At the late evolution stage of the basic particle swarm optimization (BPSO), convergence process starts to slow down and the best fitness particle fluctuates around the globally-optimal solution, which may give rise to decrease on convergence precision of the BPSO. Therefore, an improved algorithm for particle swarm optimization was proposed. The modified version of PSO uses a controllable velocity-updating mode to control velocity of evolved particles, which is expected to be useful for tuning the search for the globally-optimal solution. Optimization examples showed that the improved PSO is superior to the BPSO, on not only convergence precision but also computation expense.
Published in | Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17 |
Page(s) | 68-73 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO), Controllable Velocity-Updating Mode, Velocity-Changing Track
[1] | Kennedy J, Eberhart R C. Particle swarm optimization. In Proc. of the IEEE Conf. on Neural Networks IV, Perth, IEEE Press, 1995, pp. 1942-1948. |
[2] | Shi Y, Eberhart R C. A Modified Swarm Optimizer. IEEE International Conference of Evolutionary computation, Anchorage, Alaska, 1998, pp. 69-73. |
[3] | Clerc M. The swarm and the queen: Towards a deterministic and adaptive particle swarm optimization. In Proc. of the ICEC. Washington, 1999, pp. 1951-1957. |
[4] | Shi Y, Eberhart R C. Fuzzy adaptive particle swarm optimization. In Proc. of the Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Piscataway, IEEE, 2001, pp. 101-106. |
[5] | Huang Y, Liu Y F, Peng Z M, et al. Research on particle swarm optimization algorithm with characteristic of quantum parallel and its application in parameter estimation for fractional-order chaotic systems. Acta Phys. Sin., 2015, 64 (3): 1-8. |
[6] | Guo W H, Wang T S. Pre-Impact Configuration Optimization for a Space Robot Capturing Target Satellite. Journal of Astronautics, 2015, 36 (4): 390-396. |
[7] | Zhai T T, Zhu J Q. New Method for First-Order Structure Design of Continuous Zoom Lens System. Acta Opt. Sin., 2015, 35 (7): 1-9. |
[8] | Ireneusz G. A new approach to particle swarm optimization algorithm. Expert Systems with Applications, 2015, 42: 844-854. |
[9] | Cheung N J, Ding X M, Shen H B. A supervised particle swarm algorithm for real-parameter optimization. Application Intelligence, 2015, 43: 825-839. |
[10] | Tang R L, Fang Y J. Modification of particle swarm optimization with human simulated property. Neurocomputing, 2015, 153: 319-331. |
[11] | Clerc M, Kennedy J. The particle swarm: Explosion stability and convergence in a multi-dimensional complex space. IEEE Trans. on Evolution Computer, 2002, 6 (1): 58-73. |
[12] | Marini F, Walczak B. Particle swarm optimization (PSO): A tutorial. Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 2015, 149: 153-165. |
APA Style
Jiao Weidong, Huang Zhijing, Yan Gongbiao. (2017). Improved Particle Swarm Optimization with Controllable Velocity-Updating Mode. Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, 5(2), 68-73. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17
ACS Style
Jiao Weidong; Huang Zhijing; Yan Gongbiao. Improved Particle Swarm Optimization with Controllable Velocity-Updating Mode. J. Electr. Electron. Eng. 2017, 5(2), 68-73. doi: 10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17
AMA Style
Jiao Weidong, Huang Zhijing, Yan Gongbiao. Improved Particle Swarm Optimization with Controllable Velocity-Updating Mode. J Electr Electron Eng. 2017;5(2):68-73. doi: 10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17
@article{10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17, author = {Jiao Weidong and Huang Zhijing and Yan Gongbiao}, title = {Improved Particle Swarm Optimization with Controllable Velocity-Updating Mode}, journal = {Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {68-73}, doi = {10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jeee.20170502.17}, abstract = {At the late evolution stage of the basic particle swarm optimization (BPSO), convergence process starts to slow down and the best fitness particle fluctuates around the globally-optimal solution, which may give rise to decrease on convergence precision of the BPSO. Therefore, an improved algorithm for particle swarm optimization was proposed. The modified version of PSO uses a controllable velocity-updating mode to control velocity of evolved particles, which is expected to be useful for tuning the search for the globally-optimal solution. Optimization examples showed that the improved PSO is superior to the BPSO, on not only convergence precision but also computation expense.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Improved Particle Swarm Optimization with Controllable Velocity-Updating Mode AU - Jiao Weidong AU - Huang Zhijing AU - Yan Gongbiao Y1 - 2017/04/12 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17 DO - 10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17 T2 - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering JF - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering JO - Journal of Electrical and Electronic Engineering SP - 68 EP - 73 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2329-1605 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jeee.20170502.17 AB - At the late evolution stage of the basic particle swarm optimization (BPSO), convergence process starts to slow down and the best fitness particle fluctuates around the globally-optimal solution, which may give rise to decrease on convergence precision of the BPSO. Therefore, an improved algorithm for particle swarm optimization was proposed. The modified version of PSO uses a controllable velocity-updating mode to control velocity of evolved particles, which is expected to be useful for tuning the search for the globally-optimal solution. Optimization examples showed that the improved PSO is superior to the BPSO, on not only convergence precision but also computation expense. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -