International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications

| Peer-Reviewed |

Conflicts and Compromise: Using of Chinese Standards in China-aided Stadium Projects After 2000

Received: 20 May 2020    Accepted:     Published: 29 June 2020
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

Since the 1950s, China began to provide aid constructions to developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Among these constructions, stadium projects occupied a significant proportion, and produced great influence due to its high investment, large scale and obvious image. Since Chinese standards were required to be used in the design, management and construction process of China-aided stadiums, whether and how the Chinese standards can be well applied to various recipient regions becomes one of the key issues, which is worthy of the specific study. This is increasingly more significant in recent years, with the social and economic development of the recipient areas. Conflicts between the Chinese standards and the local ones may happen and compromises are required to solved the problem. Therefore, this study aims to explore the exportation of Chinese standards in China-aided stadium projects after 2000 based on interview studies. Statistical analysis and content analysis research methods are used in the analyzing of the interview contents. This study tries to explore the current situation, problems and solutions (countermeasures) when using Chinese standards in China-aided stadium projects after 2000. The applicability and practicability of Chinese standards are also evaluated, and the guidance and suggestions for future construction projects are summarized.

DOI 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13
Published in International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications (Volume 6, Issue 2, June 2020)
Page(s) 27-33
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

China’s Foreign Aid, China-aided Stadiums, Chinese Standard

References
[1] People's Republic of China State Council Information Office. (2011). White paper of China’s foreign aid.
[2] Neumayer, E. (2003). Do human rights matter in bilateral aid allocation? A quantitative analysis of 21 donor countries. Social Science Quarterly, 84 (3), 650–666.
[3] Dreher, A., Nunnenkamp, P., and Thiele, R. (2011). Are “new” donors different? Comparing the allocation of bilateral aid between non-DAC and DAC donor countries. World Development, 39 (11), 1950–68.
[4] Fuchs, A. (2014). Determinants of Donor Generosity: A Survey of the Aid Budget Literature. World Development, 56, 172.
[5] Copper, J. F. (1979). China’s Foreign Aid in 1978. School of Law, University of Maryland.
[6] Brautigam, D. (2011) China in Africa: Seven Myths. The Elcano Royal Institute/Real Instituto Elcano, Analysis of the Real Elcano Institute (ARI) 23/2011, Madrid, Spain, January 8.
[7] Will, R. (2012). China’s stadium diplomacy. World Policy Journal, 29 (2), 36-43.
[8] Siamphukdee, C. (2014). Introduction: “export architecture” and the cold war. Journal of Export Architecture: A War of the Worlds – Cold War Projects abroad. Deakin University, Deakin, pp. 1-2.
[9] Menary, S. (2015). China’s programme of stadium diplomacy. ICSS Journal, 3 (3): 2-9.
[10] Dong, Y. & Fan, C. (2017). The effects of China's aid and trade on its ODI in African countries. Emerging Markets Review, 33, 1-18.
[11] Naím, M. (2007). Missing Links: Rogue Aid. Foreign Policy, 159, 96-95.
[12] Noragric, P. W. (2011). China and Africa – Aid and development. EDS 270 Development Aid & Politics.
[13] Kilama, E. (2016). The influence of China and emerging donors aid allocation: A recipient perspective. China Economic Review, 38, 76-91.
[14] Chang, W. and Xue, C. (2018). A Brief Introduction to the Regional Design Attempt of China-aid Sports Buildings. Architecture & Culture, 175 (10), 241-243.
[15] Chang, W. and Xue, C. (2019). Towards International - China-aid Stadiums in the Developing World. Frontiers of Architectural Research.
[16] Chang, W. and Xue, C. (2020) Climate, Standard and Symbolization: Critical Regional Approaches in Designs of China-aided Stadiums. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering. published online: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/13467581.2020.1749060.
[17] Glaser, B., and Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
[18] Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[19] Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Wei Chang, Charlie Qiuli Xue, Yingting Chen. (2020). Conflicts and Compromise: Using of Chinese Standards in China-aided Stadium Projects After 2000. International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications, 6(2), 27-33. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Wei Chang; Charlie Qiuli Xue; Yingting Chen. Conflicts and Compromise: Using of Chinese Standards in China-aided Stadium Projects After 2000. Int. J. Archit. Arts Appl. 2020, 6(2), 27-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Wei Chang, Charlie Qiuli Xue, Yingting Chen. Conflicts and Compromise: Using of Chinese Standards in China-aided Stadium Projects After 2000. Int J Archit Arts Appl. 2020;6(2):27-33. doi: 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13,
      author = {Wei Chang and Charlie Qiuli Xue and Yingting Chen},
      title = {Conflicts and Compromise: Using of Chinese Standards in China-aided Stadium Projects After 2000},
      journal = {International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications},
      volume = {6},
      number = {2},
      pages = {27-33},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijaaa.20200602.13},
      abstract = {Since the 1950s, China began to provide aid constructions to developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Among these constructions, stadium projects occupied a significant proportion, and produced great influence due to its high investment, large scale and obvious image. Since Chinese standards were required to be used in the design, management and construction process of China-aided stadiums, whether and how the Chinese standards can be well applied to various recipient regions becomes one of the key issues, which is worthy of the specific study. This is increasingly more significant in recent years, with the social and economic development of the recipient areas. Conflicts between the Chinese standards and the local ones may happen and compromises are required to solved the problem. Therefore, this study aims to explore the exportation of Chinese standards in China-aided stadium projects after 2000 based on interview studies. Statistical analysis and content analysis research methods are used in the analyzing of the interview contents. This study tries to explore the current situation, problems and solutions (countermeasures) when using Chinese standards in China-aided stadium projects after 2000. The applicability and practicability of Chinese standards are also evaluated, and the guidance and suggestions for future construction projects are summarized.},
     year = {2020}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Conflicts and Compromise: Using of Chinese Standards in China-aided Stadium Projects After 2000
    AU  - Wei Chang
    AU  - Charlie Qiuli Xue
    AU  - Yingting Chen
    Y1  - 2020/06/29
    PY  - 2020
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13
    T2  - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
    JF  - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
    JO  - International Journal of Architecture, Arts and Applications
    SP  - 27
    EP  - 33
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-1131
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijaaa.20200602.13
    AB  - Since the 1950s, China began to provide aid constructions to developing countries in Asia, Africa and Latin America. Among these constructions, stadium projects occupied a significant proportion, and produced great influence due to its high investment, large scale and obvious image. Since Chinese standards were required to be used in the design, management and construction process of China-aided stadiums, whether and how the Chinese standards can be well applied to various recipient regions becomes one of the key issues, which is worthy of the specific study. This is increasingly more significant in recent years, with the social and economic development of the recipient areas. Conflicts between the Chinese standards and the local ones may happen and compromises are required to solved the problem. Therefore, this study aims to explore the exportation of Chinese standards in China-aided stadium projects after 2000 based on interview studies. Statistical analysis and content analysis research methods are used in the analyzing of the interview contents. This study tries to explore the current situation, problems and solutions (countermeasures) when using Chinese standards in China-aided stadium projects after 2000. The applicability and practicability of Chinese standards are also evaluated, and the guidance and suggestions for future construction projects are summarized.
    VL  - 6
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • School of Civil Engineering, Tangshan University, Tangshan, China; Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China

  • Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China

  • Department of Architecture and Civil Engineering, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China; Shenzhen Research Institute, City University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, China

  • Sections