| Peer-Reviewed

Effects of National Government Administration Soft Approaches on Countering Violent Extremism in Garissa County, Kenya

Received: 9 May 2023     Accepted: 29 May 2023     Published: 10 June 2023
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The threat of violent extremist groups across the globe cannot be ignored as it is a multi-national problem. Appropriate response strategies need to be put in place by governments and regional economic blocks to mitigate the potential threats within the framework of Countering Violent Extremism (CVE). Research findings have revealed that, there is limited documented research done on the effectiveness of the CVE strategies being employed by these parties in countering the terrorism menace. Further, it reveals lack of a single consensus pathway to violent extremism, which in turn has proven complex especially in designing best practices for CVE in Kenya. Kenya is continuously under the threat of Al-Shabaab terrorist organization which has claimed attacks within the Kenyan boundaries. This study, therefore, sought to explore the success of national government use of soft approaches and the mitigation measures to make it achieve its objectives of ensuring a secure environment to her citizens. The study used class theory of terrorism and the rational choice theory to provide the necessary theoretical background. Descriptive research methodology was employed for this study and the respondents were drawn from the national government officers in Garissa County. The research reached out to 44 respondents from the national government, Garissa County. Key Informant Interviews (KII) and Focused Group Discussion (FGD) was used to acquire required data. Collected information underwent thorough cleaning, editing, and thematic grouping for qualitative analysis. Key finding from the study showed that Life skill trainings enhance CVE programmes and are very important interventions for reducing repetition and radicalization to violent extremism among children and youth offenders in Kenya to improve safety and security. Community engagement initiatives have created safe, mentored spaces for individuals to freely express themselves and challenge one another's beliefs. The study also underlined the greater role played by media in the fight against radicalization and VE. The study concludes that government should embrace partnership across board, put in place soft approaches, conduct threat analysis so as to adopt right strategies and also, address root causes of VE. Key recommendations include: Partnership for VE mitigation, Strengthening the capacity of institutions involved in CVE, Identification and addressing the local pull and push factors and addressing grievances that may lead to radicalization and recruitment.

Published in Journal of Public Policy and Administration (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15
Page(s) 67-76
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Soft Approaches, Extremism, Countering Violent Extremism (CVE), Radicalisation, Community Engagement

References
[1] Aljunied, S. M. (2011). Countering terrorism in maritime Southeast Asia: sot and hard power approaches. Journal of Asian and African studies, 47 (6).
[2] Aly, A., Balbi, A.-M., & Jacques, C. (2015). Rethinking countering violent extremism: implementing the role of civil society. Journal of policing, intelligence, and counter terrorism, 10 (1), 3-13.
[3] Amit, S., Barua, L., & Al Kafy, A. (2021). Countering violent extremism using social media and preventing implementable strategies for Bangladesh. Heliyon, 7 (5), 1-15.
[4] Andrew, E. (1975). Marx's Theory of Classes: Science and Ideology. Canadian journal of political science, 8 (3), 454-466.
[5] Barrat, H. (2009). Methods of sampling from a population. Health knowledge.
[6] Bayo, O. A. (2012). Research on Terrorism: An overview of theoretical perspectives. Asian journal of research in social science and humanities, 2 (9).
[7] Bentley, T., Lekalake, R., & Buchanan-Clarke, S. (2016). Threat of violent extremism from a ‘grassroots’ perspective: Evidence from North Africa. Afro barometer (100), 1-17.
[8] Blomberg, B., Gandhi, A., & Hess, G. D. (2012). The Political Economy of Legislation on Terrorism. Taylor & Francis, 22 (6), 607-626.
[9] Botha, A. (2015). Radicalisation to Terrorism in Kenya and Uganda: A Political Socialisation Perspective. Perspective on the terrorism, 9 (5), 2-13.
[10] Clutterbuck, L. (2015). Deradicalization programs and counterterrorism: A perspective on the challenges and benefits. Political Science and psychology, 65-84.
[11] Council on foreign relations. (2022). Backgrounder: Al-Shabab. Retrieved from Council on foreign relations: https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/al-shabab
[12] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
[13] Fink, L. (2014). Understanding radicalisation & dynamics of terrorist networks through political-psychology. Herzliya, Israel: International institute for counter-terrorism.
[14] Fletcher, J., & Morakabati, Y. (2008). Tourism activity, terrorism and political instability within the commonwealth: the cases of Fiji and Kenya. Wiley Online Library, 10 (6), 537-556.
[15] Frazer, O. (2015). The concept of countering violent extremism. Center for Security Studies (CSS), ETH Zurich (183).
[16] GoK. (2010). The Constitution of Kenya. Nairobi, Kenya: Government of Kenya.
[17] GTI. (2021). Global terrorism index: Measuring the impact of terrorism. Sydney, Australia: Institute or economics and peace (IEP).
[18] Holmer, G., Bauman, P., & Aryaeinejad, K. (2018). Measuring up; Evaluating the impact of P/CVE programs. Washington, DC: United states institute of peace.
[19] Idris, I. (2020). Gender and countering violent extremism in the Kenya-Mozambique region. K4D Helpdesk Report 892. Brighton, UK: Institute of Development Studies.
[20] IJR. (2016). Occasional paper 21: Community perceptions of violent extremism in Kenya. Cape Town, South Africa: Institute for Justice and Reconciliation.
[21] Ishaku, B., Aksit, S., & Maza, K. D. (2021). The role of faith-based organisations in counter-radicalization in Nigeria: The case of Boko Haram. MDPI, 12 (11), 1003.
[22] Kabir, S. M. (2016). Chapter 9: METHODS OF DATA COLLECTION. In S. M. Kabir, Basic Guidelines for Research: An Introductory Approach for All Disciplines (pp. 201-275). Bangladesh: Book Zone Publication.
[23] Kelly, G. (1955). Psychology of Personal Constructs. England, UK: Routledge.
[24] Kinyanjui, S. (2014). The Impact of Terrorism on Foreign Direct Investment in Kenya. International Journal of Business Administration, 5 (3).
[25] Krueger, A. B. (2007). What makes a terrorist: Economics and the roots of terrorism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University press.
[26] Lindekilde, L. (2012). Introduction: Assessing the effectiveness of counter radicalisation policies in Northwestern Europe. Critical studies on Terrorism, 335-344.
[27] Magogo, S. (2012, November). The effectiveness of counter terrorism strategies in Kenya: A case of Eastleigh location Nairobi. Retrieved from Nairobi University repository.
[28] Mastroe, C., & Szmania. Mastroe, S. (2016). Surveying CVE metrics in prevention, disengagement and de-radicalization Programs. Baltimore, MA: National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism.
[29] Mbiyozo, A.-N. (2017). Policy Brief: How Boko Haram specifically targets displaced people. Pretoria, South Africa: Institute for security studies.
[30] McCombes, S. (2020, September 3). Descriptive research. Retrieved from https://www.scribbr.com/: https://www.scribbr.com/methodology/descriptive-research
[31] Millen, R. (2006). hobbesian Notion of Self-Preservation. the Hobbesian notion of self-preservation concerning human behavior during an insurgency behavior during an insurgency. The Us army war college quarterly: Parameters, 36 (4), 4-13.
[32] Mugenda, O., & Mugenda, A. G. (2003). Research methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Nairobi: Acts Press.
[33] Muna, W. (2017). The cost of terrorism in Kenya. The journal of Social, Political, and Economic Studies; 42 (3/4), 289-306.
[34] Neimeyer, R. A., & Winter, D. A. (2006). To Be or Not to Be: Personal Constructions of the Suicidal Choice. American Psychological Association, 149-169.
[35] Nye, J. S. (2004). Power in the global information age. London, UK: Routledge.
[36] Ogunrotifa, A. B. (2013). Class theory of terrorism: A study of Boko Haram insurgency in Nigeria. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 3 (1).
[37] OSCE. (2014). Preventing terrorism and countering violent extremism and radicalization that lead to terrorism: A community-policing approach. Viena, Austria: Organization for Security and Co-operation in Europe.
[38] Sandler, T., & Lapan, H. E. (1988). The calculus of dissent: An analysis of terrorists' choice of targets. Syntheses, 76, 245-261.
[39] Sandler, T., Tschirhart, J. T., & Cauley, J. (1983). A Theoretical Analysis of Transnational Terrorism. American Political Science Review, 77 (1), 36-54.
[40] Sapinzak, E., Post, M., & Denny, L. M. (2003). The Terrorists in their own words: interviews with 35 incarcerated Middle Eastern Terrorists. Terrorism and Political Violence, 15 (1), 171-184.
[41] Showkat, N., & Parveen, H. (2017). In-depth Interview. e-Pathshala.
[42] Sirbiladze, Z. (2004). Soft power and the American foreign policy. Political science quarterly, 255- 271.
[43] Sommers, M. (2019). Youth and the field of countering violent extremism. Washington, DC: Promundo-US.
[44] Tella, O. (2017). Boko Haram terrorism and counter-terrorism: The soft power context. Journal of Asian and African studies, 1-15.
[45] UN. (2019). UN global counter-terrorism strategy. New York, NY: United Nations.
[46] UNHCR. (2015). Violations and abuses committed by Boko Haram and the impact on human rights in the countries affected. New York, NY: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
[47] UNODC. (2018). Radicalization' and 'violent extremism'. Vienna, Austria: United Nations.
[48] Urdal, H., & Hoelscher, K. (2009). Urban youth bulges and social disorder: an empirical study of Asian and Sub-Saharan African cities. The world bank, policy research working paper series, 2-29.
[49] Walker, B. M., & Winter, D. A. (2007). The elaboration of personal construct psychology. National Library of Medicine, 58, 453-477.
[50] Winter, D. A., & Feixas, G. (2019). Toward a Constructivist Model of Radicalization and Deradicalization: A Conceptual and Methodological Proposal. Frontiers in Psychology, 10.
[51] Wright, R., Berger, J. M., Braniff, W., Bunzel, C., Byman, D., Cafarella, J.,... Watt, C. (2017). The Jihadi threat: ISIS, al-Qaeda and beyond. Washington, DC: United states institute of peace.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Timothy Mwalimu, Wilson Muna. (2023). Effects of National Government Administration Soft Approaches on Countering Violent Extremism in Garissa County, Kenya. Journal of Public Policy and Administration, 7(2), 67-76. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Timothy Mwalimu; Wilson Muna. Effects of National Government Administration Soft Approaches on Countering Violent Extremism in Garissa County, Kenya. J. Public Policy Adm. 2023, 7(2), 67-76. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Timothy Mwalimu, Wilson Muna. Effects of National Government Administration Soft Approaches on Countering Violent Extremism in Garissa County, Kenya. J Public Policy Adm. 2023;7(2):67-76. doi: 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15,
      author = {Timothy Mwalimu and Wilson Muna},
      title = {Effects of National Government Administration Soft Approaches on Countering Violent Extremism in Garissa County, Kenya},
      journal = {Journal of Public Policy and Administration},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {67-76},
      doi = {10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jppa.20230702.15},
      abstract = {The threat of violent extremist groups across the globe cannot be ignored as it is a multi-national problem. Appropriate response strategies need to be put in place by governments and regional economic blocks to mitigate the potential threats within the framework of Countering Violent Extremism (CVE). Research findings have revealed that, there is limited documented research done on the effectiveness of the CVE strategies being employed by these parties in countering the terrorism menace. Further, it reveals lack of a single consensus pathway to violent extremism, which in turn has proven complex especially in designing best practices for CVE in Kenya. Kenya is continuously under the threat of Al-Shabaab terrorist organization which has claimed attacks within the Kenyan boundaries. This study, therefore, sought to explore the success of national government use of soft approaches and the mitigation measures to make it achieve its objectives of ensuring a secure environment to her citizens. The study used class theory of terrorism and the rational choice theory to provide the necessary theoretical background. Descriptive research methodology was employed for this study and the respondents were drawn from the national government officers in Garissa County. The research reached out to 44 respondents from the national government, Garissa County. Key Informant Interviews (KII) and Focused Group Discussion (FGD) was used to acquire required data. Collected information underwent thorough cleaning, editing, and thematic grouping for qualitative analysis. Key finding from the study showed that Life skill trainings enhance CVE programmes and are very important interventions for reducing repetition and radicalization to violent extremism among children and youth offenders in Kenya to improve safety and security. Community engagement initiatives have created safe, mentored spaces for individuals to freely express themselves and challenge one another's beliefs. The study also underlined the greater role played by media in the fight against radicalization and VE. The study concludes that government should embrace partnership across board, put in place soft approaches, conduct threat analysis so as to adopt right strategies and also, address root causes of VE. Key recommendations include: Partnership for VE mitigation, Strengthening the capacity of institutions involved in CVE, Identification and addressing the local pull and push factors and addressing grievances that may lead to radicalization and recruitment.},
     year = {2023}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effects of National Government Administration Soft Approaches on Countering Violent Extremism in Garissa County, Kenya
    AU  - Timothy Mwalimu
    AU  - Wilson Muna
    Y1  - 2023/06/10
    PY  - 2023
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15
    T2  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
    JF  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
    JO  - Journal of Public Policy and Administration
    SP  - 67
    EP  - 76
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-2696
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jppa.20230702.15
    AB  - The threat of violent extremist groups across the globe cannot be ignored as it is a multi-national problem. Appropriate response strategies need to be put in place by governments and regional economic blocks to mitigate the potential threats within the framework of Countering Violent Extremism (CVE). Research findings have revealed that, there is limited documented research done on the effectiveness of the CVE strategies being employed by these parties in countering the terrorism menace. Further, it reveals lack of a single consensus pathway to violent extremism, which in turn has proven complex especially in designing best practices for CVE in Kenya. Kenya is continuously under the threat of Al-Shabaab terrorist organization which has claimed attacks within the Kenyan boundaries. This study, therefore, sought to explore the success of national government use of soft approaches and the mitigation measures to make it achieve its objectives of ensuring a secure environment to her citizens. The study used class theory of terrorism and the rational choice theory to provide the necessary theoretical background. Descriptive research methodology was employed for this study and the respondents were drawn from the national government officers in Garissa County. The research reached out to 44 respondents from the national government, Garissa County. Key Informant Interviews (KII) and Focused Group Discussion (FGD) was used to acquire required data. Collected information underwent thorough cleaning, editing, and thematic grouping for qualitative analysis. Key finding from the study showed that Life skill trainings enhance CVE programmes and are very important interventions for reducing repetition and radicalization to violent extremism among children and youth offenders in Kenya to improve safety and security. Community engagement initiatives have created safe, mentored spaces for individuals to freely express themselves and challenge one another's beliefs. The study also underlined the greater role played by media in the fight against radicalization and VE. The study concludes that government should embrace partnership across board, put in place soft approaches, conduct threat analysis so as to adopt right strategies and also, address root causes of VE. Key recommendations include: Partnership for VE mitigation, Strengthening the capacity of institutions involved in CVE, Identification and addressing the local pull and push factors and addressing grievances that may lead to radicalization and recruitment.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Public Policy and Administration, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Department of Public Policy and Administration, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya

  • Sections