| Peer-Reviewed

Repercussions of Agro-Pastoralism on Soil Condition in Western Serengeti, Tanzania

Received: 9 May 2022     Accepted: 30 May 2022     Published: 30 June 2022
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Overgrazing of rangeland and continuous cultivation of cropland are among human activities contributing to the deterioration of soil properties. To elucidate the effect of agro-pastoral activities on soil properties in western Serengeti, we examined soil properties in four land use types, namely fallow land, communal grazing land, mixed grazing land and wildlife dominated grazing land. The soil sampling sites were along the landscape from village lands towards protected areas while crossing all four land use types. Soil pH was not significantly different (p≥0.05) although it was relatively low in fallow and communal grazing lands. Clay content in soils was not affected by land use types whereas sand and silt contents were significantly different (p≤0.05) among land use types. In terms of soil nutrients, OC, CEC and soil P showed a significant difference (p≤0.05) among land use types but land use did not affect TN and Ca2+. Bare land within quadrats was highest in communal grazing lands (1233 cm2/quadrat) and lowest in wildlife dominated grazing lands (906 cm2/quadrat). Protected areas represented by wildlife grazing sites had the highest soil stability expressed in terms of soil structure stability index. Soil quality declined with increase in bare land. Further, high density of grazing animals caused a decline in soil properties. The study demonstrated that the four land use types had negative influence on soil properties. It was further noted that the current practices of livestock grazing and cultivation had higher negative effects on soil properties than the other land use types. Long term monitoring study on impacts of agro-pastoralism in western Serengeti is needed so as to establish proper stocking rates to avoid reaching an irreversible soil properties deterioration situation.

Published in Earth Sciences (Volume 11, Issue 3)
DOI 10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19
Page(s) 130-141
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Animal Density, Degradation, Grazing Animals, Land Use Type, Soil Properties, Quadrat

References
[1] Arevalo, L. A., Alegre, J. C., Bandy, D. E. and Szott, L. T. (1998). The effect of cattle grazing on soil physical and chemical properties in a silvopastoral system in the Peruvian Amazon. Agroforestry Systems, 40, 109-124.
[2] Barton, K. (2009). MuMIn: Multi-Model Inference. R package version 0.12.2/r18. bit.ly/2MYvOnv.
[3] Boke, S. (2004). Soil phosphorus fractions as influenced by different cropping systems in Andosols and Nitosols in Kembata-Tembaro and Wolayta Zones, SNNPRS. MSc Thesis. Alemaya University, pp. 131.
[4] Brandstroem, P, Hultin J., Lindstroem J. (1979). Aspects of Agro-Pastoralism in East Africa, Research Report no. 51. Uppsala: The Scandinavian Institute of African Studies.
[5] Burcher, C. L., Vallet, H. M. and Benfield, E. F. (2007). The Land Cover Cascade. Relationship Coupling Land and Water. Ecology, 88, 228-242. http://dx.doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[228:TLCRCL]2.0.CO;2.
[6] Burnham K; Anderson D. 2002. Model selection and multimodal inference. Springer, New York, USA. doi: 10.1007/b97636.
[7] Campbell, K., Hofer, H. (1995). People and wildlife: Spatial dynamics and zones of interaction. In Sinclair A and Arcese P (eds), Serengeti II: Dynamics, Management and Conservation of an Ecosystem. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1995: 534–70.
[8] Caro, T. (2016). Guidelines for wildlife monitoring: savannah herbivores. Tropical Conservation Science, 9 (1): 1-15. Available online: www.tropicalconservationscience.org
[9] Chen, X., Hutley L. B., Eamus, D. (2005). Soil organic carbon content at a range of north Australian tropical savannas with contrasting site histories. Plant Soil, 268: 161–71.
[10] Coppock, D. L. (1994). The Borana Plateau of Southern Ethiopia: Synthesis of Pastoral Research, Development and Change. ILCA, Addis Ababa.
[11] Craul, P. J. (1999). Urban Soils: Applications and Practices. Wiley, New York.
[12] Cui, X. Y., Wang, Y. F., Niu, H. S., Wu, J., Wang, S. P., Schnug, E., Rogasik, J., Fleckenstein, J., Tang, Y. H., (2005). Effect of long-term grazing on soil organic carbon content in semiarid steppes in Inner Mongolia. Ecological Research, 20: 519–527.
[13] Davison, T. M., Cowan, R. T., Shephard, R. K., Martin, P. (1985). Milk production from tropical grass pastures. 1. Effects of stocking rate and level of nitrogen fertilizer on the pasture and diet. Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture and Animal Husbandry, 25: 515 – 523.
[14] Duniway, MC., Bestelmeyer, BT., Tugel, A. (2010). Soil processes and properties that distinguish ecological sites and states. Rangelands, 32: 9–15.
[15] Emerton, L. and Mfunda, I. (1999). 'Making Wildlife Economically Viable for Communities Living around the Western Serengeti, Tanzania’, Evaluating Eden Series Discussion Paper, No. 1. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.
[16] Evjen-Olsen, A. K., (1998). Overview of the Communities Surrounding the Ikorongo/Grumeti Game Reserves, SRCS Workshop Report, Ministry of natural Resources and Tourism, Wildlife Department, Morogoro, Tanzania.
[17] FAO. (1993). Field Measurement of Soil Erosion and Runoff. N. W. Hudson. FAO Soils Bulletin No. 68. FAO, Rome.
[18] FAO. (2001). Soil Fertility Management in Support of Food Security in Sub-Saharan Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, pp. 55.
[19] FINNIDA/GRT, (1981). Lake Zone Regional Physical Plan 1981-2000. Government of the Republic of Tanzania and FINNIDA, Dar es Salaam.
[20] Fynn, R. W. S. (2012). Functional Resource Heterogeneity Increases Livestock and Rangeland Productivity. - Rangeland Ecology and Management, 65: 319–329.
[21] Gachimbi, L. N. (2002). Technical Report of Soil Survey and Sampling Results: Embu-Mbeere Districts, Kenya. LUCID Working Paper Series No. 9, KARI-Kabete, Nairobi.
[22] Gelman A. (2008). Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine, 27: 2865–2873. doi: 10.1002/sim.3107.
[23] Goldman, M. J., and F. Riosmena. (2013). “Adapting to Variability and Drought: The Shifting Relationship between Institutions and Landscapes in East Africa Savanna lands.” Global Environmental Change, 23: 588–597.
[24] Greijn, H. (1994). A Missed Opportunity. Our Planet, 6: 23-24.
[25] Guo, Z. G., Zhou, X. R., Hou, Y., (2012). Effect of available burrow densities of plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) on soil physicochemical property of the bare land and vegetation land in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 32: 104–110.
[26] Hiernaux, P., Bielders, C. L., Valentin, C., Bationo, A., FernándezRivera, S., (1999). Effects of livestock grazing on physical and chemical properties of sandy soils in Sahelian rangelands. Journal of Arid Environment, 41: 231–245.
[27] Hopkins, B. G., Ellsworth, J. W. (2005). Phosphorus availability with alkaline/calcareous soil. In: Stevens WB (ed) Proceedings of Western Nutrient Management Conference, 6: 88-93.
[28] Jobbagy, E. G., Jackson, R. B. (2000). The vertical distribution of soil organic carbon and its relation to climate and vegetation. Ecological applications, 10: 423 - 436.
[29] Kamprath, E. J., Foy, C. D. (1971). Lime-fertilizer-plant interactions in acid soils. In 'Fertilizer Technology and Use' 2nd edition, Soil Science Society of America.
[30] Kavana, P. Y., Sangeda, A. Z., Mtengeti, E. J., Mahonge, C., Bukombe, J., Fyumagwa, R and Nindi, S. (2019). Herbaceous plant species diversity in communal agro-pastoral and conservation areas in western Serengeti, Tanzania. Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 7 (5): 502–518. 502 DOI: 10.17138/TGFT(7)502-518.
[31] Kavana, P. Y., Sangeda, A. Z., Mtengeti, E. J., Mahonge, C., Bukombe, J., and Fyumagwa, R (2021). How does agro-pastoralism affect forage and soil properties in western Serengeti, Tanzania? Tropical Grasslands-Forrajes Tropicales, 9 (1): 120–133 doi: 10.17138/TGFT(9)120-133.
[32] Kerven C., Steimann B., Ashley L., Dear C., Rahim I. (2011). “Pastoralism and Farming in Central Asia’s Mountains: A Research Review.” MSRC Background Paper No. 1. September 2011. http://www.ucentralasia.org/downloads/pastoralism and farming in central Asia Mountains. Accessed on 13th November, 2016.
[33] Kidegesho, J. R. (2010). ‘Serengeti shall not die’: transforming an ambition into a reality. Tropical Conservation Science, 3: 228-248.
[34] Kuzel, S., Nýdl, V., Kolár, L., Tichý, R. (1994). Spatial variability of cadmium, pH, organic matter in soil and its dependence on sampling scales. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 78 (1-2): 51-59 DOI 10.1007/BF00475667.
[35] Kuznetsova, A., Brockhoff, P. B., Christensen, R. H. B. (2017). lmerTest package: Tests in linear mixed effects models. Journal of Statistical Software, 82 (13): 1–26. doi: 10.18637/jss.v082.i13.
[36] Lai, L., Kumar, S. (2020). A global meta-analysis of livestock grazing impacts on soil properties. PLoS ONE, 15 (8): e0236638. https://doi. org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236638.
[37] LEAD/FAO, Livestock, Environment and Development Initiative, (1999). Tropical livestock units (TLU). In: Livestock and Environment Toolbox. LEAD/FAO, Rome, Italy. www.fao.org/ag/againfo/programmes/en/lead/toolbox/Mixed1/TLU.htm.
[38] Lelisa, A., Abebaw, A., (2016). Study on selected soıl physicochemical properties of rehabilitated degraded bare land: The case of Jigessa rehabilitatıon site, Borana zone, Ethiopia. Global Journal of Advanced Research 3 (5): 345-354.
[39] Li, W., Cao, W., Wang, J., Li, X., Xu, Ch., Shi, Sh. (2017). Effects of grazing regime on vegetation structure, productivity, soil quality, carbon and nitrogen storage of alpine meadow on the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Ecological Engineering, 98: 123-133.
[40] Maganga, K. Z., Nyangito, M. M., Musimba, N. K. R., Nyariki, D. M., Mwangombe, A. W., Ekaya, W. N., Muiru, W. M., Clavel, D., Francis, J., Kaufmann R. and Verhagen, J. (2010). The Challenges of rehabilitating denuded patches of a semi-arid environment in Kenya. African Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 4 (7): 430-436.
[41] Majule, A. E. (2003). “Impacts of land Use/Land Cover Change on Soil Degradation and Biodiversity on the Slopes of the Mount Kilimanjaro, Tanzania”, LUCID Project Working Paper: 26, University of Dar es salaam.
[42] Matano, A. S., Kanangire, C. K., Anyona, D. N., Abuom, P. O., Gelder, F. B., Dida, G. O., Owuor, P. O., Ofulla. A. V. O. (2015). Effects of land use change on land degradation reflected by soil properties along Mara River, Kenya and Tanzania. Open Journal of Soil Science, 5: 20-38.
[43] McDonald, M. A., Healey, J. R., Stevens, P. A. (2002). The effects of secondary forest clearance and subsequent land-use on erosion losses and soil properties in the Blue Mountains of Jamaica. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment, 92 (1): 1-19.
[44] Mfunda IM; Røskaft E. (2011). Wildlife or crop production: the dilemma of conservation and human livelihoods in Serengeti, Tanzania. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services and Management, 7 (1): 39-49. DOI: 10.1080/21513732.2011.602028.
[45] Mfunda, I. M., Emerton, L. (1998). Making Wildlife Economically Viable for Communities Living Around the Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Biodiversity Economics for Eastern Africa. IUCN. 28pp.
[46] Mikha, M. M., Vigil, M. F., Liebig, M. A., Bowman, R. A., McConkey, B., Deibert, E. J., Pikul, J. L. (2006). “Cropping system influences on soil chemical properties and soil quality in the Great Plains,” Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 21 (1): 26–35.
[47] Nagy, N. M., Kónya, J. (2007). Study of pH-dependent charges of soils by surface acid-base properties. Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 305 (1): 94-100.
[48] Neina, D. (2019). The role of soil pH in plant nutrition and soil remediation. Applied and Environmental Soil Science. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/5794869.
[49] Okalebo, J. R., Gathua, K. W., Woomer, P. L. (2002). Laboratory methods of soil and plant analysis: A working manual. 2nd edition. TSBF-CIAT and SACRED Africa, Kenya.
[50] Peratoner, G., Pötsch, E. M. (2019). Methods to describe the botanical composition of vegetation in grassland research. Die Bodenkultur, 70: 1–18. https://doi.org/10.2478/boku-2019-0001.
[51] Pieri, C. (1992). Fertility of soils. A Future for Farming in the West African Savannah. Springer, Berlin, 348 pp.
[52] Pruksakorn, S., Popradit, A. (2018). Comparison of soil composition between farmlands and protected area. Eurasian Journal of Analytical Chemistry, 13 (3): 468 – 478.
[53] Riha, S. J., Senesac, G., Pallant, E. (1986). Effects of forest vegetation on spatial variability of surface mineral soil pH, soluble aluminium and carbon. Water Air and Soil Pollution, 31 (3-4): 929-940 DOI 10.1007/BF00284238.
[54] Ruiz-Mirazo, J. (2011). Environmental benefits of extensive livestock farming: wildfire prevention and beyond. Options Méditerranéennes, 100: 75-82.
[55] Russenes, A. L., Korsaeth, A., Bakken, L. R., Dörsch, P. (2016). Spatial variation in soil pH controls off-season N2O emission in an agricultural soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 99: 36-46. DOI 10.1016/j.catena.2016.10.017.
[56] Serme, I., Ouattara, K., Ouattara, B., Taonda S. J. B. (2016). Short term impact of tillage and fertility management on Lixisol structural degradation. International Journal of Agriculture Policy Research, 4: 1–6.
[57] Silvia, P., Escalante, A. E., Noguez, A. M., Felipe, G. O., Celeste, M. P., Cram, S. S., Eguiarte, L. E., Souza, P. (2016). Spatial heterogeneity of physicochemical properties explains differences in microbial composition in arid soils from Cuatro Cienegas, Mexico. PeerJ, 4 (9): e2459 DOI 10.7717/peerj.24.
[58] Song, X., Brus, D. J., Liu, F., Li, D., Zhao, Y., Yang, J., Zhang, G., (2016). Mapping soil organic carbon content by geographically weighted regression: A case study in the Heihe river basin, China. Geoderma 261, 11-22.
[59] Stocking, M., Murnaghan, N. (2000). Land Degradation—Guideline for Field Assessment. Overseas Development Group, University of East Anglia, Norwich.
[60] Tufa M, Asmare M, Wondwosen T. (2019). Effects of land –use types on selected soil physical and chemical properties: the case of Kuyu District, Ethiopia. Eurasian Journal of Soil Science, 8: 94 –109.
[61] Wilding, L. P. (1985). Soil spatial variability: its documentation, accommodation and implication to soil survey. In: Nielsen D. R., Bouman J, eds. Soil spatial variability. Wageningen: Pudoc, 166-194.
[62] Yan P, Peng H, Yan L, Zhang S, Chen A, Lin K. (2019). Spatial variability in soil pH and land use as the main influential factor in the red beds of the Nanxiong Basin, China. PeerJ, 7:e6342 http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6342.
[63] Yan, P., Peng, H., Yan, L., Zhang, S., Chen, A., Lin, K. (2019). Spatial variability in soil pH and land use as the main influential factor in the red beds of the Nanxiong Basin, China. PeerJ, 7:e6342 http://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.6342.
[64] Yu, C., Zhang, J., Pang, X. P., Wang, Q., Zhou, Y. P., Guo, Z. G. (2017). Soil disturbance and disturbance intensity: Response of soil nutrient concentrations of alpine meadow to plateau pika bioturbation in the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau, China. Geoderma, 307: 98– 106.
[65] Zhang, J., Zuo, X., Zhou, X., Lv, P., Lian, J., Yue, X., (2017). Long-term grazing effects on vegetation characteristics and soil properties in semiarid grassland, northern China. Enviromental Monitoring and Assessment, 189: 216.
[66] Zhang, Y., Dong, S. K., Gao, Q. Z., Liu, S. L., Liang, Y., Cao, X. J., (2016). Responses of alpine vegetation and soils to the disturbance of plateau pika (Ochotona curzoniae) at burrow level on the Qinghai–Tibetan Plateau of China. Ecological Engineering, 88, 232–236.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Pius Yoram Kavana, Ephraim Japhet Mtengeti, Anthony Zizimus Sangeda, Christopher Mahonge, John Bukombe, et al. (2022). Repercussions of Agro-Pastoralism on Soil Condition in Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Earth Sciences, 11(3), 130-141. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Pius Yoram Kavana; Ephraim Japhet Mtengeti; Anthony Zizimus Sangeda; Christopher Mahonge; John Bukombe, et al. Repercussions of Agro-Pastoralism on Soil Condition in Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Earth Sci. 2022, 11(3), 130-141. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Pius Yoram Kavana, Ephraim Japhet Mtengeti, Anthony Zizimus Sangeda, Christopher Mahonge, John Bukombe, et al. Repercussions of Agro-Pastoralism on Soil Condition in Western Serengeti, Tanzania. Earth Sci. 2022;11(3):130-141. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19,
      author = {Pius Yoram Kavana and Ephraim Japhet Mtengeti and Anthony Zizimus Sangeda and Christopher Mahonge and John Bukombe and Stephen Nindi and Robert Fyumagwa},
      title = {Repercussions of Agro-Pastoralism on Soil Condition in Western Serengeti, Tanzania},
      journal = {Earth Sciences},
      volume = {11},
      number = {3},
      pages = {130-141},
      doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20221103.19},
      abstract = {Overgrazing of rangeland and continuous cultivation of cropland are among human activities contributing to the deterioration of soil properties. To elucidate the effect of agro-pastoral activities on soil properties in western Serengeti, we examined soil properties in four land use types, namely fallow land, communal grazing land, mixed grazing land and wildlife dominated grazing land. The soil sampling sites were along the landscape from village lands towards protected areas while crossing all four land use types. Soil pH was not significantly different (p≥0.05) although it was relatively low in fallow and communal grazing lands. Clay content in soils was not affected by land use types whereas sand and silt contents were significantly different (p≤0.05) among land use types. In terms of soil nutrients, OC, CEC and soil P showed a significant difference (p≤0.05) among land use types but land use did not affect TN and Ca2+. Bare land within quadrats was highest in communal grazing lands (1233 cm2/quadrat) and lowest in wildlife dominated grazing lands (906 cm2/quadrat). Protected areas represented by wildlife grazing sites had the highest soil stability expressed in terms of soil structure stability index. Soil quality declined with increase in bare land. Further, high density of grazing animals caused a decline in soil properties. The study demonstrated that the four land use types had negative influence on soil properties. It was further noted that the current practices of livestock grazing and cultivation had higher negative effects on soil properties than the other land use types. Long term monitoring study on impacts of agro-pastoralism in western Serengeti is needed so as to establish proper stocking rates to avoid reaching an irreversible soil properties deterioration situation.},
     year = {2022}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Repercussions of Agro-Pastoralism on Soil Condition in Western Serengeti, Tanzania
    AU  - Pius Yoram Kavana
    AU  - Ephraim Japhet Mtengeti
    AU  - Anthony Zizimus Sangeda
    AU  - Christopher Mahonge
    AU  - John Bukombe
    AU  - Stephen Nindi
    AU  - Robert Fyumagwa
    Y1  - 2022/06/30
    PY  - 2022
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19
    DO  - 10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19
    T2  - Earth Sciences
    JF  - Earth Sciences
    JO  - Earth Sciences
    SP  - 130
    EP  - 141
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2328-5982
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20221103.19
    AB  - Overgrazing of rangeland and continuous cultivation of cropland are among human activities contributing to the deterioration of soil properties. To elucidate the effect of agro-pastoral activities on soil properties in western Serengeti, we examined soil properties in four land use types, namely fallow land, communal grazing land, mixed grazing land and wildlife dominated grazing land. The soil sampling sites were along the landscape from village lands towards protected areas while crossing all four land use types. Soil pH was not significantly different (p≥0.05) although it was relatively low in fallow and communal grazing lands. Clay content in soils was not affected by land use types whereas sand and silt contents were significantly different (p≤0.05) among land use types. In terms of soil nutrients, OC, CEC and soil P showed a significant difference (p≤0.05) among land use types but land use did not affect TN and Ca2+. Bare land within quadrats was highest in communal grazing lands (1233 cm2/quadrat) and lowest in wildlife dominated grazing lands (906 cm2/quadrat). Protected areas represented by wildlife grazing sites had the highest soil stability expressed in terms of soil structure stability index. Soil quality declined with increase in bare land. Further, high density of grazing animals caused a decline in soil properties. The study demonstrated that the four land use types had negative influence on soil properties. It was further noted that the current practices of livestock grazing and cultivation had higher negative effects on soil properties than the other land use types. Long term monitoring study on impacts of agro-pastoralism in western Serengeti is needed so as to establish proper stocking rates to avoid reaching an irreversible soil properties deterioration situation.
    VL  - 11
    IS  - 3
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Department of Research, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Mahale-Gombe Wildlife Research Centre, Kigoma, Tanzania

  • Department of Animal, Aquaculture and Range Sciences, College of Agriculture, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Department of Animal, Aquaculture and Range Sciences, College of Agriculture, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Department of Policy Planning and Management, Campus College of Social Sciences and Humanities, Sokoine University of Agriculture, Morogoro, Tanzania

  • Department of Research, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania

  • Department of Research, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania

  • Department of Research, Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute, Arusha, Tanzania

  • Sections