Indonesia is one of the countries in the world that has the potential of natural resources in the form of oil and gas. As a resource that plays an important role in economic life, the utilization of oil and gas needs to be managed properly and correctly. Preparation of the balance of natural resources is an important part of the management of wealth controlled by the state. The value of resources must be known so that the government can make the right policies, especially for oil and gas fields that will be terminated. One of the oil and gas resources which has significant production value and impact on the Indonesian economy is the "X" field in East Kalimantan. This study aims to provide an overview of oil and gas processing in the "X" field, estimate the monetary value of oil and gas volumes in a certain period and analyze policies that can encourage the management of the remaining oil and gas fields more optimally. The data used in the research are sourced from the results of discussions, field observations, studies of government policy literature, and company documentation. The analysis conducted in this study is divided into description analysis, oil and gas balance analysis and policy analysis. The analytical tools used are a study of government and company policy literature, the Net Present Value (NVP) method and the Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method. Based on the analysis, the physical value of proven oil and gas reserves in the "X" field amounted to 322,988,294 barrels & 420,745,986 MSCF; while the monetary value of oil and gas reserves amounting to IDR 222.655.210.375.641 (oil) and IDR 722,623,266,696 (gas) until 2018. Analysis of policies for the development of the "X" field taking into account economic, social and HSE (Health, Safety and Environmental) criteria results in a conclusion that Gross Split policy alternatives have the highest value for the draft of as business as usual policy when compared to the Cost Recovery policy and the Cost and Fee policy.
Published in | Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 5, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12 |
Page(s) | 121-129 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Oil and Gas, Physical and Monetary Balance, NVP, Multi Criteria Decision Analysis, Policy
[1] | Belmazouzi, Y & et al. Contribution to the ageing control of onshore oil and gas fields. 2019. LRPI Laboratory, Institute of Health and Safety - University of Batna. Algeria. |
[2] | Bergh VDJ. Handbook of Environmental and Resource Economics. 1999. Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing, Inc. |
[3] | Cooper, D. R., Schindler, P. S. Business Research Methods 12th Edition. 2014. McGraw-Hill. United States. |
[4] | Decree of the Minister of Finance. The Strategy and Policy Guidelines of the Ministry of Finance. 2005. Number: 464 / KMK. 01 / 2005. Jakarta. |
[5] | Decree of the Minister of Finance. Organization and Work Procedures of the Ministry of Finance. 2006. Number: 466 / KMK. 01 / 2006. Jakarta. |
[6] | Decree of the Minister of Finance. Blueprint of the Ministry of Finance's Institutional Transformation Program 2014-2025. 2014. Number: 36 / KMK. 01 / 2014. Jakarta. |
[7] | E. Veldhuizen and et al. Valuation of Oil and Gas Reserves in Netherlands 1990-2005. 2009. Statistics Netherlands Discussion Paper (09029). |
[8] | Fauzi, A. Natural Resources Economic & Environment. Theory and Application. 2006. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta. |
[9] | Grundy, B. D., and Heaney, R. Valuation of Crude Oil and Gas Reserves. 2008. SSRN-id1966829. |
[10] | Howes, J. V. C.. Petroleum resources and petroleum systems of SE Asia, Australia, Papua New Guinea, and New Zealand. 1997. Proceedings of an International Conference on Petroleum Systems of SE Asia & Australasia: Indonesian Petroleum Association, p. 81-100. |
[11] | Höök, M. Depletion and Decline Curve Analysis in Crude Oil Production. 2009. Global Energy Systems Department for Physics and Astronomy, Uppsala University. |
[12] | Jafari, Y & Othman, J. Accounting for Depletion of Oil and Gas Resources in Malaysia. 2011. National University of Malaysia. Malaysia. |
[13] | Kadir, A & Suzandi, E. Alternative Models of Oil and Gas Cooperation Contracts. National Symposium on the Indonesian Petroleum Engineering Association (IATMI) 2005. Bandung. |
[14] | Kahraman C. Fuzzy Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: Theory and Applications with Recent Developments. 2008. New York: Springer. |
[15] | Khojastehmehr, M & et al. Screening of enhanced oil recovery techniques for Iranian oil reservoirs using TOPSIS algorithm. 2019. Energy Reports 5 (2019) 529–544. Elsevier Ltd. |
[16] | Liana, L. Using Analytical Hierarchy Process to Determine Approriate Minimum Attractive Rate of Return for Oil and Gas Project in Indonesia. 2014. PM World Jurnal Volume III, Issue II. |
[17] | Magoon, LB and Dow, W. G. The Petroleum System-from Sources on Trap. 1994. AAPG Memoir 60. USA. |
[18] | Masyitoh, OC. Assessment of Oil and Gas Reserves as Wealth Under the State of Study in the "Sranta" Field. 2016. Gajah Mada University. Yogyakarta. |
[19] | Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources [KESDM]. Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources. 2017. Number 08 2017 concerning Gross Split Revenue Sharing Contracts. Jakarta. |
[20] | Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources [KESDM]. Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources. 2017. Number 52 2017 concerning Amendment to the Regulation of the Minister of Energy and Mineral Resources Number 08 2017 concerning Gross Split Production Sharing Contract. Jakarta. |
[21] | Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources [KESDM]. Handbook of Energy & Economic Statistics of Indonesia. 2018. Jakarta (ID). |
[22] | Perman, R and et all. “Natural Resource and Environment Economics”. 2002. Vol. 3rd Edition. Essex, UK: Pearson Education Limited. |
[23] | Pickles, E., and Smith, J. L. Petroleum Property Valuation: A Binomial Lattice Implementation of Option Pricing Theory. 1993. The Energy Journal, Vol 14, No 2. IAEE. United States. |
[24] | Private, A. Z. 2012. Investment Valuation in Comparative Drilling Wells of DCF and Real Option Methods in the Sanga-Sanga Block (Study on VICO Indonesia). Unpublished thesis. Postgraduate Program at Gadjah Mada University, Yogyakarta. |
[25] | Raheditya, R. Analysis of Investment Project Decision on the Installation of Compressor Booster as an Effort to Maintain the Production of Natural Gas Offshore l-Parigi in PT. PEP with AHP and Topsis Method. 2016. ITS. Surabaya. |
[26] | Schreyer, P. and C. Obst, ‘Towards Complete Balance Sheets in the National Accounts: The Case of Mineral and Energy Resources’. 2015. OECD Green Growth Papers, No. 2015/02, OECD Publishing, Paris. |
[27] | SKK Migas. Annual Report 2016. 2016. Jakarta. |
[28] | SKK Migas. Work Procedure Guidelines. PTK-037. 2018. Jakarta |
[29] | Society of Petroleum Engineers dan World Petroleum Council. Petroleum Resources Management System. 2007. World Petroleum Council. |
[30] | Suparmoko, M., Sudirman, D., Setyarko, Y., and Wibowo, H. S. Economic and Natural Resource Economic. 2014. Valuation First Edition. BPFE. Yogyakarta. |
[31] | Tampubolon, B. Analysis of Geothermal Energy Utilization Policy as Alternative Power Generation. 2015. Bogor Agricultural University Postgraduate School. Bogor. |
[32] | Virine, L., Murphy, D. Analysis of Multi-Criteria Decision Making Methodologies for the Petroleum Industry. 2007. IPTC 11765, International Petroleum Technology Conference, 4-6 December 2007, Dubai. |
[33] | Wang TC, Lee HD. Developing a Fuzzy TOPSIS Approach Based on Subjective Weights and Objective Weights. 2009. Expert System with Applications. 36 (2009): 8980-8985. Elsevier Ltd. |
APA Style
Ramli Nonci, Akhmad Fauzi, Fifi Diana Thamrin. (2020). Oil and Gas Balance Analysis (Case Study of "X" Field). Journal of Business and Economic Development, 5(3), 121-129. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12
ACS Style
Ramli Nonci; Akhmad Fauzi; Fifi Diana Thamrin. Oil and Gas Balance Analysis (Case Study of "X" Field). J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2020, 5(3), 121-129. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12
AMA Style
Ramli Nonci, Akhmad Fauzi, Fifi Diana Thamrin. Oil and Gas Balance Analysis (Case Study of "X" Field). J Bus Econ Dev. 2020;5(3):121-129. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12
@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12, author = {Ramli Nonci and Akhmad Fauzi and Fifi Diana Thamrin}, title = {Oil and Gas Balance Analysis (Case Study of "X" Field)}, journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development}, volume = {5}, number = {3}, pages = {121-129}, doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20200503.12}, abstract = {Indonesia is one of the countries in the world that has the potential of natural resources in the form of oil and gas. As a resource that plays an important role in economic life, the utilization of oil and gas needs to be managed properly and correctly. Preparation of the balance of natural resources is an important part of the management of wealth controlled by the state. The value of resources must be known so that the government can make the right policies, especially for oil and gas fields that will be terminated. One of the oil and gas resources which has significant production value and impact on the Indonesian economy is the "X" field in East Kalimantan. This study aims to provide an overview of oil and gas processing in the "X" field, estimate the monetary value of oil and gas volumes in a certain period and analyze policies that can encourage the management of the remaining oil and gas fields more optimally. The data used in the research are sourced from the results of discussions, field observations, studies of government policy literature, and company documentation. The analysis conducted in this study is divided into description analysis, oil and gas balance analysis and policy analysis. The analytical tools used are a study of government and company policy literature, the Net Present Value (NVP) method and the Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method. Based on the analysis, the physical value of proven oil and gas reserves in the "X" field amounted to 322,988,294 barrels & 420,745,986 MSCF; while the monetary value of oil and gas reserves amounting to IDR 222.655.210.375.641 (oil) and IDR 722,623,266,696 (gas) until 2018. Analysis of policies for the development of the "X" field taking into account economic, social and HSE (Health, Safety and Environmental) criteria results in a conclusion that Gross Split policy alternatives have the highest value for the draft of as business as usual policy when compared to the Cost Recovery policy and the Cost and Fee policy.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Oil and Gas Balance Analysis (Case Study of "X" Field) AU - Ramli Nonci AU - Akhmad Fauzi AU - Fifi Diana Thamrin Y1 - 2020/07/13 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12 T2 - Journal of Business and Economic Development JF - Journal of Business and Economic Development JO - Journal of Business and Economic Development SP - 121 EP - 129 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3874 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20200503.12 AB - Indonesia is one of the countries in the world that has the potential of natural resources in the form of oil and gas. As a resource that plays an important role in economic life, the utilization of oil and gas needs to be managed properly and correctly. Preparation of the balance of natural resources is an important part of the management of wealth controlled by the state. The value of resources must be known so that the government can make the right policies, especially for oil and gas fields that will be terminated. One of the oil and gas resources which has significant production value and impact on the Indonesian economy is the "X" field in East Kalimantan. This study aims to provide an overview of oil and gas processing in the "X" field, estimate the monetary value of oil and gas volumes in a certain period and analyze policies that can encourage the management of the remaining oil and gas fields more optimally. The data used in the research are sourced from the results of discussions, field observations, studies of government policy literature, and company documentation. The analysis conducted in this study is divided into description analysis, oil and gas balance analysis and policy analysis. The analytical tools used are a study of government and company policy literature, the Net Present Value (NVP) method and the Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) method. Based on the analysis, the physical value of proven oil and gas reserves in the "X" field amounted to 322,988,294 barrels & 420,745,986 MSCF; while the monetary value of oil and gas reserves amounting to IDR 222.655.210.375.641 (oil) and IDR 722,623,266,696 (gas) until 2018. Analysis of policies for the development of the "X" field taking into account economic, social and HSE (Health, Safety and Environmental) criteria results in a conclusion that Gross Split policy alternatives have the highest value for the draft of as business as usual policy when compared to the Cost Recovery policy and the Cost and Fee policy. VL - 5 IS - 3 ER -