Despite of great progress is being made towards the Education for All and Millennium development goals (MDGs) demonstrated by increase number of enrollments in schools, children with disabilities are still combating educational exclusion. Inclusive education is an educational system in which children with and without disabilities learns together. To explore the perceptions of stakeholders regarding inclusive education in visually impaired children and identify gaps in their perceptions. To identify the barriers in implementation of inclusive education. A qualitative study using 20 in depth interviews and one focus group discussion with stakeholders was carried out to explore perceptions of stakeholders. Theoretical frameworks; part of health policy triangle (actors) was used with human rights, social constructivism and symbolic interactionism. Pure grounded theory analysis was used to reach the findings. Purposive and snow ball sampling was used to approach relevant respondents. The theory that emerged from study was that “inclusive education is difficult to implement at grass root level in Pakistan, however at tertiary level (universities and colleges) of education inclusion can be implemented due to better brail training and mental stability”. Supporter explained their views in terms of participation, role of teachers, role of parents, benefits of inclusion, resources, awareness, level of education, equality and non discrimination. Non supporter explain their opinions in terms of financial instability, transport, parents selfish attitude, social stigma, psychological issue, initial training, limitation in selection of subjects and similar community. Inclusion implementation could show better results at stage of higher education. Financial instability and access to regular schools are main barrier for inclusion in Pakistan but meanwhile they believed that inclusion represent equity and non discrimination among visually impaired students.
Published in | Rehabilitation Science (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14 |
Page(s) | 16-20 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Visually Impaired, Inclusion, Stakeholders
[1] | Gupta N, Kocur I. Chronic eye disease and the WHO Universal Eye Health Global Action Plan 2014-2019. Can J Ophthalmol J Can Ophtalmol. 2014 Oct; 49 (5): 403–5. |
[2] | Shamanna BR, Dandona L, Rao GN. Economic burden of blindness in India. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1998 Sep 1; 46 (3): 169. |
[3] | Ak T, Li Z, Nj R, Fc GD& A. Perceptions of students with disabilities concerning access and support in the learning environment of a rural-based university. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance. (AJPHERD) December 2013 (Supplement 1:2), pp. 356-364. 2013 Dec [cited 2017 Jan 16]; Available from: http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/13447. |
[4] | Chhabra S, Bose K, Chadha N. Botswana Early Childhood Educators’ Perceptions on Factors associated with the Inclusion of Children with Disabilities. Int J Learn Teach Educ Res [Internet]. 2016 Mar 31 [cited 2016 Dec 22]; 15 (3). Available from: https://www.ijlter.org/index.php/ijlter/article/view/513. |
[5] | Asia US. 2016 Progress Report - Educate All Girls and Boys [Internet]. [cited 2016 Dec 22]. Available from: http://www.unicefrosa-progressreport.org/childeducation.html. |
[6] | Berlach R, Chambers D. Inclusivity imperatives and the Australian National Curriculum. Educ Forum [Internet]. 2011 Jan 1; 75 (1). Available from: http://researchonline.nd.edu.au/edu_article/53. |
[7] | Loeb ME, Eide AH, Mont D. Approaching the measurement of disability prevalence: The case of Zambia. /data/revues/18750672/00020001/07000314/ [Internet]. 2008 Apr 17 [cited 2016 Dec 22]; Available from: http://www.em-consulte.com/en/article/145430. |
[8] | Vaz S, Wilson N, Falkmer M, Sim A, Scott M, Cordier R, et al. Factors Associated with Primary School Teachers’ Attitudes Towards the Inclusion of Students with Disabilities. PLOS ONE. 2015 Aug 28; 10 (8): e0137002. |
[9] | Chonge HM, Ongeti PEK, Wawire TM. Evaluation of Classroom Physical Adjustments for Inclusion of Pupils with Physical Disability within Inclusive Public Primary Schools in Bungoma County, Kenya. Am Sci Res J Eng Technol Sci ASRJETS. 2016 Feb 27; 17 (1): 105–20. |
[10] | Lindsay G. Educational psychology and the effectiveness of inclusive education/mainstreaming. Br J Educ Psychol. 2007 Mar; 77 (Pt 1): 1–24. |
[11] | Klicpera C, Klicpera BG. [Comparing students in inclusive education to those in special schools: the view of parents of children with learning disabilities]. Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2004 Dec; 53 (10): 685–706. |
[12] | Mphongoshe SJ, Mabunda NO, Klu EK, Tugli AK, Matshidze P. Stakeholders’ Perception and Experience of Inclusive Education: A Case of a Further Education and Training College in South Africa. 2015 [cited 2017 Jan 16]; Available from: http://krepublishers.com/02-Journals/IJES/IJES-10-0-000-15-Web/IJES-10-1-000-15-ABST-PDF/IJES-10-1-066-15-715-Mphongoshe-S-J/IJES-10-1-066-15-715-Mphongoshe-S-J-Tx%5B10%5D.pdf. |
[13] | Ak T, Li Z, Nj R, Fc GD& A. Perceptions of students with disabilities concerning access and support in the learning environment of a rural-based university. African Journal for Physical, Health Education, Recreation and Dance. (AJPHERD) December 2013 (Supplement 1: 2), pp. 356-364. 2013 Dec [cited 2017 Jan 16]; Available from: http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/13447. |
[14] | Tugli AK, Zungu LI, Ramakuela NJ, Goon DT, Anyanwu FC. Perceived challenges of serving students with disabilities in a historically disadvantaged tertiary institution, South Africa. 2013 [cited 2017 Jan 16]; Available from: http://uir.unisa.ac.za/handle/10500/13442. |
[15] | Singal N, Jeffery R. DEVELOPMENTAL ARTICLES TRANSITIONS TO ADULTHOOD FOR YOUNG PEOPLE WITH DISABILITIES IN INDIA: CURRENT STATUS AND EMERGING PROSPECTS. [cited 2017 Jan 16]; Available from: http://ceid.educ.cam.ac.uk/publications/transition_adulthood_india_NS_RJ_09_06_11.pdf. |
APA Style
Anam Altaf, Ayesha Babar Kawish, Ishtiaq Anwar. (2017). Inclusive Education in Visually Impaired Children: Stakeholders Perspective. Rehabilitation Science, 2(1), 16-20. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14
ACS Style
Anam Altaf; Ayesha Babar Kawish; Ishtiaq Anwar. Inclusive Education in Visually Impaired Children: Stakeholders Perspective. Rehabil. Sci. 2017, 2(1), 16-20. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14
@article{10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14, author = {Anam Altaf and Ayesha Babar Kawish and Ishtiaq Anwar}, title = {Inclusive Education in Visually Impaired Children: Stakeholders Perspective}, journal = {Rehabilitation Science}, volume = {2}, number = {1}, pages = {16-20}, doi = {10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rs.20170201.14}, abstract = {Despite of great progress is being made towards the Education for All and Millennium development goals (MDGs) demonstrated by increase number of enrollments in schools, children with disabilities are still combating educational exclusion. Inclusive education is an educational system in which children with and without disabilities learns together. To explore the perceptions of stakeholders regarding inclusive education in visually impaired children and identify gaps in their perceptions. To identify the barriers in implementation of inclusive education. A qualitative study using 20 in depth interviews and one focus group discussion with stakeholders was carried out to explore perceptions of stakeholders. Theoretical frameworks; part of health policy triangle (actors) was used with human rights, social constructivism and symbolic interactionism. Pure grounded theory analysis was used to reach the findings. Purposive and snow ball sampling was used to approach relevant respondents. The theory that emerged from study was that “inclusive education is difficult to implement at grass root level in Pakistan, however at tertiary level (universities and colleges) of education inclusion can be implemented due to better brail training and mental stability”. Supporter explained their views in terms of participation, role of teachers, role of parents, benefits of inclusion, resources, awareness, level of education, equality and non discrimination. Non supporter explain their opinions in terms of financial instability, transport, parents selfish attitude, social stigma, psychological issue, initial training, limitation in selection of subjects and similar community. Inclusion implementation could show better results at stage of higher education. Financial instability and access to regular schools are main barrier for inclusion in Pakistan but meanwhile they believed that inclusion represent equity and non discrimination among visually impaired students.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Inclusive Education in Visually Impaired Children: Stakeholders Perspective AU - Anam Altaf AU - Ayesha Babar Kawish AU - Ishtiaq Anwar Y1 - 2017/03/02 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14 DO - 10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14 T2 - Rehabilitation Science JF - Rehabilitation Science JO - Rehabilitation Science SP - 16 EP - 20 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2637-594X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170201.14 AB - Despite of great progress is being made towards the Education for All and Millennium development goals (MDGs) demonstrated by increase number of enrollments in schools, children with disabilities are still combating educational exclusion. Inclusive education is an educational system in which children with and without disabilities learns together. To explore the perceptions of stakeholders regarding inclusive education in visually impaired children and identify gaps in their perceptions. To identify the barriers in implementation of inclusive education. A qualitative study using 20 in depth interviews and one focus group discussion with stakeholders was carried out to explore perceptions of stakeholders. Theoretical frameworks; part of health policy triangle (actors) was used with human rights, social constructivism and symbolic interactionism. Pure grounded theory analysis was used to reach the findings. Purposive and snow ball sampling was used to approach relevant respondents. The theory that emerged from study was that “inclusive education is difficult to implement at grass root level in Pakistan, however at tertiary level (universities and colleges) of education inclusion can be implemented due to better brail training and mental stability”. Supporter explained their views in terms of participation, role of teachers, role of parents, benefits of inclusion, resources, awareness, level of education, equality and non discrimination. Non supporter explain their opinions in terms of financial instability, transport, parents selfish attitude, social stigma, psychological issue, initial training, limitation in selection of subjects and similar community. Inclusion implementation could show better results at stage of higher education. Financial instability and access to regular schools are main barrier for inclusion in Pakistan but meanwhile they believed that inclusion represent equity and non discrimination among visually impaired students. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -