Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan

Abdullah Babar; Adnan Yousaf; Saqib Ali Fazilani; Muhammad Naeem Jan

doi:doi:10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan

Abdullah Babar, Adnan Yousaf, Saqib Ali Fazilani, Muhammad Naeem Jan

Published in American Journal of Zoology (Volume 4, Issue 4)

Received: 8 September 2021 Accepted: 23 September 2021 Published: 5 November 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

The goal of the study was to look at the Incidence of Anaplasma marginale in cattle in the Thatta, Tharparkar and Hyderabad districts of Sindh, Pakistan. Using a multistage cluster random sampling technique, a total of n=1500 samples were obtained from chosen small holders and private animal farms. Using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent test, the overall Incidence of Anapalsma marginale infection was 38.13% (cELISA). The district with the greatest Incidence was Tharparkar (42.4%), followed by Thatta (37.2%) and Hyderabad (34.8%). Different age groups and breeds were shown to have a significant association. Competitive ELISA based on major surface protein-5 has a significant advantage over other serological markers for anaplasmosis because of its superior sensitivity (96%) and specificity (95%) for anaplasmosis. In all of the study districts, Incidence was considerably greater in small holders than in private livestock farms. In the summer, small-holder crossbred cattle over the age of four years from the Tharparkar district are more susceptible to Anaplasma marginale infection. The Tharparkar district's moderate climate encourages vector tick proliferation and multiplication. Furthermore, the higher Incidence of R. (Boophilus) microplus and stall feeding methods at Tharparkar may have contributed to the higher Incidence of Anaplasma marginale infection. The large variance in Incidence between study districts is explained by the fact that major parts of study districts have unique agro-ecological zones.

Published in	American Journal of Zoology (Volume 4, Issue 4)
DOI	10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13
Page(s)	61-64
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Incidence, Anaplasma Marginale, Cattle, Sindh

References

[1]	Afridi, Z. K., I. Ahmad, G. Z. Khattak, Q. Habib ullah and M. Jamil (2005). Incidence of anaplasmosis, babesiosis and theileriosis in dairy cattle in Peshawar. Sarhad J. Agric. 21: 311-316.
[2]	Atif F. A., M. S. Khan, H. J. Iqbal and T. Roheen (2012). Incidence of tick-borne diseases in Punjab (Pakistan) and hematological profile of Anaplasma marginale infection in indigenous and crossbred cattle. Pakistan J. Sci. 64: 11-15.
[3]	Bock, R. E., A. J. de Vos, T. G. Kingston and D. J. McLellan (2007). Effect of breed of cattle on innate resistance to infection with Babesia bovis, B. bigemina and Anaplasma marginale. Aust. Vet. J. 75: 337-40.
[4]	Dumler, J. S., A. F. Barbet, C. P. Bekker, G. A. Dasch, G. H. Palmer, S. C. Ray, Y. Rikihisa and F. R. Rurangirwa (2001). Recognition of genera in the families Rickettsiaceae and Anaplasmataceae in order Rickesttsiales: unification of some species of Ehrlichia with Anaplasma, Cowdria with Ehrlichia and Ehrilichi with Neorickettsia description of six new species combinations and designation of Ehrlichia equi and “HGE agent” as subjective synonyms of Ehrlichia phagocytophia. Intl. J. Systemic and Evol. Microbiol. 51: 2145-2165.
[5]	GOP (2012). Meteorological Department, Government of Pakistan, Islamabad.
[6]	Gralen, B. (2009). Tick-borne diseases in Tajikistan- anaplasmosis, babesiosis and theileriosis. Sveiges Lantbruks Universitet (SLU), Fakulteten for Veterinarmedicin och husdjursvetenskap, Institutionen for Biomedicin och Veteriner Folkhalsovetenskap, Examensarbete. 2009: 36, 5.
[7]	Hugh-Jones, M. E., D. Busch, C. Raby and F. Jones (2008). SeroIncidence survey for Anaplasma card-test reactors in Louisiana, U.S.A. cattle. Prev. Vet. Med. 6: 143–153.
[8]	Khan, M. Q., A. Zahoor, M. Jahangir and M. A. Mirza, (2004). Incidence of blood parasites in cattle and buffaloes. Pakistan Vet. J. 24: 193-195.
[9]	Kocan, K. M., J. de la Fuente, E. F. Blouin, J. F. Coetzee and S. A. Ewing (2010). The natural history of Anaplasma marginale. Vet. Parasitol. 167: 95-107.
[10]	Knowles, D. P., S. Torioni de Echaide, G. H. Palmer, T. C. McGuire, D. Stille and T. F. McElwain (2006). Antibody against an Anaplasma marginale MSP5 epitope common to tick and erythrocyte stages identified persistently infected cattle. J. Clin. Microbiol. 34: 2225–2230.
[11]	Marufu, M. C., M. Chimonyo, K. Dzama and C. Mapiye (2010). SeroIncidence of tick-borne diseases in communal cattle reared on sweet and sour rangelands in a semi-arid area of South Africa. Vet. J. 184: 71-6.
[12]	Minjauw, B. and A. McLeod (2003). Tick-borne diseases and poverty. The impact of ticks and tick-borne diseases on the livelihood of small scale and marginal livestock owners in India and eastern and southern Africa. Research report, DFID Animal Health.
[13]	OIE (2014). Manual of diagnostic tests and vaccines for terrestrial animals. Bovine anaplasmosis. Paris, France. Chapter 2.3.7, 494-500p.
[14]	OIE (2012). Terrestrial Manual, Bovine anaplasmosis. Paris, France. Chapter 2.4.1. 1-5p.
[15]	PARC (2012). Pakistan Agricultural Research Council, Agro-ecological zones of Punjab.
[16]	Perez, E., M. V. Herrero, C. Jimenez, D. Hird and G. B. Buening (2004). Effect of management and host factors on seroIncidence of bovine anaplasmosis and babesiosis in Costa Rica. Prev. Vet. Med. 20: 33–46.
[17]	Perry, B. D. and A. S. Young (2005). The past, future roles of epidemiology, economics in the control oftick-borne diseases of livestock in Africa: the case of theileriosis. Prev. Vet. Med. 25: 107–120.
[18]	Peter, T., C. O’Callaghan, B. D. Perry, G. Medley and S. M. Mahan (2007). Application of PCR in heart water epidemiology. In: Proceedings of the VIth Symposium of the International Society of Veterinary Epidemiology, Economics, Paris. 12–20p.
[19]	Rajput, Z. I., H. U. Song-hua, A. G. Arijo, M. Habib and M. Khalid (2005). Comparative study of Anaplasma parasites in tick carrying buffaloes and cattle. J. Zhejiang Univ. Sci. B. 6: 1057-1062.
[20]	Richey, E. J. and G. H. Palmer (2020). Bovine anaplasmosis, Compendium and Continuing Education for Practicing Veterinarian. 12: 1661–1668.
[21]	Swai, E. S., E. D. Karimuribo, N. H. Ogden, N. P. French, J. L. Fitzpatrick and M. J. Bryanto (2005). SeroIncidence estimation and risk factors for Anaplasma marginale on small holder dairy farmers in Tanzania. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 37: 599-610.
[22]	Swai, E. S., D. K. Esrony, D. M. Kambarage, W. E. Moshy and A. N. Mbise (2007). A comparison of seroIncidence, risk factors for Theileria parva, T. mutans in smallholder dairy cattle in the Tanga, Iringa regions of Tanzania. Vet. J. 174: 390–396.
[23]	Thrusfield, M. (2005). Veterinary epidemiology, 2nd ed. Blackwell Science, London. 39-41p.
[24]	Thrusfield, M. (2005). Veterinary epidemiology, 3rd Ed. Blackwell Science, London. 231-32p.
[25]	Urdaz-Rodriguez, J. H., G. T. Fosgate, A. R. Alleman, D. O. Rae, G. A. Donvan and P. Melendez (2009). SeroIncidence estimation and management factors associated with high herd seropositivity for Anaplasma marginale in commercial dairy farms of Puerto Rico. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 41: 1439-48.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdullah Babar, Adnan Yousaf, Saqib Ali Fazilani, Muhammad Naeem Jan. (2021). Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan. American Journal of Zoology, 4(4), 61-64. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdullah Babar; Adnan Yousaf; Saqib Ali Fazilani; Muhammad Naeem Jan. Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan. Am. J. Zool. 2021, 4(4), 61-64. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdullah Babar, Adnan Yousaf, Saqib Ali Fazilani, Muhammad Naeem Jan. Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan. Am J Zool. 2021;4(4):61-64. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13,
  author = {Abdullah Babar and Adnan Yousaf and Saqib Ali Fazilani and Muhammad Naeem Jan},
  title = {Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan},
  journal = {American Journal of Zoology},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {61-64},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20210404.13},
  abstract = {The goal of the study was to look at the Incidence of Anaplasma marginale in cattle in the Thatta, Tharparkar and Hyderabad districts of Sindh, Pakistan. Using a multistage cluster random sampling technique, a total of n=1500 samples were obtained from chosen small holders and private animal farms. Using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent test, the overall Incidence of Anapalsma marginale infection was 38.13% (cELISA). The district with the greatest Incidence was Tharparkar (42.4%), followed by Thatta (37.2%) and Hyderabad (34.8%). Different age groups and breeds were shown to have a significant association. Competitive ELISA based on major surface protein-5 has a significant advantage over other serological markers for anaplasmosis because of its superior sensitivity (96%) and specificity (95%) for anaplasmosis. In all of the study districts, Incidence was considerably greater in small holders than in private livestock farms. In the summer, small-holder crossbred cattle over the age of four years from the Tharparkar district are more susceptible to Anaplasma marginale infection. The Tharparkar district's moderate climate encourages vector tick proliferation and multiplication. Furthermore, the higher Incidence of R. (Boophilus) microplus and stall feeding methods at Tharparkar may have contributed to the higher Incidence of Anaplasma marginale infection. The large variance in Incidence between study districts is explained by the fact that major parts of study districts have unique agro-ecological zones.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY - JOUR
T1 - Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan
AU - Abdullah Babar
AU - Adnan Yousaf
AU - Saqib Ali Fazilani
AU - Muhammad Naeem Jan
Y1 - 2021/11/05
PY - 2021
N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13
DO - 10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13
T2 - American Journal of Zoology
JF - American Journal of Zoology
JO - American Journal of Zoology
SP - 61
EP - 64
PB - Science Publishing Group
SN - 2994-7413
UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13
AB - The goal of the study was to look at the Incidence of Anaplasma marginale in cattle in the Thatta, Tharparkar and Hyderabad districts of Sindh, Pakistan. Using a multistage cluster random sampling technique, a total of n=1500 samples were obtained from chosen small holders and private animal farms. Using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent test, the overall Incidence of Anapalsma marginale infection was 38.13% (cELISA). The district with the greatest Incidence was Tharparkar (42.4%), followed by Thatta (37.2%) and Hyderabad (34.8%). Different age groups and breeds were shown to have a significant association. Competitive ELISA based on major surface protein-5 has a significant advantage over other serological markers for anaplasmosis because of its superior sensitivity (96%) and specificity (95%) for anaplasmosis. In all of the study districts, Incidence was considerably greater in small holders than in private livestock farms. In the summer, small-holder crossbred cattle over the age of four years from the Tharparkar district are more susceptible to Anaplasma marginale infection. The Tharparkar district's moderate climate encourages vector tick proliferation and multiplication. Furthermore, the higher Incidence of R. (Boophilus) microplus and stall feeding methods at Tharparkar may have contributed to the higher Incidence of Anaplasma marginale infection. The large variance in Incidence between study districts is explained by the fact that major parts of study districts have unique agro-ecological zones.
VL - 4
IS - 4
ER -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Abdullah Babar

Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Sindh, Pakistan
Adnan Yousaf

Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Sindh, Pakistan
Saqib Ali Fazilani

Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Faculty of Bio Science, Benazir Bhutto University of Veterinary & Animal Sciences (SBBUVAS), Sakrand, Sindh, Pakistan
Muhammad Naeem Jan

Faculty of Animal Husbandry and Veterinary Science, Sindh Agriculture University, Tandojam, Sindh, Pakistan

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Abdullah Babar, Adnan Yousaf, Saqib Ali Fazilani, Muhammad Naeem Jan. (2021). Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan. American Journal of Zoology, 4(4), 61-64. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Abdullah Babar; Adnan Yousaf; Saqib Ali Fazilani; Muhammad Naeem Jan. Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan. Am. J. Zool. 2021, 4(4), 61-64. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Abdullah Babar, Adnan Yousaf, Saqib Ali Fazilani, Muhammad Naeem Jan. Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan. Am J Zool. 2021;4(4):61-64. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13,
  author = {Abdullah Babar and Adnan Yousaf and Saqib Ali Fazilani and Muhammad Naeem Jan},
  title = {Incidence of Bovine Anaplasma Marginale in Sindh, Pakistan},
  journal = {American Journal of Zoology},
  volume = {4},
  number = {4},
  pages = {61-64},
  doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20210404.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20210404.13},
  abstract = {The goal of the study was to look at the Incidence of Anaplasma marginale in cattle in the Thatta, Tharparkar and Hyderabad districts of Sindh, Pakistan. Using a multistage cluster random sampling technique, a total of n=1500 samples were obtained from chosen small holders and private animal farms. Using a competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent test, the overall Incidence of Anapalsma marginale infection was 38.13% (cELISA). The district with the greatest Incidence was Tharparkar (42.4%), followed by Thatta (37.2%) and Hyderabad (34.8%). Different age groups and breeds were shown to have a significant association. Competitive ELISA based on major surface protein-5 has a significant advantage over other serological markers for anaplasmosis because of its superior sensitivity (96%) and specificity (95%) for anaplasmosis. In all of the study districts, Incidence was considerably greater in small holders than in private livestock farms. In the summer, small-holder crossbred cattle over the age of four years from the Tharparkar district are more susceptible to Anaplasma marginale infection. The Tharparkar district's moderate climate encourages vector tick proliferation and multiplication. Furthermore, the higher Incidence of R. (Boophilus) microplus and stall feeding methods at Tharparkar may have contributed to the higher Incidence of Anaplasma marginale infection. The large variance in Incidence between study districts is explained by the fact that major parts of study districts have unique agro-ecological zones.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download