This study focused its attention to the link among firm size and CEO compensation of firms listed at the NSE. Previous researchers have identified firm’s characteristics that influence the firm’s ability to perform. The identified characteristics include firm size, age, reputation and legitimacy. A firm’s characteristics could be described through reference to resources the firm owns and by the organization’s objectives. Previous researches examined the factors influencing CEO compensation revealed a lack of consensus to the explanation of increases in CEO’S compensation. While most of the studies confirm linkages between organizational performance and CEO compensation, they measured organizational performance using financial indicators of performance, this study investigates the link between firm size and CEOs compensation. The study’s population constituted 40 firms listed at the NSE. A mixed design was adopted in the study. Primary data was gathered to capture the opinion of board members on firm size characteristics that determine levels of CEO’S compensation using semi structured questionnaire. Secondary sources of data were used to gather information on financial performance from the financial statement of the listed organizations for 2016-2017 financial periods. Descriptive statistics, correlations, linear, multiple and stepwise regression were applied in analyzing and interpreting the data that was collected. The research revealed that there was significant and positive relationship between firm size and CEOs compensation. The findings of this study are of benefit to board members of organizations in identifying the performance measures that are important to consider when making decisions on CEO remuneration.
Published in | Journal of Business and Economic Development (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13 |
Page(s) | 23-29 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Firm Size, CEO Compensation, Nairobi Securities Exchange, Performance, Firm Characteristics
[1] | Abed, S. Suwaidan, M. & Slimani, S. (2014). The determinants of Chief Executive Officer Compensation in Jordanian Industrial Corporations, International Journal of Economics and Finance; Vol. 6, pp 110-118. |
[2] | Aduda, J. (2011). The Relationship between Executive Compensation and Firm Performance in the Kenyan Banking Sector, Journal of Accounting and Taxation, Vol. 3 (6), 130-139. |
[3] | Agrawal, A. & Charles, R. K. (1998). Managerial Compensation and the treat of Takeover. Journal of Financial Economics, 47: 2, pp. 219-39. |
[4] | Alchian, A. & Demsetz, H. (1972). Production, information costs, and economic organization. American Economic Review, 62: 777-795. |
[5] | Allen, M. P. (1981). Power and Privilege in the Large Corporation. Corporate Control and Managerial Compensation. American Journal of Sociology 86: 1112-1123. |
[6] | Brown, J., & Fraser, M. (2006). Approaches and perspective in social and Environmental Accounting; An overview of the conceptual landscape, Business Strategy and Environment. Vol: 15: 103-117. |
[7] | Buigut, K., Soi, N. & Koskei, I. (2014). Determinants of CEO Compensation Evidence from UK Public Limited Companies, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 10, No. 1; 2015. |
[8] | Bushman, R. M., Indjejikian, R. J. and Smith, A. (1996). “CEO compensation: the role of individual performance evaluation”, Journal of Accounting and economics, Vol. 21, pp. 161-193. |
[9] | Ciscel, D. H. (1974). ‘Determinants of executive compensation’. Southern Economic Journal.’ 40, 613-617. |
[10] | Chalmers, K., Koh, P. S., Stapledon, G. (2006). ‘The determinants of CEO compensation. Rent extraction or labor demand?’ The British Accounting Review 38, 259-275. |
[11] | Charan, R. (2005). Boards that deliver, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. |
[12] | Cheng, S., Venky, N. & Madhar, V. R. (2001). Control versus Risk in Stock-Based Incentives: Evidence from Antitakeover Regulation. Working paper, University of Michigan Business School. |
[13] | Chingos, P. T. (2004). Responsible Executive Compensation for a New Era of Accountability. Wiley. |
[14] | Chung, Y. (2010. CEO Ability, Pay, and Firm Performance. JEL Classification: G34, J24, J33. |
[15] | Certs, S. T., Daily C. M., Cannella, A. & Dalton, D. (2003). Giving Money to Get Money: How CEO stock option and CEO Equity Enhance IPO valuations, The Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 46, Academy of Management. |
[16] | Collingwood, H. (2009). DO CEO’S matter? June 25009 Atlantic Magazine, on line Edition. |
[17] | Eisenhardt, K. M. & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996). Resource-based view of Strategic alliance formation; Strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firm, Journal of Organization Science Vol. 7, Pg. 136-150. |
[18] | Epstein, M and Roy, M. (2002). Measuring and improving the Performance of Corporate Board. The Society of Management Accountants of Canada, Hamilton. |
[19] | Epstein, M. and Roy, M. (2002). Evaluating and Monitoring CEO performance: evidence from US compensation committee reports, The International Journal of Business in So and Country Institutional Development. Working paper. |
[20] | Farmer, M. (2008). Chief Executive Compensation and Company Performance: a weak relationship or measurement weaknesses? Kingston University, UK. |
[21] | Finkelstein, S. & Hambrick D. C., (1989). Chief Executive Compensation: a study of the intersection of markets and political processes, Strategic Management Journal Vol. 10. |
[22] | Fleming, G., & Stellios, G. (2002). CEO compensation, Managerial Agency and boards of directors in Australia. Accounting Research Journal, 15 (2), 126-145. |
[23] | Fong, E. A. (2004). ‘Chief Executive Officer (CEO) Responses to CEO Compensatin Equity.’ University of Florida. |
[24] | Caroline, Y. Parbudyal, S. Jing, W. (2019). The effects of firm size and firm performance on CEO pay in Canada: A Re-Examination and Extension. |
[25] | Fabián Blanes, Cristina de Fuentes & Rubén Porcuna (2020) Executiveremuneration determinants: New evidence from meta-analysis, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja, 33: 1, 2844-2866, DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1678503. |
[26] | Mary S. Hill, Thomas J. Lopez, Austin L. Reitenga, (2016) CEO excess compensation: The impact of firm size and managerial power, Advances in Accounting Volume 33, 2016. Pages 35-46, ISSN 0882. |
APA Style
Omamo Anne, Peter K’obonyo, Florence Muindi. (2021). Influence of Firm Size on CEOs Compensation. Journal of Business and Economic Development, 6(1), 23-29. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13
ACS Style
Omamo Anne; Peter K’obonyo; Florence Muindi. Influence of Firm Size on CEOs Compensation. J. Bus. Econ. Dev. 2021, 6(1), 23-29. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13
AMA Style
Omamo Anne, Peter K’obonyo, Florence Muindi. Influence of Firm Size on CEOs Compensation. J Bus Econ Dev. 2021;6(1):23-29. doi: 10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13
@article{10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13, author = {Omamo Anne and Peter K’obonyo and Florence Muindi}, title = {Influence of Firm Size on CEOs Compensation}, journal = {Journal of Business and Economic Development}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {23-29}, doi = {10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jbed.20210601.13}, abstract = {This study focused its attention to the link among firm size and CEO compensation of firms listed at the NSE. Previous researchers have identified firm’s characteristics that influence the firm’s ability to perform. The identified characteristics include firm size, age, reputation and legitimacy. A firm’s characteristics could be described through reference to resources the firm owns and by the organization’s objectives. Previous researches examined the factors influencing CEO compensation revealed a lack of consensus to the explanation of increases in CEO’S compensation. While most of the studies confirm linkages between organizational performance and CEO compensation, they measured organizational performance using financial indicators of performance, this study investigates the link between firm size and CEOs compensation. The study’s population constituted 40 firms listed at the NSE. A mixed design was adopted in the study. Primary data was gathered to capture the opinion of board members on firm size characteristics that determine levels of CEO’S compensation using semi structured questionnaire. Secondary sources of data were used to gather information on financial performance from the financial statement of the listed organizations for 2016-2017 financial periods. Descriptive statistics, correlations, linear, multiple and stepwise regression were applied in analyzing and interpreting the data that was collected. The research revealed that there was significant and positive relationship between firm size and CEOs compensation. The findings of this study are of benefit to board members of organizations in identifying the performance measures that are important to consider when making decisions on CEO remuneration.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Influence of Firm Size on CEOs Compensation AU - Omamo Anne AU - Peter K’obonyo AU - Florence Muindi Y1 - 2021/02/27 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13 DO - 10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13 T2 - Journal of Business and Economic Development JF - Journal of Business and Economic Development JO - Journal of Business and Economic Development SP - 23 EP - 29 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3874 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jbed.20210601.13 AB - This study focused its attention to the link among firm size and CEO compensation of firms listed at the NSE. Previous researchers have identified firm’s characteristics that influence the firm’s ability to perform. The identified characteristics include firm size, age, reputation and legitimacy. A firm’s characteristics could be described through reference to resources the firm owns and by the organization’s objectives. Previous researches examined the factors influencing CEO compensation revealed a lack of consensus to the explanation of increases in CEO’S compensation. While most of the studies confirm linkages between organizational performance and CEO compensation, they measured organizational performance using financial indicators of performance, this study investigates the link between firm size and CEOs compensation. The study’s population constituted 40 firms listed at the NSE. A mixed design was adopted in the study. Primary data was gathered to capture the opinion of board members on firm size characteristics that determine levels of CEO’S compensation using semi structured questionnaire. Secondary sources of data were used to gather information on financial performance from the financial statement of the listed organizations for 2016-2017 financial periods. Descriptive statistics, correlations, linear, multiple and stepwise regression were applied in analyzing and interpreting the data that was collected. The research revealed that there was significant and positive relationship between firm size and CEOs compensation. The findings of this study are of benefit to board members of organizations in identifying the performance measures that are important to consider when making decisions on CEO remuneration. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -