The concept of Good Governance through involving the active participation of the community in the process of making and implementing policies in the reform era and public openness is a demand for government administration to realize bureaucratic reform. Public services quality is one indicator to determine the realization of this concept. This essay aimed to analyze decision-making-theories in Indonesia public service reform concerning instrumental, cultural, and neo-institutional theories through Public Service Complaint Management Policy implemented by the Indonesian Ministry of Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform since 2018. This essay also intends to recognize the challenges of this policy and the pattern of Indonesian bureaucratic reform policies in improving the quality of public service. After analyzing instrumental, cultural, myth, and isomorphism approaches in Indonesian public service complaint management policy, hybrid organization form showed by the public organization when adapting old public administration, NPM, and post NPM for realizing accountable public service governance. A combination of vertical and horizontal specialization showed during the formulation and implementation of this policy. While some public organizations often use mythical and isomorphism and rely on path-dependency towards Javanese culture and strong hierarchy in bureaucracy. Those decision-maker theories in the organization are various aspects of the Indonesian Public Service Complaint Management Policy.
Published in | Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12 |
Page(s) | 5-11 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Instrumental, Cultural, Myth, Isomorphism, Indonesia, Public Service Complaint Management Policy, LAPOR-SP4N
[1] | Bondy, K. (2009). Isomorphism in the practice of corporate social responsibility: Evidence of an institution and its decline. University of Bath School of Management, Working Paper Series, 10. |
[2] | Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and Red Tape. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. |
[3] | Caiden, G. E. (1991). What Really is Public Administration? Wiley on behalf of the American Society for Public Administration, 486-493. |
[4] | Christensen, T. (2012). Post-NPM and Changing Public Governance. Meiji Journal of Political Science and Economics, 1-11. |
[5] | Christensen, T. a. (2007a). Transcending New Public Management: The Transformation of Public sector Reforms. Burlington, Vt: Ashgate. |
[6] | Christensen, T. a. (2018). An organization approach to public administration. In Palgrave handbook of public administration and management in Europe, 1087–1104. London: Palgrave Macmillan. |
[7] | Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2010). The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited. |
[8] | Christensen, T., Laegreid, P., & Røvik, A. K. (2020). Organization Theory and the Public Organization: Instrument, Culture, and Myth. London: Routledge. |
[9] | Christensen, T., Laegreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, a. K. (2007b). Organization and Public Sector: Instrument, Culture, and Myth. London and New York: Routledge. |
[10] | Dimaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983a). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational field. American Sociological Review, 147-160. |
[11] | DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1991). The new institutionalism in organization analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
[12] | Egeberg, M. (2012). How Bureaucratic Structure Matters: An Organizational Perspective. In Handbook of Public Administration. London: Sage. |
[13] | Gichuke, R. K., & Okello, B. (2015). Relationship between institutional pressures and strategic responses of public universities in Nakuru County, Kenya. International Journal of Economics, Commerce, 662-685. |
[14] | Krasner, S. (1982). Structural causes and regime consequences: Regimes as intervening variables. International Organization, 185-205. |
[15] | Lawrence, T. B., Suddaby, R., & Leca, B. (2009). Institutional work: Actor and agency in institutional studies of organization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. |
[16] | March, J. (1986). How we talk and how we act: Administrative theory and administrative life. Chicago: University of Illinois. |
[17] | Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 340-363. |
[18] | Ombudsman, I. (2021). Mengawal Pelayanan Publik di Masa Pandemic COVID-19 [Overseeing Public Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic]. Jakarta Selatan: Ombudsman Republik Indonesia. |
[19] | Pollit, C. (1998). Managerialism Revisited in Peters, B. G. and D. J. Savoie (eds.) Taking Stock: Assessing Public Sector Reforms. Montreal: McGill-Queen's. |
[20] | Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press. |
[21] | Rainey, H., Ronquillo, J., & Avellaneda, C. (2010). Decision Making in Public Organization. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons. |
[22] | Rosemary, A., Joseph, O., & and Emma, C. (2012). Civil service in Nigeria: The journey so far in service delivery. American journal of social and management sciences, 17-29. |
[23] | Scott, J. C. (1972). Patron-Client Politics and Political Change in Southeast Asia. American Political Science Association, 91-113. |
[24] | Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. (2005). Beyond continuity. Institutional change in advanced political economies. New York: Oxford University Press. |
[25] | Wamlsey, G., & Zald, M. (1973). The Political Economy of Public Organization. Lexington: MA: Health. |
[26] | Yu, K. (2017). Governance and Good Governance: A New Framework for Political Analysis. Fudan Journal Humaniora and Social Science, 1-8. |
APA Style
Ade Ayu Astuti. (2022). An Analysis of Indonesian Public Service Reform Through National Public Service Complaint Management Policy. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 6(1), 5-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12
ACS Style
Ade Ayu Astuti. An Analysis of Indonesian Public Service Reform Through National Public Service Complaint Management Policy. J. Public Policy Adm. 2022, 6(1), 5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12
AMA Style
Ade Ayu Astuti. An Analysis of Indonesian Public Service Reform Through National Public Service Complaint Management Policy. J Public Policy Adm. 2022;6(1):5-11. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12
@article{10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12, author = {Ade Ayu Astuti}, title = {An Analysis of Indonesian Public Service Reform Through National Public Service Complaint Management Policy}, journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration}, volume = {6}, number = {1}, pages = {5-11}, doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20220601.12}, abstract = {The concept of Good Governance through involving the active participation of the community in the process of making and implementing policies in the reform era and public openness is a demand for government administration to realize bureaucratic reform. Public services quality is one indicator to determine the realization of this concept. This essay aimed to analyze decision-making-theories in Indonesia public service reform concerning instrumental, cultural, and neo-institutional theories through Public Service Complaint Management Policy implemented by the Indonesian Ministry of Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform since 2018. This essay also intends to recognize the challenges of this policy and the pattern of Indonesian bureaucratic reform policies in improving the quality of public service. After analyzing instrumental, cultural, myth, and isomorphism approaches in Indonesian public service complaint management policy, hybrid organization form showed by the public organization when adapting old public administration, NPM, and post NPM for realizing accountable public service governance. A combination of vertical and horizontal specialization showed during the formulation and implementation of this policy. While some public organizations often use mythical and isomorphism and rely on path-dependency towards Javanese culture and strong hierarchy in bureaucracy. Those decision-maker theories in the organization are various aspects of the Indonesian Public Service Complaint Management Policy.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - An Analysis of Indonesian Public Service Reform Through National Public Service Complaint Management Policy AU - Ade Ayu Astuti Y1 - 2022/02/05 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12 DO - 10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12 T2 - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JF - Journal of Public Policy and Administration JO - Journal of Public Policy and Administration SP - 5 EP - 11 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-2696 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20220601.12 AB - The concept of Good Governance through involving the active participation of the community in the process of making and implementing policies in the reform era and public openness is a demand for government administration to realize bureaucratic reform. Public services quality is one indicator to determine the realization of this concept. This essay aimed to analyze decision-making-theories in Indonesia public service reform concerning instrumental, cultural, and neo-institutional theories through Public Service Complaint Management Policy implemented by the Indonesian Ministry of Apparatus and Bureaucratic Reform since 2018. This essay also intends to recognize the challenges of this policy and the pattern of Indonesian bureaucratic reform policies in improving the quality of public service. After analyzing instrumental, cultural, myth, and isomorphism approaches in Indonesian public service complaint management policy, hybrid organization form showed by the public organization when adapting old public administration, NPM, and post NPM for realizing accountable public service governance. A combination of vertical and horizontal specialization showed during the formulation and implementation of this policy. While some public organizations often use mythical and isomorphism and rely on path-dependency towards Javanese culture and strong hierarchy in bureaucracy. Those decision-maker theories in the organization are various aspects of the Indonesian Public Service Complaint Management Policy. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -