Amphibians are poorly known in the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (RFO) in DRC, and amphibians are identified as one of the most threatened animal taxa among vertebrates living on Earth. The aim of this study was to inventory amphibians in the Okapi Wildlife Reserve. To do this, amphibians were caught by hand during the day (between 06:00–08:00 hrs) and at night (between 18:00–20:00 hrs). All specimens were photographed, labelled, and preserved in ethanol (70%). Specimens were located by sight and sound. In two sessions of 10 days each, 692 specimens were caught, representing 53 species, 17 genera and 11 families. All the inventoried species belong to the Order Anura. Several specimens could not be identified to species. The family representation included Hyperoliidae (159 specimens: 22.97%), Pyxicephalidae (8 specimens (1.15%)), Arthroleptidae (54 individuals: 7.80%), Rhacophoridae (2 specimens: 0.28%), Hemisotidae (34 specimens: 4.91%), Dicroglossidae (123 specimens: 17.77%), Ranidae (174 individuals: 25.14%), Phrynobatrachidae (3 individuals: 0.43%), Ptychadenidae (22 specimens: 3.17%), Bufonidae (45 specimens: 6.5%) and Pipidae (68 individuals: 9.82%). The results of this research are preliminary, but they are very interesting because they will allow the Reserve authorities to know the amphibians of the RFO and to have a scientific basis for a possible drafting or implementation of the conservation plan and the protection of wetlands.
Published in | American Journal of Zoology (Volume 2, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11 |
Page(s) | 38-43 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2019. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Biodiversity, Amphibians, Habitat Loss, Okapi Wildlife Reserve, Ituri Forest, Epulu, DRC
[1] | Bury R., “Natural history, Field ecology, conservation biology and wildlife management: Time to connect the dots,” Herpetol. Conserv. Biol., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 56–61, 2006. |
[2] | Wake D. and M. S. Koo, “Amphibians,” Curr. Biol., vol. 28, no. 21, pp. R1237–R1241, 2018. |
[3] | Greenbaum E., C. Kusamba, M. M. Aristote, and K. D. Reed, “Amphibian Chytrid Fungus Infections in Hyperolius (Anura: Hyperoliidae) from Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo,” Herpetol. Rev., vol. 39, no. 2004, pp. 70–73, 2008. |
[4] | Bennun L., G. Davies, K. Howell, H. Newing, and M. Linkie, La biodiversité des forêts d’ Afrique: Manuel pratique de recensement des vertébrés. 2002. |
[5] | Urban M., J. L. Richardson, and N. A. Freidenfelds, “Plasticity and genetic adaptation mediate amphibian and reptile responses to climate change,” Evol. Appl., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 88–103, 2014. |
[6] | Alexandre Boissinot, “Influence de la structure du biotope de reproduction et de l ’agencement du paysage, sur le peuplement d ’ amphibiens d ’une région bocagère de l’ ouest de la France,” Ministère l’éducation Natl. Ec. Prat. des hautes études, pp. 1–46, 2009. |
[7] | S. J. O. Hanlon et al., “Recent Asian origin of chytrid fungi causing global amphibian declines,” RESEARCH, vol. 627, no. May, pp. 621–627, 2018. |
[8] | B. M. Z. & J. G. Larson, “Assessment of the amphibians of Batéké Plateau National Park, Gabon, including results of chytrid pathogen tests,” Salamandra, vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 159-170 pages, 2013. |
[9] | Greenbaum E., J. Meece, and K. D. Reed, “Amphibian Chytrid Infections in Non-forested Habitats of Katanga, Democratic Republic of the Congo,” Herpetol. Rev., vol. 45, no. December 2009, pp. 610–614, 2014. |
[10] | Greenbaum, E., J. Meece, K. D. Reed, and C. Kusamba, “Extensive occurence of the amphibian chytrid fungus in the Albertine, a Central African amphibian hotspot,” vol. 25, no. April, pp. 91–100, 2015. |
[11] | L. L. Wallace, “After Fires: The Ecology of Change in Yellowstoine National Park,” Yale Univ. Press New Haven London, p. 390, 2004. |
[12] | C. Bellard, “Effets des changements climatiques sur la biodiversité,” Univ. Paris sud. Ec. Dr. Sci. du végétal, Lab. d’Ecologie Systématique Evol. Dr., p. 338, 2013. |
[13] | L. M. Jean-Pierre d’Huart, “Rapport de mission de suivi réactif de la réserve de faune à okapis en République Démocratique du Congo (RDC),” p. 30 pages, 2014. |
[14] | W. Delvingt, “Parcs & Réserves. Les aires Protégées de la République Démocratique du Congo,” in Revue trimestrielle de conservation de la nature et de gestion durable d’Ardenne et Gaume, vol. 68, no. 3, 2013, p. 52. |
[15] | G. Kambale, S., H. Kazadi, “Inventaire systématique des amphibiens de Kisangani (Zaire),” Ann. Fac. Sc. Unikis 10 137 - 146, vol. 10, pp. 137–146, 1994. |
[16] | O. S. G. Pauwels and M.-O. Rödel, “Amphibians and National Parks in Gabon western Central Africa Amphibien und Nationalparks in Gabun, westliches Zentralafrika,” Herpetozoa, vol. 19, pp. 135–148, 2007. |
[17] | L. M. P. Ceríaco et al., “Herpetological Survey of Iona National Park and Namibe Regional Natural Park, with a Synoptic List of the Amphibians and Reptiles of Namibe Province, Southwestern Angola,” Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci., vol. 63, no. 2, pp. 15–61, 2016. |
[18] | D. U. Bassin et al., “Inventaires naturalistes des zones humides et du lit majeur des rivières Lez, Hérein, Coronne,” vol. 5, no. année, p. 80 p., 2011. |
APA Style
Franck Masudi Muenye Mali, Pionus Katuala Gatate Banda, Zacharie Chifundera Kusamba, Gabriel Badjedjea Babangenge, Jean Robert Kambili Sebe, et al. (2019). Preliminary Data on Amphibian Diversity of the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (RFO) in Democratic Republic of the Congo. American Journal of Zoology, 2(3), 38-43. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11
ACS Style
Franck Masudi Muenye Mali; Pionus Katuala Gatate Banda; Zacharie Chifundera Kusamba; Gabriel Badjedjea Babangenge; Jean Robert Kambili Sebe, et al. Preliminary Data on Amphibian Diversity of the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (RFO) in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Am. J. Zool. 2019, 2(3), 38-43. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11
AMA Style
Franck Masudi Muenye Mali, Pionus Katuala Gatate Banda, Zacharie Chifundera Kusamba, Gabriel Badjedjea Babangenge, Jean Robert Kambili Sebe, et al. Preliminary Data on Amphibian Diversity of the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (RFO) in Democratic Republic of the Congo. Am J Zool. 2019;2(3):38-43. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11
@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11, author = {Franck Masudi Muenye Mali and Pionus Katuala Gatate Banda and Zacharie Chifundera Kusamba and Gabriel Badjedjea Babangenge and Jean Robert Kambili Sebe and Albert Lotana Lokasola and Corneille Ewango and Guy Crispin Gembu Tungaluna and Dudu Akaibe}, title = {Preliminary Data on Amphibian Diversity of the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (RFO) in Democratic Republic of the Congo}, journal = {American Journal of Zoology}, volume = {2}, number = {3}, pages = {38-43}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20190203.11}, abstract = {Amphibians are poorly known in the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (RFO) in DRC, and amphibians are identified as one of the most threatened animal taxa among vertebrates living on Earth. The aim of this study was to inventory amphibians in the Okapi Wildlife Reserve. To do this, amphibians were caught by hand during the day (between 06:00–08:00 hrs) and at night (between 18:00–20:00 hrs). All specimens were photographed, labelled, and preserved in ethanol (70%). Specimens were located by sight and sound. In two sessions of 10 days each, 692 specimens were caught, representing 53 species, 17 genera and 11 families. All the inventoried species belong to the Order Anura. Several specimens could not be identified to species. The family representation included Hyperoliidae (159 specimens: 22.97%), Pyxicephalidae (8 specimens (1.15%)), Arthroleptidae (54 individuals: 7.80%), Rhacophoridae (2 specimens: 0.28%), Hemisotidae (34 specimens: 4.91%), Dicroglossidae (123 specimens: 17.77%), Ranidae (174 individuals: 25.14%), Phrynobatrachidae (3 individuals: 0.43%), Ptychadenidae (22 specimens: 3.17%), Bufonidae (45 specimens: 6.5%) and Pipidae (68 individuals: 9.82%). The results of this research are preliminary, but they are very interesting because they will allow the Reserve authorities to know the amphibians of the RFO and to have a scientific basis for a possible drafting or implementation of the conservation plan and the protection of wetlands.}, year = {2019} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Preliminary Data on Amphibian Diversity of the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (RFO) in Democratic Republic of the Congo AU - Franck Masudi Muenye Mali AU - Pionus Katuala Gatate Banda AU - Zacharie Chifundera Kusamba AU - Gabriel Badjedjea Babangenge AU - Jean Robert Kambili Sebe AU - Albert Lotana Lokasola AU - Corneille Ewango AU - Guy Crispin Gembu Tungaluna AU - Dudu Akaibe Y1 - 2019/10/10 PY - 2019 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11 DO - 10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11 T2 - American Journal of Zoology JF - American Journal of Zoology JO - American Journal of Zoology SP - 38 EP - 43 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7413 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20190203.11 AB - Amphibians are poorly known in the Okapi Wildlife Reserve (RFO) in DRC, and amphibians are identified as one of the most threatened animal taxa among vertebrates living on Earth. The aim of this study was to inventory amphibians in the Okapi Wildlife Reserve. To do this, amphibians were caught by hand during the day (between 06:00–08:00 hrs) and at night (between 18:00–20:00 hrs). All specimens were photographed, labelled, and preserved in ethanol (70%). Specimens were located by sight and sound. In two sessions of 10 days each, 692 specimens were caught, representing 53 species, 17 genera and 11 families. All the inventoried species belong to the Order Anura. Several specimens could not be identified to species. The family representation included Hyperoliidae (159 specimens: 22.97%), Pyxicephalidae (8 specimens (1.15%)), Arthroleptidae (54 individuals: 7.80%), Rhacophoridae (2 specimens: 0.28%), Hemisotidae (34 specimens: 4.91%), Dicroglossidae (123 specimens: 17.77%), Ranidae (174 individuals: 25.14%), Phrynobatrachidae (3 individuals: 0.43%), Ptychadenidae (22 specimens: 3.17%), Bufonidae (45 specimens: 6.5%) and Pipidae (68 individuals: 9.82%). The results of this research are preliminary, but they are very interesting because they will allow the Reserve authorities to know the amphibians of the RFO and to have a scientific basis for a possible drafting or implementation of the conservation plan and the protection of wetlands. VL - 2 IS - 3 ER -