Trees Outside Forest (TOF) are considered important from an environmental, economic and social perspective. Due to its spatial heterogeneity and distribution patterns, the assessment of TOF and its importance is largely absent. The current study was carried out to assess the major TOFs, carbon stocks contained and socio-economic contribution of TOFs in Banepa Municipality. A stratified random sampling method was used for the collection of data (i.e. agriculture land, settlement area and other than agriculture and settlement). Circular plots of 1,000 m2 having a radius of 17.84 m were laid out randomly in all three strata. A questionnaire survey and field observation was done to explore the socio-economic contribution of TOF. During the study, a total of 28 tree species were recorded. Socio-economic contribution of TOF were converted and presented in terms of monetary value per household per year (NRs/hh/yr), i.e. firewood (960 NRs/hh/yr), fruits (820 NRs/hh/yr), selling whole tree (5500 NRs/hh/yr), timber (25500 NRs/hh/yr) and fodder (4543 NRs/hh/yr). About 23% of the TOF are mostly used for fodder collection and the other 23% of TOF for fruit collection. The total carbon stock was calculated to be 5.76 ton/ha (1.39ton/ha in agriculture land, 2.09ton/ha in the settlement area, and 2.27 ton/ha in other than agriculture or settlement) in the study area and the average carbon stock was calculated to be 1.92 ton/ha. Species-wise carbon stock was calculated where Prunus cerasoides and Alnus nepalensis were found to have a higher contribution in carbon storage. Hence, there is a visible impact of TOF in carbon storage and socio-economic improvement of local people.
| Published in | American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics (Volume 6, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13 |
| Page(s) | 16-22 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Biomass, Carbon Stock, Trees Outside Forest
| [1] | FAO (2001). Trees Outside Forests, A Key Factor in Integrated Urban and Rural Management. |
| [2] | FAO (2002). Tree Outside Forests: Towards a better awareness. |
| [3] | de Foresta, H., Somarriba, E., Temu, A., Boulanger, D., Feuilly, H. & Gauthier, M. (2013). Towards the Assessment of Trees Outside Forests. FAO Resources Assessment Working Paper no. 183, Rome, Italy. |
| [4] | FAO (2006). Global Forest Resources Assessment (2005). Progress towards sustainable Forest Management. FAO Forestry Paper 147. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. |
| [5] | Ahmed, P. (2008). Trees outside forests (TOF): a case study of wood production and consumption in Haryana. International Forestry Review, 10, pp. 165-172. |
| [6] | Yadav, Y., Bahadur, B., Chhetri, B., Raymajhi, S., Rajtiwari, K. & Sitaula, B. K. (2017). Importance of trees outside forest (TOF) in Nepal: a review. Octa Journal of Environmental Research, 5 (2): 70-81. 5. 70-81. |
| [7] | Oli, B. N. (2002). Trees outside forests: an ignored dimension of forest resource assessment. Banko Janakari 12 (1): 79– 81. |
| [8] | Guo, Z. D., Hu, H. F., Pan, Y. D., Birdsey, R. A. & Fang, J. Y. (2014). Increasing biomass carbon stocks in trees outside forests in China over the last three decades, Biogeosciences, 11, 4115-4122, https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-11-4115-2014. |
| [9] | Baral, S. K., Malla, R., Khanal, S. & Shakya, R. (2013). Trees on farms: diversity, carbon pool and contribution to rural livelihoods in Kanchanpur District of Nepal. Banko Janakari. 23. 10.3126/banko.v23i1.9462. |
| [10] | ITTO (2012). The Inventory and Monitoring of Tree Resources Outside Forest in Thailand. |
| [11] | DoF (2003). Community Forestry Inventory Guideline. Community Forests Division, Department of Forests, Kathmandu, Nepal. |
| [12] | Chave, J., Andalo, C., Brown, S., Cairns, M., Chambers, J., Eamus, D., Folster, H., Fromard, F., Higuchi, N., Kira, T., Lescure, J. P., Nelson, B., Ogawa, H., Puig, H., Riera, B. A. & Yamakura, T. (2005). Tree allometry and improved estimation of carbon stocks and balance in tropical forests. Oecologia, 145, 87-99. |
| [13] | MacDicken, K. G. (1997). A Guide to Monitoring Carbon Storage in Forestry and Agroforestry Projects, Arlington, USA, Winrock National Institute for Agricultural Development. |
| [14] | Krishnankutty, C. N., Thampi, K. B., & Chundamannil, M. (2008). Trees Outside Forests (TOF): A Case Study of the Wood ProductionConsumption Situation in Kerala, Int. Forest. Rev., 10, 156–164. |
| [15] | Regmi, B. N. & Garforth, C. (2010). Trees outside forests and rural livelihoods: a study of Chitwan District, Nepal. Agroforestry systems, 79 (3): 393-407. |
| [16] | Kharal, D. K., Giri, R. K. & Karna, D. L. (2008). Assessment of Trees Outside Forest: Nawalparasi District. Department of Forest Research and Survey, Kathamndu, Nepal. |
| [17] | Singh, K. & Chand, P. (2012). Above-ground tree outside forest (TOF) phytomass and carbon estimation in the semi-arid region of southern Haryana: A synthesis approach of remote sensing and field data: pp. 1469–1482. |
| [18] | Dogra, A. S. & Chauhan S. K. (2016). Trees Outside Forests In India: Socio-Economic, Environmental and Policy Issues. |
| [19] | Somarriba, E., Rocabado, G. C., Willan, C., Rolando, C., & Ordonez, J. (2017). Trees on Farms for Livelihoods, Conservation of Biodiversity and Carbon Storage: Evidence from Nicaragua on This “Invisible” Resource. 10.1007/978-3-319-69371-2_15. |
| [20] | Muriga, C. S., Malimbwi, R. E., Dr. & Zahabu E. (2014). Carbon Storage Potential of Trees Outside Forests under Private and Communal Tenure Regimes in Ng’iresi Village, Arumeru District, Tanzania. |
APA Style
Bobby Thapa, Sandesh Bolakhe, Basudev Pokhrel. (2021). Trees Outside Forest: Carbon Stock and Socio-economic Contribution. American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics, 6(1), 16-22. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13
ACS Style
Bobby Thapa; Sandesh Bolakhe; Basudev Pokhrel. Trees Outside Forest: Carbon Stock and Socio-economic Contribution. Am. J. Environ. Resour. Econ. 2021, 6(1), 16-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13
AMA Style
Bobby Thapa, Sandesh Bolakhe, Basudev Pokhrel. Trees Outside Forest: Carbon Stock and Socio-economic Contribution. Am J Environ Resour Econ. 2021;6(1):16-22. doi: 10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13,
author = {Bobby Thapa and Sandesh Bolakhe and Basudev Pokhrel},
title = {Trees Outside Forest: Carbon Stock and Socio-economic Contribution},
journal = {American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics},
volume = {6},
number = {1},
pages = {16-22},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajere.20210601.13},
abstract = {Trees Outside Forest (TOF) are considered important from an environmental, economic and social perspective. Due to its spatial heterogeneity and distribution patterns, the assessment of TOF and its importance is largely absent. The current study was carried out to assess the major TOFs, carbon stocks contained and socio-economic contribution of TOFs in Banepa Municipality. A stratified random sampling method was used for the collection of data (i.e. agriculture land, settlement area and other than agriculture and settlement). Circular plots of 1,000 m2 having a radius of 17.84 m were laid out randomly in all three strata. A questionnaire survey and field observation was done to explore the socio-economic contribution of TOF. During the study, a total of 28 tree species were recorded. Socio-economic contribution of TOF were converted and presented in terms of monetary value per household per year (NRs/hh/yr), i.e. firewood (960 NRs/hh/yr), fruits (820 NRs/hh/yr), selling whole tree (5500 NRs/hh/yr), timber (25500 NRs/hh/yr) and fodder (4543 NRs/hh/yr). About 23% of the TOF are mostly used for fodder collection and the other 23% of TOF for fruit collection. The total carbon stock was calculated to be 5.76 ton/ha (1.39ton/ha in agriculture land, 2.09ton/ha in the settlement area, and 2.27 ton/ha in other than agriculture or settlement) in the study area and the average carbon stock was calculated to be 1.92 ton/ha. Species-wise carbon stock was calculated where Prunus cerasoides and Alnus nepalensis were found to have a higher contribution in carbon storage. Hence, there is a visible impact of TOF in carbon storage and socio-economic improvement of local people.},
year = {2021}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Trees Outside Forest: Carbon Stock and Socio-economic Contribution AU - Bobby Thapa AU - Sandesh Bolakhe AU - Basudev Pokhrel Y1 - 2021/03/17 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13 DO - 10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13 T2 - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JF - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics JO - American Journal of Environmental and Resource Economics SP - 16 EP - 22 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2578-787X UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajere.20210601.13 AB - Trees Outside Forest (TOF) are considered important from an environmental, economic and social perspective. Due to its spatial heterogeneity and distribution patterns, the assessment of TOF and its importance is largely absent. The current study was carried out to assess the major TOFs, carbon stocks contained and socio-economic contribution of TOFs in Banepa Municipality. A stratified random sampling method was used for the collection of data (i.e. agriculture land, settlement area and other than agriculture and settlement). Circular plots of 1,000 m2 having a radius of 17.84 m were laid out randomly in all three strata. A questionnaire survey and field observation was done to explore the socio-economic contribution of TOF. During the study, a total of 28 tree species were recorded. Socio-economic contribution of TOF were converted and presented in terms of monetary value per household per year (NRs/hh/yr), i.e. firewood (960 NRs/hh/yr), fruits (820 NRs/hh/yr), selling whole tree (5500 NRs/hh/yr), timber (25500 NRs/hh/yr) and fodder (4543 NRs/hh/yr). About 23% of the TOF are mostly used for fodder collection and the other 23% of TOF for fruit collection. The total carbon stock was calculated to be 5.76 ton/ha (1.39ton/ha in agriculture land, 2.09ton/ha in the settlement area, and 2.27 ton/ha in other than agriculture or settlement) in the study area and the average carbon stock was calculated to be 1.92 ton/ha. Species-wise carbon stock was calculated where Prunus cerasoides and Alnus nepalensis were found to have a higher contribution in carbon storage. Hence, there is a visible impact of TOF in carbon storage and socio-economic improvement of local people. VL - 6 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: