This study is Shea Park restoration contribution. In this study, Shea butter was cultivated for 12 months on non-sterile culture substrate and then inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The mycorrhizal parameters were evaluated at 12 months after sowing and the growth parameters of the plants at 4 and 12 months after sowing. The results showed mycorrhizal infection of all treatments and stimulation of Shea’s growth according to inocula. Yac 2 mix allowed a better improvement Shea growth. This inoculum improved Shea height growth by 10.34% at 4 months and 29.02% at 12 months after sowing compared to the treatment inoculated with Glomus aggregatum, by 46.02% at 4 months and 80.71% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Glomus aggregatum improved Shea height by 32.33% at 4 months and 40.06% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. This inoculum also improved the Shea collar diameter by 12% at 4 months and 28.53% at 12 months after sowing compared to the treatment inoculated with Glomus aggregatum, by 53.86% at 4 months and 75.85% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Glomus aggregatum improves the Shea height by 37.38% at 4 months and 36.81% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Yac 2 mix also improves the height relative growth rate by 33.33% and the collar diameter relative growth rate by 54.54% compared to the controls. This study has shown promising results for the restoration of the Shea Park and deserves to be deepened by extending it to other mycorrhizal strains.
Published in | Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering (Volume 8, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12 |
Page(s) | 73-77 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa), Mycorrhizal Inoculation, Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi
[1] | Hall JB, Aebischer DP, Tomlinson HF, Osei-Amaning E, Hindle JR (1996) Vitellaria paradoxa: a monograph. School of Agricultural and Forest Sciences, University of Wales, Bangor. |
[2] | Lovett PN, Haq N (2000) Evidence for anthropic selection of the Sheanut tree (Vitellaria paradoxa). Agroforestry Systems 48 (3): 273-288. doi: 10.1023/a:1006379217851. |
[3] | Augusseau X, Nikiéma P, Torquebiau E (2006) Tree Biodiversity, Land Dynamics and Farmers’ Strategies on the Agricultural Frontier of Southwestern Burkina Faso. Biodiversity and Conservation 15 (2): 613-630. doi: 10.1007/s10531-005-2090-8. |
[4] | Chevalier A (1946) L’arbre à beurre d’Afrique et l’avenir de sa culture. Oléagineux 1 (1): 7-11. |
[5] | Nikiema A, Van Der Maesen LJG, Hall JB (2003) The impact of parkland management practices on plant resources diversity. Improved management of agroforestry parkland systems in Sub-Saharan Africa. EU/INCO Project Contract IC18-CT98-0261, Final report, University of Wales Bangor, UK: 43-50. |
[6] | Bado BV (2002) Rôle des légumineuses sur la fertilité des sols ferrugineux tropicaux des zones guinéenne et soudanienne du Burkina Faso. Philosophiae Doctor (Ph. D.), Université de Laval. |
[7] | Dianda M, Ouedraogo SJ, Diop TA (2010) Variation de la réponse à l’endomycorhization en pépinière des plants issus de deux semenciers de karité a.u Burkina Faso. Int J Biol Chem Sci 4 (5): 1742-1752. |
[8] | Haro H, Sanon KB, Le Roux C, Duponnois R, Traoré AS (2017) Improvement of cowpea productivity by rhizobial and mycorrhizal inoculation in Burkina Faso. Symbiosis: 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s13199-017-0478-3. |
[9] | Haro H (2016) Optimisation des symbioses rhizobienne et mycorhizienne pour améliorer la productivité du niébé [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] au Burkina Faso. (Ph. D.), Université Ouaga 1 Professeur Joseph Ki-Zerbo. |
[10] | Haro H, Sanon KB, Diop I, Kane A, Dianda M, Houngnandan P, Neyra M, Traoré A (2012) Réponse à l'inoculation mycorhizienne de quatre variétés de niébé [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivées au Burkina Faso et au Sénégal. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Science 6 (5): 2097-2112. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v6i5.18. |
[11] | Hoffmann WA, Poorter H (2002) Avoiding bias in calculations of relative growth rate. Annals of botany 90 (1): 37-42. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcf140. |
[12] | Beadle CL (1985) Plant Growth Analysis. In: Coombs J, Hall DO, Long SP, Scurlock JMO (eds) Techniques in Bioproductivity and Photosynthesis. Pergamon, pp 20-25. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-08-031999-5.50012-1. |
[13] | Blackman VH (1919) The Compound Interest Law and Plant Growth. Annals of botany 33 (131): 353-360. |
[14] | Kormanik PP, McGraw AC (1982) Quantification of vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizae in plant roots. Methods and Principles of Mycorrhizal Research (Schenck NC, ed) Univ Florida Ann Phytopathol Soc St Paul, Minnesota: 37-45. |
[15] | Phillips JM, Hayman DS (1970) Improved procedures for clearing roots and staining parasitic and vesicular-arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi for rapid assessment of infection. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 55 (1): 158-161. |
[16] | Trouvelot A, Kough JL, Gianinazzi-Pearson V, Gianinazzi S (1986) Mesure du taux de mycorhization VA d’un système radiculaire. Recherche de méthodes d’estimation ayant une signification fonctionnelle. Mycorrhizae: physiology and genetics: 217-221. |
[17] | Bâ AM, Dalpé Y, Guissou T (1996) Les glomales d'Acacia holosericea et d'Acacia mangium. Bois et forêts des tropiques 250: 5-18. |
[18] | Watkinson AR, Freckleton RP (1997) Quantifying the impact of arbuscular mycorrhiza on plant competition. Journal of Ecology 85 (4): 541-545. |
[19] | Miller RM, Kling M (2000) The importance of integration and scale in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis. Plant and Soil 226 (2): 295-309. doi: 10.1023/A:1026554608366. |
[20] | Zaouchi Y, Bahri NB, Rezgui S, Bettaieb T (2013) Effects of arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculation and fertilization on mycorrhizal Statute of Jacaranda mimosifolia D. Don cultivated in nurseries. Comptes rendus biologies 336 (10): 493-499. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2013.09.005. |
[21] | Haro H, Sanon KB (2020) Réponse du sésame (Sesamum indicum L.) à l’inoculation mycorhizienne avec des souches des champignons mycorhiziens arbusculaires indigènes du Burkina Faso. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Science 14 (2): 417-423. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i2.9. |
[22] | Song Z, Bi Y, Zhang J, Gong Y, Yang H (2020) Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi promote the growth of plants in the mining associated clay. Scientific reports 10 (1): 2663. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59447-9. |
[23] | Elliott AJ, Daniell TJ, Cameron DD, Field KJ (2020) A commercial arbuscular mycorrhizal inoculum increases root colonization across wheat cultivars but does not increase assimilation of mycorrhiza‐acquired nutrients. Plants, People, Planet n/a (n/a). doi: 10.1002/ppp3.10094. |
[24] | Mensah JA, Koch AM, Antunes PM, Kiers ET, Hart M, Bucking H (2015) High functional diversity within species of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi is associated with differences in phosphate and nitrogen uptake and fungal phosphate metabolism. Mycorrhiza: 1-14. doi: 10.1007/s00572-015-0631-x. |
[25] | Haro H, Semdé K, Bahadio K, Sanon BK (2020) Effet de l’inoculation mycorhizienne avec des souches des champignons mycorhiziens arbusculaires sur la croissance de Mucuna pruriens (L.) DC en condition contrôlée. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Science 14 (3): 1065-1073. doi: https://doi.org/10.4314/ijbcs.v14i3.32. |
[26] | Haro H, Semdé K, Bahadio K (2020) Native Arbuscular Mycorrhizal inoculation of Corn (Zea mays L.) cultivated in Burkina Faso. Journal of Applied Biosciences 149: 15291-15296. doi: https://doi.org/10.35759/JABs.v149.3. |
APA Style
Haro Hadou, Ganaba Souleymane, Sanon Bibata Kadidia. (2020). Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) Growth Improvement by Mycorrhizal Inoculation in Controlled Conditions. Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering, 8(4), 73-77. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12
ACS Style
Haro Hadou; Ganaba Souleymane; Sanon Bibata Kadidia. Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) Growth Improvement by Mycorrhizal Inoculation in Controlled Conditions. Adv. BioSci. Bioeng. 2020, 8(4), 73-77. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12
AMA Style
Haro Hadou, Ganaba Souleymane, Sanon Bibata Kadidia. Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) Growth Improvement by Mycorrhizal Inoculation in Controlled Conditions. Adv BioSci Bioeng. 2020;8(4):73-77. doi: 10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12
@article{10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12, author = {Haro Hadou and Ganaba Souleymane and Sanon Bibata Kadidia}, title = {Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) Growth Improvement by Mycorrhizal Inoculation in Controlled Conditions}, journal = {Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering}, volume = {8}, number = {4}, pages = {73-77}, doi = {10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.abb.20200804.12}, abstract = {This study is Shea Park restoration contribution. In this study, Shea butter was cultivated for 12 months on non-sterile culture substrate and then inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The mycorrhizal parameters were evaluated at 12 months after sowing and the growth parameters of the plants at 4 and 12 months after sowing. The results showed mycorrhizal infection of all treatments and stimulation of Shea’s growth according to inocula. Yac 2 mix allowed a better improvement Shea growth. This inoculum improved Shea height growth by 10.34% at 4 months and 29.02% at 12 months after sowing compared to the treatment inoculated with Glomus aggregatum, by 46.02% at 4 months and 80.71% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Glomus aggregatum improved Shea height by 32.33% at 4 months and 40.06% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. This inoculum also improved the Shea collar diameter by 12% at 4 months and 28.53% at 12 months after sowing compared to the treatment inoculated with Glomus aggregatum, by 53.86% at 4 months and 75.85% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Glomus aggregatum improves the Shea height by 37.38% at 4 months and 36.81% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Yac 2 mix also improves the height relative growth rate by 33.33% and the collar diameter relative growth rate by 54.54% compared to the controls. This study has shown promising results for the restoration of the Shea Park and deserves to be deepened by extending it to other mycorrhizal strains.}, year = {2020} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Shea (Vitellaria paradoxa C.F. Gaertn.) Growth Improvement by Mycorrhizal Inoculation in Controlled Conditions AU - Haro Hadou AU - Ganaba Souleymane AU - Sanon Bibata Kadidia Y1 - 2020/11/16 PY - 2020 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12 DO - 10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12 T2 - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering JF - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering JO - Advances in Bioscience and Bioengineering SP - 73 EP - 77 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-4162 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.abb.20200804.12 AB - This study is Shea Park restoration contribution. In this study, Shea butter was cultivated for 12 months on non-sterile culture substrate and then inoculated with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF). The mycorrhizal parameters were evaluated at 12 months after sowing and the growth parameters of the plants at 4 and 12 months after sowing. The results showed mycorrhizal infection of all treatments and stimulation of Shea’s growth according to inocula. Yac 2 mix allowed a better improvement Shea growth. This inoculum improved Shea height growth by 10.34% at 4 months and 29.02% at 12 months after sowing compared to the treatment inoculated with Glomus aggregatum, by 46.02% at 4 months and 80.71% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Glomus aggregatum improved Shea height by 32.33% at 4 months and 40.06% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. This inoculum also improved the Shea collar diameter by 12% at 4 months and 28.53% at 12 months after sowing compared to the treatment inoculated with Glomus aggregatum, by 53.86% at 4 months and 75.85% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Glomus aggregatum improves the Shea height by 37.38% at 4 months and 36.81% at 12 months after sowing compared to controls. Yac 2 mix also improves the height relative growth rate by 33.33% and the collar diameter relative growth rate by 54.54% compared to the controls. This study has shown promising results for the restoration of the Shea Park and deserves to be deepened by extending it to other mycorrhizal strains. VL - 8 IS - 4 ER -