Most executed public building projects in Nigeria have a difference between their tender/initial contract sum and final contract sum, and this difference is often caused by variations. Where not properly handled, variations lead to delays, dispute and sometimes project abandonment. The effects of cost of variations on the delivery of public building projects in Nigeria have long been a source of concern to stakeholders. In view of this, the study examined the effects of variations on building costs of selected building projects in Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana (AIFPU) executed within the period (2010-2020), with the purpose to determine their effects on cost of building projects. Historical research design was adopted. Secondary data were used in the analysis. Data on ten (10) completed projects of varying characteristics were collected from the institution’s physical planning unit using purpose sampling. SPSS version 20 tool was used in descriptive analysis of the estimate of the mean, percentage and standard deviation. E-view 8 tool of inferential statistics of regression and correlation were used in the analysis and testing of the hypothesis. The result indicates that increase in cost of variation will lead to 0.881 increase in contract sum. Results also indicate that significant positive relationship exist between variations and final cost of projects with coefficient of determination (R2)=0.602987 tested at 0.05 level. This result indicates that cost of variation has an impact on the final cost of building project and should be guarded against. It was recommended that there should be detailed and continuous planning including costing of a project right from the inception of the project to the completion, involvement of professionals and contactors at the initial stage in order to reduce variations in the project, timely advance payment for procurement should be made among others in others to guard against the impact of variation on public building projects.
Published in | Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering (Volume 6, Issue 6) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12 |
Page(s) | 177-187 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Effects, Variation, Final Cost, Building Project
[1] | Abioma H. (1981). Variation as the most vexatious area of the contractual relationship in the construction industry. Analysis econometric journal of the econometric society 33, 67, 87. Google scholar. |
[2] | Arain, F. M., Assa, F. S. and Laws, P. (2004). Causes of discrepancies between design and construcition, architectural science review, 47 (3) 237–249. |
[3] | Arain, F. M. and Pheng, L. S. (2005). The potential effects of variations order on institutional building projects facilities. Vol 23 No 11/12 Pp 496–510. |
[4] | Balogun, O. O. (1986). Ways and means of reducing project cost in Nigeria “Nigerian institute of architect journal, 2 (3): 28–29. |
[5] | Bromillow, F. J. (1981). The nature and extent of variations to engineering contractors. |
[6] | Charoenngams, Conquinco, S. T. and Hadikwumo, B. H. W. (2004). Web based application for managing change orders in construction, project construction innovation. Vol 3, Pp 197–215. |
[7] | Finsen, E. 2005, ‘The Building Contract - A Commentary on the JBCC Agreements’, 2nd ed., Kenwyn: Juta & Co, Ltd. |
[8] | Gray C. and Will, H. (2005). Building design management, builder worth heineman. |
[9] | Hanna A., Calmic R, Peterson P. A, (2002). Quantitative Definition of Projects Impacted by Change Orders. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. 2002; 128 (1): 57–64. |
[10] | Harbans SKS. (2003). Valuation of Varied Work: A Commentary. In: Bulletin Ingenious, the Board Of Engineers Malaysia. 2003; 20 (3): 32–42. |
[11] | Ibbs, C. W., Wrong, C. K., Kwak, Y. H. (2001). “Project change management system”. Journal of management in engineering vol. 17 no 3 pp. 159–6. |
[12] | Ijaola, I. A. and Iyagboa, O. (2012). A comparative study of causes of change orders in public contraction project in Nigeria and Oman. Journal of engineering trends in economics and management science 3 (5): 495–501. |
[13] | Koushki, P. A., Al-Rashid K & Kartam, N. 2005, 'Delays and Cost Increases in the Construction of Private Residential Projects in Kuwait', Construction Management and Economics, vol. 23, pp 285-294. |
[14] | Koushiki, P. A., Al-Rashidik, and Kartam, N. (2008). Delays and cost increases in the construction of private residential projects in Kuwait, construction management and economics. Vol. 23, Pp 285–294. |
[15] | Love, P. E. D. 2002, 'Influence of Project Type and Procurement Method on Rework Costs in Building Construction Projects', Journal of Construction Engineering andManagement, vol. 128, no. 1, pp 1-29. |
[16] | Mohamed AA. (2001). Analysis and Management of Change Orders for combined Sewer over flow construction projects. Dissertation, Wayne State University Occupational Health and Safety Act No 85 of 1993, 2003, Construction regulation. 2001. |
[17] | Mohammed, A. A. (2001). Analysis and management of change orders for combined fewer over flow construction projects. Dissertation over flow construction projects. Dissertation wagne state university occupational health and safety het No 85 of 1993, 2003 construction regulation. |
[18] | Moselhi O, Charles L, Fazio P. Impact of change orders on construction productivity. Can J Civ Eng. 1998; 18 (4): 484–492. |
[19] | Nigeria Bureau of Statistics (NBS) 2021. |
[20] | Nwachukwu, G. O. (2004). The impact of materials management on projects profitability and corporate survival. NIQS Quarterly Journal 47 (6) 1921. |
[21] | Obiegbu, M. E. (2005). Effective project delivery in Nigeria construction industry effective building procurement and delivery in Nigeria construction industry. Anambra Rex Charles and Patrick limited. |
[22] | Oladipo, A. A. (2007). A quantitative assessment of the cost and time impact of variation orders on construction projects journal of engineering, design and technology 5 (1): 35–48. |
[23] | Skoyles, E. R. & Skoyles, J. R. 1987, ‘Waste Prevention on Site’, London: Michell Publishing Co. Ltd. |
[24] | Ssegawa, J. K., Mfolwe, K. M., Makuke, B. & Kutua, B. 2002, 'Construction Variations: A Scourge or a Necessity?', Proceedings of the First Internationa. |
[25] | Wainwright, W. H. & Wood, A. A. B. 1983, 'Variation and Final Account Procedure', 4th ed. London: Hutchinson. |
[26] | Akomah B., Mensah J. W., and Mustapha Z, (2018). Cost impacts of variations on building construction projects. MOJ Civil Eng. 2018; 4 (5): 386-392. DOI: 10.15406/mojce.2018.04.00133. |
APA Style
Mbabuike Udochukwu Cyprian, Onoh Felix Emenike, Nnadi Ezekiel Oluwaseun, Okpan Agara. (2021). The Effects of Variations on the Final Cost of Selected Public Building Projects in Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana from (2010-2020). Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering, 6(6), 177-187. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12
ACS Style
Mbabuike Udochukwu Cyprian; Onoh Felix Emenike; Nnadi Ezekiel Oluwaseun; Okpan Agara. The Effects of Variations on the Final Cost of Selected Public Building Projects in Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana from (2010-2020). J. Civ. Constr. Environ. Eng. 2021, 6(6), 177-187. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12
AMA Style
Mbabuike Udochukwu Cyprian, Onoh Felix Emenike, Nnadi Ezekiel Oluwaseun, Okpan Agara. The Effects of Variations on the Final Cost of Selected Public Building Projects in Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana from (2010-2020). J Civ Constr Environ Eng. 2021;6(6):177-187. doi: 10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12
@article{10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12, author = {Mbabuike Udochukwu Cyprian and Onoh Felix Emenike and Nnadi Ezekiel Oluwaseun and Okpan Agara}, title = {The Effects of Variations on the Final Cost of Selected Public Building Projects in Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana from (2010-2020)}, journal = {Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering}, volume = {6}, number = {6}, pages = {177-187}, doi = {10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jccee.20210606.12}, abstract = {Most executed public building projects in Nigeria have a difference between their tender/initial contract sum and final contract sum, and this difference is often caused by variations. Where not properly handled, variations lead to delays, dispute and sometimes project abandonment. The effects of cost of variations on the delivery of public building projects in Nigeria have long been a source of concern to stakeholders. In view of this, the study examined the effects of variations on building costs of selected building projects in Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana (AIFPU) executed within the period (2010-2020), with the purpose to determine their effects on cost of building projects. Historical research design was adopted. Secondary data were used in the analysis. Data on ten (10) completed projects of varying characteristics were collected from the institution’s physical planning unit using purpose sampling. SPSS version 20 tool was used in descriptive analysis of the estimate of the mean, percentage and standard deviation. E-view 8 tool of inferential statistics of regression and correlation were used in the analysis and testing of the hypothesis. The result indicates that increase in cost of variation will lead to 0.881 increase in contract sum. Results also indicate that significant positive relationship exist between variations and final cost of projects with coefficient of determination (R2)=0.602987 tested at 0.05 level. This result indicates that cost of variation has an impact on the final cost of building project and should be guarded against. It was recommended that there should be detailed and continuous planning including costing of a project right from the inception of the project to the completion, involvement of professionals and contactors at the initial stage in order to reduce variations in the project, timely advance payment for procurement should be made among others in others to guard against the impact of variation on public building projects.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - The Effects of Variations on the Final Cost of Selected Public Building Projects in Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana from (2010-2020) AU - Mbabuike Udochukwu Cyprian AU - Onoh Felix Emenike AU - Nnadi Ezekiel Oluwaseun AU - Okpan Agara Y1 - 2021/12/07 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12 T2 - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JF - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering JO - Journal of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering SP - 177 EP - 187 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-3890 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jccee.20210606.12 AB - Most executed public building projects in Nigeria have a difference between their tender/initial contract sum and final contract sum, and this difference is often caused by variations. Where not properly handled, variations lead to delays, dispute and sometimes project abandonment. The effects of cost of variations on the delivery of public building projects in Nigeria have long been a source of concern to stakeholders. In view of this, the study examined the effects of variations on building costs of selected building projects in Akanu Ibiam Federal Polytechnic, Unwana (AIFPU) executed within the period (2010-2020), with the purpose to determine their effects on cost of building projects. Historical research design was adopted. Secondary data were used in the analysis. Data on ten (10) completed projects of varying characteristics were collected from the institution’s physical planning unit using purpose sampling. SPSS version 20 tool was used in descriptive analysis of the estimate of the mean, percentage and standard deviation. E-view 8 tool of inferential statistics of regression and correlation were used in the analysis and testing of the hypothesis. The result indicates that increase in cost of variation will lead to 0.881 increase in contract sum. Results also indicate that significant positive relationship exist between variations and final cost of projects with coefficient of determination (R2)=0.602987 tested at 0.05 level. This result indicates that cost of variation has an impact on the final cost of building project and should be guarded against. It was recommended that there should be detailed and continuous planning including costing of a project right from the inception of the project to the completion, involvement of professionals and contactors at the initial stage in order to reduce variations in the project, timely advance payment for procurement should be made among others in others to guard against the impact of variation on public building projects. VL - 6 IS - 6 ER -