The recent studies indicated; determinants of rice market participation need further investigation in Fogera district. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify determinants of rice market participation decision and the quantity of rice marketed by rice producers. To address these objectives, both primary and secondary data were collected in 2018/2019 farming season. Both descriptive statistics and double hurdle econometric model were used to analyse the data of 212 sample rice producers. From the sample rice producers, 78.3% were market participants and the remaining 21.7% were non participants. The results of the study indicated, market distance was significantly and negatively influencing the probability of rice market participation, while credit use, production and market information were significantly and positively influencing the probability of rice market participation. Whereas, education level, credit use, production, labor and rice land size were significantly and positively influencing the quantity of rice marketed supply. The finding of this study emphasis the importance of socio economic, institutional and market factors related to yield enhancing rice technologies, use of credit and having access to market information. Therefore, development interventions could focus on improving such socio economic, institutional and market determinants to make farmers’ rice market participation wider.
Published in | Advances (Volume 3, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17 |
Page(s) | 87-94 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Double Hurdle, Fogera, Market Participation, Rice
[1] | Onyango A. O (2014). Exploring options for improving rice production to reduce hunger and poverty in Kenya. World Environment, 4 (4), pp. 172-179. |
[2] | FAOSTAT (2019). Production data. Retrived 30 october from FAOSTAT. |
[3] | Dawit A, Agaje T, Abebaw A, Degu A, Tilahun T, Thompson J (2018). A historical analysis of rice commercialisation in ethiopia: the case of the fogera plain. Working paper, pp. 1-34. |
[4] | Astewel T (2010). Analysis of Rice Profitability and Marketing Chain: The Case of Fogera Woreda, South Gondar Zone, Amhara National Regional State, Ethiopia, MSc thesis, Agricultural Economics, Haramaya University. https://www.scribd.com/document/271004362/Analysis-of-R. |
[5] | Meron A (2016). The Contributions and Challenges of Rice Value Chain Development on the Livelihood of Small Holder Rice Farmers, Addis Abab. |
[6] | Asmelash (2014). Determinants of Adoption of Upland Rice Varieties in Fogera District, South Gondar, Ethiopia. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development 8. 12, p. 332–38. |
[7] | Astewel T (2017). Determinants of Rice Production and Marketing in Low Producer Farmers: The Case of Fogera Districts, North-Western Ethiopia. Volume Vol.7, No.4, pp. 6-15. |
[8] | Fogera District Agriculture and Rural Development (FDARD) (2019). Quarter report prepared to South Gonder Zone. |
[9] | Fogera District Finance and Economic Development (FDFED) (2017). Annual Budget report. |
[10] | Israel D (2012). Determining Sample size. Second edition. PEOD6. University of Florida. Gainesville (http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/pd006). |
[11] | Yamane T (1967). Statistics. An Introdactory Analysis. Second edition. Harper and Row. New York, 919. |
[12] | William HG (2018). Econometric Analysis. New York: Prentice Hall, One Lake Street, Upper Saddle River. |
[13] | Wooldridge JW (2012). Multiple regression analysis with qualitative information. Australia, Brazil, Japan, Korea, Mexico, Singapore, Spain, United Kingdom, United states. |
[14] | Muricho G, Menale K, Obare G (2015). Determinants of market participation regimes among smallholder maize producers. International Maize and Wheat improvement centre, Kenya, Egerton. |
[15] | Kondo E (2018). Production, productivity and market participation of smallholder cowpea producers in the Northern region of Ghana. MSc thesis, Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness, University of Ghana. |
[16] | Shewaye A, Dawit A, Lemma Z (2016). Determinants of haricot bean market participation in Misrak Badawacho district, Hadiya zone, Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples Regional State, Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Science, 26 (2), pp. 69-81. |
[17] | Benjamin A, Yaw O, Seini W (2014). Market participation of smallholder maize farmers in in the upper West region of Ghana. African journal of agricultural research, 9 (31), pp. 2427-2435. |
[18] | Kamanzi J, Karangwa A (2017). Analysis of factors influencing market participation of smallholder bean farmers in Nyanza district of Southern province, Rwanda. Journal of Agricultural Science, 9 (11), E-ISSN 1916-9760. |
[19] | Goetz S (1992). A selectivity Model of Household Food Marketing Behavior in SubSaharan Africa. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 74, pp. 444-452. |
[20] | Abrham F, Animashaun J, Olorunfemi O (2014). Determinants of commercial production of rice in rice producing areas of Kwara state, Nigeria. Albanian Journal of Agricultural Science, 13 (2), pp. 59-65. |
[21] | Shewaye A, Adam B, Abebaw A, Adane M (2019). Cost and Return Analysis of Rain Fed Lowland Rice Production under Smallholder Farmers in Fogera District, North Western Ethiopia. 5 (3), pp 30-35. |
[22] | Rehima M, Dawit A (2012). Red pepper marketing in Siltie and Alaba SNNPRS of Ethiopia: Factors affecting households' marketing pepper. International research journal of agricultural science and soil science, 2 (6), pp. 261-266. |
[23] | Omiti J Otieno D, Nyanamba T, Cullough (2009). Factors influencing the intensity of market participation by smallholder farmers: A case study of rural and peri-urban areas of Kenya. Volume Vol 3 No 1, pp. 57-82. |
[24] | Addisu H (2016). Value chain analysis of vegetables: The case of Ejere district, West Shoa Zone, Oromia National Regional State of Ethiopia, MSc thesis, Agricultural Economics and Agribusiness. |
[25] | Tariku A, Bosena T, Lemma Z (2018). Analysis of market decisions and intensity of market participation of smallholder wheat in Adola Rede district of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. International Journal of Research Studies in Agricultural Sciences, 4 (8), pp. 1-11. |
APA Style
Ayele Tesfahun, Adane Melak, Girmachew Siraw, Almaz Giziew. (2022). Decision on Market Participation of Rice Producers in Fogera District, Northwest Ethiopia. Advances, 3(3), 87-94. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17
ACS Style
Ayele Tesfahun; Adane Melak; Girmachew Siraw; Almaz Giziew. Decision on Market Participation of Rice Producers in Fogera District, Northwest Ethiopia. Advances. 2022, 3(3), 87-94. doi: 10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17
@article{10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17, author = {Ayele Tesfahun and Adane Melak and Girmachew Siraw and Almaz Giziew}, title = {Decision on Market Participation of Rice Producers in Fogera District, Northwest Ethiopia}, journal = {Advances}, volume = {3}, number = {3}, pages = {87-94}, doi = {10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.advances.20220303.17}, abstract = {The recent studies indicated; determinants of rice market participation need further investigation in Fogera district. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify determinants of rice market participation decision and the quantity of rice marketed by rice producers. To address these objectives, both primary and secondary data were collected in 2018/2019 farming season. Both descriptive statistics and double hurdle econometric model were used to analyse the data of 212 sample rice producers. From the sample rice producers, 78.3% were market participants and the remaining 21.7% were non participants. The results of the study indicated, market distance was significantly and negatively influencing the probability of rice market participation, while credit use, production and market information were significantly and positively influencing the probability of rice market participation. Whereas, education level, credit use, production, labor and rice land size were significantly and positively influencing the quantity of rice marketed supply. The finding of this study emphasis the importance of socio economic, institutional and market factors related to yield enhancing rice technologies, use of credit and having access to market information. Therefore, development interventions could focus on improving such socio economic, institutional and market determinants to make farmers’ rice market participation wider.}, year = {2022} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Decision on Market Participation of Rice Producers in Fogera District, Northwest Ethiopia AU - Ayele Tesfahun AU - Adane Melak AU - Girmachew Siraw AU - Almaz Giziew Y1 - 2022/08/15 PY - 2022 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17 DO - 10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17 T2 - Advances JF - Advances JO - Advances SP - 87 EP - 94 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7200 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.advances.20220303.17 AB - The recent studies indicated; determinants of rice market participation need further investigation in Fogera district. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify determinants of rice market participation decision and the quantity of rice marketed by rice producers. To address these objectives, both primary and secondary data were collected in 2018/2019 farming season. Both descriptive statistics and double hurdle econometric model were used to analyse the data of 212 sample rice producers. From the sample rice producers, 78.3% were market participants and the remaining 21.7% were non participants. The results of the study indicated, market distance was significantly and negatively influencing the probability of rice market participation, while credit use, production and market information were significantly and positively influencing the probability of rice market participation. Whereas, education level, credit use, production, labor and rice land size were significantly and positively influencing the quantity of rice marketed supply. The finding of this study emphasis the importance of socio economic, institutional and market factors related to yield enhancing rice technologies, use of credit and having access to market information. Therefore, development interventions could focus on improving such socio economic, institutional and market determinants to make farmers’ rice market participation wider. VL - 3 IS - 3 ER -