TiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by Sol-Gel method at different pH values (4, 3.5, 3, 2.5, and 2). All samples were heated at 500°C for 18 h. The optical, morphological, and structural properties of the samples have been investigated using XRD, SEM, and UV-vis spectrophotometer techniques. The results indicated the formation of TiO2 nanoparticles with pure Anatase phase at pH= 4 and 3.5, while further decreasing of pH, the Rutile phase start to appear intensively compare to Anatase phase. For pH=3, the ratio Rutile phase to Anatase phase was found to be around 76%.
Published in | American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing (Volume 2, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11 |
Page(s) | 51-55 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2017. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Titanium Dioxide (TiO2), Anatase Rutile Transformation, XRD, SEM, UV-Vis Spectrophotometer
[1] | Yin, H. et al. Synthesis of ultrafine titanium dioxide nanowires using hydrothermal method. Materials Research Bulletin, 2012. 47(11): p. 3124-3128. |
[2] | Fujishima, A. Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. nature, 1972. 238: p. 37-38. |
[3] | Li, Y.-F. et al. Mechanism and activity of photocatalytic oxygen evolution on titania anatase in aqueous surroundings. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2010. 132(37): p. 13008-13015. |
[4] | Chen, X. et al. Semiconductor-based photocatalytic hydrogen generation. Chemical reviews, 2010. 110(11): p. 6503-6570. |
[5] | O’regan, B. and M. Grfitzeli, A low-cost, high-efficiency solar cell based on dye-sensitized. nature, 1991. 353(6346): p. 737-740. |
[6] | Macwan, D. P. N. Dave, and S. Chaturvedi, A review on nano-TiO2 sol–gel type syntheses and its applications. Journal of Materials Science, 2011. 46(11): p. 3669-3686. |
[7] | Tada-Oikawa, S. et al. Titanium Dioxide Particle Type and Concentration Influence the Inflammatory Response in Caco-2 Cells. International journal of molecular sciences, 2016. 17(4): p. 576. |
[8] | Mo, S.-D. and W. Ching, Electronic and optical properties of three phases of titanium dioxide: rutile, anatase, and brookite. Physical Review B, 1995. 51(19): p. 13023. |
[9] | Cromer, D. T. and K. Herrington, The structures of anatase and rutile. Journal of the American Chemical Society, 1955. 77(18): p. 4708-4709. |
[10] | Baur, W. Uber die Verfeinerung der Kristallstrukturbestimmung einiger vertreter des Rutiltyps. III. Zur Gittertheories des Rutiltyps. Acta Crystallographica, 1961. 14(3): p. 209-213. |
[11] | Kandiel, T. A. et al. Tailored titanium dioxide nanomaterials: anatase nanoparticles and brookite nanorods as highly active photocatalysts. Chemistry of materials, 2010. 22(6): p. 2050-2060. |
[12] | Clark, R. J. H. chemistry of titanium and vanadium; an introduction to the chemistry of the early transition elements. 1968. |
[13] | Aoki, Y. et al. Insulating titanium oxynitride for visible light photocatalysis. arXiv preprint arXiv:1701.06251, 2017. |
[14] | Linsebigler, A. L. G. Lu, and J. T. Yates Jr, Photocatalysis on TiO2 surfaces: principles, mechanisms, and selected results. Chemical reviews, 1995. 95(3): p. 735-758. |
[15] | Spanos, N. et al. Electro-kinetic measurements on plugs of doped titania. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 1998. 141(1): p. 101-109. |
[16] | Banfield, J. Thermodynamic analysis of phase stability of nanocrystalline titania. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 1998. 8(9): p. 2073-2076. |
[17] | Zhang, H. and J. F. Banfield, Understanding polymorphic phase transformation behavior during growth of nanocrystalline aggregates: insights from TiO2. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2000. 104(15): p. 3481-3487. |
[18] | Ranade, M. et al. eld, SH Elder, A. Zaban, PH Borse, SK Kulkarni, GS Doran and HJ Whitfield. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. US A, 2002. 99: p. 6476. |
[19] | Arbiol, J. et al. Effects of Nb doping on the TiO2 anatase-to-rutile phase transition. Journal of Applied Physics, 2002. 92(2): p. 853-861. |
[20] | Vogel, R. P. Hoyer, and H. Weller, Quantum-sized PbS, CdS, AgzS, Sb &, and Bi& particles as sensitizers for various nanoporous wide-bandgap semiconductors. J. Phys. chem, 1994. 98(12): p. 3183-3185. |
[21] | Gribb, A. A. and J. F. Banfield, Particle size effects on transformation kinetics and phase stability in nanocrystalline TiO2. American Mineralogist, 1997. 82(7-8): p. 717-728. |
[22] | Ding, X.-z. and X.-h. Liu, Correlation between anatase-to-rutile transformation and grain growth in nanocrystalline titania powders. Journal of materials research, 1998. 13(09): p. 2556-2559. |
[23] | Akarsu, M. et al. A novel approach to the hydrothermal synthesis of anatase titania nanoparticles and the photocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B. Turkish Journal of Chemistry, 2006. 30(3): p. 333-343. |
[24] | Qiu, S. and S. J. Kalita, Synthesis, processing and characterization of nanocrystalline titanium dioxide. Materials Science and Engineering: A, 2006. 435: p. 327-332. |
[25] | Rath, C. et al. Oxygen vacancy induced structural phase transformation in TiO2 nanoparticles. Journal of Physics D: Applied Physics, 2009. 42(20): p. 205101. |
[26] | Orendorz, A. et al. Phase transformation and particle growth in nanocrystalline anatase TiO2 films analyzed by X-ray diffraction and Raman spectroscopy. Surface Science, 2007. 601(18): p. 4390-4394. |
[27] | Okada, K. et al. Effect of Silica Additive on the Anatase-to-Rutile Phase Transition. Journal of the American Ceramic Society, 2001. 84(7): p. 1591-1596. |
[28] | Shin, H. et al. Crystal phase evolution of TiO2 nanoparticles with reaction time in acidic solutions studied via freeze-drying method. Journal of Solid State Chemistry, 2005. 178(1): p. 15-21. |
[29] | Matthews, A. The crystallization of anatase and rutile from amorphous titanium dioxide under hydrothermal conditions. American Mineralogist, 1976. 61(5-6): p. 419-424. |
[30] | Spurr, R. A. and H. Myers, Quantitative analysis of anatase-rutile mixtures with an X-ray diffractometer. Analytical Chemistry, 1957. 29(5): p. 760-762. |
[31] | Liu, G. et al. Titania-based photocatalysts—crystal growth, doping and heterostructuring. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2010. 20(5): p. 831-843. |
[32] | Hurum, D. C. et al. Explaining the enhanced photocatalytic activity of Degussa P25 mixed-phase TiO2 using EPR. The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, 2003. 107(19): p. 4545-4549. |
[33] | Bakardjieva, S. et al. Transformation of brookite-type TiO2 nanocrystals to rutile: correlation between microstructure and photoactivity. Journal of Materials Chemistry, 2006. 16(18): p. 1709-1716. |
APA Style
Abdel-Hamid El-Shear, Ali Basuni, Mohsen Mosaad. (2017). Influence of pH on the Formulation of TiO2 Nanocrystalline Powders. American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing, 2(4), 51-55. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11
ACS Style
Abdel-Hamid El-Shear; Ali Basuni; Mohsen Mosaad. Influence of pH on the Formulation of TiO2 Nanocrystalline Powders. Am. J. Mater. Synth. Process. 2017, 2(4), 51-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11
AMA Style
Abdel-Hamid El-Shear, Ali Basuni, Mohsen Mosaad. Influence of pH on the Formulation of TiO2 Nanocrystalline Powders. Am J Mater Synth Process. 2017;2(4):51-55. doi: 10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11, author = {Abdel-Hamid El-Shear and Ali Basuni and Mohsen Mosaad}, title = {Influence of pH on the Formulation of TiO2 Nanocrystalline Powders}, journal = {American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing}, volume = {2}, number = {4}, pages = {51-55}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajmsp.20170204.11}, abstract = {TiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by Sol-Gel method at different pH values (4, 3.5, 3, 2.5, and 2). All samples were heated at 500°C for 18 h. The optical, morphological, and structural properties of the samples have been investigated using XRD, SEM, and UV-vis spectrophotometer techniques. The results indicated the formation of TiO2 nanoparticles with pure Anatase phase at pH= 4 and 3.5, while further decreasing of pH, the Rutile phase start to appear intensively compare to Anatase phase. For pH=3, the ratio Rutile phase to Anatase phase was found to be around 76%.}, year = {2017} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Influence of pH on the Formulation of TiO2 Nanocrystalline Powders AU - Abdel-Hamid El-Shear AU - Ali Basuni AU - Mohsen Mosaad Y1 - 2017/07/31 PY - 2017 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11 T2 - American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing JF - American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing JO - American Journal of Materials Synthesis and Processing SP - 51 EP - 55 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2575-1530 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajmsp.20170204.11 AB - TiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by Sol-Gel method at different pH values (4, 3.5, 3, 2.5, and 2). All samples were heated at 500°C for 18 h. The optical, morphological, and structural properties of the samples have been investigated using XRD, SEM, and UV-vis spectrophotometer techniques. The results indicated the formation of TiO2 nanoparticles with pure Anatase phase at pH= 4 and 3.5, while further decreasing of pH, the Rutile phase start to appear intensively compare to Anatase phase. For pH=3, the ratio Rutile phase to Anatase phase was found to be around 76%. VL - 2 IS - 4 ER -