Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department

Bernard Naledzani Rasila

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department

Bernard Naledzani Rasila

Published in International and Public Affairs (Volume 5, Issue 2)

Received: 8 June 2021 Accepted: 30 June 2021 Published: 23 August 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Educators are in the “coal-front” of teaching and learning in all schools and they therefore are key in curriculum delivery. They are at the level that drives the direction of education in terms of quality production. They are however less considered in departmental strategic planning sessions, the fora that gives the strategic direction education has to take. This leaves them with hard work to teach and develop the learners but not aware of the strategic vision, mission and goals of the education sector. This is despite that they have to be capacitated with government priorities related to education in each period of an administration as part of them changing with the Medium term strategic Frame Works (MTSF). This qualitative study used data collected from secondary sources, interviews and observations and realised that in many ways educators are not guided by priorities of government and the department in line with the MTSF as they are mostly denied opportunity to be engaged in effective levels of strategic planning. This has impact on quality of education received by the learners in particular responding to the socio-economic needs in their country. It creates disparities between the hard work educators do in classes and the expected impact. The study recommend that the educators are prioritized in terms of becoming active participants of during strategic planning in their departments.

Published in	International and Public Affairs (Volume 5, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11
Page(s)	44-49
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Impact Statement, Vision, Mission, Outcomes, Teaching and Learning

References

[1]	Bakewell, O., Adams, J. & Pratt, B., 2003, Sharpening the development processes: A practical guide to monitoring and evaluation, Intract, Praxis Serial 1, Oxford, Great Britain.
[2]	Brest, P., 2010, The power of Theory of Change. Stanford Social Review Spring.
[3]	Kombate, B., Emmannuel, M & Richard, K., 2021, The implication of the Strategic Implementation Style and Middle Management Effort in Public Organisation Strategic Management Implementation and Its Organisational Performance. Journal of Public Administration and Governance, Vol. 11. No. 1. ISSN pp 216107104.
[4]	Oxford South African Concise Dictionary, 2010, Oxford University Press South Africa (pty) LTD, Cape Town.
[5]	Quarterly Community Survey report, 2021, Statistics South Africa (StatsSA), June 2021, Pretoria, South Africa.
[6]	Revised National Evaluation Policy Framework, 2019. Department of Planning, Monitoring and Evaluation (DPME), Pretoria, South Africa.
[7]	The Constitution of South Africa, 1996, The parliament of the Republic of South Africa, Cape Town.
[8]	Lu, Y., 2009, Challenges for China’s international communication: University of Nottingham. UK.
[9]	Rasila, B. N., Mashau, T. S. & Obadire, O. S, 2020, Levels of adherence to Covid-19 regulations and protocols by community members during lockdown alert 3 in the Limpopo Province, South Africa. Gender & Bahaviour, Vol. 18 (4), 2020 ISSN: 1598-9231 Copyright ©2020 Center for Pshychological Studies/services, lle-ife, Nigerial.
[10]	Rasila, B. N. & Mudau, J., 2014, An effective Communication Framework for rural development, Prime journal of social Sciences 3 (3), 612-617.
[11]	Schramm, W., 1964, Mass media and national development. Stanford University Press.
[12]	Skinner, T., 1997, How to facilitate a strategic planning session. Rhythm Systems.com/blog/how_to_facilitate_a_strategic_planning session (26 May 2021).
[13]	Strategic Planning, 200, Metayes. E. Business Funding in 24hrs, December 30, 2000.
[14]	Strategic Plan 2020-2025, Limpopo Department of Education, Polokwane, Limpopo Province, South Africa.
[15]	Sun Tzu, 2005, The art of war, Shambalala, Boston, MA.
[16]	Wotela, K., 2017, Using systems thinking to conceptually link the monitoring and evaluation function within development interventions and public policy, The journal for Transdisciplinary Research in South Africa 13 (1), a398. https://doi.org/10.4102/ltd.v13i1.398.
[17]	Revised framework for strategic plans and annual performance plans 2019-2024.
[18]	The Limpopo Development Plan (as amended (2015-2019).

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Bernard Naledzani Rasila. (2021). Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department. International and Public Affairs, 5(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Bernard Naledzani Rasila. Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department. Int. Public Aff. 2021, 5(2), 44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Bernard Naledzani Rasila. Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department. Int Public Aff. 2021;5(2):44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11,
  author = {Bernard Naledzani Rasila},
  title = {Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department},
  journal = {International and Public Affairs},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {44-49},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ipa.20210502.11},
  abstract = {Educators are in the “coal-front” of teaching and learning in all schools and they therefore are key in curriculum delivery. They are at the level that drives the direction of education in terms of quality production. They are however less considered in departmental strategic planning sessions, the fora that gives the strategic direction education has to take. This leaves them with hard work to teach and develop the learners but not aware of the strategic vision, mission and goals of the education sector. This is despite that they have to be capacitated with government priorities related to education in each period of an administration as part of them changing with the Medium term strategic Frame Works (MTSF). This qualitative study used data collected from secondary sources, interviews and observations and realised that in many ways educators are not guided by priorities of government and the department in line with the MTSF as they are mostly denied opportunity to be engaged in effective levels of strategic planning. This has impact on quality of education received by the learners in particular responding to the socio-economic needs in their country. It creates disparities between the hard work educators do in classes and the expected impact. The study recommend that the educators are prioritized in terms of becoming active participants of during strategic planning in their departments.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department
AU  - Bernard Naledzani Rasila
Y1  - 2021/08/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11
T2  - International and Public Affairs
JF  - International and Public Affairs
JO  - International and Public Affairs
SP  - 44
EP  - 49
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-4192
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11
AB  - Educators are in the “coal-front” of teaching and learning in all schools and they therefore are key in curriculum delivery. They are at the level that drives the direction of education in terms of quality production. They are however less considered in departmental strategic planning sessions, the fora that gives the strategic direction education has to take. This leaves them with hard work to teach and develop the learners but not aware of the strategic vision, mission and goals of the education sector. This is despite that they have to be capacitated with government priorities related to education in each period of an administration as part of them changing with the Medium term strategic Frame Works (MTSF). This qualitative study used data collected from secondary sources, interviews and observations and realised that in many ways educators are not guided by priorities of government and the department in line with the MTSF as they are mostly denied opportunity to be engaged in effective levels of strategic planning. This has impact on quality of education received by the learners in particular responding to the socio-economic needs in their country. It creates disparities between the hard work educators do in classes and the expected impact. The study recommend that the educators are prioritized in terms of becoming active participants of during strategic planning in their departments.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Bernard Naledzani Rasila

Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Directorate, Limpopo Department of Education, Polokwane, South Africa

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Bernard Naledzani Rasila. (2021). Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department. International and Public Affairs, 5(2), 44-49. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Bernard Naledzani Rasila. Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department. Int. Public Aff. 2021, 5(2), 44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Bernard Naledzani Rasila. Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department. Int Public Aff. 2021;5(2):44-49. doi: 10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11,
  author = {Bernard Naledzani Rasila},
  title = {Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department},
  journal = {International and Public Affairs},
  volume = {5},
  number = {2},
  pages = {44-49},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ipa.20210502.11},
  abstract = {Educators are in the “coal-front” of teaching and learning in all schools and they therefore are key in curriculum delivery. They are at the level that drives the direction of education in terms of quality production. They are however less considered in departmental strategic planning sessions, the fora that gives the strategic direction education has to take. This leaves them with hard work to teach and develop the learners but not aware of the strategic vision, mission and goals of the education sector. This is despite that they have to be capacitated with government priorities related to education in each period of an administration as part of them changing with the Medium term strategic Frame Works (MTSF). This qualitative study used data collected from secondary sources, interviews and observations and realised that in many ways educators are not guided by priorities of government and the department in line with the MTSF as they are mostly denied opportunity to be engaged in effective levels of strategic planning. This has impact on quality of education received by the learners in particular responding to the socio-economic needs in their country. It creates disparities between the hard work educators do in classes and the expected impact. The study recommend that the educators are prioritized in terms of becoming active participants of during strategic planning in their departments.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Exploration of Involvement of Educators’ in Strategic Planning Sessions of their Department
AU  - Bernard Naledzani Rasila
Y1  - 2021/08/23
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11
T2  - International and Public Affairs
JF  - International and Public Affairs
JO  - International and Public Affairs
SP  - 44
EP  - 49
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2640-4192
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ipa.20210502.11
AB  - Educators are in the “coal-front” of teaching and learning in all schools and they therefore are key in curriculum delivery. They are at the level that drives the direction of education in terms of quality production. They are however less considered in departmental strategic planning sessions, the fora that gives the strategic direction education has to take. This leaves them with hard work to teach and develop the learners but not aware of the strategic vision, mission and goals of the education sector. This is despite that they have to be capacitated with government priorities related to education in each period of an administration as part of them changing with the Medium term strategic Frame Works (MTSF). This qualitative study used data collected from secondary sources, interviews and observations and realised that in many ways educators are not guided by priorities of government and the department in line with the MTSF as they are mostly denied opportunity to be engaged in effective levels of strategic planning. This has impact on quality of education received by the learners in particular responding to the socio-economic needs in their country. It creates disparities between the hard work educators do in classes and the expected impact. The study recommend that the educators are prioritized in terms of becoming active participants of during strategic planning in their departments.
VL  - 5
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download