Engineering Physics

| Peer-Reviewed |

On the Possibility of Spontaneous Magnetic Field Observation in Turbulent Laser Plasma

Received: Aug. 29, 2018    Accepted: Nov. 01, 2018    Published: Dec. 04, 2018
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

It has been discussed the opportunity of the spontaneous magnetic field (SMF) observation in turbulent hot plasma which formed as the result of power laser beam interaction with porous low density matter. The sources of SMF appearance are the crossed gradients of electron pressure and plasma density, which arise in the turbulent zone and increase with its development. It has been proposed two diagnostic methods for investigation of SMF generation in turbulent laser plasma. The first method bases on the idea of the constrained orientation of magnetic moments with help of the external strong regular magnetic field (~ 0.1 MG). The second method bases on the idea of bunch electron scattering observation in the magnetic fields. The Mega Gauss SMF could effect on energy transport in laser plasma. The generation of SMF up to 100 MGs in low density substance could suppress the electron heat conductivity into the wall of cone target and improve the conditions of “dynamical confinement” of compressed DT fuel.

DOI 10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14
Published in Engineering Physics ( Volume 2, Issue 2, December 2018 )
Page(s) 53-57
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Turbulent Laser Plasma, Spontaneous Magnetic Fields, Two Methods of SMF Observation

References
[1] Korobkin V. V., Serov R. V. (1966), Pis’ma v Zhurnal Eksp. Teor. Fiziki, 4,103-106 (in Russian).
[2] Askar’yan G. A., Rabinovich M. S., Smirnova A. D., V. B. Studenov V. B.. (1967). Pis’ma v Zhurnal Eksp. Teor. Fiziki. 4, 116-120.
[3] Stamper J. A. et al. (1971). Phys. Fluids, v.26, 1012-1019.
[4] Bol’shov L. A., Dreizin Yu. A., Dyikhne A. M. (1974). Pis’ma v Zhurnal Eksp. Teor. Fiziki, 77, N19, 289-191, (in Russian).
[5] Al’terkop B. A., Mishin E. B., Rukhadze A. A. (1974). Pis’ma v Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiziki, 77, N19, 292-294, (in Russian).
[6] Craxton R. S., Hains G. (1975), Phys. Rev. Letters, 35, 1336-1346.
[7] Colombant D. G., Winsor N. K., (1977), Phys. Rev. Letters, 38, 1278-1285
[8] Afanas’ev Yu. V., Gamaly E. G., Lebo I. G., Rozanov V. B. (1978), Zhurnal Exp, Teor. Fiziki, 74(2), 516-524 (in Russian).
[9] E. G. Gamaly, I. G. Lebo, V. B. Rozanov. (1985). Spontanie magnitnie polya v sfericheskoy lazernoy plazme. Trudi Fizicheskogo Instituta im. P. N. Lebedeva. Academiya nauk SSSR. V.149, 66-96, Moskva, Nauka (in Russian).
[10] Diankov O. V., Glazirin I. V., Koshelev S. V. et al. (2000). Laser and Particle Beams, 18(2), 255-260.
[11] Stamper J. A., McLean E. A., Ripin B. H. (1978). Phys. Rev. Letters, (1978), v.40, 1177-1181.
[12] F. V. Bunkin, Yu. S. Kas’anov, V. V. Korobkin, S. L. Motilev. (1983). Kvantovaya Electronika, 10, 2149-2151.
[13] Dune M., Borghesi M., Ivase A. et al. (1995). Phys. Rev. Letters. 75 (21), 3858-3861.
[14] Koch J. A., Esterbrook K. G., Bauer J. D. et al. (1995). Phys. Plasmas, 2, 3820-3831.
[15] Bugrov A. E., Burdonskiy I. N., I. K. Fasakhov et. al. (2003). Proc. Of SPIE, v.5228. Ed. By O. N. Krokhin, S. Yu. Gus’kov, Yu. A. Merkuliev, Bellingham. WA.
[16] Borisenko N. G., Akunets A. A., Khalenkov A. M. et al. (2007). Journal of Russian Laser Research. 28, N.6, 548-566, 2007.
[17] Borisenko N. G., Merkuliev Yu. A. (2010). Jour. of Russian Laser Research. 31, N3, 256-269.
[18] Lebo A. I., Lebo I. G. (2009). Mathematical Models and Simulations, 1(6), 724-738.
[19] Lebo A. I., Lebo I. G. (2010a). A model of the energy transport in turbulent plasma of porous targets. IOP Publishing. Phys. Scripta, T142, 014024 (4pp).
[20] Jungwirth K., Cenarova A., Juha L, Kralicova J. et al. (2001). Phys. Plasmas, 8, 2495-3006.
[21] Batchelor G. (1950). On the Spontaneous Magnetic Field in Conducting Liquid in Turbulent Motion. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Ser. Math. And Phys. Sciences, 21, London, Cambridge Univ., 23 May.
[22] Lebo A. I., Lebo I. G. (2010). Mathematical Models and Simulations, 2(3), 359-361.
[23] Gotchev O. V., Chang P. Y., Knauer J. P. et al. (2009), Phys. Rev. Letters, 103, 215004(4).
[24] Kotel’nikov S. S., Lebo I. G., Rozanov V. B. (1986). Soviet Physics – Lebedev Institute Reports. Allerton Press. Inc. N12, 95-100.
[25] Korobkin Yu. V., Lebo A. I., Lebo I. G. (2010). Quantum Electronics. 40(9), 811-816.
[26] Konash P. V., Lebo I. G., (2006). Quantum Electronics, 36(8), 767-772.
[27] Konash P. V., Lebo A. I., Lebo I. G. (2013). Mathematical Models and Computer Simulations. 6(1), 9-18
[28] Lebo I. G., Isaev E. A., Lebo A. I. (2017). Quantum Electronics, 47(2), 106-110. Kvantovaya Elektronika and Turpion Ltd.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Alexandra Lebo, Ivan Lebo. (2018). On the Possibility of Spontaneous Magnetic Field Observation in Turbulent Laser Plasma. Engineering Physics, 2(2), 53-57. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Alexandra Lebo; Ivan Lebo. On the Possibility of Spontaneous Magnetic Field Observation in Turbulent Laser Plasma. Eng. Phys. 2018, 2(2), 53-57. doi: 10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Alexandra Lebo, Ivan Lebo. On the Possibility of Spontaneous Magnetic Field Observation in Turbulent Laser Plasma. Eng Phys. 2018;2(2):53-57. doi: 10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14,
      author = {Alexandra Lebo and Ivan Lebo},
      title = {On the Possibility of Spontaneous Magnetic Field Observation in Turbulent Laser Plasma},
      journal = {Engineering Physics},
      volume = {2},
      number = {2},
      pages = {53-57},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14},
      eprint = {https://download.sciencepg.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ep.20180202.14},
      abstract = {It has been discussed the opportunity of the spontaneous magnetic field (SMF) observation in turbulent hot plasma which formed as the result of power laser beam interaction with porous low density matter. The sources of SMF appearance are the crossed gradients of electron pressure and plasma density, which arise in the turbulent zone and increase with its development. It has been proposed two diagnostic methods for investigation of SMF generation in turbulent laser plasma. The first method bases on the idea of the constrained orientation of magnetic moments with help of the external strong regular magnetic field (~ 0.1 MG). The second method bases on the idea of bunch electron scattering observation in the magnetic fields. The Mega Gauss SMF could effect on energy transport in laser plasma. The generation of SMF up to 100 MGs in low density substance could suppress the electron heat conductivity into the wall of cone target and improve the conditions of “dynamical confinement” of compressed DT fuel.},
     year = {2018}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - On the Possibility of Spontaneous Magnetic Field Observation in Turbulent Laser Plasma
    AU  - Alexandra Lebo
    AU  - Ivan Lebo
    Y1  - 2018/12/04
    PY  - 2018
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14
    T2  - Engineering Physics
    JF  - Engineering Physics
    JO  - Engineering Physics
    SP  - 53
    EP  - 57
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1029
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ep.20180202.14
    AB  - It has been discussed the opportunity of the spontaneous magnetic field (SMF) observation in turbulent hot plasma which formed as the result of power laser beam interaction with porous low density matter. The sources of SMF appearance are the crossed gradients of electron pressure and plasma density, which arise in the turbulent zone and increase with its development. It has been proposed two diagnostic methods for investigation of SMF generation in turbulent laser plasma. The first method bases on the idea of the constrained orientation of magnetic moments with help of the external strong regular magnetic field (~ 0.1 MG). The second method bases on the idea of bunch electron scattering observation in the magnetic fields. The Mega Gauss SMF could effect on energy transport in laser plasma. The generation of SMF up to 100 MGs in low density substance could suppress the electron heat conductivity into the wall of cone target and improve the conditions of “dynamical confinement” of compressed DT fuel.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Faculty of Business Informatics, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia

  • Institute of Cybernetics, Russian Technologic University MIREA, Moscow, Russia

  • Section