Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam; Ramin Ghasemi Shayan; Shila Zalnejad

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam, Ramin Ghasemi Shayan, Shila Zalnejad

Published in American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business (Volume 8, Issue 1)

Received: 23 November 2021 Accepted: 14 December 2021 Published: 29 March 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The study aimed to investigate the impact of Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making on the result of organ transplantation. We have conducted this idea that social sciences have a great reflection on the result of organ transplantation and gathered more insight over this subject by conducting the most reliable studies in the field of Behavioral Economics and the process of decision-making. Economics and psychology have an indisputable close relationship, to determine the effect of behavioral economics and decision-making on organ transplants we have declared the psychology behind this title and expanded the relative subjects. For this purpose, categorized sub-headings were included in order to bring efficient insight into this review article. Decision-making is more correspondent in pediatric organ transplantation, therefore, the main focus of the types of transplantation was pediatric organ transplantation, because pediatric transplantation has seen the most challenging decision both for the recipient's families and clinical workers. Allocation of organ transplantation and implementing an allocation system are the crucial factors having a direct impact on the result of transplanting an organ. Decision-making and the factors that have an influence on it, which originates especially from human psychology, play a key role in the result of successful organ transplantation and preventing any undesirable outcomes.

Published in	American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business (Volume 8, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11
Page(s)	1-7
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Behavioral Economics, Health Economics, Decision-Making, Rational Decision

References

[1]	Hoff K, Stiglitz JE. Striving for balance in economics: Towards a theory of the social determination of behavior. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2016; 126: 25-57.
[2]	Allport GW, & Odbert, H. S. Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 47 (1), i–171. 1936.
[3]	Kosse AB-TD-TD-AF-F. The Relationship Between Economic Preferences and Psychological Personality Measures. 2012.
[4]	Russo J. decision-making. 2014.
[5]	Brockmann EN, Anthony WP. Tacit Knowledge and Strategic Decision Making. Group & Organization Management. 2002; 27 (4): 436-55.
[6]	Manara ARM, P. G.; O'Callaghan, G. "Donation after circulatory death" British Journal of Anaesthesia 108: i108–21. 2011.
[7]	Bernat JL, Capron AM, Bleck TP, Blosser S, Bratton SL, Childress JF, et al. The circulatory–respiratory determination of death in organ donation*. Critical Care Medicine. 2010; 38 (3).
[8]	WHO Guiding Principles on human cell taot, Annexed to World Health Organization. 2008.
[9]	WHO FsitBoEot. 2016.
[10]	Siegel R, Gordon K, Dynan L. Behavioral Economics: A Primer and Applications to the UN Sustainable Development Goal of Good Health and Well-Being. Reports. 2021; 4 (2).
[11]	Matjasko JL, Cawley JH, Baker-Goering MM, Yokum DV. Applying Behavioral Economics to Public Health Policy: Illustrative Examples and Promising Directions. Am J Prev Med. 2016; 50 (5 Suppl 1): S13-S9.
[12]	Butler A, Chapman G, Johnson J, Amodeo A, Böhmer J, Camino M, et al. Part VII: Behavioral economics—A framework for donor organ decision-making in pediatric heart transplantation. Pediatric Transplantation. 2020; 24.
[13]	Rice T. The Behavioral Economics of Health and Health Care. Annual Review of Public Health. 2013; 34 (1): 431-47.
[14]	Walter S. Andrews BJK, Richard J. Hendrickson. Organ allocation and utilization in pediatric transplantation. 2017.
[15]	Malik S, Kassaï B, Cochat P. Overview of pediatric organ transplantation: current opinion and future perspectives on immunosuppression. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation. 2015; 20 (5).
[16]	Olbrisch M, Benedict S, Ashe K, Levenson J. Psychological assessment and care of organ transplant patients. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology. 2002; 70: 771-83.
[17]	Craven J, Rodin G. Psychiatric aspects of organ transplantation. Jama-journal of The American Medical Association - JAMA-J AM MED ASSN. 2021; 260.
[18]	Shroff R, Ledermann S. Long-term outcome of chronic dialysis in children. Pediatr Nephrol. 2009; 24 (3): 463-74.
[19]	Harmon WE H-ST, Magee JC et al.. Improvements in outcomes in pediatric renal transplantation: children less than 10 years of age now have best graft survival of all recipients. Am J Transplant 2003; 3 (Suppl. 5): 285.
[20]	Sarwal MM CJ, Millan MT, Salvatierra O Jr.. Adult-size kidneys without acute tubular necrosis provide exceedingly superior long-term graft outcomes for infants and small children: a single center and UNOS analysis. United Network for Organ Sharing. Transplantation. 2000.
[21]	Han DJ, Sutherland DE. Pancreas transplantation. Gut Liver. 2010; 4 (4): 450-65.
[22]	Andrews WS, Kane BJ, Hendrickson RJ. Organ allocation and utilization in pediatric transplantation. Semin Pediatr Surg. 2017; 26 (4): 186-92.
[23]	Kirkby S, Hayes D, Jr. Pediatric lung transplantation: indications and outcomes. J Thorac Dis. 2014; 6 (8): 1024-31.
[24]	William E. Harmon RAM, Jorge D. Reyes, Nancy D. Bridges, Stuart C. Sweet, Cindy M. Sommers, Mary K. Guidinger. Pediatric transplantation. 1994–2003.
[25]	Zakrzewski W, Dobrzyński M, Szymonowicz M, Rybak Z. Stem cells: past, present, and future. Stem Cell Research & Therapy. 2019; 10 (1): 68.
[26]	Lennard AL, Jackson GH. Stem cell transplantation. West J Med. 2001; 175 (1): 42-6.
[27]	Starzl TE, Groth CG, Brettschneider L, Penn I, Fulginiti VA, Moon JB, et al. Orthotopic Homotransplantation of the Human Liver. Annals of Surgery. 1968; 168 (3): 392-415.
[28]	Thomson AW, Vionnet J, Sanchez-Fueyo A. Understanding, predicting and achieving liver transplant tolerance: from bench to bedside. Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology. 2020; 17 (12): 719-39.
[29]	Calne RY. Prope tolerance—the future of organ transplantation from the laboratory to the clinic. International Immunopharmacology. 2005; 5 (1): 163-7.
[30]	Jenne CN, Kubes P. Immune surveillance by the liver. Nature Immunology. 2013; 14 (10): 996-1006.
[31]	Hatzinger M, Stastny M, Grützmacher P, Sohn M. [The history of kidney transplantation]. Urologe A. 2016; 55 (10): 1353-9.
[32]	Daniel Casanova obotSPTG. Pancreas transplantation: 50 years of experience. pages 254-260 (May 2017).
[33]	Venuta F, Van Raemdonck D. History of lung transplantation. J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9 (12): 5458-71.
[34]	Chaney J, Suzuki Y, Cantu E, 3rd, van Berkel V. Lung donor selection criteria. J Thorac Dis. 2014; 6 (8): 1032-8.
[35]	Meirelles Júnior RF, Salvalaggio P, Rezende MB, Evangelista AS, Guardia BD, Matielo CE, et al. Liver transplantation: history, outcomes and perspectives. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015; 13 (1): 149-52.
[36]	Stavros A. and Katselidis I. The Relationship between Psychology and Economics: Insights from the History of Economic Thought. 2017.
[37]	DellaVigna S. Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field. Journal of Economic Literature. 2009; 47 (2): 315-72.
[38]	Richard Dorent CJ, Benoît Audry, Florian Bayer, Camille Legeai, Christelle Cantrelle, Jacqueline M. Smits, Howard Eisen, Christian Jacquelinet, Pascal Leprince, Olivier Bastien,. New French heart allocation system: Comparison with Eurotransplant and US allocation systems. 2020.
[39]	Easley LEBaD. "The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, 2nd Edition. 2008.
[40]	Gary Browning AH, Frank Webster. Understanding Contemporary Society: Theories of the Present, London: SAGE Publications. 2000.
[41]	Levin JaM, P. Introduction to choice theory. 2004.
[42]	Policy. IoMUCoOPaT. Organ Procurement and Transplantation: Assessing Current Policies and the Potential Impact of the DHHS Final Rule. Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US). 1999.
[43]	Fontana M, Ambrosino A, Gigante A. “Shifting boundaries in Economics: the Institutional Cognitive strand” 2015.
[44]	Rabin M. Psychology and Economics. Journal of Economic Literature. 1998; 36 (1): 11-46.
[45]	E. J. Gordon ZB, S. E. Jensen, A. Lok-Ming Lehr, J. Franklin, Y. Becker, L. Sherman, W. J. Chon, N. Beauvais, J. Hanneman, D. Penrod, M. G. Ison, M. M. Abecassis. Opportunities for Shared Decision Making in Kidney Transplantation. 2013.
[46]	Rettig RA ME. Implementing the end-stage renal disease program of Medicare. Santa Monica, CA: The RAND Corporation (R-2505-HCFA). 1980.
[47]	US OECEiomt, Department of Health and Human Services e. A detailed review from the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Nework regarding all of the ethical implications of multiorgan transplantation. 2019.
[48]	Kim W, Kremers W. Benefits of "The Benefit Model" in liver transplantation. Hepatology (Baltimore, Md). 2008; 48: 697-8.
[49]	Cheng XS, Wall A, Teuteberg J. Ethical decision-making in simultaneous heart–liver transplantation. Current Opinion in Organ Transplantation. 2020; 25 (5).
[50]	Mendonça FV, Catalão-Lopes M, Marinho RT, Figueira JR. Improving medical decision-making with a management science game theory approach to liver transplantation. Omega. 2020; 94: 102050.
[51]	Volk ML, Tocco RS, Pelletier SJ, Zikmund-Fisher BJ, Lok AS. Patient decision making about organ quality in liver transplantation. Liver Transpl. 2011; 17 (12): 1387-93.
[52]	Amount charged for select organ transplants in the U.S. as of 2020 [Internet]. 2020.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam, Ramin Ghasemi Shayan, Shila Zalnejad. (2022). Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business, 8(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam; Ramin Ghasemi Shayan; Shila Zalnejad. Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Bus. 2022, 8(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam, Ramin Ghasemi Shayan, Shila Zalnejad. Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making. Am J Theor Appl Bus. 2022;8(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11,
  author = {Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam and Ramin Ghasemi Shayan and Shila Zalnejad},
  title = {Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making},
  journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business},
  volume = {8},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-7},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtab.20220801.11},
  abstract = {The study aimed to investigate the impact of Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making on the result of organ transplantation. We have conducted this idea that social sciences have a great reflection on the result of organ transplantation and gathered more insight over this subject by conducting the most reliable studies in the field of Behavioral Economics and the process of decision-making. Economics and psychology have an indisputable close relationship, to determine the effect of behavioral economics and decision-making on organ transplants we have declared the psychology behind this title and expanded the relative subjects. For this purpose, categorized sub-headings were included in order to bring efficient insight into this review article. Decision-making is more correspondent in pediatric organ transplantation, therefore, the main focus of the types of transplantation was pediatric organ transplantation, because pediatric transplantation has seen the most challenging decision both for the recipient's families and clinical workers. Allocation of organ transplantation and implementing an allocation system are the crucial factors having a direct impact on the result of transplanting an organ. Decision-making and the factors that have an influence on it, which originates especially from human psychology, play a key role in the result of successful organ transplantation and preventing any undesirable outcomes.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making
AU  - Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam
AU  - Ramin Ghasemi Shayan
AU  - Shila Zalnejad
Y1  - 2022/03/29
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11
T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
SP  - 1
EP  - 7
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-7842
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11
AB  - The study aimed to investigate the impact of Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making on the result of organ transplantation. We have conducted this idea that social sciences have a great reflection on the result of organ transplantation and gathered more insight over this subject by conducting the most reliable studies in the field of Behavioral Economics and the process of decision-making. Economics and psychology have an indisputable close relationship, to determine the effect of behavioral economics and decision-making on organ transplants we have declared the psychology behind this title and expanded the relative subjects. For this purpose, categorized sub-headings were included in order to bring efficient insight into this review article. Decision-making is more correspondent in pediatric organ transplantation, therefore, the main focus of the types of transplantation was pediatric organ transplantation, because pediatric transplantation has seen the most challenging decision both for the recipient's families and clinical workers. Allocation of organ transplantation and implementing an allocation system are the crucial factors having a direct impact on the result of transplanting an organ. Decision-making and the factors that have an influence on it, which originates especially from human psychology, play a key role in the result of successful organ transplantation and preventing any undesirable outcomes.
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam

Department of Economics, Faculty of Economics and Management, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
Ramin Ghasemi Shayan

Radiology Department, Paramedical Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
Shila Zalnejad

Accounting Department, Damegan Islamic Azad University, Damegan, Iran

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam, Ramin Ghasemi Shayan, Shila Zalnejad. (2022). Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business, 8(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam; Ramin Ghasemi Shayan; Shila Zalnejad. Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Bus. 2022, 8(1), 1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam, Ramin Ghasemi Shayan, Shila Zalnejad. Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making. Am J Theor Appl Bus. 2022;8(1):1-7. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11,
  author = {Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam and Ramin Ghasemi Shayan and Shila Zalnejad},
  title = {Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making},
  journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business},
  volume = {8},
  number = {1},
  pages = {1-7},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtab.20220801.11},
  abstract = {The study aimed to investigate the impact of Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making on the result of organ transplantation. We have conducted this idea that social sciences have a great reflection on the result of organ transplantation and gathered more insight over this subject by conducting the most reliable studies in the field of Behavioral Economics and the process of decision-making. Economics and psychology have an indisputable close relationship, to determine the effect of behavioral economics and decision-making on organ transplants we have declared the psychology behind this title and expanded the relative subjects. For this purpose, categorized sub-headings were included in order to bring efficient insight into this review article. Decision-making is more correspondent in pediatric organ transplantation, therefore, the main focus of the types of transplantation was pediatric organ transplantation, because pediatric transplantation has seen the most challenging decision both for the recipient's families and clinical workers. Allocation of organ transplantation and implementing an allocation system are the crucial factors having a direct impact on the result of transplanting an organ. Decision-making and the factors that have an influence on it, which originates especially from human psychology, play a key role in the result of successful organ transplantation and preventing any undesirable outcomes.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Organ Transplantation Evaluation by Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making
AU  - Sajjad Esmaeili Aghdam
AU  - Ramin Ghasemi Shayan
AU  - Shila Zalnejad
Y1  - 2022/03/29
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11
T2  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
JF  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
JO  - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business
SP  - 1
EP  - 7
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2469-7842
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20220801.11
AB  - The study aimed to investigate the impact of Behavioral Economics and Decision-Making on the result of organ transplantation. We have conducted this idea that social sciences have a great reflection on the result of organ transplantation and gathered more insight over this subject by conducting the most reliable studies in the field of Behavioral Economics and the process of decision-making. Economics and psychology have an indisputable close relationship, to determine the effect of behavioral economics and decision-making on organ transplants we have declared the psychology behind this title and expanded the relative subjects. For this purpose, categorized sub-headings were included in order to bring efficient insight into this review article. Decision-making is more correspondent in pediatric organ transplantation, therefore, the main focus of the types of transplantation was pediatric organ transplantation, because pediatric transplantation has seen the most challenging decision both for the recipient's families and clinical workers. Allocation of organ transplantation and implementing an allocation system are the crucial factors having a direct impact on the result of transplanting an organ. Decision-making and the factors that have an influence on it, which originates especially from human psychology, play a key role in the result of successful organ transplantation and preventing any undesirable outcomes.
VL  - 8
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download