Livestock systems experience increased losses from heat stress, drought, floods, and climate-sensitive illnesses. Conventional, reactive management is ill-suited to the spatial-temporal complexity of these risks. This paper advocates for data-driven resilience as a unifying framework for climate risk management in livestock by integrating multimodal data (remote sensing, climate re-analyses, veterinary surveillance, supply-chain, and socio-economic indicators) with machine learning, causal inference, and decision optimization to support anticipatory action. We (i) consolidate the state-of-the-art; (ii) propose an open, modular reference architecture for end-to-end climate-risk analytics and early warning; (iii) sketch a transparent indicator taxonomy and composite risk index; and (iv) demonstrate a small, proof-of-concept simulation of how the pipeline triages heat-stress and vector-borne disease risk and optimizes low-cost interventions. For example, satellite data detecting a 15% decrease in forage availability during drought periods is used to predict livestock stress hotspots. The paper also addresses critical issues of governance, equity, and adoption pathways, emphasizing the need for inclusive decision-making and equitable access to data-driven tools. We outline validation protocols and reporting standards to ensure robustness and transparency in risk assessment and intervention planning. The article provides a constructive roadmap for researchers and policymakers to integrate data intelligence into policies and practices for the resilience of climate-smart livestock systems.
| Published in | Science, Technology & Public Policy (Volume 9, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15 |
| Page(s) | 117-126 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Climate Resilience, Livestock, Early Warning, Machine Learning, Remote Sensing, Decision Support, Optimization, Low- and Middle-income countries (LMICs)
| [1] | Horvathne Kovacs, B., Zörög, Z. (2025). Digital livestock farming in climate-smart agriculture: an overview to advance the SDGs. Discov Sustain 6, 940. |
| [2] | Papakonstantinou, G. I., Voulgarakis, N., Terzidou, G., Fotos, L., Giamouri, E., Papatsiros, V. G. (2024). Precision livestock farming technology: applications and challenges of animal welfare and climate change. Agriculture 14(4), 620. |
| [3] | Melki, M. N. E., Faqeih, K. Y., Alamri, S. M., AlAmri, A. R., Aldubehi, M. A., Alamery, E. R. (2025). Integrating artificial intelligence, drones, robotics, and sensors for sustainable and climate-resilient agriculture: a critical review. Sustainability, 1, 0. |
| [4] | Raj, M., Prahadeeswaran, M. (2025). Revolutionizing agriculture: a review of smart farming technologies for a sustainable future. Discover Applied Sciences 7, 937. |
| [5] | Alshehri, F. A. (2023). Blockchain-assisted IoT framework for smart livestock farming. Journal of Network and Computer Applications 208, 103515. |
| [6] | Alonso, R. S., Sanchez-Ibanez, J. M., Prieto, J., Garcia, Ó. (2020). Edge-IoT platform for smart farming. Sensors 16, 4821. |
| [7] | Aquilani, C., Vitali, A., Mammi, L. M. E., Bozzi, R. (2022). Precision livestock farming in pasture-based systems: state-of-the-art and future trends. Animals 12(3), 342. |
| [8] | Arshad, M., Khan, M. A., Raza, M. Q., Yousaf, S. (2024). Machine learning approaches for livestock health monitoring: a review. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 211, 107989. |
| [9] | Asher, M., Thompson, A. N., Trotter, M. (2022). Decision support systems for climate-resilient livestock grazing management. Agricultural Systems 196, 103306. |
| [10] | Asmamaw, M., Mohammed, A., Simane, B. (2019). Determinants of climate resilience of smallholder farmers in the Abay basin, Ethiopia. Ecological Indicators 101, 495-502. |
| [11] | Bahta, Y. T., Myeki, L. (2022). Assessing the socio-economic impacts of drought on smallholder livestock farmers in South Africa. Sustainability 14(11), 6412. |
| [12] | Becker, C. A., Smith, M. W., Johnson, D. E. (2021). Heat stress prediction using machine learning in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science 104(9), 10132-10145. |
| [13] | Bergier, I., De Oliveira, C. S., Rodrigues, L. (2021). Cloud-edge computing applications in environmental monitoring: a livestock use case. Journal of Environmental Informatics 38(1), 12-26. |
| [14] | Bonilla-Cedrez, C., Giertz, Å., Wane, W. (2023). Transforming livestock systems for climate resilience: a policy and investment framework. World Bank Publications. |
| [15] | Chapa, J. M., Maselyne, J., Van Nuffel, A. (2020). Review: the use of accelerometers for monitoring animal welfare in livestock farming. Animal 14(5), 1057-1069. |
| [16] | Chapman, M., Nguyen, T., Yazdi, H. (2023). Machine learning in livestock climate adaptation: forecasting heat stress using multisource environmental data. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 209, 107949. |
| [17] | Dardonville, M., Duru, M., Theau, J. P. (2023). Integration of satellite data in territorial crop-livestock systems planning. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 43(1), 10. |
| [18] | Distante, C., Gadaleta, M., Di Felice, M. (2025). AI-powered livestock management through integrated satellite and sensor data. Remote Sensing in Agriculture 35(2), 88-105. (In press) |
| [19] | FAO. (2012). Developing a climate-smart agriculture strategy at the country level: lessons from recent experience. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. |
| [20] | Feng, S., Delgado, M. S., Hill, J. (2021). Remote sensing of rangeland productivity and land use change in livestock systems. Global Environmental Change 68, 102247. |
| [21] | Folke, C., Colding, J., Berkes, F. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, 441-473. |
| [22] | Fuentes, S., De Bei, R., Gonzalez Viejo, C. (2022). Automated tracking of livestock movement using drones and AI: a case study in precision grazing. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 199, 107144. |
| [23] | Godde, C. M., Boone, R. B., Ash, A. J., Waha, K., Thornton, P. K. (2021). Global rangeland productivity and livestock management under climate change. Nature Climate Change 11, 81-88. |
| [24] | Malcom, W. (2024). Indigenous knowledge and climate policy for sustainable livestock systems. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning 26(1), 45-63. |
| [25] | Maltou, H., Bahta, Y. T. (2019). Household resilience and welfare outcomes in South African livestock systems. Agrekon 58(4), 429-443. |
| [26] | Matlou, K., Bahta, Y. T., Morojele, P. (2021). Resilience indicators in smallholder livestock production: a case study in arid regions. Sustainability 13(2), 789. |
| [27] | Myeki, L., Bahta, Y. T. (2021). Exploring food insecurity as a component of resilience in livestock systems. South African Journal of Agricultural Extension 49(1), 100-115. |
| [28] | Niloofar, M., Sadeghi, M., Abbasi, H. (2021). Evaluating decision support systems for sustainable livestock production. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 186, 106157. |
| [29] | Niloofar, M., Sadeghi, M., Abbasi, H. (2023). A framework for integrating sustainability metrics into livestock DSS. Sustainability 15(4), 2031. |
| [30] | Singh, R. P., Gautam, R., Ojha, C. S. P. (2023). Wearable sensor systems for livestock health and climate adaptation. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 195, 653. |
| [31] | Vignal, B., Leclerc, G., Jouven, M. (2023). Adaptive destocking strategies for rangeland resilience under climate stress. Grass and Forage Science 78(3), 321-336. |
APA Style
Tua, U. R., Zakir, M. A. A., Ghosh, P. R. (2025). Mapping Solutions for Livestock Climate Challenges: Satellite Tech Innovations Steer Through Environmental Risks. Science, Technology & Public Policy, 9(2), 117-126. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15
ACS Style
Tua, U. R.; Zakir, M. A. A.; Ghosh, P. R. Mapping Solutions for Livestock Climate Challenges: Satellite Tech Innovations Steer Through Environmental Risks. Sci. Technol. Public Policy 2025, 9(2), 117-126. doi: 10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15
@article{10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15,
author = {Umme Rumana Tua and Mohammad Abdullah Al Zakir and Poly Rani Ghosh},
title = {Mapping Solutions for Livestock Climate Challenges: Satellite Tech Innovations Steer Through Environmental Risks},
journal = {Science, Technology & Public Policy},
volume = {9},
number = {2},
pages = {117-126},
doi = {10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.stpp.20250902.15},
abstract = {Livestock systems experience increased losses from heat stress, drought, floods, and climate-sensitive illnesses. Conventional, reactive management is ill-suited to the spatial-temporal complexity of these risks. This paper advocates for data-driven resilience as a unifying framework for climate risk management in livestock by integrating multimodal data (remote sensing, climate re-analyses, veterinary surveillance, supply-chain, and socio-economic indicators) with machine learning, causal inference, and decision optimization to support anticipatory action. We (i) consolidate the state-of-the-art; (ii) propose an open, modular reference architecture for end-to-end climate-risk analytics and early warning; (iii) sketch a transparent indicator taxonomy and composite risk index; and (iv) demonstrate a small, proof-of-concept simulation of how the pipeline triages heat-stress and vector-borne disease risk and optimizes low-cost interventions. For example, satellite data detecting a 15% decrease in forage availability during drought periods is used to predict livestock stress hotspots. The paper also addresses critical issues of governance, equity, and adoption pathways, emphasizing the need for inclusive decision-making and equitable access to data-driven tools. We outline validation protocols and reporting standards to ensure robustness and transparency in risk assessment and intervention planning. The article provides a constructive roadmap for researchers and policymakers to integrate data intelligence into policies and practices for the resilience of climate-smart livestock systems.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Mapping Solutions for Livestock Climate Challenges: Satellite Tech Innovations Steer Through Environmental Risks AU - Umme Rumana Tua AU - Mohammad Abdullah Al Zakir AU - Poly Rani Ghosh Y1 - 2025/12/09 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15 DO - 10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15 T2 - Science, Technology & Public Policy JF - Science, Technology & Public Policy JO - Science, Technology & Public Policy SP - 117 EP - 126 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2640-4621 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.stpp.20250902.15 AB - Livestock systems experience increased losses from heat stress, drought, floods, and climate-sensitive illnesses. Conventional, reactive management is ill-suited to the spatial-temporal complexity of these risks. This paper advocates for data-driven resilience as a unifying framework for climate risk management in livestock by integrating multimodal data (remote sensing, climate re-analyses, veterinary surveillance, supply-chain, and socio-economic indicators) with machine learning, causal inference, and decision optimization to support anticipatory action. We (i) consolidate the state-of-the-art; (ii) propose an open, modular reference architecture for end-to-end climate-risk analytics and early warning; (iii) sketch a transparent indicator taxonomy and composite risk index; and (iv) demonstrate a small, proof-of-concept simulation of how the pipeline triages heat-stress and vector-borne disease risk and optimizes low-cost interventions. For example, satellite data detecting a 15% decrease in forage availability during drought periods is used to predict livestock stress hotspots. The paper also addresses critical issues of governance, equity, and adoption pathways, emphasizing the need for inclusive decision-making and equitable access to data-driven tools. We outline validation protocols and reporting standards to ensure robustness and transparency in risk assessment and intervention planning. The article provides a constructive roadmap for researchers and policymakers to integrate data intelligence into policies and practices for the resilience of climate-smart livestock systems. VL - 9 IS - 2 ER -