The livestock feed resources in Ethiopia are classified as natural pasture, crop residues, improved pasture and forage, agro-industrial by-products, and also hay production of which the first two feed resources are the major feed contributors for the livestock production in Ethiopia but they are lacking in protein and minerals. Natural pastures contribute about 80-85 of animal feed in Ethiopia, including naturally occurring grasses, legumes, shrubs, hurbs, and tree foliages. Crop residue is one of the feed resources used for animal production in Ethiopia and is available in those areas in which livestock and crop production are practiced. Around 30 million tonnes of DM of agricultural crop residues are produced annually on the national scale, of which 70% are used as animal feed. The major agro-industrial by products commonly used in Ethiopia are obtained from different agro-industries. The nutritional values of agro-industrial by products are excellent but their productivity is small, limited, and limited to few farms in urban and peri-urban areas and they contribute much less to livestock feed. Furthermore, traditional livestock feed supply mainly depends upon natural pasture and crop residues, which have low crude protein and other chemical composition. However, there is tremendous potential to alleviate feed shortages using improved forage production. To fulfill this gap, producing a stable improved forage in the livestock sector is mandatory. For that reason, the legume and grass intercropping system are important to increase biomass production and forage yield. Hence, Sudan grass (Aden gode) known with its plant height than other cultivars and vetch (Vicia dasycarpa) have greater plant height and creeping growth habit that enable compatible to larger grass species and they are selectable forages to enhance the forage yield and quality under similar times.
Published in | Reports (Volume 4, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13 |
Page(s) | 48-53 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Grass-Vetch, Mixture, Forage Yield and Quality
DM% | CP% | NDF% | ADF% | Source | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Sudan grass (Jumbo) alone | - | 10.0 | 64.9 | 42.6 | [17] |
Sudan grass alone | - | 8.8 | 65 | 40 | [10] |
Sorghum hybride intercrop | 8.40 | - | - | [4] | |
Sudan grass alone | - | 9.03 | 66.04 | 48.32 | [14] |
Sudan grass alone | - | 15-18 | 57.2 | 33.9 | [12] |
Sorghum hybrid alone | 26.83 | 8.64 | 55.18 | 36.52 | [20] |
Sorghum hybride intercrop | 9.21 | -6.37 | - | [22] | |
Sudan grass alone | - | 14.66 | 38.63 | 33.12 | [21] |
Sudan grass intercrop | - | 15.47 | 38.94 | 33.25 | [14] |
Sudan grass alone | 23.9 | 12.6 | 72.4 | 43.4 | [25] |
Sudan grass alone | - | 12.42 | 59.24 | 33.18 | [24] |
% | Percent |
ADF | Acid Detergent Fiber |
CP | Crude Protein |
CSA | Central Statistical Agency |
DM | Dry Matter |
GDP | Gross Domestic Product |
NDF | Neutral Detergent Fiber |
[1] | Alemu Tarekegn. (2014). Adaptability of vetch (Vicia spp.) for potential feed production in Gumara-Maksegnit watershed, North Gondar, Ethiopia. Journal Livestock Research for Rural Development, 26(7), |
[2] | Ashenafi Mengistu, Getnet Assefa, & Fekede Feyissa. (2019). Feed Resources Availability and Feeding Practices of Smallholder Farmers in Selected Districts of West Shewa Zone, Ethiopia Feed Resources Availability and Feeding Practices of Smallholder. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 15, |
[3] | Aynalem Haile, Workneh Ayalew, Noah Kebede, Tadelle Dessie and Azage Tegegne. (2011). Breeding strategy to improve Ethiopian Boran cattle for meat and milk production. 26, 46. |
[4] | Basaran, U., Copur Dogrusoz, M., Gulumser, E., & Mut, H. (2017). Hay yield and quality of intercropped sorghum-sudan grass hybrid and legumes with different seed ratio. Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 22(1), 47–53. |
[5] | Boufennara, S. Lopez, H. Bousseboua, R. Bodas, and L. Bouazza. (2012). Chemical composition and digestibility of some browse plant species collected from Algerian arid rangelands. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 10(1), 88 98. |
[6] | Belel M., R. Halim, M. Rafii & H. Saud. (2014). Intercropping of Corn with Some Selected Legumes for Improved Forage Production: A Review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 6(3), 48. |
[7] | CSA (Centeral Statistical Agency). (2018). Agricultural sample survey Volume II report on livestock and livestock characteristics, Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, Central Statistical Agency; Statistical bulletin number 587. |
[8] | CSA (Centeral Statistical Agency). (2021). Agricultural Sample Survey. Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics (Private Peasant Holdings). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia, II (587), 104. |
[9] | Fantahun Dereje. (2016). The Effect of Variety and Seed Proportions on Yield, Nutritional Quality and Compatibility of Oat and Vetch Mixtures. Msc. Thesis, Addis Ababa University, College of Veterinary Medicine and Agriculture, Department Of Animal Production Studies. |
[10] | Getachew Assefa. (2021). Efforts, Successes And Challenges Of Green Feed Production In Ethiopia. Journal of Animal and Feed Research, 11(1), 13 17. |
[11] | Gezahagn Kebede, Getnet Assefa, Alemayehu Mengistu, and Hussein Mohammed. (2013). Evaluation of Vetch Species and their Accessions for Agronomic Performance and Nutritive Value in the Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Ethiop. J. Agric. Sci., 24, 99–121. |
[12] | Guleria, G., & Kumar, N. (2016). Sowing methods and varying seed rates of cowpea on production potentialof sorghum, sudan grass hybrid and cowpea: A review. Agricultural Research Communication Centre journals, 37(4), 290 299. |
[13] | IGAD (Intergovernmental Authority on Development). (2011). The Contribution of Livestock to the Ethiopian Economy – Part II. IGAD Livestock Policy Initiative Working Paper No. 02-11. |
[14] | Khan, Z., Ahmad, K., Danish, M., & Mirzaei, F. (2012). Minerals Profile of Forages for Grazing Ruminants in Pakistan. International Journal of Livestock Research, 2(2), 74. |
[15] | Lima, E., Pires, A., Moura, M., Costa, F., Rodrigues, S., & Alves, K. (2017). Nutritional characteristics of Sorghum hybrids hay (Sorghum sudanense sudanense vs. Sorghum bicolor). Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences, 39(3), 229 234. |
[16] | Malede Birhan, & Adugna Tolera. (2014). Livestock Feed Resources Assessment, Constraints and Improvement Strategies in Ethiopia. Middle-East Jornal of Scientific Research, 21(4), 616–622. |
[17] | Mekonnen Tadessie. (2020). The Status of Improved Forage Production and Utilization in Horro Guduru Wollega Zone, Western Oromiya Regional State, Ethiopia. World Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16(4), 238–246. |
[18] | Muluneh Minta and Angaw Tsige. (2014). Effect of Rhizobium Inoculation on Herbage Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Fixation of Annual Forage Legumes on Nitisols in Central Highlands of Ethiopia. Journal of Advances in Applied Agricultural Sciences, 02(10), 29–48. |
[19] | Najmaldin, S. S. Y., & Ali, G. S. (2019). Effect Of Seed Rate And Nitrogen Fertilizer On Forage Yield Of Sudangrass (Sorghum Sudanense " Piper " Stapf) In Central Sudan. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies (IJIRAS), 6(4), 4–9. |
[20] | Prusty, S., Mohini, M., Kundu, S. S., Kumar, A., & Datt, C. (2014). Erratum to Methane emissions from river buffaloes fed on green fodders in relation to the nutrient intake and digestibility. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 46(1), 71. |
[21] | Rusdy, M. (2021). Grass-legume intercropping for sustainability animal production in the tropics. CAB Reviews, 16(021). |
[22] | Sefa Salo. (2017). Estimation of Feeds and Fodders for Livestock Population of Ethiopia and Mitigation of Feed Shortage. Journal of Natural Sciences Research, 7(11), 45–51. |
[23] | Shimelis Mengistu, Ajebu Nurfeta, Adugna Tolera, Melkamu Bezabih, Abera Adie, Endalkachw Wolde-meskel, and Mesfin Zenebe. (2021). Livestock Production Challenges and Improved Forage Production Efforts in the Damot Gale District of Wolaita Zone, Ethiopia. Hindawi Advances in Agriculture, 1–10. |
[24] | Solomon Tefera, Bimrew Asmare, and Firew Tegegne. (2019). Farmers’ utilization practice, yield and chemical composition of selected improved forages grown in natural resource management areas of Farta Farmers’ utilization practice, yield and chemical composition of selected improved forages grown in natural. Cogent Food & Agriculture, 5(1), 1686961. |
[25] | Zafaranieh, M. (2015). Effect of various combinations of safflower and chickpea intercropping on yield and yield components of safflower. Agriculture Science Developments, 4, 31–34. |
APA Style
Ambaw, H., Tadilo, M., Kumie, B. (2024). Effect of Seed Rate on Forage Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sudan Grass and Vetch Mixtures in Ethiopia: A Review. Reports, 4(3), 48-53. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13
ACS Style
Ambaw, H.; Tadilo, M.; Kumie, B. Effect of Seed Rate on Forage Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sudan Grass and Vetch Mixtures in Ethiopia: A Review. Reports. 2024, 4(3), 48-53. doi: 10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13
AMA Style
Ambaw H, Tadilo M, Kumie B. Effect of Seed Rate on Forage Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sudan Grass and Vetch Mixtures in Ethiopia: A Review. Reports. 2024;4(3):48-53. doi: 10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13
@article{10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13, author = {Habtie Ambaw and Mekuanint Tadilo and Berie Kumie}, title = {Effect of Seed Rate on Forage Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sudan Grass and Vetch Mixtures in Ethiopia: A Review }, journal = {Reports}, volume = {4}, number = {3}, pages = {48-53}, doi = {10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.reports.20240403.13}, abstract = {The livestock feed resources in Ethiopia are classified as natural pasture, crop residues, improved pasture and forage, agro-industrial by-products, and also hay production of which the first two feed resources are the major feed contributors for the livestock production in Ethiopia but they are lacking in protein and minerals. Natural pastures contribute about 80-85 of animal feed in Ethiopia, including naturally occurring grasses, legumes, shrubs, hurbs, and tree foliages. Crop residue is one of the feed resources used for animal production in Ethiopia and is available in those areas in which livestock and crop production are practiced. Around 30 million tonnes of DM of agricultural crop residues are produced annually on the national scale, of which 70% are used as animal feed. The major agro-industrial by products commonly used in Ethiopia are obtained from different agro-industries. The nutritional values of agro-industrial by products are excellent but their productivity is small, limited, and limited to few farms in urban and peri-urban areas and they contribute much less to livestock feed. Furthermore, traditional livestock feed supply mainly depends upon natural pasture and crop residues, which have low crude protein and other chemical composition. However, there is tremendous potential to alleviate feed shortages using improved forage production. To fulfill this gap, producing a stable improved forage in the livestock sector is mandatory. For that reason, the legume and grass intercropping system are important to increase biomass production and forage yield. Hence, Sudan grass (Aden gode) known with its plant height than other cultivars and vetch (Vicia dasycarpa) have greater plant height and creeping growth habit that enable compatible to larger grass species and they are selectable forages to enhance the forage yield and quality under similar times. }, year = {2024} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Effect of Seed Rate on Forage Yield, and Nutritional Value of Sudan Grass and Vetch Mixtures in Ethiopia: A Review AU - Habtie Ambaw AU - Mekuanint Tadilo AU - Berie Kumie Y1 - 2024/08/20 PY - 2024 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13 DO - 10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13 T2 - Reports JF - Reports JO - Reports SP - 48 EP - 53 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7146 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.reports.20240403.13 AB - The livestock feed resources in Ethiopia are classified as natural pasture, crop residues, improved pasture and forage, agro-industrial by-products, and also hay production of which the first two feed resources are the major feed contributors for the livestock production in Ethiopia but they are lacking in protein and minerals. Natural pastures contribute about 80-85 of animal feed in Ethiopia, including naturally occurring grasses, legumes, shrubs, hurbs, and tree foliages. Crop residue is one of the feed resources used for animal production in Ethiopia and is available in those areas in which livestock and crop production are practiced. Around 30 million tonnes of DM of agricultural crop residues are produced annually on the national scale, of which 70% are used as animal feed. The major agro-industrial by products commonly used in Ethiopia are obtained from different agro-industries. The nutritional values of agro-industrial by products are excellent but their productivity is small, limited, and limited to few farms in urban and peri-urban areas and they contribute much less to livestock feed. Furthermore, traditional livestock feed supply mainly depends upon natural pasture and crop residues, which have low crude protein and other chemical composition. However, there is tremendous potential to alleviate feed shortages using improved forage production. To fulfill this gap, producing a stable improved forage in the livestock sector is mandatory. For that reason, the legume and grass intercropping system are important to increase biomass production and forage yield. Hence, Sudan grass (Aden gode) known with its plant height than other cultivars and vetch (Vicia dasycarpa) have greater plant height and creeping growth habit that enable compatible to larger grass species and they are selectable forages to enhance the forage yield and quality under similar times. VL - 4 IS - 3 ER -