As the development of society is continued and lays a great impact on society, nonprofit organizations are also under this influence and are prompted to change and grow vigorously. According to Henry Mintzberg, he believes that change is not single-factor directed. It is not a simple linear process. It is a complex process with intricate relations. Accordingly, change in organizations can be depicted as a system of moving cycles [1]. At present nonprofit organizations are facing a series of reforms which is an irresistible trend. However, the nonprofit organizations are surrounded by barriers which impede their development. This article will analyze the factors which hinder the advance of nonprofit organizations. Within organizations, internal reasons mainly include the restriction of ideas, institutional systems and inadequate resources. External reasons mainly include the restriction of system and government.
Published in | International and Public Affairs (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13 |
Page(s) | 23-27 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Non-profit Organizations, Government, Management, Resources
[1] | Henry Minzberg, and Frances Westley (1992). Cycles of organizational change. Strategic Management Journal. |
[2] | Wang Jun (2015). Study on the path of private social work institution transform into the social enterprise. Anhui University. |
[3] | Pan Hanqing (2017). A preliminary study on the social circle of social workers in China. Capital University of Economics and Business. |
[4] | Feng Guan (2005). Research on organizational inertial change management. Liaoning Technical university. |
[5] | Finkelstein, S., and Hambrick (1990). Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly. |
[6] | Nelson, R. R., and Winter, S. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press: Cambridge MA. |
[7] | Tian, Rong (2009). Development and transformation: A case study on social welfare nongovernmental organizations in Hong Kong. The University of Hong Kong. |
[8] | Garcia-Morales VJ, Florens-Montes. FJ, Verdu-Jover AJ. (2007). The effects of transformational leadership on organizational performance through knowledge and innovation. British Journal of Management. |
[9] | Zeng Jia, and Wang Na (2014). Analysis of problems faced by non-profit organizations in transformation of public welfare enterprises. Oriental Enterprise Culture. |
[10] | Sun Hua (2014). The development and reflection of private social work institutions——Based on the investigation of Nanjing's development status. Journal of Nanjing Radio & Television University. |
[11] | Cyert, R. M., and March, J. G. (1963). A behavioral theory of the firm, Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, NJ. |
[12] | Cui Jinghong (2017). An analysis of the dilemma of charitable foundation in social governance and the countermeasures. Shandong University. |
[13] | Lu Jinkang (2016). An analysis of the professional path of the modern transformation of China's social public welfare organizations. The Modern Occupation Education. |
[14] | Deng Guosheng (2001). A preliminary analysis of China's questionnaire survey. United Nations Centre for Regional Development, Institute of Science, Technology and Society, Tsinghua University, BJ. |
[15] | Jiang Yazhou, and Shi Congmei (2018). Feasibility analysis of the transformation of public welfare institutions to social enterprises——Based on the comparison of transformation experiences of three hospitals in Suzhou. Journal of Fujian Provincial Committee Party School of CPC. |
[16] | W. R. Scott (2001). Institutions and Organizations. California: Sage Publications. Inc. |
[17] | Zhang Yan, and Shi Bonian (2016). Education, providing professional support for the development of social work. China Social Work. |
[18] | Guo Xiaohui (2015). Research on the governance of charitable organizations commercialization in China. Shandong University. |
[19] | Zhou Hongyun (2016). Charity's institutional environment and transformation. China Social Organization. |
[20] | Wang Ming, and Sun Weilin (2011). Social organization management system: internal logic and development trend. Chinese Public Administration. |
[21] | Szelényi, I. (1983). Urban inequalities under state socialism. New York: Oxford University Press. |
[22] | Liu Zhimeng (2012). Studies on Chinese social enterprise in charity dilemma—— The amity bakery as a case. Nanjing University of Science & Technology. |
[23] | Zhang Sanbao, and Zhang Zhixue (2012). Regional system differences, CEO management sovereignty and corporate risk assumption——Evidence from 30 provincial technological industries. Management World. |
APA Style
Zhang Pengpeng. (2018). Difficulties in Leading Change in Non-profit Organizations. International and Public Affairs, 2(1), 23-27. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13
ACS Style
Zhang Pengpeng. Difficulties in Leading Change in Non-profit Organizations. Int. Public Aff. 2018, 2(1), 23-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13
AMA Style
Zhang Pengpeng. Difficulties in Leading Change in Non-profit Organizations. Int Public Aff. 2018;2(1):23-27. doi: 10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13
@article{10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13, author = {Zhang Pengpeng}, title = {Difficulties in Leading Change in Non-profit Organizations}, journal = {International and Public Affairs}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {23-27}, doi = {10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ipa.20180201.13}, abstract = {As the development of society is continued and lays a great impact on society, nonprofit organizations are also under this influence and are prompted to change and grow vigorously. According to Henry Mintzberg, he believes that change is not single-factor directed. It is not a simple linear process. It is a complex process with intricate relations. Accordingly, change in organizations can be depicted as a system of moving cycles [1]. At present nonprofit organizations are facing a series of reforms which is an irresistible trend. However, the nonprofit organizations are surrounded by barriers which impede their development. This article will analyze the factors which hinder the advance of nonprofit organizations. Within organizations, internal reasons mainly include the restriction of ideas, institutional systems and inadequate resources. External reasons mainly include the restriction of system and government.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Difficulties in Leading Change in Non-profit Organizations AU - Zhang Pengpeng Y1 - 2018/05/07 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13 T2 - International and Public Affairs JF - International and Public Affairs JO - International and Public Affairs SP - 23 EP - 27 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4192 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20180201.13 AB - As the development of society is continued and lays a great impact on society, nonprofit organizations are also under this influence and are prompted to change and grow vigorously. According to Henry Mintzberg, he believes that change is not single-factor directed. It is not a simple linear process. It is a complex process with intricate relations. Accordingly, change in organizations can be depicted as a system of moving cycles [1]. At present nonprofit organizations are facing a series of reforms which is an irresistible trend. However, the nonprofit organizations are surrounded by barriers which impede their development. This article will analyze the factors which hinder the advance of nonprofit organizations. Within organizations, internal reasons mainly include the restriction of ideas, institutional systems and inadequate resources. External reasons mainly include the restriction of system and government. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -