Aims: Textured surfaces morphology on solar cell are benefited to minimize the reflection. Many configurations are used for solar cell manufacturing. The ray’s simulators are used in this work. The gains (photogeneration) and losses (reflection, transmission, parasitic absorption) are recorded for each ray. The global gains and losses are determined by averaging many rays. With a sufficiently large number of rays, the Monte Carlo simulation converges to the physical model. The Monte-Carlo algorithm employed by the Wafer Optics Calculator necessarily results in output uncertainties. These uncertainties are calculated by dividing the user-requested number of rays into several sub-simulations, then applying statistical analysis to the set of sub-simulations to arrive at a mean value and 95% confidence interval (about two standard deviations). The calculators weight the magnitudes by the photon flux in the user-defined spectrum, then integrates over the wavelength, to calculate photon current density. The photogenerated current JG in a wafer equates to the short circuit current that could be extracted from a perfect solar cell made from the wafer. This work focuses on two textured surfaces morphology such that, upright pyramids, and inverted pyramids. To show their impact in solar cell efficiency. Which involve evaluating the external reflection for both surface morphology. Also compare the photogeneration JG absorbed by the substrate.
Published in | Journal of Photonic Materials and Technology (Volume 9, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11 |
Page(s) | 1-4 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Optic, Perc, Upright, Inverted Pyramids, Solar Cell
[1] | Azem Hysa Modeling and Simulation of the Photovoltaic Cells for Different Values of Physical and Environmental Parameters Emerging Science Journal, Vol 3, No 6, December 2019. |
[2] | N. Abas, A. Kalair, N. Khan, Review of fossil fuels and future energy technologies, Elsevier journal, future 69 (2015) pp 31-49. |
[3] | J. Zhao, A., W., Dai, X., Green, M. A., and Wenham, S. R., “Improvements in Silicon Solar Cell Performance”, 22nd IEEE PV Specialists Conference. pp. 399-402, 1991. |
[4] | S. R. Wenham and Green, M. A., “Buried contact solar cell”. 1988. |
[5] | J. C. Zolper, Narayanan, S., Wenham, S. R., and Green, M. A., “16.7% efficient, laser textured, buried contact polycrystalline silicon solar cell”, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 55, p. 2363, 1989. |
[6] | W. L. Bailey, Coleman, M. G., Harris, C. B., and Lesk, I. A., “United States Patent: 4137123 - Texture etching of silicon: method”. 1979. |
[7] | P. Campbell and Green, M. A., “Light trapping properties of pyramidally textured surfaces”, Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 62, no. 1, p. 243, 1987. |
[8] | P. Campbell and Green, M. A., “High performance light trapping textures for monocrystalline silicon solar cells”, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells, vol. 65, no. 1-4, pp. 369 - 375, 2001. |
[9] | Min su Kim, Jue Heon Lee. Moon Kyu Kwak, Review: Surface Texturing Methods for solar cell efficiency Enhancment, International journal of precision engineering and Manufacturing (2020) 21: 1389-1398. |
[10] | Keith R. McIntosh and Simeon C. Baker-Finch, OPAL 2: Rapid Optical Simulation of Silicon Solar Cells, Accepted version of the paper presented at the 38th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Austin, 2012. Copyright, IEEE. |
[11] | Hanbo Tang, Yaoping Liu, Quansheng Chen, Yan Wang, Wei Chen, Juntao Wu, Yan Zhao and Xiaolong Du, Optical Design of Inverted Pyramid Textured PERC Solar Cells, Applied electronics material, 2019, 1, 2684-2691. |
[12] | Martin A. Green, The Passivated Emitter and Rear Cell (PERC): From conception to mass production, Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 143 (2015) 190–197. |
[13] | Shruti Sharma, Kamlesh Kumar Jain, Ashutosh Sharma, Solar Cells: In Research and Applications—A Review, Materials Sciences and Applications, 2015, 6, 1145-1155. |
[14] | Mohamed Amara, Fabien Mandorlo, Romain Couderc, Félix Gérenton, and Mustapha Lemiti, Temperature and color management of silicon solar cells for building integrated photovoltaic, EPJ Photovoltaics 9, 1 (2018). |
[15] | M. D. Abbott, K. R. McIntosh, B. Sudbury; Optical Loss Analysis of PV Modules; 32nd European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference and Exhibition; pp 976 – 979; ISBN. 3-936338-41-8. |
[16] | Andrew Blakers Development of the PERC Solar Cell; IEEE journal of photovoltaics, Vol. 9, No. 3, May 2019. |
[17] | Jo Gjessinga, Erik S. Marstein; Optical performance of solar modules; Elsivier; Energy Procedia 38 (2013) 348 – 354 1876-6102 © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of the scientifi c committee of the Silicon PV 2013 conferencedoi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2013.07.288 Silicon PV: March 25-27, 2013. |
[18] | P. J. Verlinden, Swanson, R. M., and Crane, R. A., “7000 High Efficiency Cells for a Dream”, Progress in Photovoltaics: Research and Applications, vol. 2, pp. 143 - 152, 1994. |
[19] | Alassane Diaw, Papa Touty Traore, Awa Dieye; Comparative Studies on Reflection Defect between Textured and Planar Surface Based on TCO Materials; Science research publishing, Energy and Power Engineering, 2022, 14, 550-557. |
[20] | Alassane Diaw, Awa Dieye, Ousmane Ngom, Moulaye Diagne, Nacire Mbengue, Oumar Absatou Niasse, Bassirou Ba; Optimization of Antireflective Layers of Silicon Solar Cells: Comparative Studies of the Efficiency Between Single and Double Layer at the Reference Wavelength; American Journal of Physics and Applications 2021; 9 (6): 133-138. |
[21] | Awa Dieye, Alassane Diawa, Modou Pilora, Oumar A. Nissea, El Hadji Abdoulaye Niassa, Nacire Mbenguea, Moulaye Diagnea, Bassirou Baa; The Equations and Optical Parameters of Antireflective Multilayers: A Literature Review; IRA-International Journal of Applied Sciences ISSN 2455-4499; Vol. 17, Issue 02 (Q. 2 2022) Pg. no. 17-23. |
APA Style
Papa Touty Traore, Omar Diallo Sadio, Mor Ndiaye, Issa Diagne. (2023). Optical Design Impact on PERC Solar Cell Efficiency: Upright Pyramids vs Inverted Pyramids Textured Surfaces. Journal of Photonic Materials and Technology, 9(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11
ACS Style
Papa Touty Traore; Omar Diallo Sadio; Mor Ndiaye; Issa Diagne. Optical Design Impact on PERC Solar Cell Efficiency: Upright Pyramids vs Inverted Pyramids Textured Surfaces. J. Photonic Mater. Technol. 2023, 9(1), 1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11
AMA Style
Papa Touty Traore, Omar Diallo Sadio, Mor Ndiaye, Issa Diagne. Optical Design Impact on PERC Solar Cell Efficiency: Upright Pyramids vs Inverted Pyramids Textured Surfaces. J Photonic Mater Technol. 2023;9(1):1-4. doi: 10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11
@article{10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11, author = {Papa Touty Traore and Omar Diallo Sadio and Mor Ndiaye and Issa Diagne}, title = {Optical Design Impact on PERC Solar Cell Efficiency: Upright Pyramids vs Inverted Pyramids Textured Surfaces}, journal = {Journal of Photonic Materials and Technology}, volume = {9}, number = {1}, pages = {1-4}, doi = {10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jmpt.20230901.11}, abstract = {Aims: Textured surfaces morphology on solar cell are benefited to minimize the reflection. Many configurations are used for solar cell manufacturing. The ray’s simulators are used in this work. The gains (photogeneration) and losses (reflection, transmission, parasitic absorption) are recorded for each ray. The global gains and losses are determined by averaging many rays. With a sufficiently large number of rays, the Monte Carlo simulation converges to the physical model. The Monte-Carlo algorithm employed by the Wafer Optics Calculator necessarily results in output uncertainties. These uncertainties are calculated by dividing the user-requested number of rays into several sub-simulations, then applying statistical analysis to the set of sub-simulations to arrive at a mean value and 95% confidence interval (about two standard deviations). The calculators weight the magnitudes by the photon flux in the user-defined spectrum, then integrates over the wavelength, to calculate photon current density. The photogenerated current JG in a wafer equates to the short circuit current that could be extracted from a perfect solar cell made from the wafer. This work focuses on two textured surfaces morphology such that, upright pyramids, and inverted pyramids. To show their impact in solar cell efficiency. Which involve evaluating the external reflection for both surface morphology. Also compare the photogeneration JG absorbed by the substrate.}, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Optical Design Impact on PERC Solar Cell Efficiency: Upright Pyramids vs Inverted Pyramids Textured Surfaces AU - Papa Touty Traore AU - Omar Diallo Sadio AU - Mor Ndiaye AU - Issa Diagne Y1 - 2023/05/17 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11 T2 - Journal of Photonic Materials and Technology JF - Journal of Photonic Materials and Technology JO - Journal of Photonic Materials and Technology SP - 1 EP - 4 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-8431 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jmpt.20230901.11 AB - Aims: Textured surfaces morphology on solar cell are benefited to minimize the reflection. Many configurations are used for solar cell manufacturing. The ray’s simulators are used in this work. The gains (photogeneration) and losses (reflection, transmission, parasitic absorption) are recorded for each ray. The global gains and losses are determined by averaging many rays. With a sufficiently large number of rays, the Monte Carlo simulation converges to the physical model. The Monte-Carlo algorithm employed by the Wafer Optics Calculator necessarily results in output uncertainties. These uncertainties are calculated by dividing the user-requested number of rays into several sub-simulations, then applying statistical analysis to the set of sub-simulations to arrive at a mean value and 95% confidence interval (about two standard deviations). The calculators weight the magnitudes by the photon flux in the user-defined spectrum, then integrates over the wavelength, to calculate photon current density. The photogenerated current JG in a wafer equates to the short circuit current that could be extracted from a perfect solar cell made from the wafer. This work focuses on two textured surfaces morphology such that, upright pyramids, and inverted pyramids. To show their impact in solar cell efficiency. Which involve evaluating the external reflection for both surface morphology. Also compare the photogeneration JG absorbed by the substrate. VL - 9 IS - 1 ER -