American Journal of Statistics and Probability

| Peer-Reviewed |

Karmarkar’s Approach for Solving Linear Programming Problem for Profit Maximization in Production Industries: NBC Port-Harcourt Plant

Received: 4 December 2016    Accepted: 13 February 2017    Published: 14 April 2017
Views:       Downloads:

Share This Article

Abstract

In this work, the Karmarkar’s algorithm of the interior point method is compared to the simplex method by ascertaining the effect of interior point algorithm on linear programming problem of high number of variables and study why it is not so popularly used in solving linear programming problems. Six (6) products of coca-cola Hellenic Port Harcourt plant (Coke 50cl, Coke35cl, Fanta 50cl, Fanta 35cl, Sprite 35cl and Schweppes 33cl) and their raw materials (Concentrates, Sugar, Water and Carbon (iv) oxide) respectively were studied. The data were analysed using Scilab 5.5.2 software for Karmarmar’s approach and Tora software for Simplex method and the results are compared. The Karmarkar’s algorithm gave a maximum profit of N70,478,116.00 giving a breakdown that the company should produce 159300 crates of Coke 35cl, 64173 crates of Fanta 50cl, 8419 crates of Coke 50cl, 4876 crates of Fanta 35cl, 1118 crates of Sprite and 7 crates of Schweppes from the available resources to attain the optimal solution. The Simplex gave a maximum profit of N107,666,639.51 giving only the production of about 339482 crates of Schweppes 33cl from the available resources to attain the optimal solution.

DOI 10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11
Published in American Journal of Statistics and Probability (Volume 2, Issue 1, January 2017)
Page(s) 1-8
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Linear Programming, Interior Point, Karmarkar, Simplex, Duality Gap

References
[1] Barnes E. R (1995) “A Variation on Karmarkar’s Algorithm for Solving Linear Programming Problems” yorktown heights, New York.
[2] Dantzig G. B (1947) “Linear Programming and Extension” Princeton University Press. New Jessey.
[3] Gill et al (1986): On projected Newton barrier methods for linear programming and an equivalence to Karmarkar's projective method, Math. Programming, 36, 183-209.
[4] Hoffman L. D. and Bradley G. L. (1995) “Finite Mathematics with Calculus” page (153). MC Graw Hill Inc. New York.
[5] Jessen P. A. and Bard J. F. (2000) LP Methods: Interior point Method.
[6] Karmarkar N. (1984) “A New Polynomial-time Algorithm for Linear programming” AT&T Bell Laboratories murray Hill, USA.
[7] Khachiyan, L. G. (1979): “A polynomial algorithm in linear programming”. Sou. Math. Dokl. 20: 191-94.
[8] Korte & Vygen on www. Wikipedia.com.
[9] Nemirovski A. S. and Todd M. J. (2008) “Interior-point method for Optimization” Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
[10] Nimrod Megiddo (1986) “Linear Programming” IBM Resaerch, Statistics Department, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
[11] Ponnambalam et al (1989) “An Application of Karmarkar’s Interior-point linear programming algorithm for multi-reservior operations optimization” University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada.
[12] Richard B. and Govindasami N. (1997) “Schaum’s Outline Operations Research” 2nd Edition. MC Graw-Hill Inc. USA.
[13] Robere Robert (2012) “interior point methods and Linear Programming” University of Toronto.
[14] Schrijver A. (1986) “The new linear programming Method of karmarkar” Centre for Mathematics and Computer Science, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
[15] Sharma J. K (2013) “Operations Research: Theory and Applications” 5th Edition. Mac Millan Publishers india ltd. India.
[16] Shirish K. Shevade (2012) “Numerical Optimization” An online lecture of Indian Institute of Science. Bangalore, India.
[17] Szabo Zsuzsanna and Kovacs Marta (2003) “Interior-Point Methods And Simplex Method In Linear Programming” St. Univ. Ovidius constanta vol. 11 (2), 2003, 155–162. Petru Maior University of TgMures, Romania.
[18] Taha H. A. (2008) “Operations Research: An Introduction” Eight Edition. Pearson press, Dorling Kindershey (india) pvt. Ltd. India.
[19] Todd M. J. (1991) “The Affine-scalling Direction for Linear Programming is a limit of projection scalling directions” Cornell University, Upson Hall Ithaca, New York.
[20] Vanderbei R. J. (1986) “Convex optimization: Interior Point Methods and Applications.” Princeton University Press.
[21] Vanderbei, R. J, Meketon M. J, Freedman, B. A (1986) “A Modification of Karmarkar’s Linear Programming Algorithm.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Nsikan Paul Akpan, Okeh Chibuzor Ojoh. (2017). Karmarkar’s Approach for Solving Linear Programming Problem for Profit Maximization in Production Industries: NBC Port-Harcourt Plant. American Journal of Statistics and Probability, 2(1), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Nsikan Paul Akpan; Okeh Chibuzor Ojoh. Karmarkar’s Approach for Solving Linear Programming Problem for Profit Maximization in Production Industries: NBC Port-Harcourt Plant. Am. J. Stat. Probab. 2017, 2(1), 1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Nsikan Paul Akpan, Okeh Chibuzor Ojoh. Karmarkar’s Approach for Solving Linear Programming Problem for Profit Maximization in Production Industries: NBC Port-Harcourt Plant. Am J Stat Probab. 2017;2(1):1-8. doi: 10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11,
      author = {Nsikan Paul Akpan and Okeh Chibuzor Ojoh},
      title = {Karmarkar’s Approach for Solving Linear Programming Problem for Profit Maximization in Production Industries: NBC Port-Harcourt Plant},
      journal = {American Journal of Statistics and Probability},
      volume = {2},
      number = {1},
      pages = {1-8},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajsp.20170201.11},
      abstract = {In this work, the Karmarkar’s algorithm of the interior point method is compared to the simplex method by ascertaining the effect of interior point algorithm on linear programming problem of high number of variables and study why it is not so popularly used in solving linear programming problems. Six (6) products of coca-cola Hellenic Port Harcourt plant (Coke 50cl, Coke35cl, Fanta 50cl, Fanta 35cl, Sprite 35cl and Schweppes 33cl) and their raw materials (Concentrates, Sugar, Water and Carbon (iv) oxide) respectively were studied. The data were analysed using Scilab 5.5.2 software for Karmarmar’s approach and Tora software for Simplex method and the results are compared. The Karmarkar’s algorithm gave a maximum profit of N70,478,116.00 giving a breakdown that the company should produce 159300 crates of Coke 35cl, 64173 crates of Fanta 50cl, 8419 crates of Coke 50cl, 4876 crates of Fanta 35cl, 1118 crates of Sprite and 7 crates of Schweppes from the available resources to attain the optimal solution. The Simplex gave a maximum profit of N107,666,639.51 giving only the production of about 339482 crates of Schweppes 33cl from the available resources to attain the optimal solution.},
     year = {2017}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Karmarkar’s Approach for Solving Linear Programming Problem for Profit Maximization in Production Industries: NBC Port-Harcourt Plant
    AU  - Nsikan Paul Akpan
    AU  - Okeh Chibuzor Ojoh
    Y1  - 2017/04/14
    PY  - 2017
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11
    T2  - American Journal of Statistics and Probability
    JF  - American Journal of Statistics and Probability
    JO  - American Journal of Statistics and Probability
    SP  - 1
    EP  - 8
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajsp.20170201.11
    AB  - In this work, the Karmarkar’s algorithm of the interior point method is compared to the simplex method by ascertaining the effect of interior point algorithm on linear programming problem of high number of variables and study why it is not so popularly used in solving linear programming problems. Six (6) products of coca-cola Hellenic Port Harcourt plant (Coke 50cl, Coke35cl, Fanta 50cl, Fanta 35cl, Sprite 35cl and Schweppes 33cl) and their raw materials (Concentrates, Sugar, Water and Carbon (iv) oxide) respectively were studied. The data were analysed using Scilab 5.5.2 software for Karmarmar’s approach and Tora software for Simplex method and the results are compared. The Karmarkar’s algorithm gave a maximum profit of N70,478,116.00 giving a breakdown that the company should produce 159300 crates of Coke 35cl, 64173 crates of Fanta 50cl, 8419 crates of Coke 50cl, 4876 crates of Fanta 35cl, 1118 crates of Sprite and 7 crates of Schweppes from the available resources to attain the optimal solution. The Simplex gave a maximum profit of N107,666,639.51 giving only the production of about 339482 crates of Schweppes 33cl from the available resources to attain the optimal solution.
    VL  - 2
    IS  - 1
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

  • Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Port Harcourt, Port Harcourt, Nigeria

  • Sections