Under the “new normal”, China's economic development mode has shifted from scale and speed to quality and efficiency, and the development driving force has shifted from mainly relying on factor inputs such as resources and low-cost labor to innovation driven. Therefore, it is particularly important to correctly understand the different promoting effects of human capital on economic growth in different stages of human capital development. Consequently, the panel smooth transition regression model was used to study the threshold characteristics and regional differences for human capital of mental quality and physical quality to the economic growth from 1982 to 2019 in China. The results shown that, the mental quality and physical quality of urban and rural have nonlinear effects on economic growth, in addition to the model of physical quality of urban has two system, the other three models are three system. Except the effect of mental quality of rural on the economic growth inhibited the transformation of restrain to promote, the effect of rest of the models always shows promotion performance, along with the promotion of mental quality and physical quality of urban and rural, the promoting effect of economic growth is gradually strengthened. The stimulating effect of mental quality and physical quality of human capital on economic growth exits regional difference, the role of human capital on economic growth is more obvious especially in the eastern coastal areas and relatively developed areas of economy.
Published in | American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business (Volume 7, Issue 4) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19 |
Page(s) | 137-145 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Human Capital, Economic Growth, Threshold Characteristics, PSTR
[1] | Schultz T W. Education and Economic Growth. In N. B. Henry (Ed#), Social Forces Influencing American Education [M]. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. 1961: 85—90. |
[2] | Uzawa H. Optimum technical change in an aggregative model of economic growth [J]. International economic review, 1965, 6 (1): 18-31. |
[3] | Nelson, R. and E, Phelps. Investment in Humans, Technological Diffusion and Economic Growth [J]. American Economic Review, 1966 (56): 69-75. |
[4] | Lucas R E. On the mechanics of economic development [J]. Journal of monetary economics, 1988, 22 (1): 3-42. |
[5] | Aghion, P, Howitt P. A Model of Growth through Creative Destruction [J]. Econometrica, 1992, 60 (3): 323-351. |
[6] | Cohen D, Soto M. Growth and human capital: good data, good results [J]. Cepr Discussion Papers, 2007, 12 (1): 51-76. |
[7] | Greiner A, Flaschel P. Economic Policy in a Growth Model with Human Capital, Heterogenous Agents and Unemployment [J]. Computational Economics, 2009, 33 (2): 175-192. |
[8] | Fleisher B, Li H, Zhao M Q. Human capital, economic growth, and regional inequality in China [J]. Journal of Development Economics, 2010, 92 (2): 215-231. |
[9] | Ding S, Knight J. Why has China Grown So Fast? The Role of Physical and Human Capiital Formation [J]. Oxford Bulletin of Economics & Statistics, 2011, volume 73 (2): 141-174 (34). |
[10] | Elena Pelinescu. The Impact of Human Capital on Economic Growth [J]. Procedia Economics and Finance, 2015: 184–190. |
[11] | Chowdhury M N M, Uddin M J, Uddin N, et al. Human capital development and economic growth in Bangladesh [J]. Journal of World Economic Research, 2018, 7 (2): 52-63. |
[12] | Affandi Y, Anugrah D F, Bary P. Human capital and economic growth across regions: a case study in Indonesia [J]. Eurasian Economic Review, 2019, 9 (3): 331-347. |
[13] | Hanushek E A, Woessmann L. Education, knowledge capital, and economic growth [J]. The Economics of Education, 2020: 171-182. |
[14] | Guo Qingwang, Lv Bingyang, Zhang Deyong. Fiscal expenditure structure and economic growth [J]. Economic Theory and Economic Management, 2003, 11: 5-12. |
[15] | Yang, Jianfang, Gong, Liutang, Zhang, Qinghua. Human capital formation and its impact on economic growth-an endogenous growth model including education and health inputs and its test [J]. Management World, 2006, 05: 10-18+34+171. |
[16] | Wei, Ha-Hai, Li, Shu-Pei. Human capital, human capital structure and regional economic growth: An empirical study based on quantile regression method [J]. Finance and Trade Research, 2009, 05: 15-24. |
[17] | Feng Xiao, Zhu Yanyuan, Yang Xi. A study on the production function of Chinese national economy based on the variance of human capital distribution [J]. Economics (Quarterly), 2012, 02: 559-594. |
[18] | Huang Yanping, Liu Yu, Wu Yiqun. Regional economic growth differences in China: effects based on graded education [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2013: 94-105. |
[19] | Du Wei, Yang Zhijiang, Xia Guoping. Research on the mechanism of the role of human capital in driving economic growth [J]. China Soft Science, 2014, 08: 173-183. |
[20] | Li Chengyou, Sun Tao, Jiao Yong. Factor endowment, wage gap and human capital formation [J]. Economic Research Journal, 2018, 53 (10): 113-126. |
[21] | Yang Ziwei, Xing Chunbing. Education, unemployment and human capital investment [J]. Research on Labor Economy, 2019, 7 (02): 60-77. |
[22] | Vogl T S. Education and Health in Developing Economies [J]. Encyclopedia of Health Economics, 2014: 246-249. |
[23] | Luo Yongmin. Public health expenditure, health human capital and economic growth [J]. Southern Economics, 2011, 04: 3-15. |
[24] | Huang Xiaoping, Yan Lifang, Liu Shan. A study of regional differences in the impact of health human capital on economic growth [J]. Health Economics Research, 2013, 02: 22-27. |
[25] | Feng Yan, Chai Zhihong. The impact of healthy human capital on economic growth [J]. Economic and Management Research, 2016, 02: 21-27+123. |
[26] | Wang Dihai, Li Xiawei, Huang Liang. How health investment affects economic growth: a study from transnational panel data [J]. Economic Science, 2019 (01): 5-17. |
[27] | Azariadis C, Drazen A. Threshold externalities in economic development [J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1990, 105 (2): 501-26. |
[28] | Hansen B E. Threshold effects in non-dynamic panels: Estimation, testing, and inference [J]. Journal of Econometrics, 1999, 93 (2): 345-368. |
[29] | Teräsvirta T. Specification, estimation, and evaluation of smooth transition autoregressive models [J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1994, 89 (425): 208-218. |
APA Style
Yan Su. (2021). Nonlinear Effect of Human Capital on Economic Growth. American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business, 7(4), 137-145. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19
ACS Style
Yan Su. Nonlinear Effect of Human Capital on Economic Growth. Am. J. Theor. Appl. Bus. 2021, 7(4), 137-145. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19
AMA Style
Yan Su. Nonlinear Effect of Human Capital on Economic Growth. Am J Theor Appl Bus. 2021;7(4):137-145. doi: 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19
@article{10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19, author = {Yan Su}, title = {Nonlinear Effect of Human Capital on Economic Growth}, journal = {American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business}, volume = {7}, number = {4}, pages = {137-145}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajtab.20210704.19}, abstract = {Under the “new normal”, China's economic development mode has shifted from scale and speed to quality and efficiency, and the development driving force has shifted from mainly relying on factor inputs such as resources and low-cost labor to innovation driven. Therefore, it is particularly important to correctly understand the different promoting effects of human capital on economic growth in different stages of human capital development. Consequently, the panel smooth transition regression model was used to study the threshold characteristics and regional differences for human capital of mental quality and physical quality to the economic growth from 1982 to 2019 in China. The results shown that, the mental quality and physical quality of urban and rural have nonlinear effects on economic growth, in addition to the model of physical quality of urban has two system, the other three models are three system. Except the effect of mental quality of rural on the economic growth inhibited the transformation of restrain to promote, the effect of rest of the models always shows promotion performance, along with the promotion of mental quality and physical quality of urban and rural, the promoting effect of economic growth is gradually strengthened. The stimulating effect of mental quality and physical quality of human capital on economic growth exits regional difference, the role of human capital on economic growth is more obvious especially in the eastern coastal areas and relatively developed areas of economy.}, year = {2021} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Nonlinear Effect of Human Capital on Economic Growth AU - Yan Su Y1 - 2021/12/11 PY - 2021 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19 DO - 10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19 T2 - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business JF - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business JO - American Journal of Theoretical and Applied Business SP - 137 EP - 145 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2469-7842 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajtab.20210704.19 AB - Under the “new normal”, China's economic development mode has shifted from scale and speed to quality and efficiency, and the development driving force has shifted from mainly relying on factor inputs such as resources and low-cost labor to innovation driven. Therefore, it is particularly important to correctly understand the different promoting effects of human capital on economic growth in different stages of human capital development. Consequently, the panel smooth transition regression model was used to study the threshold characteristics and regional differences for human capital of mental quality and physical quality to the economic growth from 1982 to 2019 in China. The results shown that, the mental quality and physical quality of urban and rural have nonlinear effects on economic growth, in addition to the model of physical quality of urban has two system, the other three models are three system. Except the effect of mental quality of rural on the economic growth inhibited the transformation of restrain to promote, the effect of rest of the models always shows promotion performance, along with the promotion of mental quality and physical quality of urban and rural, the promoting effect of economic growth is gradually strengthened. The stimulating effect of mental quality and physical quality of human capital on economic growth exits regional difference, the role of human capital on economic growth is more obvious especially in the eastern coastal areas and relatively developed areas of economy. VL - 7 IS - 4 ER -