| Peer-Reviewed

Gender Roles and Women Participation in Bee Keeping: A Focus on Baringo South Sub-County, Baringo County

Received: 6 April 2021     Accepted: 20 May 2021     Published: 31 May 2021
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

This study acknowledges that women participation in bee keeping is still low despite the initiatives and programs by the government and non-governmental organizations to have women participate in bee keeping in Baringo South Sub- County. The study identified that one of the factors blamed in low participation of women in bee farming in most developing countries is gender roles. This is particularly evident in male dominated societies. The study therefore sought to determine the influence of gender roles on women participation in Bee Keeping in Baringo South Sub- County. The study collected data from 128 women sampled from women engaged in bee farming in the sub-county. Data was collected through research questionnaires with closed ended questions that were self-administer by the researcher. The study revealed that gender roles had a significant influence on women participation in beekeeping. Women had huge gender roles that hampered their participation in beekeeping. The study also revealed that the high burden of gender roles on women presented itself in forms such as childrearing, household chores, income generating activities, provision of labour (paid and unpaid) and community development roles, influence female participation in bee keeping. The study recommends that gender roles should not be assigned according to biological and cultural stereotyping in order to create time for women to participate in bee keeping. Greater load with gender roles reduces women participation in beekeeping. Promotion of time saving technologies for household chores could go a long way in creating the much needed time necessary for women participation in beekeeping.

Published in Advances in Sciences and Humanities (Volume 7, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14
Page(s) 32-37
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Gender Roles, Women Participation, Bee Keeping, Baringo South Sub-County

References
[1] Ahikiriza, E. (2016). Beekeeping as an alternative source of livelihood in Uganda. School of Graduate, Ghent University.
[2] Birhanu, T. A. (2016). Constraints and opportunities of honeybee production and honey marketing systems: a case study of Fuji and Boerne Zone of Oromia State. EC. Agriculture 3 (3): 635-645.
[3] Chemurot, M. (2011). Beekeeping in Adjumani district, Uganda. Bee World, 88 (3), 58-61.
[4] Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Plano, V. L. C. & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research design: Selection and implementation. Sage journals, 35 (2), 236-264. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F001100000628739.
[5] Kioko, E. (2010). Agfax: Reporting Science in Africa. Retrieved January 30, 2013, from Agfax: http://www.agfax.net at 1000hrs.
[6] Macoloo, C., Recha, J., Radeny, M., & Kinyangi, J. (2013). Empowering a local community to address climate risks and food insecurity in Lower Nyando, Kenya. Case study for Hunger, Nutrition and climate justice, a new dialogue; putting people at the heart of global development. Dublin, Ireland, nature publishing.
[7] Mburu, P. D. M. (2015). Mapping of the honey value chain and analysis of changes in gender roles and factors influencing women empowerment among beekeepers in Kitui County, Kenya (Doctoral dissertation). University of Nairobi, Nairobi.
[8] Moser, C. & Moser, A. (2005). ‘Gender mainstreaming since Beijing: A Review of success and limitations in International Institutions’. In Porter, F. & Sweetman, C. (eds.), Mainstreaming gender in development, a critical review. United Kingdom, Oxford Press.
[9] Mujuni, A., Natukunda, K. & Kugonza, D. R. (2012). Factors affecting the adoption of beekeeping and associated technologies in Bushenyi District, Western Uganda. Development, 24, 8.
[10] Oduol, J., Place, F., Mithöfer, D., Olwande, J., Kirimi, L., & Mathenge, M. (2013). Improving participation in agricultural commodity markets for smallholder avocado farmers in Kenya: assessing growth opportunities for women in Kandara and Marani districts. Tegemeo Institute, Egerton University. Retrieved from http://www.tegemeo.org/images/downloads/publications/technical_reports/TR4.pdf on, 22 February 2019.
[11] PactKenya. (2010). Scoping study and value chain analysis for bee keeping and honey products. Retrieved from www.PactKenya.org on 31st May 31, 2019 1010hrs.
[12] Qaiser, T., Ali, M., & Taj, M. (2010). Scoping study and value chain analysis for bee keeping and honey products. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS) Vol, 2.
[13] Qaiser, T., Ali, M., Taj, S., & Akmal, N. (2013). Impact assessment of beekeeping in sustainable rural livelihood. Journal of Social Sciences (COES&RJ-JSS) Vol, 2.
[14] Raina, S. K., Kioko, E. N., Gordon, I. & Nyandiga, C. (2009). Improving forest conservation and community livelihoods through income generation from commercial insects in three Kenyan forests. Nairobi, International centre of insect physiology and ecology.
[15] Ross, A. C. (2009). Securing communal land rights to achieve sustainable development in Sub-Saharan Africa: critical analysis and policy implications. Journal of Law. Environment and Development, 5 (2), 130-141.
[16] Shackleton, S., Paumgarten, F., Kassa, H., Husselman, M., & Zida, M. (2011). Opportunities for enhancing poor women’s socioeconomic empowerment in the value chains of three African non-timber forest products (NTFPs). International Forestry Review, doi: 136–151.10.1505/146554811797406642.
[17] Shire, D., Asabi, G. & Mergers, E. (2016). Identifying Opportunities and Constraints of Beekeeping: A case of Gamblezeria and God ereWeredas. Gamble Regional State, Ethiopia. Entomol Ornitology, Herpotol 5: 182.
[18] Wadji, D. N., Pouomgne, V., Binam, J. N. & Nouaga R. Y. (2012). Farmers’ perceptions and adoption of new Acquaculture Technologies in the Western Highland of Cameroon. Tropiculture. Cameroon University Press.
[19] Weber, E. (2013). Apis mellifera: The domestication of European honey bee for agriculture in North America. England, Oxford Press.
[20] Zwarteveen, M. (2008). Men, masculinities and water powers in irrigation. Water Alternative, 1 (2), 111-113.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Yator Caroline Jemase, Lilian Chesikaw. (2021). Gender Roles and Women Participation in Bee Keeping: A Focus on Baringo South Sub-County, Baringo County. Advances in Sciences and Humanities, 7(2), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Yator Caroline Jemase; Lilian Chesikaw. Gender Roles and Women Participation in Bee Keeping: A Focus on Baringo South Sub-County, Baringo County. Adv. Sci. Humanit. 2021, 7(2), 32-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Yator Caroline Jemase, Lilian Chesikaw. Gender Roles and Women Participation in Bee Keeping: A Focus on Baringo South Sub-County, Baringo County. Adv Sci Humanit. 2021;7(2):32-37. doi: 10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14,
      author = {Yator Caroline Jemase and Lilian Chesikaw},
      title = {Gender Roles and Women Participation in Bee Keeping: A Focus on Baringo South Sub-County, Baringo County},
      journal = {Advances in Sciences and Humanities},
      volume = {7},
      number = {2},
      pages = {32-37},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ash.20210702.14},
      abstract = {This study acknowledges that women participation in bee keeping is still low despite the initiatives and programs by the government and non-governmental organizations to have women participate in bee keeping in Baringo South Sub- County. The study identified that one of the factors blamed in low participation of women in bee farming in most developing countries is gender roles. This is particularly evident in male dominated societies. The study therefore sought to determine the influence of gender roles on women participation in Bee Keeping in Baringo South Sub- County. The study collected data from 128 women sampled from women engaged in bee farming in the sub-county. Data was collected through research questionnaires with closed ended questions that were self-administer by the researcher. The study revealed that gender roles had a significant influence on women participation in beekeeping. Women had huge gender roles that hampered their participation in beekeeping. The study also revealed that the high burden of gender roles on women presented itself in forms such as childrearing, household chores, income generating activities, provision of labour (paid and unpaid) and community development roles, influence female participation in bee keeping. The study recommends that gender roles should not be assigned according to biological and cultural stereotyping in order to create time for women to participate in bee keeping. Greater load with gender roles reduces women participation in beekeeping. Promotion of time saving technologies for household chores could go a long way in creating the much needed time necessary for women participation in beekeeping.},
     year = {2021}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Gender Roles and Women Participation in Bee Keeping: A Focus on Baringo South Sub-County, Baringo County
    AU  - Yator Caroline Jemase
    AU  - Lilian Chesikaw
    Y1  - 2021/05/31
    PY  - 2021
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14
    T2  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
    JF  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
    JO  - Advances in Sciences and Humanities
    SP  - 32
    EP  - 37
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2472-0984
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ash.20210702.14
    AB  - This study acknowledges that women participation in bee keeping is still low despite the initiatives and programs by the government and non-governmental organizations to have women participate in bee keeping in Baringo South Sub- County. The study identified that one of the factors blamed in low participation of women in bee farming in most developing countries is gender roles. This is particularly evident in male dominated societies. The study therefore sought to determine the influence of gender roles on women participation in Bee Keeping in Baringo South Sub- County. The study collected data from 128 women sampled from women engaged in bee farming in the sub-county. Data was collected through research questionnaires with closed ended questions that were self-administer by the researcher. The study revealed that gender roles had a significant influence on women participation in beekeeping. Women had huge gender roles that hampered their participation in beekeeping. The study also revealed that the high burden of gender roles on women presented itself in forms such as childrearing, household chores, income generating activities, provision of labour (paid and unpaid) and community development roles, influence female participation in bee keeping. The study recommends that gender roles should not be assigned according to biological and cultural stereotyping in order to create time for women to participate in bee keeping. Greater load with gender roles reduces women participation in beekeeping. Promotion of time saving technologies for household chores could go a long way in creating the much needed time necessary for women participation in beekeeping.
    VL  - 7
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Institute of Women Gender and Development Studies, Egerton University, Egerton, Kenya

  • Institute of Women Gender and Development Studies, Egerton University, Egerton, Kenya

  • Sections