Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) is major food crop of semi-aid of tropics of Africa and Asia which is indigenous to Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted in western part of Ethiopia Bako, B/Boshe and Gute in 2020-2022 cropping season with the objective of identifying the optimum and economically feasible integrated decomposed cattle manure and in-organic fertilizer for finger millet production in western part of Ethiopia. The experiment contains five level of in organic fertilizer 0, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of recommended inorganic fertilizer and four level of decomposed cattle manure 0, 3tone/ha, 6tone/ha and 9tone/ha combined in factorial arrangement in RCBD design. The integrated fertilizer affected grain yield, dry biomass, ear length, harvest index, effective tillers per plant, number of fingers per plant and plant height. The highest grain yield 2546kg/ha was observed on integration of 100% and 9tone/ha when 2195kg/ha from the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended fertilizer. The number of effective tillers per plant was not affected by the fertilizer. In economic analysis both integration of 100% with 9ton and 75% with 6tone/ha were economically feasible having 758 and 998 MRR respectively. Using 75% recommended fertilizer and 6tone/hectare is more economical. Therefore, it is advisable for farmers using the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended inorganic fertilizer.
Published in | International Journal of Science, Technology and Society (Volume 13, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11 |
Page(s) | 88-96 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
In Organic, Fertilizer, Organic, Soil, Finger Millet
Number | Parameters | Bako | B/Boshe |
---|---|---|---|
1 | pH | 4.85 | 4.75 |
2 | %OC | 2.11 | 2.93 |
3 | %OM | 3.29 | 5.04 |
4 | %TN | 0.16 | 0.25 |
5 | avaP (ppm) | 7.2 | 5.2 |
6 | Ex. Ca (cmol/kg soil | 5.5 | 10 |
7 | Ex.Mg (cmol/kg soil) | 4.5 | 2 |
8 | CEC (cmol/kg soil) | 18.75 | 18 |
9 | Ex.k (cmol(+)/kg soil | 0.94 | 0.90 |
10 | Sand | 48 | 42 |
11 | Clay | 39 | 45 |
12 | Silt | 13 | 13 |
13 | Textural class | Clay loam | Clay |
Cattle manure (tone/ha) | In organic fertilizer | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
0 | 6.100 ab | 5.900 abc | 6.017 abc | 5.733 abc | 5.833 abc |
3 | 5.817 abc | 5.783 abc | 6.267 a | 5.900 abc | 6.233 ab |
6 | 5.467 c | 5.800 abc | 5.917 abc | 6.167 ab | 5.967abc |
9 | 5.667 bc | 5.933 abc | 5.833 abc | 5.933 abc | 5.917 abc |
CV (%) | 10.0 | ||||
F-prob | * |
Cattle manure (tone/ha) | In organic fertilizer in (%) recommended | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
0 | 43.52 ab | 37.60 abcd | 42.14 abc | 34.10 bcd | 30.95cd |
3 | 35.97 abcd | 31.29bcd | 34.70bcd | 32.61 bcd | 31.49 bcd |
6 | 31.36bcd | 36.09abcd | 32.59 bcd | 34.12 bcd | 47.42 a |
9 | 27.93 d | 35.11 bcd | 34.84 bcd | 40.12 abcd | 42.53 abc |
CV (%) | 34.7 | ||||
F-prob | * |
Cattle manure (tone/ha) | In organic fertilizer in (%) recommended | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
0 | 2.000 a | 1.217 c | 1.200 c | 1.150 c | 1.500abc |
3 | 1.733 abc | 1.383 bc | 1.550 abc | 1.433 abc | 1.567 abc |
6 | 1.650 abc | 1.433abc | 1.483 abc | 1.267 c | 1.933 ab |
9 | 1.667 abc | 1.517 abc | 1.317 c | 1.317 c | 1.258c |
CV (%) | 41.5 | ||||
F-prob | * |
Cattle manure (tone/ha) | In organic fertilizer in (%) recommended | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
0 | 4.717 bcde | 4.950 abcd | 4.850 abcde | 5.100 abcd | 4.350de |
3 | 4.500cde | 4.533 cde | 5.217 abcd | 5.450 ab | 5.375 abc |
6 | 4.033 e | 4.700 bcde | 5.017 abcd | 5.367 abc | 5.117 abcd |
9 | 4.650bcde | 4.833 abcde | 5.083 abcd | 5.617 a | 5.500 ab |
CV (%) | 18.1 | ||||
F-prob | * |
Cattle manure (tone/ha) | In organic fertilizer in (%) recommended | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
0 | 0.5833 | 0.3833 | 0.3500 | 0.2833 | 0.3000 |
3 | 0.5333 | 0.4667 | 0.2500 | 0.3500 | 0.4667 |
6 | 0.5417 | 0.4333 | 0.4167 | 0.4667 | 0.3167 |
9 | 0.4833 | 0.6000 | 0.3000 | 0.4500 | 0.2500 |
CV (%) | 82.9 | ||||
F-prob | Ns |
Cattle manure (tone/ha) | In organic fertilizer in (%) recommended | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
0 | 62.24 def | 69.53 bcde | 71.10 abcd | 75.42 abc | 65.12cdef |
3 | 60.37 ef | 65.20 cdef | 75.05abc | 76.33 ab | 72.70 abc |
6 | 62.24def | 69.10 bcdef | 73.63 abc | 76.12 ab | 72.82abc |
9 | 58.95 f | 67.12 bcdef | 75.02abc | 81.53 a | 74.83 abc |
CV (%) | 15.8 | ||||
F-prob | 0.748 |
Cattle manure (tone/ha) | In organic fertilizer in (%) recommended | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
0 | 3904 fgh | 4889 defg | 5042 def | 6739 ab | 5218 de |
3 | 3780gh | 5467 de | 4817 defg | 6769 ab | 4881 defg |
6 | 4515efgh | 5573 cde | 5067 def | 6624 abc | 4800 defg |
9 | 3450 h | 5298 de | 5818 bcd | 5964 bcd | 7091a |
CV (%) | 23.5 | ||||
F-prob | ** |
Cattle manure (tone/ha) | In organic fertilizer in (%) recommended | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 25 | 50 | 75 | 100 | |
0 | 1544efg | 1688 de | 2040 bc | 2076 bc | 1371 fg |
3 | 1294 g | 1648def | 1526 efg | 2024 bc | 1375 fg |
6 | 1333 g | 1513 efg | 1430 efg | 2195 b | 1716 de |
9 | 928h | 1581defg | 1855 cd | 2087 bc | 2546 a |
CV (%) | 18.3 | ||||
F-prob | ** |
Cattle manure tone/hectare | Recommended fertilizer (%)/hectare | Grain Yield | Growth profit | Total cost | Net profit | Dominance analysis | Marginal rate of return |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
0 | 0 | 1544 | 92640 | 0 | 92640 | ||
3 | 0 | 1294 | 77640 | 300 | 77340 | D | |
6 | 0 | 1333 | 79980 | 600 | 79380 | D | |
9 | 0 | 928 | 55680 | 900 | 54780 | D | |
0 | 25 | 1688 | 101280 | 1150 | 100130 | 6.51 | |
3 | 25 | 1648 | 98880 | 1450 | 97430 | D | |
6 | 25 | 1513 | 90780 | 1750 | 89030 | D | |
9 | 25 | 1581 | 94860 | 2050 | 92810 | D | |
0 | 50 | 2040 | 122400 | 2300 | 120100 | 17.36 | |
0 | 75 | 2076 | 124560 | 2400 | 122160 | 26.03 | |
3 | 50 | 1526 | 91560 | 2600 | 88960 | D | |
3 | 75 | 2024 | 121440 | 2750 | 118690 | D | |
6 | 50 | 1430 | 85800 | 2900 | 82900 | D | |
6 | 75 | 2195 | 131700 | 3050 | 128650 | 9.98 | |
9 | 50 | 1855 | 111300 | 3200 | 108100 | D | |
9 | 75 | 2087 | 125220 | 3350 | 121870 | D | |
0 | 100 | 1371 | 82260 | 4600 | 77660 | D | |
3 | 100 | 1375 | 82500 | 4900 | 77600 | D | |
6 | 100 | 1716 | 102960 | 5200 | 97760 | D | |
9 | 100 | 2546 | 152760 | 5500 | 147260 | 7.59 |
OC | Organic Carbon |
OM | Organic Matter |
TN | Total Nitrogen |
AVA.p | Available Phosphorus |
Ex.Ca | Exchangeable Calcium |
Ex.Mg | Echangeable Calcium |
CEC | Excation Exchange Capacity |
Ex.K | Echangeable Potacium |
CV | Cofficint of Variation |
[1] | Andualem Wolie, Tadesse Dessalegn and Ketema Belete (2013), Heritability, variance components and genetic advance of some yield and yield related traits in Ethiopian collections of finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) genotypes, African Journal of Biotechnology, 12(36): 5529-5534. |
[2] | Ashokh Aravind S, Senthil Kumar N, Hemalatha M and Paramasivan M (2020), Influence of organic supplements on growth and yield of finger millet (Eleusine Coracana L.), Journal of farmachology and phytochemistry, 9(3): 1564-1567. |
[3] | Birhanu Ayalew (2015) Trends, Growth and Instability of Finger millet Production in Ethiopia, Journal of Agriculture and Environmental Management, 4(2): 078-081. |
[4] | D. Balasankar, S. Praneetha T. Arumugam, P. Jeyakumar, N. Manivannan and K. Arulmozhiselvan (2017), Genotypic Response of Chilli (Capsicum annuum L.) on Germination and Seedling Characters to Different Salinity Levels, International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences, 6(4) 2197-2205. |
[5] | G. R. Maruthi Sankar, K. L. Sharma, G. N. Dhanapal, M. A. Shankar, P. K. Mishra, B. Venkateswarlu, and J. Kusuma Grace (2011), Influessnce of Soil and Fertilizer Nutrients on Sustainability of Rainfed Finger Millet Yield and Soil Fertility in Semi-arid Alfisols, Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis, 42: 1462–1483. |
[6] | J. V. Harika, Sagar Maitra, Tanmoy Shankar, Monisankar Bera and Pilli Manasa (2019), Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Productivity, Nutrient Uptake and Economics of Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana L. Gaertn), International Journal of Agriculture, Environment and Biotechnology, 12(3): 273-279. |
[7] | K Aparna, K Bhanu Rekha, KP Vani and T Ram Prakash (2019). Growth and yield of finger millet as influenced by crop residue composting, Journal of farmachology and phytochemistry, ISSN: 2278-4136. |
[8] | K. L. Sharma, B. K. Ramachandrappa, D. Suma Chandrika, A. Sathish, G. N. Dhanpal, Ch. Srinivasa Rao, M. A. Shankar, J. Kususma Grace, G. R. Maruthi Sankar, G. Ravindra Chary, Munnalal, T. Satish Kumar, K. Usha Rani, and B. Venkateswarlu (2016), Effect of Organic Manure and Crop Residue Based Long-Term Nutrient Management Systems on Soil Quality Changes under Sole Finger Millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.) and Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)– Finger Millet Rotation in Rainfed Alfisol, communications in soil science and plant analysis, 47(7): 899–914. |
[9] | Malinda S. Thilakarathna and Manish N. Raizada (2015), A Review of Nutrient Management Studies Involving Finger Millet in the Semi-Arid Tropics of Asia and Africa, 5, 262-290. |
[10] | Molla Fentie, Alemayehu Assefa and Ketema Belete (2013), Ammi Analysis of Yield Performance and Stability of Finger Millet Genotypes Across Different Environments, World Journal of Agricultural Sciences 9(3): 231-237. |
[11] | Mudalagiriyappas, B. Raghavendra Goud, B. K. Ramachandrappa and H. V. Nanjappa (2015), Influence of Customized Fertilizers on Growth and Yield of Finger Millet {Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.} in Alfisols of Southern India, Indian J. Dryland Agric. Res. & Dev. 30(1): 50-54. |
[12] | Narayan Hebbal, B. K. Ramachandrappa, Mudalairiyappa and M. N. Thimmegouda(2018) Yield and Economics of Finger Millet with Establishment Methods under Different Planting Geometry and Nutrient Source, Indian Journal of Dryland Agricultural Research & Development, 33(1): 54-58. |
[13] | R. D. Nigade, P. N. Gajbhiye and S. M. More (2014), Integrated nutrient management studies in finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.), Crop Res. 48(1, 2 & 3): 27-31. |
[14] | Rabeen Abdul Gafoor, Shalini Pillai P and Nishan MA (2021), Effect on integrated nutrient management on finger millet (Eleusine coracana (L.) Gaertn.): A review, Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry; 10(5): 292-298. |
[15] | Sompalli Gowthami, Bodapati Keerthi, Gowriraja Gayethri, Seelam Raghavender Reddy and Dr. Shikha Singh (2022), Effect of organic manures and zinc levels on growth and yield of finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.), 11(4): 1747-1750. |
[16] | Suchith Chellappana, c, K. Aparnaa,, Ch. Chingakhamb, V. Sajithb, Vaishakh Naird(2019), Microwave assisted biodiesel production using a novel Brønsted acid catalyst based on nanomagnetic biocomposite, Science and Technology of Fuel and Energy. |
[17] | Tadesse Mosissa and Baihilu Bezabih (2017), Review on participatory small-scale irrigation schemes and small-scale rainwater harvesting technology development and its contribution to household food security in Ethiopia, International Journal of Water Resources and Environmental Engineering, 9(3): 2141-6613 2141-6613. 54-63. |
[18] | Wekha N. Wafula, Korir K. Nicholas, Ojulong F. Henry, Moses Siambi and Joseph P. Gweyi-Onyango (2016), Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) grain yield and yield components as influenced by phosphorus application and variety in Western Kenya, An international sssjournal of society for tropical plant research, 3(3): 673–680. |
[19] | Zarihun Ababe and Hile Deressa (2017), The Effect of Organic and Inorganic Fertilizers on the Yield of Two Contrasting Soybean Varieties and Residual Nutrient Effects on a Subsequent Finger Millet Crop. |
APA Style
Anbessa, F., Feyisa, H., Garama, G. (2025). Effects of Integrated Decomposed Cattle Manure and Blended (NPSB) Inorganic Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana (L) Gaertn.) in West Region of Ethiopia. International Journal of Science, Technology and Society, 13(3), 88-96. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11
ACS Style
Anbessa, F.; Feyisa, H.; Garama, G. Effects of Integrated Decomposed Cattle Manure and Blended (NPSB) Inorganic Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana (L) Gaertn.) in West Region of Ethiopia. Int. J. Sci. Technol. Soc. 2025, 13(3), 88-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11
AMA Style
Anbessa F, Feyisa H, Garama G. Effects of Integrated Decomposed Cattle Manure and Blended (NPSB) Inorganic Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana (L) Gaertn.) in West Region of Ethiopia. Int J Sci Technol Soc. 2025;13(3):88-96. doi: 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11
@article{10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11, author = {Fufa Anbessa and Hayssilu Feyisa and Galata Garama}, title = {Effects of Integrated Decomposed Cattle Manure and Blended (NPSB) Inorganic Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana (L) Gaertn.) in West Region of Ethiopia }, journal = {International Journal of Science, Technology and Society}, volume = {13}, number = {3}, pages = {88-96}, doi = {10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijsts.20251303.11}, abstract = {Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) is major food crop of semi-aid of tropics of Africa and Asia which is indigenous to Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted in western part of Ethiopia Bako, B/Boshe and Gute in 2020-2022 cropping season with the objective of identifying the optimum and economically feasible integrated decomposed cattle manure and in-organic fertilizer for finger millet production in western part of Ethiopia. The experiment contains five level of in organic fertilizer 0, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of recommended inorganic fertilizer and four level of decomposed cattle manure 0, 3tone/ha, 6tone/ha and 9tone/ha combined in factorial arrangement in RCBD design. The integrated fertilizer affected grain yield, dry biomass, ear length, harvest index, effective tillers per plant, number of fingers per plant and plant height. The highest grain yield 2546kg/ha was observed on integration of 100% and 9tone/ha when 2195kg/ha from the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended fertilizer. The number of effective tillers per plant was not affected by the fertilizer. In economic analysis both integration of 100% with 9ton and 75% with 6tone/ha were economically feasible having 758 and 998 MRR respectively. Using 75% recommended fertilizer and 6tone/hectare is more economical. Therefore, it is advisable for farmers using the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended inorganic fertilizer. }, year = {2025} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effects of Integrated Decomposed Cattle Manure and Blended (NPSB) Inorganic Fertilizer on Yield and Yield Components of Finger Millet (Eleusine Coracana (L) Gaertn.) in West Region of Ethiopia AU - Fufa Anbessa AU - Hayssilu Feyisa AU - Galata Garama Y1 - 2025/06/23 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11 T2 - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JF - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society JO - International Journal of Science, Technology and Society SP - 88 EP - 96 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7420 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijsts.20251303.11 AB - Finger millet (Eleusine coracana L.) is major food crop of semi-aid of tropics of Africa and Asia which is indigenous to Ethiopia. The experiment was conducted in western part of Ethiopia Bako, B/Boshe and Gute in 2020-2022 cropping season with the objective of identifying the optimum and economically feasible integrated decomposed cattle manure and in-organic fertilizer for finger millet production in western part of Ethiopia. The experiment contains five level of in organic fertilizer 0, 25%, 50%, 75% and 100% of recommended inorganic fertilizer and four level of decomposed cattle manure 0, 3tone/ha, 6tone/ha and 9tone/ha combined in factorial arrangement in RCBD design. The integrated fertilizer affected grain yield, dry biomass, ear length, harvest index, effective tillers per plant, number of fingers per plant and plant height. The highest grain yield 2546kg/ha was observed on integration of 100% and 9tone/ha when 2195kg/ha from the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended fertilizer. The number of effective tillers per plant was not affected by the fertilizer. In economic analysis both integration of 100% with 9ton and 75% with 6tone/ha were economically feasible having 758 and 998 MRR respectively. Using 75% recommended fertilizer and 6tone/hectare is more economical. Therefore, it is advisable for farmers using the integration of 6tone/ha and 75% recommended inorganic fertilizer. VL - 13 IS - 3 ER -