Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations

Isgandarli Turgay Talib

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12

Research Article |

| Peer-Reviewed

Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations

Isgandarli Turgay Talib^*

Published in International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 12, Issue 4)

Received: 27 October 2024 Accepted: 14 November 2024 Published: 12 December 2024

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations

Published in	International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering (Volume 12, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12
Page(s)	101-105
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

LCM Materials, Drilling Process, Circulation, Wellbore Pressure, Loss Circulation, Drilling Fluid

1. Introduction

We previously mentioned that one of the main functions of drilling fluid is to create counter-pressure against formation pressure. This created pressure is called hydrostatic pressure. By generating hydrostatic pressure, it is essential to control the formation pressure (at minimum) and the hydraulic fracturing pressure (at maximum) of the subsurface rocks. In other words, for normal drilling operations, hydrostatic pressure should be higher than formation pressure but lower than fracturing pressure

[1]

When the hydrostatic pressure generated by the drilling fluid exceeds the formation's fracturing pressure, drilling fluid loss occurs. Simply put, if the 'force' exerted by our fluid on the wellbore wall exceeds the formation's 'strength,' fluid loss happens. To prevent fluid loss, the pressure created by the drilling fluid (hydrostatic pressure) must be lower than the formation's fracturing pressure. At the same time, it’s crucial to ensure that the hydrostatic pressure is above the formation pressure. The figure illustrates the process of fluid loss under formation conditions

[2]

. As shown, since hydrostatic pressure (Phs) is greater than the formation's hydraulic fracturing pressure (Phy), fractures form in the formation, leading to the absorption of drilling fluid by the formation (Figure 1).

Download: Download full-size image

Figure 1. The loss of the drilling fluid by the formation occurs because the hydrostatic pressure (Phs) is greater than the formation pressure (Phy).

2. Problem Statement

Therefore, measures to combat fluid loss must be developed. The main objective of these measures is to prevent fluid loss, maintain stable pressure in the well, and ensure a safe drilling process. The paper will cover the following main topics: Deep well drilling technologies are of critical importance in the drilling industry. In this process, the drilling fluid (drilling mud) is used to maintain pressure balance, cool the drilling tool, and remove cuttings

[3]

. However, sometimes due to the characteristics of the geological structures or the parameters of the drilling process, the fluid is absorbed, which can lead to serious problems. Fluid loss can result in pressure imbalances in the well, delays in drilling operations, safety risks, and environmental contamination.

This paper will investigate measures to combat fluid loss and the use of new technologies. When focusing on the main causes and consequences of fluid loss, we see that it can occur for various reasons. Geological causes, such as the presence of high-porosity formations like sandstone or carbonate, fractures, or voids, lead to fluid absorption. On the other hand, pressure mismatch can also be cited as an example

[4]

. Fluid loss can occur when the pressure of the drilling fluid is lower than the formation pressure. Drilling parameters should also be carefully monitored. High drilling speeds or inappropriate drilling techniques increase the risk of fluid loss. The consequences of fluid loss can be severe. Delays in drilling manifest as the slowing of operations and the requirement for additional resources during the fluid loss process. Safety risks refer to factors that lead to well collapse or the creation of dangerous conditions in the well when pressure drops. Environmental risks include contamination and ecological issues that arise when the fluid leaks into the environment

[5]

. Through various mitigation measures and technologies, different methods are applied to combat fluid loss in the event of potential and existing risks: The adjustment of fluid density—by adding materials like barium sulfate to increase the density—helps maintain pressure balance

[6]

. Anti-loss additives seal fractures and pores and prevent fluid absorption. Changing drilling techniques, such as optimizing the drilling method, can reduce the risk of fluid loss. Techniques such as slow drilling or modified drilling angles can be applied.

2.1. Impact of Lost Circulation on Drilling Operations

Pressure management includes the use of high-pressure drilling systems and special pressure control devices. Risk management and safety measures must include preventive actions and safety protocols related to fluid loss risk. In addition to density adjustment, the use of anti-loss additives plays a vital role in the management of fluid loss. These specialized additives work by sealing fractures and pores in the surrounding formation, effectively preventing unwanted fluid absorption. This creates a more stable environment for drilling operations and minimizes the risks associated with fluid loss. Moreover, modifications to drilling techniques can further mitigate the risk of fluid loss

[7]

. For instance, optimizing the drilling method itself can yield significant benefits. Techniques such as implementing slower drilling speeds or adjusting drilling angles can effectively reduce the stress on the wellbore and lower the risk of fluid loss during the drilling process. By carefully selecting and adjusting these techniques, drilling teams can enhance the overall stability of the operation. Another critical aspect of fluid loss prevention is pressure management. Employing high-pressure drilling systems, along with specialized pressure control devices, is essential for maintaining optimal pressure levels in the wellbore. This proactive approach helps prevent pressure drops that could lead to fluid loss incidents, thereby ensuring safer and more efficient drilling operations. Finally, a comprehensive approach to risk management must encompass not only reactive measures but also proactive strategies. Implementing preventive actions and robust safety protocols related to fluid loss risks is vital

[8]

. This includes regular training for personnel, thorough risk assessments, and the development of detailed emergency response plans. By integrating these components into the operational framework, companies can better safeguard their drilling activities against fluid loss and its associated impacts. To effectively combat the challenges posed by fluid loss, particularly in the face of both potential and existing risks, a variety of mitigation strategies and advanced technologies can be implemented. One of the primary approaches involves adjusting the fluid density. By incorporating heavy materials like barium sulfate (BaSO₄) into the drilling fluid (Figure 2), operators can significantly enhance the density of the fluid. The density (ρ) of the drilling fluid can be expressed as:

ρ = \frac{m}{V}

where m is the mass of the fluid and V is its volume.

Download: Download full-size image

Figure 2. Comparison of Fluid Densities.

This graphic illustrates the different types of drilling fluids mentioned in the paper, specifically how adjusting fluid density (e.g., adding barium sulfate) helps maintain pressure balance. It supports the point about using heavier fluids to mitigate fluid loss risks

[9]

This adjustment is crucial, as it helps maintain a delicate pressure balance within the wellbore, represented by the hydrostatic pressure equation:

P=ρ⋅g⋅h

where P is the pressure at depth, g is the acceleration due to gravity, and h is the height of the fluid column. The pressure changes in the wellbore at varying depths

[10]

. It aligns with the discussion on how maintaining hydrostatic pressure is crucial for preventing fluid loss and the impact of fluid density on well pressure (Figure 3).

Download: Download full-size image

Figure 3. Pressure Gradient in Wellbore.

By ensuring that the fluid density is adequately increased, the likelihood of fluid loss can be substantially reduced. In addition to density adjustment, the use of anti-loss additives plays a vital role in the management of fluid loss. These specialized additives work by sealing fractures and pores in the surrounding formation, effectively preventing unwanted fluid absorption

[11]

. The effectiveness of these additives can be quantified using the permeability reduction factor (R_k) which is calculated as:

Rk = \frac{k 0 - k}{k 0}

where k₀is the initial permeability and k is the permeability after the application of anti-loss additives. This creates a more stable environment for drilling operations and minimizes the risks associated with fluid loss. Moreover, modifications to drilling techniques can further mitigate the risk of fluid loss

[12]

. For instance, optimizing the drilling method itself can yield significant benefits. Techniques such as implementing slower drilling speeds (v_d) or adjusting drilling angles (θ) can effectively reduce the stress on the wellbore. The impact of drilling speed on the rate of penetration (ROP) can be expressed as:

ROP=f(v_d,θ)

By carefully selecting and adjusting these techniques, drilling teams can enhance the overall stability of the operation. Another critical aspect of fluid loss prevention is pressure management

[13]

. Employing high-pressure drilling systems, along with specialized pressure control devices, is essential for maintaining optimal pressure levels in the wellbore. This proactive approach helps prevent pressure drops that could lead to fluid loss incidents, represented by the pressure gradient (ΔP) in the wellbore:

ΔP= P_initial- P_final

Where P_initialis the pressure at the start of the operation and P_final is the pressure at the time of potential loss. By ensuring that pressure levels are adequately maintained, companies can safeguard against the complications arising from fluid loss. Finally, a comprehensive approach to risk management must encompass not only reactive measures but also proactive strategies. Implementing preventive actions and robust safety protocols related to fluid loss risks is vital

[14]

2.2. The Solution Methods

The solution to the issue directly depends on preventive measures and the level of preparedness. An emergency plan refers to having strategies in place that describe what to do in case of fluid loss, and it is essential. Personnel training, meaning informing drilling workers about the risks of fluid loss and corresponding safety measures, is of great importance. Regular monitoring and analysis should be conducted. By tracking well pressure and the drilling process, potential fluid loss events can be prevented. Successfully managing this challenge relies heavily on preventive strategies and robust preparedness

[15]

. Crafting a comprehensive emergency response plan is foundational; it establishes clear protocols for addressing fluid loss scenarios swiftly and effectively. Equally critical is thorough training for all personnel—ensuring that drilling teams are well-informed about the specific risks associated with fluid loss and fully understand the safety measures designed to mitigate these risks. Consistent monitoring and detailed analysis also play pivotal roles. By closely tracking well pressure and observing each stage of the drilling process, teams can identify early warning signs of fluid loss, allowing for timely intervention and reduced impact on operations.

3. Conclusion

Research and innovation must always remain a focus. Scientific research and technological advancements are increasing to prevent fluid loss. Artificial intelligence and data analysis are among the factors that continue to maintain their significance. AI technologies and big data analysis are used to predict potential fluid loss risks in the drilling process in advance. New chemicals and additives are crucial in developing more effective and environmentally friendly anti-leak measures. Nanotechnology offers innovative solutions to prevent fluid loss. We already know that drilling fluid absorption can cause serious problems in the drilling industry. With a deeper understanding of the causes and consequences of ingestion, the development of control measures and preventive protocols, it is possible to solve this problem. Future research and technological innovations will ensure effective management of absorption and increase the safety of the drilling process.

Abbreviations

Phs	Hydrostatic Pressure
Phy	Formation Pressure
MW	Mud Weight
ROP	Rate of Penetration
RIH	Run in Hole
POOH	Pull Out of The Hole
SG	Specific Gravity

Author Contributions

Isgandarli Turgay Talib is the sole author. The author read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

References

[1]	Sun, J., Bai, Y., Lv, K., Zhang, G., & Li, Y.** (2022). Status and prospect of drilling fluid loss and lost circulation control technology in fractured formation. Gels, 8(5), 260. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels8050260
[2]	Zhang, S., Liu, J., & Wang, F.** (2022). Interpretable lost circulation analysis: Labeled, identified, and classified severity for drilling operations. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 208, 1692-1698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.108745
[3]	Gong, Z., Wang, Q., Liu, J., & Zheng, Y.** (2021). Mitigation of lost circulation in oil-based drilling fluids using oil absorbent polymers. MDPI, 10(3), 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10030476
[4]	He, Z., Li, X., Wang, Y., & Liu, Z.** (2021). Innovative approaches to lost circulation material design for deep well drilling. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 92, 103858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103858
[5]	Xie, L., Li, J., & Zhang, D.** (2023). Advanced study on the influence of drilling fluid rheology on lost circulation prevention. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 13(2), 627-635. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10953-023-01188-1
[6]	Khan, M., Chaudhary, D., & Sultana, S.** (2021). Development of a novel lost circulation material for effective sealing in fractured formations. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 143(12), 125402. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4047033
[7]	Yang, M., Zhang, P., & Zhang, X.** (2023). New methods for real-time monitoring of lost circulation during drilling operations. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 75(9), 35-43. https://doi.org/10.2118/125465-PA
[8]	Zhou, Y., Wang, Y., & Wu, G.** (2022). A novel approach for predicting lost circulation in deep wells. SPE Drilling & Completion, 37(6), 759-767. https://doi.org/10.2118/212295-PA
[9]	Wang, X., Liu, H., & Tang, Z.** (2023). A comprehensive study of lost circulation and mud loss management in deep and ultra-deep wells. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 145(1), 12035. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4068909
[10]	Fang, L., Sun, X., & Zheng, T.** (2021). Optimization of lost circulation materials for high-temperature and high-pressure wells. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 86, 103708. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2021.103708
[11]	Zhang, L., Song, W., & Yu, Z.** (2022). An integrated approach for lost circulation prevention in drilling operations. Energy Reports, 8, 1321-1329. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2022.03.086
[12]	Liu, B., Gao, P., & Wang, S.** (2022). Design and application of advanced lost circulation materials for wellbore strengthening. SPE Journal, 27(5), 3383-3396. https://doi.org/10.2118/202680-PA
[13]	Xu, S., Guo, Y., & Lu, F.** (2023). Development of highly efficient lost circulation control technologies in fractured formations. Petroleum Science and Technology, 41(3), 201-210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10916466.2022.2063373
[14]	Liu, W., Cheng, Y., & Li, Z.** (2023). Characterization and development of new-generation lost circulation materials for deep-water drilling. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 145(9), 092303. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4067812
[15]	Zhu, C., Liu, Y., & Zhang, H.** (2021). A study on the application of multi-stage lost circulation materials in shale gas drilling operations. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 204, 107649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.107649

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Talib, I. T. (2024). Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 12(4), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Talib, I. T. Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2024, 12(4), 101-105. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Talib IT. Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2024;12(4):101-105. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12,
  author = {Isgandarli Turgay Talib},
  title = {Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations
},
  journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
  volume = {12},
  number = {4},
  pages = {101-105},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20241204.12},
  abstract = {Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations
},
 year = {2024}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations

AU  - Isgandarli Turgay Talib
Y1  - 2024/12/12
PY  - 2024
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12
T2  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
JF  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
JO  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
SP  - 101
EP  - 105
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7677
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12
AB  - Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations

VL  - 12
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Isgandarli Turgay Talib

College of Petroleum Engineering, Azerbaijan State Oil and Industry University, Baku, Azerbaijan

Contact Email

http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3852-8578

Download PDF

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Talib, I. T. (2024). Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations. International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering, 12(4), 101-105. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Talib, I. T. Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations. Int. J. Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2024, 12(4), 101-105. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Talib IT. Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations. Int J Oil Gas Coal Eng. 2024;12(4):101-105. doi: 10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12,
  author = {Isgandarli Turgay Talib},
  title = {Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations
},
  journal = {International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering},
  volume = {12},
  number = {4},
  pages = {101-105},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ogce.20241204.12},
  abstract = {Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations
},
 year = {2024}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations

AU  - Isgandarli Turgay Talib
Y1  - 2024/12/12
PY  - 2024
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12
DO  - 10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12
T2  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
JF  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
JO  - International Journal of Oil, Gas and Coal Engineering
SP  - 101
EP  - 105
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2376-7677
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ogce.20241204.12
AB  - Optimizing Prevention Methods and Drilling Fluid Parameters to Minimize Lost Circulation in Drilling Operations

VL  - 12
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download