Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan

Herman Hidayat; Ernawati Sinaga

doi:doi:10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13

| Peer-Reviewed

Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan

Herman Hidayat, Ernawati Sinaga

Published in Earth Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 1)

Received: 27 January 2021 Accepted: 14 February 2021 Published: 3 March 2021

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

A Current condition the trend of deforestation was decreasing in Indonesia. According to Minister of Environment and Forestry statement (January 29, 2018) the rationale was happened due to that the government released policy for keeping moratorium of estate oil palm concession permission, to implement law enforcement for illegal logging actors, to launch forest restoration program and conservation in protected forest and peat swamp land, and to invite participation of local people for social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial). There is close relation that deforestation issues affect on ecological damage and social resilience and eventually affect on poverty among local community who live in and around forest and people as well. As an illustration ecological damage for instance forest fire, flood, drought, soil erosion, extinction of biodiversity and so forth due to deforestation impact. On the other hand, deforestation eventually affect on social resilience and poverty was indicated more ten percent that marginalized society (they categorized poor) below average national income, no access to land utilization and lower education still high. As registered by National Bureau Statistic (BPS) in 2018 reached 9,82 percent and 10,12 percent in 2017 (total 23,8 million) from 268 million people. From this point of view, the paper focuses on discussion three level analysis to reply deforestation that eventually affect on social resilience. Firstly, is to examine government policy toward private sectors on moratorium of oil palm estate plantation and land conflict. Secondly is shifting cultivator changed into mining activities to respond forest degradation. Thirdly is to invite participation of local people and to carry out social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial) program which aims to promote their income and social welfare and to maintain the sustainability of forest ecosystem.

Published in	Earth Sciences (Volume 10, Issue 1)
DOI	10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13
Page(s)	17-26
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Government, Private Sector, Local People, Mining Activities, Social Forestry, Law Enforcement

References

[1]	Hidayat, Herman. 2008. Politik Lingkungan: Pengelolaan Hutan Masa Orde Baru dan Reformasi (Jakarta: Pustaka Obor Press).
[2]	Hidayat, Herman. 2016. Forest Resources Management in Indonesia: A Political Ecology Approach (Singapore: Springer Press).
[3]	FWI/GFW. 2001. Keadaan Hutan Indonesia (Bogor, Indonesia: Forest Watch Indonesia and Washington D. C: Global Forest Watch Forum).
[4]	Pearce, D. W. 2001.” The Economic Value of Forest Ecosystems” in Ecosystem Health 7 (2), pp. 284-296.
[5]	Webersick, Christian. 2010. Climate Change and Security (California: Prager Press).
[6]	Berkes et al., 2012. “Introduction” in E. Boyd and C. Folke (eds.) Adapting Institution: Governance, Complexity and Social Ecological Resilience (New York: Cambridge University Press), pp. 1-9.
[7]	“Foreign Exchange Earnings of Oil Palm and Crude Palm Oil (CPO): Trading in 2019-2020” (Access in Google, 13 January 2021).
[8]	Slette, J. P and Wiyono, I. E. 2011. ‘Oilseeds and Products Update Indonesia 2011, 11 pp., USDA Foreign Agricultural Service.’ Retrieved 21 July, 2013, from http://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN520Publications/Oilseeds%20and%20 Products%20Update_Jakarta_Indonesia_1-28-2011.pdf.
[9]	Obidzinski, K et al., 2012. “Environmental and Social Impacts of Oil Palm Plantations and Their Implications for Biofuel Production in Indonesia”, in Ecology and Society 17 (1): 25.
[10]	Kompas, 15 September 2011.
[11]	Walker, A. 2001. ‘Karen Consensus, Ethnic Politics and Resources Use Legitimacy in Northern Thailand’ in Asian Ethnicity 2 (2) pp. 145-162.
[12]	Clausen, F, M. L. Barreto, and A. Attaran. 2011. “Property Rights Theory and Reform of Artisanal and Small-Scale Mining in Developing Countries” in Journal of Politics and law 4 (1) pp. 15-26.
[13]	Inswiasri, Kusnoputranto, H. 2011. “Pajanan Hg pada Petambang Emas Tradisional di Kabupaten Gunung Mas-Kalimantan Tengah: Mercury Exposure of Traditional Miners in Gunung Mas District, Central Kalimantan”, in Ekologi Kesehatan 10 (2) pp. 72-82.
[14]	Lindayati, Rita, “Gagasan dan Kelembagaan Dalam Kebijakan Perhutanan Sosial”, dalam Resosudarmo, Ida Ayu Pradnja and Colfer, Carol J. Pierce (eds.) 2003. Ke Mana Harus Melangkah?: Masyarakat, Hutan. Dan Perumusan Kebijakan di Indonesia (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia), pp. 43-44.
[15]	Hidayat, Herman (eds.). 2019. Deforestasi dan Ketahanan Sosial (Deforestation and Social Resilience) (Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Pustaka Indonesia).
[16]	Kompas, 13 Januari 2021.
[17]	Harian Terbit, 19 Mei 2015.

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Herman Hidayat, Ernawati Sinaga. (2021). Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan. Earth Sciences, 10(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Herman Hidayat; Ernawati Sinaga. Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan. Earth Sci. 2021, 10(1), 17-26. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Herman Hidayat, Ernawati Sinaga. Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan. Earth Sci. 2021;10(1):17-26. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13,
  author = {Herman Hidayat and Ernawati Sinaga},
  title = {Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan},
  journal = {Earth Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {17-26},
  doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20211001.13},
  abstract = {A Current condition the trend of deforestation was decreasing in Indonesia. According to Minister of Environment and Forestry statement (January 29, 2018) the rationale was happened due to that the government released policy for keeping moratorium of estate oil palm concession permission, to implement law enforcement for illegal logging actors, to launch forest restoration program and conservation in protected forest and peat swamp land, and to invite participation of local people for social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial). There is close relation that deforestation issues affect on ecological damage and social resilience and eventually affect on poverty among local community who live in and around forest and people as well. As an illustration ecological damage for instance forest fire, flood, drought, soil erosion, extinction of biodiversity and so forth due to deforestation impact. On the other hand, deforestation eventually affect on social resilience and poverty was indicated more ten percent that marginalized society (they categorized poor) below average national income, no access to land utilization and lower education still high. As registered by National Bureau Statistic (BPS) in 2018 reached 9,82 percent and 10,12 percent in 2017 (total 23,8 million) from 268 million people. From this point of view, the paper focuses on discussion three level analysis to reply deforestation that eventually affect on social resilience. Firstly, is to examine government policy toward private sectors on moratorium of oil palm estate plantation and land conflict. Secondly is shifting cultivator changed into mining activities to respond forest degradation. Thirdly is to invite participation of local people and to carry out social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial) program which aims to promote their income and social welfare and to maintain the sustainability of forest ecosystem.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan
AU  - Herman Hidayat
AU  - Ernawati Sinaga
Y1  - 2021/03/03
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13
T2  - Earth Sciences
JF  - Earth Sciences
JO  - Earth Sciences
SP  - 17
EP  - 26
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5982
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13
AB  - A Current condition the trend of deforestation was decreasing in Indonesia. According to Minister of Environment and Forestry statement (January 29, 2018) the rationale was happened due to that the government released policy for keeping moratorium of estate oil palm concession permission, to implement law enforcement for illegal logging actors, to launch forest restoration program and conservation in protected forest and peat swamp land, and to invite participation of local people for social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial). There is close relation that deforestation issues affect on ecological damage and social resilience and eventually affect on poverty among local community who live in and around forest and people as well. As an illustration ecological damage for instance forest fire, flood, drought, soil erosion, extinction of biodiversity and so forth due to deforestation impact. On the other hand, deforestation eventually affect on social resilience and poverty was indicated more ten percent that marginalized society (they categorized poor) below average national income, no access to land utilization and lower education still high. As registered by National Bureau Statistic (BPS) in 2018 reached 9,82 percent and 10,12 percent in 2017 (total 23,8 million) from 268 million people. From this point of view, the paper focuses on discussion three level analysis to reply deforestation that eventually affect on social resilience. Firstly, is to examine government policy toward private sectors on moratorium of oil palm estate plantation and land conflict. Secondly is shifting cultivator changed into mining activities to respond forest degradation. Thirdly is to invite participation of local people and to carry out social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial) program which aims to promote their income and social welfare and to maintain the sustainability of forest ecosystem.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Herman Hidayat

Graduate School of Social and Political Science, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia
Ernawati Sinaga

Graduate School of Biology, Universitas Nasional, Jakarta, Indonesia

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Herman Hidayat, Ernawati Sinaga. (2021). Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan. Earth Sciences, 10(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Herman Hidayat; Ernawati Sinaga. Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan. Earth Sci. 2021, 10(1), 17-26. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Herman Hidayat, Ernawati Sinaga. Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan. Earth Sci. 2021;10(1):17-26. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13,
  author = {Herman Hidayat and Ernawati Sinaga},
  title = {Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan},
  journal = {Earth Sciences},
  volume = {10},
  number = {1},
  pages = {17-26},
  doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20211001.13},
  abstract = {A Current condition the trend of deforestation was decreasing in Indonesia. According to Minister of Environment and Forestry statement (January 29, 2018) the rationale was happened due to that the government released policy for keeping moratorium of estate oil palm concession permission, to implement law enforcement for illegal logging actors, to launch forest restoration program and conservation in protected forest and peat swamp land, and to invite participation of local people for social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial). There is close relation that deforestation issues affect on ecological damage and social resilience and eventually affect on poverty among local community who live in and around forest and people as well. As an illustration ecological damage for instance forest fire, flood, drought, soil erosion, extinction of biodiversity and so forth due to deforestation impact. On the other hand, deforestation eventually affect on social resilience and poverty was indicated more ten percent that marginalized society (they categorized poor) below average national income, no access to land utilization and lower education still high. As registered by National Bureau Statistic (BPS) in 2018 reached 9,82 percent and 10,12 percent in 2017 (total 23,8 million) from 268 million people. From this point of view, the paper focuses on discussion three level analysis to reply deforestation that eventually affect on social resilience. Firstly, is to examine government policy toward private sectors on moratorium of oil palm estate plantation and land conflict. Secondly is shifting cultivator changed into mining activities to respond forest degradation. Thirdly is to invite participation of local people and to carry out social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial) program which aims to promote their income and social welfare and to maintain the sustainability of forest ecosystem.},
 year = {2021}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Deforestation and Social Resilience: A Case Study of Gunung Mas District-Central Kalimantan
AU  - Herman Hidayat
AU  - Ernawati Sinaga
Y1  - 2021/03/03
PY  - 2021
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13
DO  - 10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13
T2  - Earth Sciences
JF  - Earth Sciences
JO  - Earth Sciences
SP  - 17
EP  - 26
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2328-5982
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20211001.13
AB  - A Current condition the trend of deforestation was decreasing in Indonesia. According to Minister of Environment and Forestry statement (January 29, 2018) the rationale was happened due to that the government released policy for keeping moratorium of estate oil palm concession permission, to implement law enforcement for illegal logging actors, to launch forest restoration program and conservation in protected forest and peat swamp land, and to invite participation of local people for social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial). There is close relation that deforestation issues affect on ecological damage and social resilience and eventually affect on poverty among local community who live in and around forest and people as well. As an illustration ecological damage for instance forest fire, flood, drought, soil erosion, extinction of biodiversity and so forth due to deforestation impact. On the other hand, deforestation eventually affect on social resilience and poverty was indicated more ten percent that marginalized society (they categorized poor) below average national income, no access to land utilization and lower education still high. As registered by National Bureau Statistic (BPS) in 2018 reached 9,82 percent and 10,12 percent in 2017 (total 23,8 million) from 268 million people. From this point of view, the paper focuses on discussion three level analysis to reply deforestation that eventually affect on social resilience. Firstly, is to examine government policy toward private sectors on moratorium of oil palm estate plantation and land conflict. Secondly is shifting cultivator changed into mining activities to respond forest degradation. Thirdly is to invite participation of local people and to carry out social forestry (Perhutanan Sosial) program which aims to promote their income and social welfare and to maintain the sustainability of forest ecosystem.
VL  - 10
IS  - 1
ER  -

Copy | Download