Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation

Donatella Rita Petretto; Silvia Vinci; Ivano Paolo Todde; Paola Piras; Ilenia Pistis; Carmelo Masala

doi:doi:10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation

Donatella Rita Petretto, Silvia Vinci, Ivano Paolo Todde, Paola Piras, Ilenia Pistis, Carmelo Masala

Published in Rehabilitation Science (Volume 2, Issue 4)

Received: 17 August 2017 Accepted: 5 September 2017 Published: 30 September 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to analyse how the different conceptual models of disability can help daily work of rehabilitation clinicians. Previous papers described the usefulness in rehabilitation psychology of the International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) a worldwide-known conceptual model of disability [1-6] In this paper, we describe how other conceptual models could be useful for rehabilitation clinicians [7-8]. A Narrative review of the literature on conceptual models of disability was undertaken. Based on a previous history of Conceptual models of disability in the 20° century, we describe four groups of models and their impact on rehabilitation: models that analysed the role of pathology, models that analysed the relationship between pathology and its consequences, models that emphasized the role of the environment, and models that analysed the relationship between person and environment. In the daily routine of rehabilitation psychology and in general in rehabilitation sciences, as in the theoretical analysis, one can choose one or another of these options, although the history of the conceptual models of disability shows that the fourth option is the most advanced and the most worldwide-recognized (thanks to the ICF). As for rehabilitation clinicians, the awareness of the chosen option can help in understanding the focus of intervention and to modify it. The main aims of this process is to transform the disablement process into a positive one by which the person can be enabled.

Published in	Rehabilitation Science (Volume 2, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11
Page(s)	75-81
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Disablement, Enablement, Health, Environment, Individual, Conceptual Models, Dyslexia

References

[1]	World Health Organization (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. Geneva, World Health Organization.
[2]	Law, M., Darrah, J., Pollock, N., King, G., Rosenbaum, P., Russell, D. et al. (1998). Family-centred functional therapy for children with cerebral palsy: An emerging practice model. Physical & Occupational Therapy in Paediatrics, 18(1):83-102.
[3]	Bruyere, S.M., Peterson, D.B. (2005). Introduction to the Special Section on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: implications for Rehabilitation Psychology. Rehabilitation Psychology, 5(2), 102-104.
[4]	Law, M., Darrah, J., Pollock, N., Rosenbaum, P., Russell, D., Walter, S. D. et al. (2007). Focus on Function – a randomized controlled trial comparing two rehabilitation interventions for young children with cerebral palsy. BMC Paediatrics, 7(1): 31.
[5]	Mc Dougall, J., Wright, V., & Rosenbaum, P. (2010). The ICF model of functioning and disability: incorporating quality of life and human development. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 13(3): 204-211.
[6]	Thyberg M., Arvidsson P., Thyberg I., Nordenfelt L. (2014) Rehabilitation and Practice: Simplified bipartite concepts of functioning and disability recommended for interdisciplinary use of the ICF, Disability and Rehabilitation, 1-11.
[7]	Masala, C, Petretto, D. R. (2008a). From disablement to enablement: Conceptual models of disability in the twentieth century, Disability and Rehabilitation,30(17):1233-1244.
[8]	Masala, C., Petretto, D. R. (2008b). Psicologia dell'handicap e della riabilitazione: dall'hand in the cap alla partecipazione. Roma, Kappa Edizioni.
[9]	World Health Organization (2011). World Report on Disability, Geneva, World Health Organization.
[10]	Peterson, D. B. (2005). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an introduction for rehabilitation psychologists, Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(2): 15-11.
[11]	Florian, L., Hollenweger, J., Simeonsson, R. J., Wedell, K., Riddell, S., Terzi, L., Holland A. (2006) Cross-cultural perspectives on the classification of children with disabilities: part 1, issues in the classification of children with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 40 (19): 36-45.
[12]	Federici S., Bracalenti, M., Meloni, F., Luciano, J.V. (2016): World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: An international systematic review, Disability and Rehabilitation.
[13]	Scherer, M.J., Glueckauf, R. (2005). Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for Activities and Participation, Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(2): 132-141.
[14]	Levitt, J.M. (2017) Developing a model of disability that focuses on the actions of disabled people.Disability & Society, 32 (5): 735-747.
[15]	Masala, C., Petretto, DR., Models of Disability. In CIRRIE, International Encyclopedia of Rehabilitation, Center for International Rehabilitation Research Information and Exchange (CIRRIE), 2010 in http://cirrie.buffalo.edu.
[16]	Brandt, E.N., Pope,A.M.(Eds.) (1997). Enabling America: assessing the role of rehabilitation science and engineering. Washington, D. C., National Academy Press.
[17]	Borg, J., Larsson, S., O’ Stergren, P., Eide, A.H. (2010). The friction model- a dynamic model of functioning, disability and contextual factors and its conceptual and practical applicability. Disability and Rehabilitation, 32(21):1790-1797.
[18]	Nagi, S.Z. (1965). Some conceptual issues in disability and rehabilitation. In: M.B., Sussman (Ed.). Sociology and Rehabilitation.(pp. 100-113).Washington D.C., American Sociological Association.
[19]	Harris, A. (1971). Handicapped and Impaired in Great Britain (part 1). London, HMSO.
[20]	UPIAS (1976). Fundamental Principles of Disability, Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. London, The Disability Alliance.
[21]	Badley, E.M., Thompson, R.P., Wood, P.H.N. (1978). The prevalence and severity of major disabling conditions: a reappraisal of the government social survey of the handicapped and impaired in Great Britain. International Journal of Epidemiology,7:145-151.
[22]	Wood, P.H.N.(1987). Maladies imaginaries: some common misconceptions about the I.C.I.D.H.. International Disabilities Studies. 9: 125-128.
[23]	Wood, P.H.N. (1989). Measuring the consequences of illness. World Health Statistics Quarterly, 42: 115-121.
[24]	Verbrugge, L.M., Jette, A.M. (1994). The Disablement process. Social Science Medicine, 38: 1-14.
[25]	Pope, A.M., Tarlov, A.R. (Eds) (1991). Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington D.C., The National Academy Press.
[26]	Nagi, S.Z. (1991). Disability concepts revised: implications for prevention. In A.M. Pope, A.R., Tarlov, (Eds.), Disability in America: toward a national agenda for prevention. Washington D.C., The National Academy Press.
[27]	World Health Organization (1980). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease, published in accordance with resolution WHA 29.35 of the Twenty-ninth World Health Assembly, may 1976. Geneva, World Health Organization.
[28]	World Health Organization (1993). International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities and Handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease, published in accordance with resolution WHA 29.35 of the Twenty-ninth World Health Assembly, may 1976 (reprinted with foreword). Geneva, World Health Organization.
[29]	Shaywitz, S.E., Morris, R., Shaywitz, B.A. (2008). The education of dyslexic children from childhood to young adulthood, Annual Review of Psychology. 59: 451-75.
[30]	Pennington, B.F. (2009). How neuropsychology informs our understanding of developmental disorders, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(1-2): 72-8.
[31]	Petretto, D.R., Masala, C. (in press) L’intelligenza: L’intelligenza: tra psicologia clinica ed intervento. Ed. Aracne, Roma.
[32]	Whiteneck, G. (2006). Conceptual models of disability: past, present and present. In M.J. Field, A.M. Jette, L. Martin (Eds.), Workshop on Disability in America: a new look summary and background papers (pp. 309-330). Washington, The National Academies Press.
[33]	Mura G., Petretto D.R., Bhat K.M., Carta M.G. (2012), Schizophrenia: from epidemiology to rehabilitation, Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, 8, 52-66.
[34]	Alhadi, J., Abdulhakim, E. (2017). A Review of Conceptual Models for Rehabilitation Research and Practice. Rehabilitation Sciences. 2(2): 46-53.
[35]	Simpson, J., Thomas, C. (2014) Clinical psychology and disability studies: bridging the disciplinary divide on mental health and disability, 1-6.
[36]	Petretto, D.R., Piras, P. Pistis, I., Masala, C. (2017b) Disability, learning difficulties and environment: Psychology of disability and Neuropsychology as basis for the development of a “School for all”? in Faiferri, M., Bartocci,S., Pusceddu, F. (2017) ILS Innovative learning spaces, List Laboratorio Internazionale Editoriale, ISBN 9788899854393.
[37]	Petretto, D.R., Piras, P., Pistis, I., Masala, C. (2017) Disabilità, difficoltà di apprendimento ed ambiente: La psicologia della disabilità e la neuropsicologia quali basi per lo sviluppo di una “School for all”? in Faiferri, M., Bartocci,S., Pusceddu, F. (2017a) ILS Innovative learning spaces, List Laboratorio Internazionale Editoriale, ISBN 9788899854409.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Donatella Rita Petretto, Silvia Vinci, Ivano Paolo Todde, Paola Piras, Ilenia Pistis, et al. (2017). Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Science, 2(4), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Donatella Rita Petretto; Silvia Vinci; Ivano Paolo Todde; Paola Piras; Ilenia Pistis, et al. Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation. Rehabil. Sci. 2017, 2(4), 75-81. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Donatella Rita Petretto, Silvia Vinci, Ivano Paolo Todde, Paola Piras, Ilenia Pistis, et al. Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation. Rehabil Sci. 2017;2(4):75-81. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11,
  author = {Donatella Rita Petretto and Silvia Vinci and Ivano Paolo Todde and Paola Piras and Ilenia Pistis and Carmelo Masala},
  title = {Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation},
  journal = {Rehabilitation Science},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {75-81},
  doi = {10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rs.20170204.11},
  abstract = {The aim of this paper is to analyse how the different conceptual models of disability can help daily work of rehabilitation clinicians. Previous papers described the usefulness in rehabilitation psychology of the International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) a worldwide-known conceptual model of disability [1-6] In this paper, we describe how other conceptual models could be useful for rehabilitation clinicians [7-8]. A Narrative review of the literature on conceptual models of disability was undertaken. Based on a previous history of Conceptual models of disability in the 20° century, we describe four groups of models and their impact on rehabilitation: models that analysed the role of pathology, models that analysed the relationship between pathology and its consequences, models that emphasized the role of the environment, and models that analysed the relationship between person and environment. In the daily routine of rehabilitation psychology and in general in rehabilitation sciences, as in the theoretical analysis, one can choose one or another of these options, although the history of the conceptual models of disability shows that the fourth option is the most advanced and the most worldwide-recognized (thanks to the ICF). As for rehabilitation clinicians, the awareness of the chosen option can help in understanding the focus of intervention and to modify it. The main aims of this process is to transform the disablement process into a positive one by which the person can be enabled.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation
AU  - Donatella Rita Petretto
AU  - Silvia Vinci
AU  - Ivano Paolo Todde
AU  - Paola Piras
AU  - Ilenia Pistis
AU  - Carmelo Masala
Y1  - 2017/09/30
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11
T2  - Rehabilitation Science
JF  - Rehabilitation Science
JO  - Rehabilitation Science
SP  - 75
EP  - 81
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-594X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11
AB  - The aim of this paper is to analyse how the different conceptual models of disability can help daily work of rehabilitation clinicians. Previous papers described the usefulness in rehabilitation psychology of the International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) a worldwide-known conceptual model of disability [1-6] In this paper, we describe how other conceptual models could be useful for rehabilitation clinicians [7-8]. A Narrative review of the literature on conceptual models of disability was undertaken. Based on a previous history of Conceptual models of disability in the 20° century, we describe four groups of models and their impact on rehabilitation: models that analysed the role of pathology, models that analysed the relationship between pathology and its consequences, models that emphasized the role of the environment, and models that analysed the relationship between person and environment. In the daily routine of rehabilitation psychology and in general in rehabilitation sciences, as in the theoretical analysis, one can choose one or another of these options, although the history of the conceptual models of disability shows that the fourth option is the most advanced and the most worldwide-recognized (thanks to the ICF). As for rehabilitation clinicians, the awareness of the chosen option can help in understanding the focus of intervention and to modify it. The main aims of this process is to transform the disablement process into a positive one by which the person can be enabled.
VL  - 2
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Donatella Rita Petretto

Department of Education, Psychology and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Silvia Vinci

Department of Education, Psychology and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Ivano Paolo Todde

Department of Education, Psychology and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Paola Piras

Department of Education, Psychology and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Ilenia Pistis

Department of Education, Psychology and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
Carmelo Masala

Department of Education, Psychology and Philosophy, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Donatella Rita Petretto, Silvia Vinci, Ivano Paolo Todde, Paola Piras, Ilenia Pistis, et al. (2017). Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation. Rehabilitation Science, 2(4), 75-81. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Donatella Rita Petretto; Silvia Vinci; Ivano Paolo Todde; Paola Piras; Ilenia Pistis, et al. Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation. Rehabil. Sci. 2017, 2(4), 75-81. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Donatella Rita Petretto, Silvia Vinci, Ivano Paolo Todde, Paola Piras, Ilenia Pistis, et al. Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation. Rehabil Sci. 2017;2(4):75-81. doi: 10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11,
  author = {Donatella Rita Petretto and Silvia Vinci and Ivano Paolo Todde and Paola Piras and Ilenia Pistis and Carmelo Masala},
  title = {Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation},
  journal = {Rehabilitation Science},
  volume = {2},
  number = {4},
  pages = {75-81},
  doi = {10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.rs.20170204.11},
  abstract = {The aim of this paper is to analyse how the different conceptual models of disability can help daily work of rehabilitation clinicians. Previous papers described the usefulness in rehabilitation psychology of the International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) a worldwide-known conceptual model of disability [1-6] In this paper, we describe how other conceptual models could be useful for rehabilitation clinicians [7-8]. A Narrative review of the literature on conceptual models of disability was undertaken. Based on a previous history of Conceptual models of disability in the 20° century, we describe four groups of models and their impact on rehabilitation: models that analysed the role of pathology, models that analysed the relationship between pathology and its consequences, models that emphasized the role of the environment, and models that analysed the relationship between person and environment. In the daily routine of rehabilitation psychology and in general in rehabilitation sciences, as in the theoretical analysis, one can choose one or another of these options, although the history of the conceptual models of disability shows that the fourth option is the most advanced and the most worldwide-recognized (thanks to the ICF). As for rehabilitation clinicians, the awareness of the chosen option can help in understanding the focus of intervention and to modify it. The main aims of this process is to transform the disablement process into a positive one by which the person can be enabled.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Conceptual Models of Disability and Their Role in the Daily Routine of Clinical Rehabilitation
AU  - Donatella Rita Petretto
AU  - Silvia Vinci
AU  - Ivano Paolo Todde
AU  - Paola Piras
AU  - Ilenia Pistis
AU  - Carmelo Masala
Y1  - 2017/09/30
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11
T2  - Rehabilitation Science
JF  - Rehabilitation Science
JO  - Rehabilitation Science
SP  - 75
EP  - 81
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2637-594X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.rs.20170204.11
AB  - The aim of this paper is to analyse how the different conceptual models of disability can help daily work of rehabilitation clinicians. Previous papers described the usefulness in rehabilitation psychology of the International classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) a worldwide-known conceptual model of disability [1-6] In this paper, we describe how other conceptual models could be useful for rehabilitation clinicians [7-8]. A Narrative review of the literature on conceptual models of disability was undertaken. Based on a previous history of Conceptual models of disability in the 20° century, we describe four groups of models and their impact on rehabilitation: models that analysed the role of pathology, models that analysed the relationship between pathology and its consequences, models that emphasized the role of the environment, and models that analysed the relationship between person and environment. In the daily routine of rehabilitation psychology and in general in rehabilitation sciences, as in the theoretical analysis, one can choose one or another of these options, although the history of the conceptual models of disability shows that the fourth option is the most advanced and the most worldwide-recognized (thanks to the ICF). As for rehabilitation clinicians, the awareness of the chosen option can help in understanding the focus of intervention and to modify it. The main aims of this process is to transform the disablement process into a positive one by which the person can be enabled.
VL  - 2
IS  - 4
ER  -

Copy | Download