Shibuya multiple knife edge diffraction loss method is presented in this paper. The Shibuya method is used to compute the effective diffraction loss of ten multiple knife edge obstructions for a 900 MHz GSM network. Each of the ten obstructions gave rise to a virtual hop which resulted in a knife edge diffraction loss while the overall diffraction loss, according to the Shibuya method is the sum of the diffraction loss computed for each of the ten virtual hops. According to the results, the highest line of sight (LOS) clearance height of 8.480769 m and the highest diffraction parameter of 0.397783 occurred in virtual hop 6. On the other hand, the lowest line of sight (LOS) clearance height of 0.628571 m and the lowest diffraction parameter of 0.044447 occurred in virtual hop 9. Furthermore, the highest virtual hop diffraction loss of 9.30294 dB occurred in virtual hop 6 whereas the lowest virtual hop diffraction loss of 6.38736 dB occurred in virtual hop 9. In all, the overall effective diffraction loss for the 10 knife edge obstructions as computed by the Shibuya is 71.7973 dB.
Published in | Software Engineering (Volume 5, Issue 2) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.se.20170502.12 |
Page(s) | 38-43 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Multiple Knife Edge, Diffraction Loss, Diffraction Parameter, Line of Sight, Clearance Height, Virtual Hop, Shibuya Method
[1] | Menon, R., & Cantu, P. (2015). U. S. Patent No. 9,063,434. Washington, DC: U. S. Patent and Trademark Office. |
[2] | Reeves, J., Krinner, L., Stewart, M., Pazmiño, A., & Schneble, D. (2015). Nonadiabatic diffraction of matter waves. Physical Review A, 92 (2), 023628. |
[3] | Rabiefar, H., Akbarpour, A., & Pourlak, M. (2012). Sensitivity Analysis of Mike21-BW Diffraction Model by using Breakwater Reflection Coefficient. |
[4] | Sakuyama, T., Funatomi, T., Iiyama, M., & Minoh, M. (2015). Diffraction-Compensating Coded Aperture for Inspection in Manufacturing. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 11 (3), 782-789. |
[5] | Naik, V. (2016). Hyperspectral Radiometer and Ultraviolet Spectrometer Design (Doctoral dissertation). |
[6] | Wei, Y. (2014, August). Depth reconstruction with Fresnel diffraction. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation (pp. 61-65). IEEE. |
[7] | Misra, I. S. (2013). Wireless Communications and Networks: 3G and Beyond. McGraw Hill Education (India) Pvt Ltd. |
[8] | Wesolowski, H., & Wesolowski, K. (2001). Mobile communication systems. John Wiley & Sons, Inc.. |
[9] | Ghasemi, A., Abedi, A., & Ghasemi, F. (2011). Propagation engineering in wireless communications. Springer Science & Business Media. |
[10] | Malila, B., Falowo, O., & Ventura, N. (2015, September). Millimeter wave small cell backhaul: An analysis of diffraction loss in NLOS links in urban canyons. In AFRICON, 2015 (pp. 1-5). IEEE. |
[11] | Phillips, C., Sicker, D., & Grunwald, D. (2013). A survey of wireless path loss prediction and coverage mapping methods. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 15 (1), 255-270. |
[12] | Tyson, R. K. (2014). Fresnel and Fraunhofer diffraction and wave optics. In Principles and Applications of Fourier Optics. IOP Publishing, Bristol, UK. |
[13] | Pedrotti, L. S. (2008). Basic physical optics. Fundamentals of Photonics, 152-154. |
[14] | Östlin, E. (2009). On Radio Wave Propagation Measurements and Modelling for Cellular Mobile Radio Networks. |
[15] | Baldassaro, P. M. (2001). RF and GIS: Field Strength Prediction for Frequencies between 900 MHz and 28 GHz. |
[16] | Qing, L. (2005). GIS Aided Radio Wave Propagation Modeling and Analysis (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University). |
[17] | Barclay, L. W. (2003). Propagation of radiowaves (Vol. 502). Iet. |
[18] | Sizun, H., & de Fornel, P. (2005). Radio wave propagation for telecommunication applications. Heidelberg: Springer. |
[19] | Shibuya S (1983) A Basic Atlas of Radio-Wave Propagation. John Wiley & Sons, New York. |
[20] | Aragon-Zavala, A. (2008). Antennas and propagation for wireless communication systems. John Wiley & Sons. |
[21] | Salous, S. (2013). Radio propagation measurement and channel modelling. John Wiley & Sons. |
[22] | Akkaşlı, C. (2009). Methods for Path loss Prediction. Reports from MSI, School of Mathematics and Systems Engineering, Report, 9067. |
[23] | Beyer, J. (2004). An approximate approach to predict multiple screen diffraction in the case of grazing incidence. Radio science, 39 (4). |
[24] | Guo, W., Mias, C., Farsad, N., & Wu, J. L. (2015). Molecular versus electromagnetic wave propagation loss in macro-scale environments. IEEE Transactions on Molecular, Biological and Multi-Scale Communications, 1 (1), 18-25. |
[25] | Adamo, F., Attivissimo, F., Carducci, C. G. C., & Lanzolla, A. M. L. (2015). A smart sensor network for sea water quality monitoring. IEEE Sensors Journal, 15 (5), 2514-2522. |
APA Style
Oloyede Adams Opeyemi, Ozuomba Simeon, Constance Kalu. (2017). Shibuya Method for Computing Ten Knife Edge Diffraction Loss. Software Engineering, 5(2), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20170502.12
ACS Style
Oloyede Adams Opeyemi; Ozuomba Simeon; Constance Kalu. Shibuya Method for Computing Ten Knife Edge Diffraction Loss. Softw. Eng. 2017, 5(2), 38-43. doi: 10.11648/j.se.20170502.12
@article{10.11648/j.se.20170502.12, author = {Oloyede Adams Opeyemi and Ozuomba Simeon and Constance Kalu}, title = {Shibuya Method for Computing Ten Knife Edge Diffraction Loss}, journal = {Software Engineering}, volume = {5}, number = {2}, pages = {38-43}, doi = {10.11648/j.se.20170502.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20170502.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.se.20170502.12}, abstract = {Shibuya multiple knife edge diffraction loss method is presented in this paper. The Shibuya method is used to compute the effective diffraction loss of ten multiple knife edge obstructions for a 900 MHz GSM network. Each of the ten obstructions gave rise to a virtual hop which resulted in a knife edge diffraction loss while the overall diffraction loss, according to the Shibuya method is the sum of the diffraction loss computed for each of the ten virtual hops. According to the results, the highest line of sight (LOS) clearance height of 8.480769 m and the highest diffraction parameter of 0.397783 occurred in virtual hop 6. On the other hand, the lowest line of sight (LOS) clearance height of 0.628571 m and the lowest diffraction parameter of 0.044447 occurred in virtual hop 9. Furthermore, the highest virtual hop diffraction loss of 9.30294 dB occurred in virtual hop 6 whereas the lowest virtual hop diffraction loss of 6.38736 dB occurred in virtual hop 9. In all, the overall effective diffraction loss for the 10 knife edge obstructions as computed by the Shibuya is 71.7973 dB.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Shibuya Method for Computing Ten Knife Edge Diffraction Loss AU - Oloyede Adams Opeyemi AU - Ozuomba Simeon AU - Constance Kalu Y1 - 2017/06/07 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20170502.12 DO - 10.11648/j.se.20170502.12 T2 - Software Engineering JF - Software Engineering JO - Software Engineering SP - 38 EP - 43 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-8037 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.se.20170502.12 AB - Shibuya multiple knife edge diffraction loss method is presented in this paper. The Shibuya method is used to compute the effective diffraction loss of ten multiple knife edge obstructions for a 900 MHz GSM network. Each of the ten obstructions gave rise to a virtual hop which resulted in a knife edge diffraction loss while the overall diffraction loss, according to the Shibuya method is the sum of the diffraction loss computed for each of the ten virtual hops. According to the results, the highest line of sight (LOS) clearance height of 8.480769 m and the highest diffraction parameter of 0.397783 occurred in virtual hop 6. On the other hand, the lowest line of sight (LOS) clearance height of 0.628571 m and the lowest diffraction parameter of 0.044447 occurred in virtual hop 9. Furthermore, the highest virtual hop diffraction loss of 9.30294 dB occurred in virtual hop 6 whereas the lowest virtual hop diffraction loss of 6.38736 dB occurred in virtual hop 9. In all, the overall effective diffraction loss for the 10 knife edge obstructions as computed by the Shibuya is 71.7973 dB. VL - 5 IS - 2 ER -