Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Phosphorous Calibration Study for Maize Production (Zea mays L.) at Abay Choman District, Western Oromia, Ethiopia

Received: 14 July 2025     Accepted: 5 August 2025     Published: 29 August 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Pre Extension demonstration was held in the Abay Choman district to show how using soil tests can help decide the right amount of phosphorus fertilizer for growing maize. The goal was to create awareness about why soil tests are important for maize production and to gather feedback from farmers and others stakeholders for future improvements in technology. The test was done on the fields of seven farmers, which were used to repeat the experiment. There are two treatments: (T1) blanket recommendation and (T2) a recommendation based on a soil test that indicates how much phosphorus fertilizer to use, along with a recommended nitrogen fertilizer amount of 92 kg per hectare. Plot size for each treatments was 10 m x 10 m = 100 m2. Maize variety “BH-661” was used with the spacing of 50 cm and 80 cm between seeds and rows respectively. A total of 4 FRGs units which are having 43 male and 17 female members were established. For gender issue 22.1% of the participants were women and 77.9% were men. A grain yield of 6275 kg per hectare was recorded as the most favorable when fertilizers were utilized based on soil analysis. The application of a standard fertilizer led to a yield of 5,136 kilograms per hectare. The average grain yield obtained with soil test crop response based suggested phosphorus fertilizer was 6275 kg/ha with yield advantage of 22.17% over blanket recommendation. Moreover, financial investigation result appeared that net of return 119162.00 and 98850.00 ETB per hectare were picked up from soil test crop response based p-fertilizer suggestion and blanket recommendation respectively. Based on these actualities, the scaling up/out of soil test crop response based suggested P-fertilizers should be carried out for encourage maize generation at the study area.

Published in Science Frontiers (Volume 6, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16
Page(s) 106-111
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Pre-extension, Soil Test, Fertilizer Recommendation, Maize, Blanket Recommendation, FRG

1. Introduction
Maize (Zea mays L.) is one of the most vital cereals broadly adjusted around the world . Universally, maize is known as queen of cereals since it has the most elevated hereditary abdicate potential among the cereals. It is one of the foremost imperative cereal crops utilized within the human count calories in expansive parts of the world and it is a vital bolster component for animals. It is also used as industrial raw material for oil & glucose production . Maize grain has more prominent wholesome esteem because it contains 72% starch, 10% protein, 4.8% oil, 8.5% fiber, 3.0% sugar and 1.7% cinder. Maize is the single most imperative crop in terms of both number of farmers engaged in development and crop yield .
Low soil fertility is one among the major components constraining maize generation and efficiency in western Oromia, Ethiopia . In most of maize producing zones within the world, inorganic fertilizers are depended upon to move forward crop yields and keep up soil fertility. Over abundance and inadequately uses of fertilizers result in serious supplement consumption of soils and reduce the production and productivity of maize.
Soil test based fertilizer recommendation plays a crucial part in guaranteeing adjusted nutrition to crops . It is broadly accepted that financial ideal fertilizer application can as it were be accomplished by creating suitable fertilizer recommendation that takes into thought the nutrient status of individual field . Right now there are no site-specific fertilizer recommendations for the diverse soil-crop climatic conditions . Soil test based phosphorus calibration study was conducted at Abay Choman District on Maize by Nekemte Soil Research Center for three years. Under research circumstances once modern technologies are released and confirmed, the next step is conducting pilot test/demonstration on a little number of farmers field.
Abay Choman district was chosen for pre-extension demonstration of soil test based phosphorus suggestion. The research activity will be conducted with the aim of demonstrate the technology by using both method and result type of demonstration and fill the gap between released technology and end users through FRGs and also create awareness for farming communities in order to break traditional fertilization. As a result reported by the yield (76.22 Qt/ha) was obtained from soil test based fertilizer recommendation rates. Accordingly, the result of pre extension demonstration of soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation will be conducted some time recently advance popularization in order to assess and make mindfulness within the community.
Objective
1) To create awareness on the significance of soil test based crop response fertilizer suggestion rate for maize production within the consider range.
2) To assess farmers and other partners input for encourage technology advancement
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Description of Study Area
The study was carried out on farmer’s fields in Abay choman District. The district found at 9o 31’ 42’’ to 9o 59’ 48’’ N latitude and 37o 10’ 03’’ to 37o 28’ 44’’ E longitude and capital of the district Fincha town is 289 kms northwest of Addis Ababa. The range gets tall precipitation in one season of the year . The height of the ponder region ranges from 1061 to 2492 meters over ocean level (masl) with two agro biological zones mid-highland and low land . The least and most extreme temperatures of the area are 13.4 and 27.2℃, individually, and the cruel yearly precipitation is 1399 mm. The region has uni-modal precipitation design.
Figure 1. Outline of the study area.
2.2. Experimental Strategies and Treatments
The experiment was conducted on farmer’s fields and consisted of two treatments where, (T1) blanket recommendation and (T2) soil test crop response based phosphorus fertilizer recommendation. Maize assortment “BH-661” was planted utilizing seed rate of 25 kg ha-1. Suggested optimum N-fertilizer rate of 92 kg ha-1 was applied with part application of 1/3 amid sowing and 2/3 will be applied at 30-35 days after planting . The land size that was demonstrated plots applied is 10 m x 10 m=100 m2. The spacing between plots, blocks, plants and rows were 50 cm, 1 m, 50 cm and 80 cm respectively. The experiments were done on 7 farmer’s fields across the district.
2.3. Soil Sampling and Analysis
Soil samples were taken from farmers' fields using standard methods to check for available phosphorus. The samples were obtained from the fields at a depth between 0 and 20 cm. The samples which having initial available phosphorus below critical concentration determined for the district was selected to conduct the experiment. Then Phosphorus fertilizer rate was calculated by using the formula given below. Amount of phosphorus (kg/ha) = (Pc-Pi) *Pf; Where; Pc - Critical phosphorus concentration 12 ppm, Pi - Initial available Phosphorus Prf - Phosphorus requirement factor which was derived from the calibration study 10.55.
2.4. Data Collected and Types
Data was gathered by observing in the field, interviewing people one-on-one, and having group discussions. We used checklists and data sheets to help with this process. Quantitative data included things like how much grain was produced, the costs involved, the benefits received, the total number of farmers who took part in extension events like farmer groups, training sessions, field visits, and mini field days, as well as the participation and role of stakeholders in showing and assessing new technology. Farmers' thoughts and opinions about how well the technologies worked were gathered.
2.5. Technology Demonstration, Evaluation Techniques and FRGs Establishment
One FRGs comprising 10 to 15 members of mixed genders was established in every site. We looked at gender balance in each FRG. Members of FRGs and other farmers were encouraged to join various events and activities held at each demonstration site. Training was provided on why it's important to use soil tests for fertilizer recommendations and the best farming practices to follow when growing maize. These were ways to help farmers learn from each other and share information, like training sessions, field visits, sharing experiences, and field days to show their work.
2.6. Data Management and Analysis
Data which was collected from the fields were properly managed and analyzed through different methods. We analyzed the gathered numbers using basic statistics like the highest and lowest values, average, and a specific budget analysis from CIMMYT . We gathered farmers' perspectives by sharing their narratives.
3. Results and Discussion
3.1. Soil Physical Properties of the Test Field
3.1.1. Soil Ph
The soil pH in the study area was very acidic to strongly acidic, with values between 4.48 and 5.05 based on the ratings provided . So, the pH of the test soil was good for farming.
3.1.2. Available Phosphorus
The phosphorus levels in the soil were low to medium, measuring between 3.43 and 10.43 parts per million (ppm), based on the ratings shown in . Table 1. So, the soil in the study areas needs fertilizers that have phosphorus to help grow crops.
Table 1. Selected experimental soil properties before planting in Abay Choman District.

Experiment Sites

PH (H2O)

Av. P(ppm)

1

5.05

9.91

2

4.99

3.43

3

4.86

6.48

4

4.63

10.43

5

4.60

5.46

6

4.48

4.47

7

4.86

7.45

3.2. Establishment of Farmers Research Group (FRGs)
During usage of the activity farmers were organized beneath farmers research group (FRGs). A total of 4 FRGs units which are having 43 male and 17 female individuals were built up. For gender issue 22.1% of the members were women agriculturists and 77.9% were men. They were capacitated with diverse trainings, involvement sharing and on working together to construct their capacity to illuminates their issues by themselves.
Table 2. Number of established farmers research group and members.

District

Kebele

FRG established

Members of FRG

Male

Female

Total

Abay Choman

Achane

1

10

5

15

Jare

1

11

4

15

Ganji haro

2

22

8

30

Total

3

4

43

17

60

3.3. Provision of Training
Training was given on soil test crop response based phosphorus fertilizer application technology, for farmers, DAs and SMS. A total of 31 farmers and 2 agricultural experts were taken training. (Table 3)
Table 3. Number of members took training.

Topic of the training

Location

Farmers

DAs

SMS

Total

Soil test crop response based fertilizer suggestion and soil acidity management

Abay Choman

M

F

M

F

M

F

33

20

11

1

-

1

-

3.4. Yield Performance of the Field
3.4.1. Average Grain Yield
The highest mean grain yield (6275 kg/ha) was obtained from the soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation and (5136 kg/ha) was gained from blanket fertilizer application. As reported by the result of the trial conducted at Chora district showed that maize grain yield was higher (68 qt ha-1) with application of optimum 92 kg ha-1N and site-specific Phosphorus fertilizer recommended.
Figure 2. Average maize grain yields over the demonstration sites.
3.4.2. Grain Yield Advantage
Dagnachew Lule reported that, soil test crop response based fertilizer recommendation shows the higher yield as compared to blanket fertilizer recommendation . The research finding appears soil test crop response based fertilizer suggestion was gives 22.1% yield advantage over the blanket type of fertilizer application. Yield advantage of the demonstrated technology was calculated utilizing the following equation.
Yield advantage%=Yield of STCRBFR-Yield of blanket recommendationYield of blanket recommendation*100
Table 4. Average grain yield and Yield advantage obtained in Abay Choman District.

Treatments

Average yield kg/ha

Yield difference kg/ha

Yield advantage over blanket recommendation (%)

Blanket Recommendation

5136

1139

22.17

STCRBFR

6275

Where; STCRBFR = Soil test crop response based fertilizer suggestion
3.5. Farmers’ Perception
The opinion of farmers was collected from participants during training. Farmers in the study area selected the best performing technology by using their own criteria. The major criteria used: Grain yield, leaf color, plant height, number of cob per plant, cob size, disease resistance and its biomass. Therefore, most of the farmers were selected soil test based fertilizer application to use on their farm fields for the future. (See Table 5)
Table 5. Rank of demonstrated technology.

Technology

Farmers rank

Reasons

STCRBFR

1st

High grain yield, double cob per plant, large cob size, disease resistance and good biomass

BR

2nd

Medium grain yield, single cob per plant, medium cob size, disease resistance and medium biomass

Where; STCRBFR = soil test crop response fertilizer recommendation, BR= blanket recommendation.
4. Conclusion and Recommendation
The test was conducted in Abay choman district on 7 farmer’s field for two continuous trimming seasons. Four FRG were established in purposively chosen kebeles and training was given on the subject of soil test based crop response fertilizer proposal for agriculturists, development agent, experts and partners in the district. From the test, the highest mean grain yield (6275 kg/ha) was gotten from the soil test crop response based fertilizer suggestion with 22.17% of yield advantage over the cover fertilizer proposal. Based on these realities, the scaling up/out of soil test crop response based prescribed P-fertilizers ought to be carried out for encourage maize production at the consider area.
Abbreviations

BH-661

Bako Hybrid 661

BR

Blanket Recommendation

ETB

Ethiopian Birr

FRG

Farmers Research Group

NSRC

Nekemte Soil Research Center

OARI

Oromia Agricultural Research Institute

Ppm

Parts Per Million

STCRBFR

Soil Test Crop Response Based Fertilizer Recommendation

Acknowledgments
The authors express their gratitude to the Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (OARI) for funding the research and to the Nekemte Soil Research Center (NSRC) for supplying the necessary facilities. We would like to extend our heartfelt gratitude to all our employees, particularly the Technician Assistance team, for their invaluable support throughout the trial period.
Conflict of Interests
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
References
[1] Asefa, et al., 2024. Evaluating released Maize hybrids’ parents for yield producibility. International Journal of Agricultural Sciences Volume 6 Issue (3) pp.: 1-13,
[2] Belette, T. (2014). Fertility Mapping of Soils of Abay Chomen District, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Master Thesis, Haramaya University.
[3] Benti Tolessa, 1993. The need and objective of the 1st National Maize Workshop. In: Proceedings of the 1stNational Maize Workshop of Ethiopia. 5-7 May, 1992, IAR and IMWIC, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[4] CIMMYT, 1988. From Agronomic Data to Farmer Recommendations: An Economics Training Manual. Completely revised edition. Mexico, DF.
[5] CSA (Central Statistical Agency), 2010. Agricultural Sample Survey for the 2009/2010 cropseason. Volume II Report on Area and production of Crops for Private Peasant Holdings (Meher Season) Statistical Bulletin 446. FDRE/CSA, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
[6] Dagnachew Lule, et al., 2018. Oromia Agricultural research institute workshop proceeding on Adaptation and Generation of Agricultural Technologies, 25-27 June 2018, Adama, Ethiopia. pp 329-333.
[7] Diao, X., 2010. Economic Importance of Agriculture for Sustainable Development and Poverty Reduction: The Case Study of Ethiopia. Global Forum on Agriculture 29-30 November 2010. Policies for Agricultural Development, Poverty Reduction and Food Security OECD Headquarters, Paris retrieved on 01/2/2011.
[8] Fageria NK, Baligar VC (2005) Enhancing nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Advances in Agronomy 88: 97-185.
[9] Kefyalew Assefa, Bikila Mengistu and Tilahun Geleto (Eds), 2019. Proceedings of Review Workshop on Completed Research Activities of Natural Resource Research Directorate Held at Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center, Adami Tulu, Ethiopia, 08-11 October 2018. Oromia Agricultural Research Institute (IQQO), Finfine, Ethiopia. 164 pp.
[10] Olsen, S. R. and Sommers, L. E. 1982. Phosphorus. pp. 403-430. In: A. L. Page, et al. (eds.) Methods of soil analysis: Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Agron. Mongr. 9. 2nd ed. ASA and SSSA, Madison, WI.
[11] Self, J. (2013). “Soil testing”. Fact sheet No. 0.501. Crop/soil series. Colorado state university. USA.
[12] Suleiman Aman, Gedefa Sori., 2021. Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Recommended Phosphorus Fertilizer for Maize in Chora District in Southwestern Part of Oromia, Ethiopia. International Journal of Applied Agricultural Sciences. Vol. 7, No. 6, pp. 277-282.
[13] Tekalign Tadese., 1991. Soil, plant, water, fertilizer, animal manure, and compost analysis.
[14] Temesgen Chimdessa, Chalsissa Takele, Garamu Bayeta, Firaol Gemada, Rafisa Leta, 2023. Soil test crop response based phosphorous calibration study on maize at Abay Choman district, Horo Guduru Wollega zone, Oromia region, Ethiopia. Journal of Scientific Agriculture 2023, 7: 1-5
[15] Wakene Negasa and Heluf Gebrekidan and D. K. Friesen, 2005. Integrated Use of Farmyard Manure and NP fertilizers for Maize on Farmers’ Fields, Journal of Agriculture and Rural Development in the Tropics and Sub tropics. Volume 106, Number 2, 131-141pp.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Negesa, N., Takele, C., Chimdessa, T., Desalegn, M. (2025). Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Phosphorous Calibration Study for Maize Production (Zea mays L.) at Abay Choman District, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Science Frontiers, 6(3), 106-111. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Negesa, N.; Takele, C.; Chimdessa, T.; Desalegn, M. Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Phosphorous Calibration Study for Maize Production (Zea mays L.) at Abay Choman District, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Sci. Front. 2025, 6(3), 106-111. doi: 10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Negesa N, Takele C, Chimdessa T, Desalegn M. Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Phosphorous Calibration Study for Maize Production (Zea mays L.) at Abay Choman District, Western Oromia, Ethiopia. Sci Front. 2025;6(3):106-111. doi: 10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16,
      author = {Naferom Negesa and Chalsissa Takele and Temesgen Chimdessa and Mintesinot Desalegn},
      title = {Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Phosphorous Calibration Study for Maize Production (Zea mays L.) at Abay Choman District, Western Oromia, Ethiopia
    },
      journal = {Science Frontiers},
      volume = {6},
      number = {3},
      pages = {106-111},
      doi = {10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.sf.20250603.16},
      abstract = {Pre Extension demonstration was held in the Abay Choman district to show how using soil tests can help decide the right amount of phosphorus fertilizer for growing maize. The goal was to create awareness about why soil tests are important for maize production and to gather feedback from farmers and others stakeholders for future improvements in technology. The test was done on the fields of seven farmers, which were used to repeat the experiment. There are two treatments: (T1) blanket recommendation and (T2) a recommendation based on a soil test that indicates how much phosphorus fertilizer to use, along with a recommended nitrogen fertilizer amount of 92 kg per hectare. Plot size for each treatments was 10 m x 10 m = 100 m2. Maize variety “BH-661” was used with the spacing of 50 cm and 80 cm between seeds and rows respectively. A total of 4 FRGs units which are having 43 male and 17 female members were established. For gender issue 22.1% of the participants were women and 77.9% were men. A grain yield of 6275 kg per hectare was recorded as the most favorable when fertilizers were utilized based on soil analysis. The application of a standard fertilizer led to a yield of 5,136 kilograms per hectare. The average grain yield obtained with soil test crop response based suggested phosphorus fertilizer was 6275 kg/ha with yield advantage of 22.17% over blanket recommendation. Moreover, financial investigation result appeared that net of return 119162.00 and 98850.00 ETB per hectare were picked up from soil test crop response based p-fertilizer suggestion and blanket recommendation respectively. Based on these actualities, the scaling up/out of soil test crop response based suggested P-fertilizers should be carried out for encourage maize generation at the study area.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Pre-extension Demonstration of Soil Test Crop Response Based Phosphorous Calibration Study for Maize Production (Zea mays L.) at Abay Choman District, Western Oromia, Ethiopia
    
    AU  - Naferom Negesa
    AU  - Chalsissa Takele
    AU  - Temesgen Chimdessa
    AU  - Mintesinot Desalegn
    Y1  - 2025/08/29
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16
    DO  - 10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16
    T2  - Science Frontiers
    JF  - Science Frontiers
    JO  - Science Frontiers
    SP  - 106
    EP  - 111
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2994-7030
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.sf.20250603.16
    AB  - Pre Extension demonstration was held in the Abay Choman district to show how using soil tests can help decide the right amount of phosphorus fertilizer for growing maize. The goal was to create awareness about why soil tests are important for maize production and to gather feedback from farmers and others stakeholders for future improvements in technology. The test was done on the fields of seven farmers, which were used to repeat the experiment. There are two treatments: (T1) blanket recommendation and (T2) a recommendation based on a soil test that indicates how much phosphorus fertilizer to use, along with a recommended nitrogen fertilizer amount of 92 kg per hectare. Plot size for each treatments was 10 m x 10 m = 100 m2. Maize variety “BH-661” was used with the spacing of 50 cm and 80 cm between seeds and rows respectively. A total of 4 FRGs units which are having 43 male and 17 female members were established. For gender issue 22.1% of the participants were women and 77.9% were men. A grain yield of 6275 kg per hectare was recorded as the most favorable when fertilizers were utilized based on soil analysis. The application of a standard fertilizer led to a yield of 5,136 kilograms per hectare. The average grain yield obtained with soil test crop response based suggested phosphorus fertilizer was 6275 kg/ha with yield advantage of 22.17% over blanket recommendation. Moreover, financial investigation result appeared that net of return 119162.00 and 98850.00 ETB per hectare were picked up from soil test crop response based p-fertilizer suggestion and blanket recommendation respectively. Based on these actualities, the scaling up/out of soil test crop response based suggested P-fertilizers should be carried out for encourage maize generation at the study area.
    
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Abstract
  • Keywords
  • Document Sections

    1. 1. Introduction
    2. 2. Materials and Methods
    3. 3. Results and Discussion
    4. 4. Conclusion and Recommendation
    Show Full Outline
  • Abbreviations
  • Acknowledgments
  • Conflict of Interests
  • References
  • Cite This Article
  • Author Information