The work was carried out on the village roads where the traffic intensity is very low. The roads should be constructed as durable and with minimum construction cost without affecting the strength. Therefore the experiments were carried out on different types of roads. The experiments can be performed in the laboratory but that is not sufficient and therefore the tests should also be performed on the actual constructed pavement patches. The non destructive test is the best way to check the parameters responsible for the effectiveness of pavement. The non destructive testing machines like ground penetrating radar (GPR) and falling weight deflectometer is used to assess different parameters of pavements. The subgrade moduli is also compared with the help of these machines. The falling weight deflectometer (FWD) was carried out on the plastic cell filled concrete block pavement (PCCBP), Geocell filled concrete concrete block pavement (GCCBP) and grouted macadam (GM). The deflection, modulus of elasticity, strain, thickness calculation, area, RRS were calculated through this test by the back calculation. From this observation it is found that the geocell filled concrete block pavement performed well as compared to the other pavements in terms of the calculated parameter. The deflection was more in the grouted macadam when compared with the PCCBP and GCCBP.
Published in |
Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (Volume 4, Issue 4)
This article belongs to the Special Issue Computational Technologies in Concrete Structures |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11 |
Page(s) | 73-80 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Deflection, Strain, FWD, Thickness, Concrete Block Pavement
[1] | Andrzej, M. & Marta, M., 2014. Modern NDT Systems for Structural Integrity Examination of Concrete Bridge Structures. Procedia Engineering, Volume 91, pp. 418-423. |
[2] | Anon., 1997. Nondestructive evaluation of concrete with impact-echo and pulse- velocity techniques: 47640 Limaye, H. S.; Krause, R. J. Materials Evaluation, Vol. 49, No. 10, pp. 1312–1315 (Oct. 1991). NDT & E International, Volume 30, pp. 262-263. |
[3] | Asli, C., Feng, Z.-Q., Porcher, G. & Rincent, J.-J., 2012. Back-calculation of elastic modulus of soil and subgrade from portable falling weight deflectometer measurements. Engineering Structures, Volume 34, pp. 1-7. |
[4] | Březina, I., Grošek, J. & Janků, M., 2017. Measurement of Deflections and Determination of Jointed Plain Concrete Pavements Stiffness by Falling Weight Deflectometer. Procedia Engineering, Volume 190, pp. 162-169. |
[5] | Davis, A. G., 2003. The nondestructive impulse response test in North America: 1985–2001. NDT & E International, Volume 36, pp. 185-193. |
[6] | Edwards, L. & Bell, H. P., 2016. Comparative evaluation of nondestructive devices for measuring pavement thickness in the field. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology, Volume 9, pp. 102-111. |
[7] | Gosk, W., 2016. Stiffness Estimation of the Soil Built-in Road Embankment on the Basis of Light Falling Weight Deflectometer Test. Procedia Engineering, Volume 143, pp. 395-402. |
[8] | Guzzarlapudi, S. D., Adigopula, V. K. & Kumar, R., 2016. Comparative studies of lightweight deflectometer and Benkelman beam deflectometer in low volume roads. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Volume 3, pp. 438-447. |
[9] | Hegde, A., 2017. Geocell reinforced foundation beds-past findings, present trends and future prospects: A state-of-the-art review. Construction and Building Materials, Volume 154, pp. 658-674. |
[10] | Lam, M. N.-T., Jaritngam, S. & Le, D.-H., 2017. Roller-compacted concrete pavement made of Electric Arc Furnace slag aggregate: Mix design and mechanical properties. Construction and Building Materials, Volume 154, pp. 482-495. |
[11] | Nega, A., Nikraz, H. & Al-Qadi, I. L., 2016. Dynamic analysis of falling weight deflectometer. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Volume 3, pp. 427-437. |
[12] | Pokharel, S. K., Han, J., Leshchinsky, D. & Parsons, R. L., 2017. Experimental evaluation of geocell-reinforced bases under repeated loading. International Journal of Pavement Research and Technology. |
[13] | Rehman, S. K. U., Ibrahim, Z., Memon, S. A. & Jameel, M., 2016. Nondestructive test methods for concrete bridges: A review. Construction and Building Materials, Volume 107, pp. 58-86. |
[14] | Ruta, P., Krawczyk, B. & Szydło, A., 2015. Identification of pavement elastic moduli by means of impact test. Engineering Structures, Volume 100, pp. 201-211. |
[15] | Sack, D. A. & Olson, L. D., 1995. Advanced NDT methods for evaluating concrete bridges and other structures. NDT & E International, Volume 28, pp. 349-357. |
[16] | Sirithepmontree, H. & Sapsathiarn, Y., 2017. Dynamic Soil Models for Backcalculation of Material Properties from Falling Weight Deflectometer Deflection Data. Procedia Engineering, Volume 189, pp. 152-157. |
[17] | Suku, L., Prabhu, S. S., Ramesh, P. & Babu, G. L. S., 2016. Behavior of geocell-reinforced granular base under repeated loading. Transportation Geotechnics, Volume 9, pp. 17-30. |
[18] | Thakur, J. K., Han, J., Pokharel, S. K. & Parsons, R. L., 2012. Performance of geocell-reinforced recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) bases over weak subgrade under cyclic plate loading. Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Volume 35, pp. 14-24. |
APA Style
Shrikant Madhav Harle, Prakash Pajgade. (2019). Falling Weight Deflectometer Analysis of Low Volume Roads. Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 4(4), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11
ACS Style
Shrikant Madhav Harle; Prakash Pajgade. Falling Weight Deflectometer Analysis of Low Volume Roads. J. Civ. Constr. Environ. Eng. 2019, 4(4), 73-80. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11
AMA Style
Shrikant Madhav Harle, Prakash Pajgade. Falling Weight Deflectometer Analysis of Low Volume Roads. J Civ Constr Environ Eng. 2019;4(4):73-80. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11
@article{10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11, author = {Shrikant Madhav Harle and Prakash Pajgade}, title = {Falling Weight Deflectometer Analysis of Low Volume Roads}, journal = {Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering}, volume = {4}, number = {4}, pages = {73-80}, doi = {10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jccee.20190404.11}, abstract = {The work was carried out on the village roads where the traffic intensity is very low. The roads should be constructed as durable and with minimum construction cost without affecting the strength. Therefore the experiments were carried out on different types of roads. The experiments can be performed in the laboratory but that is not sufficient and therefore the tests should also be performed on the actual constructed pavement patches. The non destructive test is the best way to check the parameters responsible for the effectiveness of pavement. The non destructive testing machines like ground penetrating radar (GPR) and falling weight deflectometer is used to assess different parameters of pavements. The subgrade moduli is also compared with the help of these machines. The falling weight deflectometer (FWD) was carried out on the plastic cell filled concrete block pavement (PCCBP), Geocell filled concrete concrete block pavement (GCCBP) and grouted macadam (GM). The deflection, modulus of elasticity, strain, thickness calculation, area, RRS were calculated through this test by the back calculation. From this observation it is found that the geocell filled concrete block pavement performed well as compared to the other pavements in terms of the calculated parameter. The deflection was more in the grouted macadam when compared with the PCCBP and GCCBP.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Falling Weight Deflectometer Analysis of Low Volume Roads AU - Shrikant Madhav Harle AU - Prakash Pajgade Y1 - 2019/09/23 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11 T2 - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JF - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JO - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering SP - 73 EP - 80 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3890 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20190404.11 AB - The work was carried out on the village roads where the traffic intensity is very low. The roads should be constructed as durable and with minimum construction cost without affecting the strength. Therefore the experiments were carried out on different types of roads. The experiments can be performed in the laboratory but that is not sufficient and therefore the tests should also be performed on the actual constructed pavement patches. The non destructive test is the best way to check the parameters responsible for the effectiveness of pavement. The non destructive testing machines like ground penetrating radar (GPR) and falling weight deflectometer is used to assess different parameters of pavements. The subgrade moduli is also compared with the help of these machines. The falling weight deflectometer (FWD) was carried out on the plastic cell filled concrete block pavement (PCCBP), Geocell filled concrete concrete block pavement (GCCBP) and grouted macadam (GM). The deflection, modulus of elasticity, strain, thickness calculation, area, RRS were calculated through this test by the back calculation. From this observation it is found that the geocell filled concrete block pavement performed well as compared to the other pavements in terms of the calculated parameter. The deflection was more in the grouted macadam when compared with the PCCBP and GCCBP. VL - 4 IS - 4 ER -