y balance; right anterior (p=0.001), left anterior (p=0.001), right posteriolateral (p=0.001), left posteriolateral (p=0.008) measurements and also for flamingo balance test both on right-left foot and eyes open-closed results (p≤0.001) are significantly different in favor of soccer players. There were no significant difference for dynamic balance bipedal-right-left forward backward axis and medium lateral axis, right foot area gap percentage, left foot perimeter length, area gap percentage and medium speed and for y balance; right-left foot posteriomedial measurements. The dynamic balance ability of soccer players was clearly different than that of sedentary. According to these results it can be concluded that the effect of extensive soccer skill practice on overall balance control.
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Inci Kesilmis

Institute of Educational Sciences, Department of Physical Education and Sports, Mersin University, Mersin, Turkey

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Inci Kesilmis. (2017). The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary. International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education, 2(3), 37-43. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Inci Kesilmis. The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary. Int. J. Sports Sci. Phys. Educ. 2017, 2(3), 37-43. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Inci Kesilmis. The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary. Int J Sports Sci Phys Educ. 2017;2(3):37-43. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11,
  author = {Inci Kesilmis},
  title = {The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary},
  journal = {International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education},
  volume = {2},
  number = {3},
  pages = {37-43},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsspe.20170203.11},
  abstract = {This study aims to compare different dynamic balance ability between soccer players and sedentary. Sixteen soccer players and 18 sedentary participated in the study. Soccer players group participated soccer trainings consisting of different coordinative exercises for 3 years; the sedentary group attended a normal school program. Soccer players’ mean height was 157.81±6.63 cm, mean weight was 44.06±6.81 kg and sedentary mean height was 154.91±7.45 cm, mean weight was 43.46±7.03 kg. Informed consent form signed by the entire participant, their parents and the trainer prior to the study as required by the Helsinki declaration. Dynamic balance ability with Prokin, Y balance and Flamingo balance tests were used. Factorial ANOVA and independent samples t test was used for analyzing the results. For dynamic balance ability; bipedal perimeter length (p=0.019), area gap percentage (p=0.019) and medium speed (p=0.032); right foot perimeter length (p=0.03) and medium speed (p=0.03) values; and for Y balance; right anterior (p=0.001), left anterior (p=0.001), right posteriolateral (p=0.001), left posteriolateral (p=0.008) measurements and also for flamingo balance test both on right-left foot and eyes open-closed results (p≤0.001) are significantly different in favor of soccer players. There were no significant difference for dynamic balance bipedal-right-left forward backward axis and medium lateral axis, right foot area gap percentage, left foot perimeter length, area gap percentage and medium speed and for y balance; right-left foot posteriomedial measurements. The dynamic balance ability of soccer players was clearly different than that of sedentary. According to these results it can be concluded that the effect of extensive soccer skill practice on overall balance control.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Comparison of the Different Balance Performance of Soccer Players Versus Sedentary
AU  - Inci Kesilmis
Y1  - 2017/07/31
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11
T2  - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education
JF  - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education
JO  - International Journal of Sports Science and Physical Education
SP  - 37
EP  - 43
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2575-1611
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsspe.20170203.11
AB  - This study aims to compare different dynamic balance ability between soccer players and sedentary. Sixteen soccer players and 18 sedentary participated in the study. Soccer players group participated soccer trainings consisting of different coordinative exercises for 3 years; the sedentary group attended a normal school program. Soccer players’ mean height was 157.81±6.63 cm, mean weight was 44.06±6.81 kg and sedentary mean height was 154.91±7.45 cm, mean weight was 43.46±7.03 kg. Informed consent form signed by the entire participant, their parents and the trainer prior to the study as required by the Helsinki declaration. Dynamic balance ability with Prokin, Y balance and Flamingo balance tests were used. Factorial ANOVA and independent samples t test was used for analyzing the results. For dynamic balance ability; bipedal perimeter length (p=0.019), area gap percentage (p=0.019) and medium speed (p=0.032); right foot perimeter length (p=0.03) and medium speed (p=0.03) values; and for Y balance; right anterior (p=0.001), left anterior (p=0.001), right posteriolateral (p=0.001), left posteriolateral (p=0.008) measurements and also for flamingo balance test both on right-left foot and eyes open-closed results (p≤0.001) are significantly different in favor of soccer players. There were no significant difference for dynamic balance bipedal-right-left forward backward axis and medium lateral axis, right foot area gap percentage, left foot perimeter length, area gap percentage and medium speed and for y balance; right-left foot posteriomedial measurements. The dynamic balance ability of soccer players was clearly different than that of sedentary. According to these results it can be concluded that the effect of extensive soccer skill practice on overall balance control.
VL  - 2
IS  - 3
ER  -

Copy | Download