The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Karakozov Pavel; Ibadov Bakhrom; Mardonov Jamshid; Baybekov Iskander

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15

| Peer-Reviewed

The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy

Karakozov Pavel, Ibadov Bakhrom, Mardonov Jamshid, Baybekov Iskander

Published in American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Volume 2, Issue 2)

Received: 24 February 2017 Accepted: 31 March 2017 Published: 17 April 2017

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Using scanning electron microscopy – SEM, 165 various samples of surgical sutures, including 75 monofilament and 80 multifilament sutures were studied. SEM revealed varying degrees of defects on surface of sutures. They became more frequent when knots were tied, found in 4 cases of monofilament sutures - 5.3% and 8 cases of multifilament sutures - 10%. SEM is one of the most reliable methods for evaluating suture defects that may cause surgical complications.

Published in	American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (Volume 2, Issue 2)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15
Page(s)	35-40
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

SEM, Surgical Sutures, Defects, Knots, Monofilament, Multifilament

References

[1]	Baibekov I. M. Significance of assessment of three-dimensional ultrastructure of plastic and suture materials used in reconstructive surgery. Surgery of Uzbekistan. 2006, 3: 81-82.
[2]	Callahan, Travis L., et al. "Mechanical properties of commercially available nylon sutures in the United States." Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials (2016).
[3]	Christopher H. J; Yee C. W., Christopher L. Scanning electron microscopic study of monofilament suture knots. British Journal of Ophthalmology, 1996.80 (2): 164-167.
[4]	Dennis, Christopher, et al. "Suture materials—Current and emerging trends." Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A 104.6 (2016): 1544-1559.
[5]	Dhom, Jonas, et al. "Bacterial adhesion to suture material in a contaminated wound model: Comparison of monofilament, braided, and barbed sutures." Journal of Orthopaedic Research (2016).
[6]	Diener, Markus K., et al. "Effectiveness of triclosan-coated PDS Plus versus uncoated PDS II sutures for prevention of surgical site infection after abdominal wall closure: the randomised controlled PROUD trial." The Lancet 384.9938 (2014): 142-152.
[7]	Egyev, V. N. Suturing material (lecture). Khirurgiia-Moskva- (1998): 33-38.
[8]	Huber Ch., Eckstein F. S., HalbeisenМ., Carrel T. P. Rupture of a polypropylene suture after aortic operation: a scanning electronic microscopical assessment of potential mechanisms. Ann Thorac Surg, 2003; 75: 1318-1321.
[9]	Huggins, Richard J., et al. "Histologic and ultrastructural evaluation of sutures used for surgical fixation of the SMAS." Aesthetic plastic surgery 31.6 (2007): 719-724.
[10]	Johnson, Peter C., et al. "The Effect of Instrumentation on Suture Tensile Strength and Knot Pullout Strength of Common Suture Materials." Journal of surgical education 73.1 (2016): 162-165.
[11]	Karakozov P., Baibekov I., Ibadov B., Chekanov V., Wann S. «Synthetic materials in cardiovascular surgery - the view of surgeon and morphologist».. The 15th World Congress of World Society of Cardio- ThoracicSurgeons, Vilnius, Lithuania, 2005.
[12]	Khadzhibaev A. M., Baibekov I. M., Hodzhimuhamedova N. A., Khadzhibaev F. A. Characteristics of interaction of tissue structures, metallic ring and suture materials in experiment. Problems of clinical medicine, Barnaul, 2007, 3.11: 64-67.
[13]	Law, Andy Y., et al. "Biomechanical Testing and Histologic Examination of Intradermal Skin Closure in Dogs Using Barbed Suture Device and Non‐Barbed Monofilament Suture." Veterinary Surgery 46.1 (2017): 59-66.
[14]	Li, Jianhua, et al. "Surgical Sutures with Porous Sheaths for the Sustained Release of Growth Factors." Advanced Materials 28.23 (2016): 4620-4624.
[15]	Molokova O. A., Kecherukov A. I., AlievF. Sh., Chernov I. A., V. G. Bychkov V. G., KononovV. P. Tissue reactions to modern suturing material in colorectal surgery. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine, 2007, Vol. 143, 6: 767-770.
[16]	Richey M. L, Roe S. C. Assessment of knot security in continuous intradermal wound closures. J Surg Res. 2005, 123 (2): 284-288.
[17]	Villa, Oscar, et al. "Suture materials affect peri-implant bone healing and implant osseointegration." Journal of oral science 57.3 (2015): 219-227.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Karakozov Pavel, Ibadov Bakhrom, Mardonov Jamshid, Baybekov Iskander. (2017). The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy. American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2(2), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Karakozov Pavel; Ibadov Bakhrom; Mardonov Jamshid; Baybekov Iskander. The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Am. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017, 2(2), 35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Karakozov Pavel, Ibadov Bakhrom, Mardonov Jamshid, Baybekov Iskander. The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Am J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;2(2):35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15,
  author = {Karakozov Pavel and Ibadov Bakhrom and Mardonov Jamshid and Baybekov Iskander},
  title = {The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy},
  journal = {American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {35-40},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtcs.20170202.15},
  abstract = {Using scanning electron microscopy – SEM, 165 various samples of surgical sutures, including 75 monofilament and 80 multifilament sutures were studied. SEM revealed varying degrees of defects on surface of sutures. They became more frequent when knots were tied, found in 4 cases of monofilament sutures - 5.3% and 8 cases of multifilament sutures - 10%. SEM is one of the most reliable methods for evaluating suture defects that may cause surgical complications.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy
AU  - Karakozov Pavel
AU  - Ibadov Bakhrom
AU  - Mardonov Jamshid
AU  - Baybekov Iskander
Y1  - 2017/04/17
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15
T2  - American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF  - American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JO  - American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
SP  - 35
EP  - 40
PB  - Science Publishing Group
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15
AB  - Using scanning electron microscopy – SEM, 165 various samples of surgical sutures, including 75 monofilament and 80 multifilament sutures were studied. SEM revealed varying degrees of defects on surface of sutures. They became more frequent when knots were tied, found in 4 cases of monofilament sutures - 5.3% and 8 cases of multifilament sutures - 10%. SEM is one of the most reliable methods for evaluating suture defects that may cause surgical complications.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Karakozov Pavel

Republican Specialized Center of Surgery Named After Academician V. Vakhidov. Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Ibadov Bakhrom

Republican Specialized Center of Surgery Named After Academician V. Vakhidov. Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Mardonov Jamshid

Republican Specialized Center of Surgery Named After Academician V. Vakhidov. Tashkent, Uzbekistan
Baybekov Iskander

Republican Specialized Center of Surgery Named After Academician V. Vakhidov. Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Karakozov Pavel, Ibadov Bakhrom, Mardonov Jamshid, Baybekov Iskander. (2017). The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy. American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2(2), 35-40. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Karakozov Pavel; Ibadov Bakhrom; Mardonov Jamshid; Baybekov Iskander. The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Am. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2017, 2(2), 35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Karakozov Pavel, Ibadov Bakhrom, Mardonov Jamshid, Baybekov Iskander. The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy. Am J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2017;2(2):35-40. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15,
  author = {Karakozov Pavel and Ibadov Bakhrom and Mardonov Jamshid and Baybekov Iskander},
  title = {The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy},
  journal = {American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery},
  volume = {2},
  number = {2},
  pages = {35-40},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtcs.20170202.15},
  abstract = {Using scanning electron microscopy – SEM, 165 various samples of surgical sutures, including 75 monofilament and 80 multifilament sutures were studied. SEM revealed varying degrees of defects on surface of sutures. They became more frequent when knots were tied, found in 4 cases of monofilament sutures - 5.3% and 8 cases of multifilament sutures - 10%. SEM is one of the most reliable methods for evaluating suture defects that may cause surgical complications.},
 year = {2017}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - The Surface of Various Types of Surgical Sutures by Scanning Electron Microscopy
AU  - Karakozov Pavel
AU  - Ibadov Bakhrom
AU  - Mardonov Jamshid
AU  - Baybekov Iskander
Y1  - 2017/04/17
PY  - 2017
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15
T2  - American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF  - American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JO  - American Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
SP  - 35
EP  - 40
PB  - Science Publishing Group
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtcs.20170202.15
AB  - Using scanning electron microscopy – SEM, 165 various samples of surgical sutures, including 75 monofilament and 80 multifilament sutures were studied. SEM revealed varying degrees of defects on surface of sutures. They became more frequent when knots were tied, found in 4 cases of monofilament sutures - 5.3% and 8 cases of multifilament sutures - 10%. SEM is one of the most reliable methods for evaluating suture defects that may cause surgical complications.
VL  - 2
IS  - 2
ER  -

Copy | Download