Surface-based precipitation measurements with high accuracy on different spatial-temporal scales have a crucial importance in different land-use planning sectors, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, such as Iran. Because the density of spatial distribution of rain-gauges is not uniform throughout the country, satellite sensor technology is considered useful for precipitation monitoring over the study area. In this study, PERSIANN satellite-based rainfall data were validated through comparison with the APHRODITE surface-based precipitation data. The validation was carried out for annual and seasonal precipitation, as well as an inter-annual comparison. Our analysis was based on a visual comparison and a statistical approach, including linear regression and spatial correlation between APHRODITE and PERSIANN datasets for each 0.25°×0.25° grid cell in the entire country, in the Caspian Sea region, and in the Zagros Mountains, indicating spatial correlation coefficients of 0.62, 0.62, 0.47, respectively. Both APHRODITE data and PERSIANN data showed that spatial distribution of mean annual and seasonal precipitation over Iran has two main patterns: along the Caspian Sea and along the Zagros Mountain chain. In general, PERSIANN underestimates high rainfall rates by 5.5 mm/day in winter but overestimates the low rainfalls in annual and seasonal scales by 0.9 mm/day in summer.
Published in | Earth Sciences (Volume 4, Issue 5) |
DOI | 10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11 |
Page(s) | 150-160 |
Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2015. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Precipitation Validation, Satellite Data, PERSIANN, APHRODITE, Iran, Gridded Data
[1] | Ebert, N. Kerle, and A. Stein, 2007: Remote sensing based assessment of social vulnerability, the space policy institute, George Washington University. |
[2] | Jensen, N. E. and L. Pedersen, 2005: Spatial variability of rainfall: Variations within a single radar pixel, Atmos.Res.,77,269-277 |
[3] | Hong G., P. Yang, B.C. Gao, B. A. Baum, Y.X. Hu, M.D. King, and S. Platnicks, 2007: High cloud properties from three years of MODIS Terra and Aqua collection-4 data over the tropics, J. Appl. Meteor. Climatol., 46, 1840-1856. |
[4] | Sorooshian S, K-L. Hsu, B. Imam, Y. Hong, 2006: Global precipitation estimation from satellite imagery using artificial neural networks. Chapter 2in Hydrological Modeling in Arid and Semi-arid Areas. UNESCO. |
[5] | Javanmard S., A. Yatagai, M. I. Nodzu, J. Bodagh Jamali, and H. Kawamoto, 2010: Comparing high-resolution gridded precipitation data with satellite rainfall estimates of TRMM_3B42 over Iran, Adv. Geosci., 25, 119-125 |
[6] | Kamali Gh. A., A. Asgari, and K. Noohi, 2009: Applied Meteorology, Atmospheric Science and Meteorological Research Center (ASMERC), Tehran, Iran, pp. 271 (in Persian language) |
[7] | Hsu, K., X. Gao, S. Sorooshian, and H.V. Gupta, 1997: Precipitation estimation from remotely sensed information using artificial neural networks, J. Appl. Meteor., 36, 1176-1190. |
[8] | Hsu, K., H. V. Gupta, X. Gao, and S. Sorooshian, 1999: Estimation of physical variables from multi-channel remotely sensed imagery using a neural network: Application to rainfall estimation, Water Resources Res., 35(5), 1605-1618. |
[9] | Ferraro, R. R., and G. F. Marks, 1995: The development of SSM/I rain-rate retrieval algorithms using ground-based radar measurements, J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 12, 755-770. |
[10] | Janowiak, J. E., R. J. Joyce, and Y. Yarosh, 2000: A real-time global half-hourly pixel resolution infrared dataset and its applications, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 82,205-217. |
[11] | Sorooshian, S., K. Hsu, X. Gao, H.V. Gupta, B. Imam, and D. Braithwaite, 2000: Evaluation of PERSIANN system satellite-based estimates of tropical rainfall, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 81, 2035-2046. |
[12] | Weng, F., L. Zhao, R. Ferraro, G. Poe, X. Li, and N. Grody, 2003: Advanced microwave sounding unit cloud and precipitation algorithms, Radio Sci.,38, 8086-8096. |
[13] | Sorooshian S., Lawford R., Try P., Rossow W., Roads J., Polcher J., Sommeria G., and Schiffer R., 2005: Water and energy cycles: investigating the links. WMO Bull.54, 58-64 |
[14] | Gruber A., and V. Levizzani, 2008: Assessment of global precipitation products, WCRP Report, 128, WMO/TD-No. 1430 |
[15] | Yatagai, A., O. Arakawa, K. Kamiguchi, H. Kawamoto, M. I. Nodzu, and A. Hamada, 2009: A 44-year daily gridded precipitation dataset for Asia based on a dense network of rain gauges, SOLA, 5, 137-140, DOI:10.2151. |
[16] | Turk, F. J., P. Arkin, E. E. Ebert, and M. R. P. Sapiano, 2008: Evaluating high-resolution precipitation products, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 89, 1911-1916. |
[17] | Ebert, E. E., and M. J. Manton, 1998: Performance of satellite rainfall estimation algorithms during TOGA COARE, J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 1537-1557. |
[18] | Chen, M., W. Shi, P. Xie, V. B. S. Silva, V. E. Kousky, R. Wayne Higgins, and J. E. Janowiak, 2008: Assessing objective techniques for gauge-based analyses of global daily precipitation, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D04110, doi: 10.1029/2007 JD009132. |
[19] | Xie, P., and P. A. Arkin, 1997: Global precipitation: A17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 78, 2539-2558. |
[20] | Adler, R. F., G. J. Huffman, A. Chang, R. Ferraro, P. Xie, J. Janowiak, B. Rudolf, U. Schneider, S. Curtis, D. Bolvin, A. Gruber, J. Susskind, P. Arkin, and E. Nelkin, 2003: The Version 2 Global Precipitation Climatology Project (GPCP) monthly precipitation analysis (1979–present), J. Hydrometeor., 4, 1147-1167. |
[21] | Yatagai, A., P. Xie, and A. Kitoh, 2005: Utilization of a new gauge-based daily precipitation dataset over monsoon Asia for validation of the daily precipitation climatology simulated by the MRI/JMA 20-km-mesh AGCM. SOLA, 1, 193-196, doi: 10.2151. |
[22] | Huffman, G. J., R. F. Adler, M. Morrissey, D. Bolvin, S. Curtis, R. Joyce, B. Mc Gavock, and J. Susskind, 2001: Global precipitation at one-degree daily resolution from multi-satellite observations, J. Hydrometeor., 2, 36-50. |
[23] | Hijmans, R. J., S. E. Cameron, J. L. Parra, P. G. Jones, and A. Jarvis, 2005: Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas, Int. J. Climatol., 25, 1965-1978. |
[24] | Shepard, D., 1968: A two-dimensional interpolation function for irregularly spaced data, Proc. 23 ACM Nat’l Conf., Princeton, N.J., Barandon/Systems Press, 517-524. |
APA Style
Javad Bodagh Jamli. (2015). Validation of Satellite-Based PERSIANN Rainfall Estimates Using Surface-Based APHRODITE Data over Iran. Earth Sciences, 4(5), 150-160. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11
ACS Style
Javad Bodagh Jamli. Validation of Satellite-Based PERSIANN Rainfall Estimates Using Surface-Based APHRODITE Data over Iran. Earth Sci. 2015, 4(5), 150-160. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11
AMA Style
Javad Bodagh Jamli. Validation of Satellite-Based PERSIANN Rainfall Estimates Using Surface-Based APHRODITE Data over Iran. Earth Sci. 2015;4(5):150-160. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11
@article{10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11, author = {Javad Bodagh Jamli}, title = {Validation of Satellite-Based PERSIANN Rainfall Estimates Using Surface-Based APHRODITE Data over Iran}, journal = {Earth Sciences}, volume = {4}, number = {5}, pages = {150-160}, doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11}, url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11}, eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20150405.11}, abstract = {Surface-based precipitation measurements with high accuracy on different spatial-temporal scales have a crucial importance in different land-use planning sectors, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, such as Iran. Because the density of spatial distribution of rain-gauges is not uniform throughout the country, satellite sensor technology is considered useful for precipitation monitoring over the study area. In this study, PERSIANN satellite-based rainfall data were validated through comparison with the APHRODITE surface-based precipitation data. The validation was carried out for annual and seasonal precipitation, as well as an inter-annual comparison. Our analysis was based on a visual comparison and a statistical approach, including linear regression and spatial correlation between APHRODITE and PERSIANN datasets for each 0.25°×0.25° grid cell in the entire country, in the Caspian Sea region, and in the Zagros Mountains, indicating spatial correlation coefficients of 0.62, 0.62, 0.47, respectively. Both APHRODITE data and PERSIANN data showed that spatial distribution of mean annual and seasonal precipitation over Iran has two main patterns: along the Caspian Sea and along the Zagros Mountain chain. In general, PERSIANN underestimates high rainfall rates by 5.5 mm/day in winter but overestimates the low rainfalls in annual and seasonal scales by 0.9 mm/day in summer.}, year = {2015} }
TY - JOUR T1 - Validation of Satellite-Based PERSIANN Rainfall Estimates Using Surface-Based APHRODITE Data over Iran AU - Javad Bodagh Jamli Y1 - 2015/09/06 PY - 2015 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11 DO - 10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11 T2 - Earth Sciences JF - Earth Sciences JO - Earth Sciences SP - 150 EP - 160 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5982 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20150405.11 AB - Surface-based precipitation measurements with high accuracy on different spatial-temporal scales have a crucial importance in different land-use planning sectors, especially in arid and semi-arid regions, such as Iran. Because the density of spatial distribution of rain-gauges is not uniform throughout the country, satellite sensor technology is considered useful for precipitation monitoring over the study area. In this study, PERSIANN satellite-based rainfall data were validated through comparison with the APHRODITE surface-based precipitation data. The validation was carried out for annual and seasonal precipitation, as well as an inter-annual comparison. Our analysis was based on a visual comparison and a statistical approach, including linear regression and spatial correlation between APHRODITE and PERSIANN datasets for each 0.25°×0.25° grid cell in the entire country, in the Caspian Sea region, and in the Zagros Mountains, indicating spatial correlation coefficients of 0.62, 0.62, 0.47, respectively. Both APHRODITE data and PERSIANN data showed that spatial distribution of mean annual and seasonal precipitation over Iran has two main patterns: along the Caspian Sea and along the Zagros Mountain chain. In general, PERSIANN underestimates high rainfall rates by 5.5 mm/day in winter but overestimates the low rainfalls in annual and seasonal scales by 0.9 mm/day in summer. VL - 4 IS - 5 ER -