Highly pathogenic Avian Influenza virus (HPAI) H5N1 commonly called Bird Flu, is a highly infectious viral disease of birds including domestic poultry, and first infected humans in China 1997. Since its widespread and re-emergence in 2003 and 2004, the avian virus has become a global public health threat. The H5N1 is known to be very infectious and has caused death of millions of chickens and other birds around the world with high economic loss. The prevention and control of this virus depend on the awareness and protective practices of the poultry workers as well as the general population. This study aims to assess risk factors related to Avian influenza virus infection among poultry workers in Plateau State, Nigeria. A structured questionnaire was administered to 200 poultry workers age 14 to 63.The results showed that more females (52%) participated in poultry farming than males (48%), and younger population ages 14-23 years (33%) participated more than the older population ages 54-63 years (7%). Also, occupationally hired poultry workers (53%) were more compared to farm owners (18%) with other workers (health workers, cullers, scavengers) (29%). Knowledge about protective measures was high in relation to wearing of coverall (44.5%), hand gloves (20.5%) and boots (17%). Those in contact with the dead birds were more (43%) than those in contact with the carcass (29%) and sick birds (28%). The number of subject that answered yes to risk perception were 66.0%, and those who said no was 34%, the female perception was higher (73%). The study showed that there is moderate preventive practices and awareness about avian influenza virus infection among the poultry workers. Preventive practices might play an effective role in reducing or slowing transmission of influenza. This calls for proper training of poultry workers about avian influenza virus to improve preventive practices that will curb the spread, reduce risk of infection and economic loss.
| Published in | American Journal of Zoology (Volume 2, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12 |
| Page(s) | 6-10 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Avian Influenza Virus, Risk Perception, Prevention, Poultry Workers
| [1] | World Health Organization (WHO, 2016). OIE, World Organization for Animal Health. (2016) Update on Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza in Animals (Type H5 and H7). Available from: http://www.oie.int/animal-healthin-the-world/update-on-avian-influenza/2016. Accessed on 16-11-2018. |
| [2] | ECDC, 2016, Surveillance report: Avian influenza overview (October 2016–August 2017) European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. https://ecdc.europa.eu/en/publications-data/surveillance-report-avian-influenza-overview-october-2016-august-2017. Accessed November 27, 2018. |
| [3] | Fasanmi OG, Odetokun IA, Balogun FA, Fasina FO (2017). Public health concerns of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 endemicity in Africa, Veterinary World, 10 (10): 1194-1204. |
| [4] | World Health Organization (2006). Cumulative number of confirmed human cases of avian influenza A (H5N1) infection reported to WHO: Geneva: World Health Organization. Available at Http://www.who.int/influenza/ Human Animal -interface/EN-GIP -20120529 Cumulative Number H5N1 Cases. |
| [5] | Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Worries Rise over Outbreaks of Avian Flu in West Africa. News Article. [Accessed on 15-02-2017]. Available from: http://www.fao.org/news/story/it/item/297715/icode. |
| [6] | Swayne DE and Suarez D. (2000). Highly pathogenic avian influenza. Rev. Sci Tech 19, 463–482. |
| [7] | Kuiken T, Rimmelzwaan G., Van Riel D, Van, AMeongen G, Baars M, Fouchier R, and Osterhaus A. (2004). Avian H5N1 influenza in cats. Science 306, 5694, 241. |
| [8] | Kilpatric, AM, Chmura, AA, Gibbons DW, Fleischer RC Marra, PP, Dazak, P (2006). Predicting the global spread of H5N1 avian influenza. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103 (51), 19368–19373. |
| [9] | Fasanmi OG, Laleye AT and Fasina FO (2016). Systematic review and meta-analyses of cases and deaths associated with HPAI H5N1 in humans and poultry. CAB Rev. Perspect. Agric. Vet. Sci. Nutr. Nat. Resour., 11: 4. |
| [10] | Wikramaratna PS, Sandeman M, Recker M, Gupta S (2013). The antigenic evolution of influenza: drift or thrift? Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 368 (1614): 20120200. |
| [11] | Fatiregun AA, (2008). Knowledge, attitudes and compliance of poultry workers with preventive measures for avian influenza in Legelu, Oyo state Nigeria. J Infect Develop Countr, 2, 130–134. |
| [12] | Abdullahi M, Oguntunde O and Habib A (2009). Knowledge, attitudes and practices of avian influenza among poultry traders in Nigeria. Internet J Infect Dis, 8, 1–8. |
| [13] | Neupane D, Khanal V, Ghimire K, Aro AR and Leppin A (2012). Knowledge, attitudes and practices related to avian influenza among poultry workers in Nepal : a cross sectional study. |
| [14] | Abbate R, Di Qiuseppe G, Marinelli PA (2006). Knowledge, attitudes and practices of avian influenza poultry workers Italy. Emerg Infect Dis, 12 (11), 1762–1765. |
| [15] | MacMahon KL, Delaney LI, Kulman G, Gibbins JD, Deder JKM. (2008). Protecting poultry workers from exposure to avian influenza viruses. Public Health Rep, 123, 316–322. |
| [16] | Goodwin R, Haque S, Hassan SB, Dhanoa A. (2011). Representative of swine flu, perspertive from a Malaysian pig farm. Public Underst Sci. 20 (4): 477-90. |
| [17] | Ly S, Van Kekhove MD, Holl D, Roehlich Y, Vong S (2007). Interaction between humans and poultry, rural Cambodia. Emerg Infect Dis, 13, 130–132. |
| [18] | Food and Agriculture Organization FAO (2015) of the United Nations. Global Animal Disease Intelligence Report. Rome, Italy. [Accessed on 16-02-2018]. p. 2. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5119e.pdf. |
| [19] | FAO, Animal Production And Health. (2011). Approaches to controlling, preventing and eliminating H5N1 highly pathogenic avian influenza in endemic countries. Rome Food and Agriculture Organisation of the UN. |
| [20] | Monne I, Meseko C, Joannis T, Shittu I, Ahmed M, Tassoni L, Fusaro A, Cattoli G (2015). Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza A (H5N1) Virus in Poultry, Nigeria, Emerging Infectious Diseases, 21 (7): 1275-1278. |
| [21] | Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016.). H5N1 Genetic Changes Inventory: a tool for influenza surveillance and preparedness. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/avianflu/h5n1-genetic-changes.htm |
| [22] | Yakubu B, Nok AJ, Owolodun, OA, Luka PD and Umaru DA (2015). The re-occurrence of H5N1 outbreaks necessitates the development of safe and effective influenza vaccine technologies for the prevention and control of avian influenza in Sub-Saharan Africa. Biotech. Mol. Biol. Rev. 10 (3): 19-36. |
APA Style
Vem Tabitha Silas, Anejo-Okopi Joseph, Dabak D. Jonathan, Ugwu B. KIngsley, Bigwan Emmanuel Isa, et al. (2019). Avian Influenza Risk Perception and Preventive Practice Among Poultry Workers in Jos: A Cross Sectional Study. American Journal of Zoology, 2(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12
ACS Style
Vem Tabitha Silas; Anejo-Okopi Joseph; Dabak D. Jonathan; Ugwu B. KIngsley; Bigwan Emmanuel Isa, et al. Avian Influenza Risk Perception and Preventive Practice Among Poultry Workers in Jos: A Cross Sectional Study. Am. J. Zool. 2019, 2(1), 6-10. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12
Share This Article
Twitter
Linked In
Facebook
Copy
Download@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12,
author = {Vem Tabitha Silas and Anejo-Okopi Joseph and Dabak D. Jonathan and Ugwu B. KIngsley and Bigwan Emmanuel Isa and Kopkuk Ezra Dasun and Essien Cosmas Uyeime and Tyem Dinchi and Davou Aaron Gyang and Nimzing Lohya},
title = {Avian Influenza Risk Perception and Preventive Practice Among Poultry Workers in Jos: A Cross Sectional Study},
journal = {American Journal of Zoology},
volume = {2},
number = {1},
pages = {6-10},
doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20190201.12},
abstract = {Highly pathogenic Avian Influenza virus (HPAI) H5N1 commonly called Bird Flu, is a highly infectious viral disease of birds including domestic poultry, and first infected humans in China 1997. Since its widespread and re-emergence in 2003 and 2004, the avian virus has become a global public health threat. The H5N1 is known to be very infectious and has caused death of millions of chickens and other birds around the world with high economic loss. The prevention and control of this virus depend on the awareness and protective practices of the poultry workers as well as the general population. This study aims to assess risk factors related to Avian influenza virus infection among poultry workers in Plateau State, Nigeria. A structured questionnaire was administered to 200 poultry workers age 14 to 63.The results showed that more females (52%) participated in poultry farming than males (48%), and younger population ages 14-23 years (33%) participated more than the older population ages 54-63 years (7%). Also, occupationally hired poultry workers (53%) were more compared to farm owners (18%) with other workers (health workers, cullers, scavengers) (29%). Knowledge about protective measures was high in relation to wearing of coverall (44.5%), hand gloves (20.5%) and boots (17%). Those in contact with the dead birds were more (43%) than those in contact with the carcass (29%) and sick birds (28%). The number of subject that answered yes to risk perception were 66.0%, and those who said no was 34%, the female perception was higher (73%). The study showed that there is moderate preventive practices and awareness about avian influenza virus infection among the poultry workers. Preventive practices might play an effective role in reducing or slowing transmission of influenza. This calls for proper training of poultry workers about avian influenza virus to improve preventive practices that will curb the spread, reduce risk of infection and economic loss.},
year = {2019}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Avian Influenza Risk Perception and Preventive Practice Among Poultry Workers in Jos: A Cross Sectional Study AU - Vem Tabitha Silas AU - Anejo-Okopi Joseph AU - Dabak D. Jonathan AU - Ugwu B. KIngsley AU - Bigwan Emmanuel Isa AU - Kopkuk Ezra Dasun AU - Essien Cosmas Uyeime AU - Tyem Dinchi AU - Davou Aaron Gyang AU - Nimzing Lohya Y1 - 2019/03/11 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12 T2 - American Journal of Zoology JF - American Journal of Zoology JO - American Journal of Zoology SP - 6 EP - 10 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7413 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20190201.12 AB - Highly pathogenic Avian Influenza virus (HPAI) H5N1 commonly called Bird Flu, is a highly infectious viral disease of birds including domestic poultry, and first infected humans in China 1997. Since its widespread and re-emergence in 2003 and 2004, the avian virus has become a global public health threat. The H5N1 is known to be very infectious and has caused death of millions of chickens and other birds around the world with high economic loss. The prevention and control of this virus depend on the awareness and protective practices of the poultry workers as well as the general population. This study aims to assess risk factors related to Avian influenza virus infection among poultry workers in Plateau State, Nigeria. A structured questionnaire was administered to 200 poultry workers age 14 to 63.The results showed that more females (52%) participated in poultry farming than males (48%), and younger population ages 14-23 years (33%) participated more than the older population ages 54-63 years (7%). Also, occupationally hired poultry workers (53%) were more compared to farm owners (18%) with other workers (health workers, cullers, scavengers) (29%). Knowledge about protective measures was high in relation to wearing of coverall (44.5%), hand gloves (20.5%) and boots (17%). Those in contact with the dead birds were more (43%) than those in contact with the carcass (29%) and sick birds (28%). The number of subject that answered yes to risk perception were 66.0%, and those who said no was 34%, the female perception was higher (73%). The study showed that there is moderate preventive practices and awareness about avian influenza virus infection among the poultry workers. Preventive practices might play an effective role in reducing or slowing transmission of influenza. This calls for proper training of poultry workers about avian influenza virus to improve preventive practices that will curb the spread, reduce risk of infection and economic loss. VL - 2 IS - 1 ER -
Information
Email: