Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Verification Challenges of AI-Generated Identity Documents: Blockchain Technology as a Trust Layer and AI as a Supporting Signal

Received: 14 May 2026     Accepted: 25 May 2026     Published: 2 July 2026
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

The rapid advancement of generative AI has revolutionized digitalization, while simultaneously introducing new security challenges. As AI models are increasingly integrated into cameras to enhance or modify images, a fundamental question arises for verification systems: whether captured images retain authentic camera fingerprints, such as Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU), Color Filter Array (CFA) patterns, physically random sensor noise, and lens distortions, or are heavily altered or fully generated by AI. Modern generative AI models create images that are highly similar to those produced by cameras, increasing the risk of document forgery and verification challenges. To address these challenges, this research proposes blockchain technology as a foundational trust layer for digital identity, enabling secure and tamper-proof evidence recording through an immutable ledger and cryptographic mechanisms. The proposed system integrates blockchain with a layered microservices architecture, separating user management, blockchain interaction, and audit logging into independent services. Communication between services uses gRPC with clearly defined Protocol Buffer schemas for efficient communication. The API layer is implemented using FastAPI for authentication, authorization, and request routing with high performance and automatic documentation. Data is stored in MongoDB, including user profiles, authentication records, verification results, and audit logs, which ensures flexibility and high availability. AI is used as a supporting signal rather than a definitive decision-maker. Experimental evaluation was conducted on 4,550 handwritten signatures, created using real ink pens but not belonging to any specific individual, and 4,550 AI-generated signatures were created using OpenAI's GPT image models, Nano Banana 2, and Qwen image generation models. ResNet50 was used to compute the signal score and achieved an F1 score of 0.996 on the classification task. The proposed method is designed to generalize well across a wide range of document and image domains.

Published in American Journal of Artificial Intelligence (Volume 10, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12
Page(s) 189-197
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Generative AI, Verification Challenges, Digital Identity, Blockchain Technology, Cryptographic Mechanisms

References
[1] J. Zuo, H. Deng, H. Zhou, J. Zhu, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Y. Yan, K. Huang, W. Chen, Y. Deng, R. Jin, N. Sang, and C. Gao, "Is Nano Banana Pro a Low-Level Vision All-Rounder? A Comprehensive Evaluation on 14 Tasks and 40 Datasets,"
[2] H. Yang, Y. Yang, R. Zhang, and L. Pan, "A Preliminary Study for GPT-4o on Image Restoration,"
[3] S. Susnjara and I. Smalley, "Blockchain," IBM Think, 2026.
[4] S. Nakamoto, "Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system," 2008.
[5] V. Buterin, "Ethereum: A Next-Generation Smart Contract and Decentralized Application Platform," White Paper, 2014.
[6] C. Fisch, "Initial coin offerings (ICOs) to finance new ventures," Journal of Business Venturing, vol. 34, pp. 1--22, Jan. 2019,
[7] IBM, "What is Blockchain and AI?," IBM Think, 2026.
[8] A. Nehe, A. Bhagwat, V. Lamkhade, S. Kshirsagar, R. Kadlag, and A. Shinde, "Blockchain Based Identity Verification System," World Journal of Pharmaceutical Science and Research, vol. 4, pp. 981-997, Nov. 2025,
[9] C. J. Zhang, A. Q. Gill, B. Liu, and M. J. Anwar, "AI-based Identity Fraud Detection: A Systematic Review," Jan. 2025.
[10] Babaei, R., Cheng, S., Duan, R., and Zhao, S. (2025). Generative Artificial Intelligence and the Evolving Challenge of Deepfake Detection: A Systematic Analysis. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 14(1), 17.
[11] Rahman, M. M., Tonmoy, M. T. K., Shihab, S. R., and Farhana, R. (2023). Blockchain-based certificate authentication system with enabling correction.
[12] Lopes, A. D., Mello, T., and Bezerra, W. R. (2025). Digital identity management system with blockchain: An implementation with Ethereum and Ganache.
[13] Vinogradov, A. (2025). Can generative models actually forge realistic identity documents?
[14] Y. Hao and Z. Zheng, "Research on detecting AI-generated forged handwritten signatures via data-efficient image transformers",
[15] A. A. Abdirahma, A. O. Hashi, M. A. Elmi, and O. E. R. Rodriguez, "Advancing handwritten signature verification through deep learning: A comprehensive study and high-precision approach.
[16] N. Gupta, "Security risks of generative AI in financial systems: A comprehensive review," World Journal of Information Systems, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 17--24, 2025.
[17] H. Natarajan, S. Krause, and H. Gradstein, "Distributed ledger technology (DLT) and blockchain," World Bank FinTech Note No. 1, International Bank for Reconstruction and Development / The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA, 2017.
[18] C. Nguyen, H. T. Thai, D. Nguyen, D. Niyato, H. Nguyen, and E. Dutkiewicz, "Proof-of-Stake Consensus Mechanisms for Future Blockchain Networks: Fundamentals, Applications and Opportunities," IEEE Access, pp. 1--1, 2019,
[19] S. N. Khan et al., "Blockchain smart contracts: Applications, challenges, and future trends, Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications," vol. 14, no. 5, pp. 2901--2925, 2021.
[20] W. Zhou, D. Lyu, and X. Li, "Blockchain security based on cryptography: A review," 2025.
[21] Susnjara, S., and Smalley, I., "What is Blockchain?," IBM Think, 2026.
[22] Z. Zheng, S. Xie, H.-N. Dai, X. Chen, and H. Wang, "An overview of blockchain technology: Architecture, consensus, and future trends," 2017.
[23] Amazon Web Services, "What is blockchain technology?,"
[24] Shubham Randive, "How to Handle Variable-Size Images in Deep Learning Batches - A Practical Guide to Batching Strategies for Training Vision Models,"
[25] Timothy M, "What is Image Resizing? A Computer Vision Guide,"
[26] PyTorch,"Transforming images, videos, boxes and more."
[27] Kaiming He, Xiangyu Zhang, Shaoqing Ren, and Jian Sun, "Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition," 2015.
[28] Aditi Rastogi,"ResNet50," Dev Genius Blog,
[29] Abirami Vina, "What is ResNet-50 and what is its relevance in computer vision?" Ultralytics Blog.
[30] PyTorch Developers. BCEWithLogitsLoss. PyTorch Documentation, version 2.10.0 (21 March 2026).
[31] Zeljko Vujovic, Classification Model Evaluation Metrics, International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, vol. 12, pp. 599--606, 2021.
[32] Aniruddha Bhandari, Guide to AUC ROC Curve in Machine Learning, Analytics Vidhya:
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Baduwal, T. (2026). Verification Challenges of AI-Generated Identity Documents: Blockchain Technology as a Trust Layer and AI as a Supporting Signal. American Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 10(2), 189-197. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Baduwal, T. Verification Challenges of AI-Generated Identity Documents: Blockchain Technology as a Trust Layer and AI as a Supporting Signal. Am. J. Artif. Intell. 2026, 10(2), 189-197. doi: 10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Baduwal T. Verification Challenges of AI-Generated Identity Documents: Blockchain Technology as a Trust Layer and AI as a Supporting Signal. Am J Artif Intell. 2026;10(2):189-197. doi: 10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12,
      author = {Tapendra Baduwal},
      title = {Verification Challenges of AI-Generated Identity Documents: Blockchain Technology as a Trust Layer and AI as a Supporting Signal},
      journal = {American Journal of Artificial Intelligence},
      volume = {10},
      number = {2},
      pages = {189-197},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajai.20261002.12},
      abstract = {The rapid advancement of generative AI has revolutionized digitalization, while simultaneously introducing new security challenges. As AI models are increasingly integrated into cameras to enhance or modify images, a fundamental question arises for verification systems: whether captured images retain authentic camera fingerprints, such as Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU), Color Filter Array (CFA) patterns, physically random sensor noise, and lens distortions, or are heavily altered or fully generated by AI. Modern generative AI models create images that are highly similar to those produced by cameras, increasing the risk of document forgery and verification challenges. To address these challenges, this research proposes blockchain technology as a foundational trust layer for digital identity, enabling secure and tamper-proof evidence recording through an immutable ledger and cryptographic mechanisms. The proposed system integrates blockchain with a layered microservices architecture, separating user management, blockchain interaction, and audit logging into independent services. Communication between services uses gRPC with clearly defined Protocol Buffer schemas for efficient communication. The API layer is implemented using FastAPI for authentication, authorization, and request routing with high performance and automatic documentation. Data is stored in MongoDB, including user profiles, authentication records, verification results, and audit logs, which ensures flexibility and high availability. AI is used as a supporting signal rather than a definitive decision-maker. Experimental evaluation was conducted on 4,550 handwritten signatures, created using real ink pens but not belonging to any specific individual, and 4,550 AI-generated signatures were created using OpenAI's GPT image models, Nano Banana 2, and Qwen image generation models. ResNet50 was used to compute the signal score and achieved an F1 score of 0.996 on the classification task. The proposed method is designed to generalize well across a wide range of document and image domains.},
     year = {2026}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Verification Challenges of AI-Generated Identity Documents: Blockchain Technology as a Trust Layer and AI as a Supporting Signal
    AU  - Tapendra Baduwal
    Y1  - 2026/07/02
    PY  - 2026
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12
    T2  - American Journal of Artificial Intelligence
    JF  - American Journal of Artificial Intelligence
    JO  - American Journal of Artificial Intelligence
    SP  - 189
    EP  - 197
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2639-9733
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajai.20261002.12
    AB  - The rapid advancement of generative AI has revolutionized digitalization, while simultaneously introducing new security challenges. As AI models are increasingly integrated into cameras to enhance or modify images, a fundamental question arises for verification systems: whether captured images retain authentic camera fingerprints, such as Photo-Response Non-Uniformity (PRNU), Color Filter Array (CFA) patterns, physically random sensor noise, and lens distortions, or are heavily altered or fully generated by AI. Modern generative AI models create images that are highly similar to those produced by cameras, increasing the risk of document forgery and verification challenges. To address these challenges, this research proposes blockchain technology as a foundational trust layer for digital identity, enabling secure and tamper-proof evidence recording through an immutable ledger and cryptographic mechanisms. The proposed system integrates blockchain with a layered microservices architecture, separating user management, blockchain interaction, and audit logging into independent services. Communication between services uses gRPC with clearly defined Protocol Buffer schemas for efficient communication. The API layer is implemented using FastAPI for authentication, authorization, and request routing with high performance and automatic documentation. Data is stored in MongoDB, including user profiles, authentication records, verification results, and audit logs, which ensures flexibility and high availability. AI is used as a supporting signal rather than a definitive decision-maker. Experimental evaluation was conducted on 4,550 handwritten signatures, created using real ink pens but not belonging to any specific individual, and 4,550 AI-generated signatures were created using OpenAI's GPT image models, Nano Banana 2, and Qwen image generation models. ResNet50 was used to compute the signal score and achieved an F1 score of 0.996 on the classification task. The proposed method is designed to generalize well across a wide range of document and image domains.
    VL  - 10
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections