Adami Tulu Research center undertaken the composite breed development to improve milk yield and Arsi cow indigenous breed. As intermediate results this research center distributed the cross breed cows to the farmers. So, this study investigated Adoption of cross breed Cows distributed by Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center in East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data from 223 (105 Adopters and 118 non-Adopters) respondents purposively selected from designated locations in the study area. The result also revealed that about 71.43% of sample households were adopt cross breed cow. About 113 cows and calves distributed for farmers by Adami Tulu Research Center and the total offspring of cross breed cow ranges from 1 to 14 cows on average about 4 cows. The average value of cross breed cow was on average 144,272.7 Ethiopian birr with minimum 10000 ETB and maximum 800,000 Ethiopian birr for adopters. The gender participation result indicated that the participation of women high all activities of dairy production such as milking, feeding, health management, sold milk and milk product as well as milk processing into butter. The result of Tobit model revealed that, experience in dairy production, Number of cross breed, actual price of Cross breed cow distributed, total annual cash income and extension service on livestock production positively influenced households cross breed Cow decision and intensity of adoption whereas, total livestock number negatively affected sample households cross breed cow decision and intensity of adoption. The study indicated that the government, stakeholders and concerned bodies need to focus on facilitating farmers to experience sharing, increase cross breed cows by improving livestock production, strengthen extension service and improve income of farmers by participating different income generating activities so as to improve adoption decision and intensity of adoption cross breed cows in the study area.
Published in | American Journal of Zoology (Volume 6, Issue 3) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12 |
Page(s) | 53-62 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Adoption, Adopters, Non-Adopters, Tobit Model
[1] | CSA (Center Statistical Agency), 2020. Agricultural sample survey report on livestock and livestock characteristics (private peasant holdings), Volume II. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[2] | CSA (Central Statistical Agency), (2015). Ministry of Finance and Economic Development: Livestock Sample Survey, Study Documentation, Ethiopia. |
[3] | CSA (Central Statistical Agency), (2018). Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency Central Statistical Agency Agricultural Sample Survey Agricultural Sample Survey. Report on Livestock and Livestock Characteristics, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[4] | Tilahun Sisay, 2018. “Agriculture –industry Linkage and Technology Adoption in Ethiopia; Challenges and Opportunities: Review”. Nutrition and Food Toxicology 3 (1). |
[5] | Getu A, Guadu T, AddisuSh, Asefa A, Birhan M, Mogese N, Chanie M, Bogale B, Alebie A, Feresebhate A, Fantahun T, Mitiku T. 2016. Crossbreedingchallenges and its effect on dairy cattle performances in Amhara region, Ethiopia. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 6 (5): 96-102. Available on: www.science-line.com; www.ojafr.ir |
[6] | IGAD (Intergovernmental Authority for Development). 2010. The contribution of livestock to the economies of IGAD member states. Study findings, application of the methodology in Ethiopia and recommendations for future work. IGAD LPI working paper, No. 02–10. Roy Behnke, Odessa center, Great Wolford, UK. |
[7] | Belay Kassa. 2003. Agricultural Extension in Ethiopia: The Case of Participatory Demonstration and Training Extension System. Journal of Social Development in Africa 18.1, 49-83. |
[8] | Alemayehu Seyoum, P. A. Dorosh, SinafikehAsrat, 2013. “crop production in Ethiopia: Regional patterns and trends. Food and agriculture in Ethiopia: Progress and policy challenges”. 74 (2013): 53.39. |
[9] | Aynalem Haile, 2006. Genetic and economic analysis of Ethiopian Boran cattle and their crosses with Holstein Friesian in central Ethiopia. PhD thesis. National dairy research institute (I.C.A.R) karnal-132001 (Haryana), India. Pp. 197. |
[10] | Teshome Gedefa, Ajebu Nurfeta and NegaTola. 2019. Evaluation of production performance of Arsi-Holstein Friesian crossbred dairy cattle: A case of Assela Model Agricultural Enterprise, Arsi zone, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. |
[11] | Fikirneh Negash, FisehaTadesse, Megersa Handabo, Shimelis Gizachew, Tilahun Firomsa, and GetachewFelleke. 2016. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Regional Exchange Network for Market Orient Dairy Development.html. |
[12] | ZOA (Zone Agricultural Office). 2019. East Shewa and West Arsi Zone Agricultural office annual report. Ethiopia. |
[13] | CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2014b. Agricultural sample survey 2013/2014: Volume IV – Report on land utilization (Private peasant holdings meher season). Statistical Bulletin number 446, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. |
[14] | CSA (Central Statistical Agency). 2015. The Federal Democratic Republic of Ethiopia Central Statistical Agency key finding agricultural sample, surveys. |
[15] | Ward PS, Bell AR, Parkhurst GM, Droppelmann K, Mapemba L. 2016. Heterogeneous preferences and the effects of incentives in promoting conservation agriculture in Malawi. AgrEcosyst Environ 222: 67–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2016.02.005 |
[16] | Yenealem K. 2006. Gender disparities in adoption of improved maize varieties between male headed and female headed households in Kuni Wereda, Western Hararghe Zone, Ethiopia. M Sc Thesis presented to the School of Graduate Studies of Alemaya University. |
[17] | Dehinenet Gezie. 2014. Analyses of impact of improved dairy technology adoption on smallholder household livelihoods and milk value chain in selected zones of Oromia and Amhara national regional states, Ethiopia. A dissertation submitted to the college of veterinary medicine and agriculture, Addis Ababa University in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of doctor of philosophy in Animal Production. |
[18] | Melese Kassahun and Jemal Jeilu. 2012. Dairy Technology Impacts on Lovely hoods of Dairy Producers in Central Ethiopia: International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics Vol. 1 No. 1 Pp. 109-118 109. |
[19] | Ayantunde AA, Oluwatosin BO, Yameogo V, van Wijk. 2020. Perceived benefits, constraints and determinants of sustainable intensification of mixed crop and livestock systems in the Sahelian zone of Burkina Faso. Int J AgricSustain 18 (1): 84–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903. 2019.1698494 |
APA Style
Negesse Senbeta, A., Esmael Ahmed, Y. (2023). Adoption of Cross Breed Cows Distributed by Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center in East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. American Journal of Zoology, 6(3), 53-62. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12
ACS Style
Negesse Senbeta, A.; Esmael Ahmed, Y. Adoption of Cross Breed Cows Distributed by Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center in East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Am. J. Zool. 2023, 6(3), 53-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12
AMA Style
Negesse Senbeta A, Esmael Ahmed Y. Adoption of Cross Breed Cows Distributed by Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center in East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Am J Zool. 2023;6(3):53-62. doi: 10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12
@article{10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12, author = {Asfaw Negesse Senbeta and Yassin Esmael Ahmed}, title = {Adoption of Cross Breed Cows Distributed by Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center in East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia}, journal = {American Journal of Zoology}, volume = {6}, number = {3}, pages = {53-62}, doi = {10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajz.20230603.12}, abstract = {Adami Tulu Research center undertaken the composite breed development to improve milk yield and Arsi cow indigenous breed. As intermediate results this research center distributed the cross breed cows to the farmers. So, this study investigated Adoption of cross breed Cows distributed by Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center in East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data from 223 (105 Adopters and 118 non-Adopters) respondents purposively selected from designated locations in the study area. The result also revealed that about 71.43% of sample households were adopt cross breed cow. About 113 cows and calves distributed for farmers by Adami Tulu Research Center and the total offspring of cross breed cow ranges from 1 to 14 cows on average about 4 cows. The average value of cross breed cow was on average 144,272.7 Ethiopian birr with minimum 10000 ETB and maximum 800,000 Ethiopian birr for adopters. The gender participation result indicated that the participation of women high all activities of dairy production such as milking, feeding, health management, sold milk and milk product as well as milk processing into butter. The result of Tobit model revealed that, experience in dairy production, Number of cross breed, actual price of Cross breed cow distributed, total annual cash income and extension service on livestock production positively influenced households cross breed Cow decision and intensity of adoption whereas, total livestock number negatively affected sample households cross breed cow decision and intensity of adoption. The study indicated that the government, stakeholders and concerned bodies need to focus on facilitating farmers to experience sharing, increase cross breed cows by improving livestock production, strengthen extension service and improve income of farmers by participating different income generating activities so as to improve adoption decision and intensity of adoption cross breed cows in the study area. }, year = {2023} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Adoption of Cross Breed Cows Distributed by Adami Tullu Agricultural Research Center in East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia AU - Asfaw Negesse Senbeta AU - Yassin Esmael Ahmed Y1 - 2023/11/29 PY - 2023 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12 DO - 10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12 T2 - American Journal of Zoology JF - American Journal of Zoology JO - American Journal of Zoology SP - 53 EP - 62 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2994-7413 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajz.20230603.12 AB - Adami Tulu Research center undertaken the composite breed development to improve milk yield and Arsi cow indigenous breed. As intermediate results this research center distributed the cross breed cows to the farmers. So, this study investigated Adoption of cross breed Cows distributed by Adami Tulu Agricultural Research Center in East Shewa and West Arsi Zones, Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Structured questionnaires were used to collect data from 223 (105 Adopters and 118 non-Adopters) respondents purposively selected from designated locations in the study area. The result also revealed that about 71.43% of sample households were adopt cross breed cow. About 113 cows and calves distributed for farmers by Adami Tulu Research Center and the total offspring of cross breed cow ranges from 1 to 14 cows on average about 4 cows. The average value of cross breed cow was on average 144,272.7 Ethiopian birr with minimum 10000 ETB and maximum 800,000 Ethiopian birr for adopters. The gender participation result indicated that the participation of women high all activities of dairy production such as milking, feeding, health management, sold milk and milk product as well as milk processing into butter. The result of Tobit model revealed that, experience in dairy production, Number of cross breed, actual price of Cross breed cow distributed, total annual cash income and extension service on livestock production positively influenced households cross breed Cow decision and intensity of adoption whereas, total livestock number negatively affected sample households cross breed cow decision and intensity of adoption. The study indicated that the government, stakeholders and concerned bodies need to focus on facilitating farmers to experience sharing, increase cross breed cows by improving livestock production, strengthen extension service and improve income of farmers by participating different income generating activities so as to improve adoption decision and intensity of adoption cross breed cows in the study area. VL - 6 IS - 3 ER -