Infrastructure projects are the backbone of the economy of the developed counties. Gaza Strip is suffering from non-prioritization of infrastructure project implementation. The objective of this paper was to identify the causes of non-prioritization infrastructure projects in the Gaza Strip. This paper considers the key causes of non-prioritizing infrastructure projects in Gaza Strip. Using an empirical questionnaire survey targeting groups consist of 5 ministries, 25 municipalities, 25 NGOs, international agencies and 59 consultancy firms working in Gaza Strip, respondents were invited to rate the level of importance of 52 causes have been finalized to be involved in this study from the literature. Results revealed that the most important causes are related to the project and its location, the surrounded political and economic environment, donors and project's owner. There is no consideration for local needs in the implementation of the infrastructure projects in the Gaza Strip and there are problems in the process of selecting infrastructure projects priorities by owners of these projects. Furthermore, several donors placing limitations on the type of infrastructure that it can support that related to their working area of aids and according to their political directions. Finally, the political and economic situation in Gaza Strip, and imposed borders blockade affects the decision-making process for the selection of the proposed projects. This paper will help the decision makers to consider the important aspects that should be considered when planning to infrastructure projects.
Published in | Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (Volume 3, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15 |
Page(s) | 29-38 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2018. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Infrastructure Projects, Construction, Prioritization, Gaza Strip
[1] | International Monetary Fund, & van Eden, H. (2015). Making public investment more efficient. Public Financial Management Blog, 2015-2007. |
[2] | OECD, (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) (2015). Towards A framework for the Governance of Infrastructure. Retrieved from Ankara, Turkey. |
[3] | Secchi, C., Bodewig, K., Grosch, M., Peijs, K., Cox, P., Balazs, P., &Brinkhorst, L. (2015). The work plans of the 11 European Coordinators for the TEN T have been finalized, establishing the basis for action until 2030. Brussels, Belgium: The information publishing European Commission, Directorate General for Mobility and Transport. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/infrastructure/news/2015, 5, 28. |
[4] | Nigim, K., Hipel, K., & Smith, G. (2006). An effective multiple criteria approach to infrastructure reconstruction in devastated countries. Journal of Systems Science and Systems Engineering, 15 (2), 232-246. |
[5] | Ziara, M., Nigim, K., Enshassi, A., &Ayyub, B. M. (2002). Strategic implementation of infrastructure priority projects: case study in Palestine. Journal of infrastructure systems, 8 (1), 2-11. |
[6] | Karlsen, J. T. (2008). Forming relationships with stakeholders in engineering projects. European Journal of Industrial Engineering, 2 (1), 35-49. |
[7] | Hammad, S. (2013). Investigating the stakeholder management in construction projects in the Gaza Strip. (Master Thesis), Islamic University, Gaza. |
[8] | Elmahroug, M. H., Tutesigensi, A., & Brookes, N. J. (2014). Integrating external stakeholder identification and project initiation in civil engineering infrastructure projects. Paper presented at the Proceedings 30th Annual ARCOM Conference. |
[9] | Siriwardena, N., Haigh, R., & Ingirige, B. (2010). Managing stakeholder expectations of post-disaster housing reconstruction projects in Sri Lanka. University of Salford, UK, Issue Published paper. |
[10] | Taha, S. (2004). A decision making approach for prioritization of municipal infrastructure projects. Islamic University of Gaza. |
[11] | UNCTAD, (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) (2015). Report on UNCTAD assistance to the Palestinian people: developments in the economy of the Occupied Palestinian Territory. Geneva: United Nations. |
[12] | UNSCO, (United Nations Special Coordinator) (2016). Report to the Ad Hoc Liaison Committee Retrieved from New York, 18-19 September 2016. |
[13] | UNDP, (United Nations Development Program) (2016). Building Resilience in Gaza: Challenges and Opportunities. Paper presented at the Palestine Resilience Conference, Amman, Jordan. 24-25 November 2016. |
[14] | Enshassi, A., Mohamed, S., &Abushaban, S. (2009). Factors affecting the performance of construction projects in the Gaza strip. Journal of Civil engineering and Management, 15 (3), 269-280. |
[15] | PECDAR, (Palestinian Economy Council for Development & Reconstruction). (2008). Infrastructure that needed for Palestinian trade. Retrieved from Jerusalem. |
[16] | Brghooth, G. (2013). Evaluation of infrastructure projects funded by international organizations in Gaza strip from partner's perspective from 2008 to 2012 (Master Thesis), Islamic University of Gaza, Gaza. |
[17] | Birzeit University, Development Studies Programme (2005). Human development report. Retrieved from Ramallah, Palestine. |
[18] | Marcelo, D., Mandri-Perrott, C., House, S., & Schwartz, J. (2015). Prioritization of infrastructure projects: A decision support framework. World, 1. |
[19] | Berechman, J., & Paaswell, R. E. (2005). Evaluation, prioritization and selection of transportation investment projects in New York City. Transportation, 32 (3), 223-249. |
[20] | Burger, P., & Hawkesworth, I. (2011). How to attain value for money: comparing PPP and traditional infrastructure public procurement. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 11 (1), 91. |
[21] | Sartori, D., Catalano, G., Genco, M., Pancotti, C., Sirtori, E., Vignetti, S., & Del Bo, C. (2014). Guide to cost-benefit analysis of investment projects: Economic appraisal tool for cohesion policy 2014–2020. Evaluation Unit, DG Regional Policy, European Commission. |
[22] | Keng’ara, R. (2014). Effect of funds disbursement procedures on implementation of donor projects in Homabay County, Kenya. Universal Journal of Accounting and Finance, 2 (1), 9-23. |
[23] | Rathbone, M., & Redrup, O. (2014). Developing infrastructure in Asia Pacific: Outlook, challenges and solutions. Singapore: Price waterhouse Coopers Services LLP. |
[24] | Roos, K., Wiener, D., Guldimann, R., & Grossmann, M. (2014). Unleashing private capital investments for sustainable infrastructure greenfield projects. Basel, Switzerland: Global Infrastructure Basel Foundation. |
[25] | Runde, D. F., Savoy, C. M., Rice, C. F., Center for, S., & International, S. (2016). Global infrastructure development: a strategic approach to U.S. leadership. |
[26] | World Bank (2014). Prioritizing Projects to Enhance Development Impact. Available from: http://www.worldbank.org [Accessed 25 january 2017]. |
[27] | Liesiö, J., Mild, P., & Salo, A. (2007). Preference programming for robust portfolio modeling and project selection. European Journal of Operational Research, 181 (3), 1488-1505. |
[28] | Nigim, K., Hipel, K., & Smith, G. (2005). An effective approach to infrastructure reconstruction of devastated countries. Paper presented at the Proceedings of international symposium on the analytic hierarchy process. |
[29] | Lane, M. T. D., & Bulir, M. A. (2002). Aid and fiscal management: International Monetary Fund. |
[30] | Jerve, A., & Nissanke, M. (2008). Aid effectiveness to infrastructure: a comparative study of East Asia and sub-Saharan Africa: framework paper. JBICI Research paper, (36-1), 1-68. |
[31] | El-Sawalhi, N. and Mansour, M. (2014). Preparation critical success factors for Public Private Partnership (PPP) projects in Palestine. Journal of Engineering Research and Technology, 1 (2), 52-57. |
[32] | Wai, S., Yusof, A. M., Ismail, S., & Ng, C. (2013). Exploring success factors of social infrastructure projects in malaysia. International Journal of Engineering Business Management, 5, 4. |
APA Style
Nabil El-Sawalhi, Mohammed Salah Sarhan. (2018). Causes of Non-Prioritization of Infrastructure Projects in the Gaza Strip. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 3(1), 29-38. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15
ACS Style
Nabil El-Sawalhi; Mohammed Salah Sarhan. Causes of Non-Prioritization of Infrastructure Projects in the Gaza Strip. J. Civ. Constr. Environ. Eng. 2018, 3(1), 29-38. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15
AMA Style
Nabil El-Sawalhi, Mohammed Salah Sarhan. Causes of Non-Prioritization of Infrastructure Projects in the Gaza Strip. J Civ Constr Environ Eng. 2018;3(1):29-38. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15
@article{10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15, author = {Nabil El-Sawalhi and Mohammed Salah Sarhan}, title = {Causes of Non-Prioritization of Infrastructure Projects in the Gaza Strip}, journal = {Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering}, volume = {3}, number = {1}, pages = {29-38}, doi = {10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jccee.20180301.15}, abstract = {Infrastructure projects are the backbone of the economy of the developed counties. Gaza Strip is suffering from non-prioritization of infrastructure project implementation. The objective of this paper was to identify the causes of non-prioritization infrastructure projects in the Gaza Strip. This paper considers the key causes of non-prioritizing infrastructure projects in Gaza Strip. Using an empirical questionnaire survey targeting groups consist of 5 ministries, 25 municipalities, 25 NGOs, international agencies and 59 consultancy firms working in Gaza Strip, respondents were invited to rate the level of importance of 52 causes have been finalized to be involved in this study from the literature. Results revealed that the most important causes are related to the project and its location, the surrounded political and economic environment, donors and project's owner. There is no consideration for local needs in the implementation of the infrastructure projects in the Gaza Strip and there are problems in the process of selecting infrastructure projects priorities by owners of these projects. Furthermore, several donors placing limitations on the type of infrastructure that it can support that related to their working area of aids and according to their political directions. Finally, the political and economic situation in Gaza Strip, and imposed borders blockade affects the decision-making process for the selection of the proposed projects. This paper will help the decision makers to consider the important aspects that should be considered when planning to infrastructure projects.}, year = {2018} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Causes of Non-Prioritization of Infrastructure Projects in the Gaza Strip AU - Nabil El-Sawalhi AU - Mohammed Salah Sarhan Y1 - 2018/04/08 PY - 2018 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15 DO - 10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15 T2 - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JF - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JO - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering SP - 29 EP - 38 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3890 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20180301.15 AB - Infrastructure projects are the backbone of the economy of the developed counties. Gaza Strip is suffering from non-prioritization of infrastructure project implementation. The objective of this paper was to identify the causes of non-prioritization infrastructure projects in the Gaza Strip. This paper considers the key causes of non-prioritizing infrastructure projects in Gaza Strip. Using an empirical questionnaire survey targeting groups consist of 5 ministries, 25 municipalities, 25 NGOs, international agencies and 59 consultancy firms working in Gaza Strip, respondents were invited to rate the level of importance of 52 causes have been finalized to be involved in this study from the literature. Results revealed that the most important causes are related to the project and its location, the surrounded political and economic environment, donors and project's owner. There is no consideration for local needs in the implementation of the infrastructure projects in the Gaza Strip and there are problems in the process of selecting infrastructure projects priorities by owners of these projects. Furthermore, several donors placing limitations on the type of infrastructure that it can support that related to their working area of aids and according to their political directions. Finally, the political and economic situation in Gaza Strip, and imposed borders blockade affects the decision-making process for the selection of the proposed projects. This paper will help the decision makers to consider the important aspects that should be considered when planning to infrastructure projects. VL - 3 IS - 1 ER -