Review Article | | Peer-Reviewed

The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities

Received: 12 January 2026     Accepted: 31 January 2026     Published: 11 February 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Inclusive education has emerged as a global priority, emphasizing equitable access, participation, and learning outcomes for learners with disabilities. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have introduced new opportunities to address diverse learner needs through adaptive, personalized, and accessible educational technologies. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the effectiveness of AI- and ML-based interventions for learners with disabilities across educational contexts. Guided by PRISMA 2020 standards, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, identifying 245 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and December 2025. Following duplicate removal, screening, eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal, 19 studies met all methodological and thematic inclusion criteria and were included in the final thematic narrative synthesis. The review examined types of AI/ML technologies, disability categories (learning, sensory, physical, and psychosocial), educational and inclusion-related outcomes, and ethical and accessibility considerations. The included studies employed quantitative (47.4%), qualitative (31.6%), and mixed-methods (21.0%) designs. AI-driven interventions, such as intelligent tutoring systems, natural language processing applications, assistive technologies, and learning analytics, demonstrated positive effects on academic achievement, accessibility, learner autonomy, engagement, psychosocial outcomes, and social inclusion, with particularly strong evidence for learners with learning and sensory disabilities. However, evidence for institutional-level impact and long-term outcomes remains limited. Key challenges identified include algorithmic bias, data privacy risks, uneven accessibility compliance, and persistent inequities between high-income and low-resource contexts. Overall, the findings indicate that AI and ML can meaningfully support inclusive education when grounded in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and rights-based frameworks. The review underscores the need for more methodologically rigorous, geographically diverse, and longitudinal research to determine which technologies are most effective for specific disability groups and to ensure that AI-enabled education advances inclusion rather than reinforcing existing inequities.

Published in American Journal of Medical Education (Volume 2, Issue 1)
DOI 10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11
Page(s) 1-14
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Artificial Intelligence, Assistive and Adaptive Technologies, Inclusive Education, Learners with Disabilities, Machine Learning

References
[1] Achieng, M., & Ochieng, P. (2020). Digital technologies and inclusive education in Africa. International Journal of Educational Development, 76, 102–115.
[2] African Union. (2023). Continental Artificial Intelligence Strategy. Addis Ababa: AU.
[3] Ainscow, M., Booth, T., & Dyson, A. (2006). Improving schools, developing inclusion. Routledge.
[4] Al-Azawei, A., Serenelli, F., & Lundqvist, K. (2016). Universal Design for Learning (UDL): A content analysis of peer-reviewed journals. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 39–56.
[5] Alnahdi, G. (2022). Assistive technology and artificial intelligence for students with disabilities. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 26(8), 1–15.
[6] Avramidis, E., & Norwich, B. (2002). Teachers’ attitudes towards integration/inclusion. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 17(2), 129–147.
[7] Baker, R. S., & Inventado, P. S. (2014). Educational data mining and learning analytics. In Learning analytics (pp. 61–75). Springer.
[8] Bishop, C. M. (2006). Pattern recognition and machine learning. Springer.
[9] CAST. (2018). Universal Design for Learning Guidelines (Version 2.2).
[10] Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
[11] D’Mello, S., & Graesser, A. (2015). Feeling, thinking, and computing with affect-aware learning technologies. Educational Psychologist, 50(4), 329–347.
[12] Eubanks, V. (2018). Automating inequality: How high-tech tools profile, police, and punish the poor. St. Martin’s Press.
[13] Eysenbach, G. (2011). What is e-health? Journal of Medical Internet Research, 3(2), e20.
[14] Fichten, C. S., et al. (2019). Accessibility of e-learning and computer technologies for students with disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 32(1), 45–62.
[15] Florian, L., & Black-Hawkins, K. (2011). Exploring inclusive pedagogy. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(4), 513–528.
[16] Floridi, L., et al. (2018). AI 4 People An ethical framework for a good AI society. Minds and Machines, 28, 689–707.
[17] Hassan, Q. F. (Ed.). (2025). Internet of things A to Z: technologies and applications. John Wiley & Sons.
[18] Holmes, W. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education. Center for Curriculum Redesign.
[19] Kafyulilo, A., Fisser, P., & Voogt, J. (2021). Teacher preparedness for technology integration in East Africa. Education and Information Technologies, 26, 1–18.
[20] Khowaja, K., Banire, B., Al-Thani, D., & Sqalli, M. (2020). Educational technologies for children with autism spectrum disorder. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(6), 1–15.
[21] Lund, C., et al. (2019). Global mental health and development. World Psychiatry, 18(3), 270–290.
[22] Meyer, A., Rose, D. H., & Gordon, D. (2014). Universal Design for Learning: Theory and practice. CAST.
[23] Moher, D., et al. (2020). PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ, 372, n71.
[24] Ok, M. W., & Rao, K. (2019). Digital tools for inclusive classrooms. Journal of Special Education Technology, 34(1), 3–15.
[25] Oliver, M. (2013). The social model of disability: Thirty years on. Disability & Society.
[26] Page, M. J., et al. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement. BMJ.
[27] Patel, V., et al. (2018). The Lancet Commission on global mental health. The Lancet, 392(10157), 1553–1598.
[28] Rehman, T. U. (2025). The transformative impact and evolving landscape: A comprehensive exploration of the globalization of higher education in the 21st century. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 49(3), 346-361.
[29] Russell, S., & Norvig, P. (2021). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (4th ed.). Pearson.
[30] Schwab, S. (2017). The impact of inclusive education on students’ social development. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 32(2), 254–269.
[31] Selwyn, N. (2019). Should robots replace teachers? Polity Press.
[32] Shogren, K. A., et al. (2015). Self-determination and inclusive education. Inclusion, 3(2), 99–113.
[33] UNESCO. (2019). Global report on adult learning and education (GRALE IV). UNESCO.
[34] UNESCO. (2020). Global Education Monitoring Report: Inclusion and Education – All Means All. Paris: UNESCO.
[35] UNESCO. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and Education in Africa. Paris: UNESCO.
[36] United Nations. (2006). Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities.
[37] United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.
[38] Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Historical threads, missing links, and future directions in AI and education. Learning, Media and Technology, 45(3), 223–235.
[39] Williamson, B., & Eynon, R. (2020). Teaching and Teacher Education.
[40] World Health Organization. (2011). World report on disability.
[41] Zawacki-Richter, O., et al. (2019). Systematic review of AI in education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 16(39).
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Belay, H. D., Alamneh, S. (2026). The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities. American Journal of Medical Education, 2(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Belay, H. D.; Alamneh, S. The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities. Am. J. Med. Educ. 2026, 2(1), 1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Belay HD, Alamneh S. The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities. Am J Med Educ. 2026;2(1):1-14. doi: 10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11,
      author = {Habtamu Debasu Belay and Simachew Alamneh},
      title = {The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities},
      journal = {American Journal of Medical Education},
      volume = {2},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-14},
      doi = {10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.mededu.20260201.11},
      abstract = {Inclusive education has emerged as a global priority, emphasizing equitable access, participation, and learning outcomes for learners with disabilities. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have introduced new opportunities to address diverse learner needs through adaptive, personalized, and accessible educational technologies. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the effectiveness of AI- and ML-based interventions for learners with disabilities across educational contexts. Guided by PRISMA 2020 standards, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, identifying 245 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and December 2025. Following duplicate removal, screening, eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal, 19 studies met all methodological and thematic inclusion criteria and were included in the final thematic narrative synthesis. The review examined types of AI/ML technologies, disability categories (learning, sensory, physical, and psychosocial), educational and inclusion-related outcomes, and ethical and accessibility considerations. The included studies employed quantitative (47.4%), qualitative (31.6%), and mixed-methods (21.0%) designs. AI-driven interventions, such as intelligent tutoring systems, natural language processing applications, assistive technologies, and learning analytics, demonstrated positive effects on academic achievement, accessibility, learner autonomy, engagement, psychosocial outcomes, and social inclusion, with particularly strong evidence for learners with learning and sensory disabilities. However, evidence for institutional-level impact and long-term outcomes remains limited. Key challenges identified include algorithmic bias, data privacy risks, uneven accessibility compliance, and persistent inequities between high-income and low-resource contexts. Overall, the findings indicate that AI and ML can meaningfully support inclusive education when grounded in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and rights-based frameworks. The review underscores the need for more methodologically rigorous, geographically diverse, and longitudinal research to determine which technologies are most effective for specific disability groups and to ensure that AI-enabled education advances inclusion rather than reinforcing existing inequities.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - The Inclusive Algorithm: A Systematic Review of AI and Machine Learning in Supporting Learners with Disabilities
    AU  - Habtamu Debasu Belay
    AU  - Simachew Alamneh
    Y1  - 2026/02/11
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11
    T2  - American Journal of Medical Education
    JF  - American Journal of Medical Education
    JO  - American Journal of Medical Education
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 14
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 3070-1570
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.mededu.20260201.11
    AB  - Inclusive education has emerged as a global priority, emphasizing equitable access, participation, and learning outcomes for learners with disabilities. Recent advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI) and Machine Learning (ML) have introduced new opportunities to address diverse learner needs through adaptive, personalized, and accessible educational technologies. This systematic review synthesizes empirical evidence on the effectiveness of AI- and ML-based interventions for learners with disabilities across educational contexts. Guided by PRISMA 2020 standards, a comprehensive literature search was conducted across Scopus, Web of Science, ERIC, IEEE Xplore, and Google Scholar, identifying 245 peer-reviewed studies published between 2015 and December 2025. Following duplicate removal, screening, eligibility assessment, and quality appraisal, 19 studies met all methodological and thematic inclusion criteria and were included in the final thematic narrative synthesis. The review examined types of AI/ML technologies, disability categories (learning, sensory, physical, and psychosocial), educational and inclusion-related outcomes, and ethical and accessibility considerations. The included studies employed quantitative (47.4%), qualitative (31.6%), and mixed-methods (21.0%) designs. AI-driven interventions, such as intelligent tutoring systems, natural language processing applications, assistive technologies, and learning analytics, demonstrated positive effects on academic achievement, accessibility, learner autonomy, engagement, psychosocial outcomes, and social inclusion, with particularly strong evidence for learners with learning and sensory disabilities. However, evidence for institutional-level impact and long-term outcomes remains limited. Key challenges identified include algorithmic bias, data privacy risks, uneven accessibility compliance, and persistent inequities between high-income and low-resource contexts. Overall, the findings indicate that AI and ML can meaningfully support inclusive education when grounded in Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles and rights-based frameworks. The review underscores the need for more methodologically rigorous, geographically diverse, and longitudinal research to determine which technologies are most effective for specific disability groups and to ensure that AI-enabled education advances inclusion rather than reinforcing existing inequities.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections