Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat

doi:doi:10.11648/j.her.20220706.11

| Peer-Reviewed

Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat

Published in Higher Education Research (Volume 7, Issue 6)

Received: 16 October 2022 Accepted: 2 November 2022 Published: 10 November 2022

Views: Downloads:

Download PDF

Share This Article

Twitter
Linked In
Facebook

Abstract

Research is essential to the improved practice of a profession and is indispensable in completing a program of study. However, business education students have remarkable difficulty and challenges in conducting research resulting in the inability to complete their research projects on time. This study will examine the relationship between the three research constructs: research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research among business education students. Furthermore, the study will investigate whether business education students differ in research self-efficacy, perception of the research training environment, and interest in research based on their demographic characteristics. Employing a cross-sectional research design and using structured questionnaires administered to 149 business education students, it was revealed that there is no significant difference in the three research constructs in terms of gender and program of study and no significant relationship between gender and program of study and the three research constructs. This study suggests integrating research into coursework to promote interest in research and provide a supportive research training environment that will contribute to a positive research experience among students. Moreover, a recommendation is to conduct a follow-up study employing a longitudinal research design per program to measure the influence of research self-efficacy, research training environment, and interest in research of the students through their program of study.

Published in	Higher Education Research (Volume 7, Issue 6)
DOI	10.11648/j.her.20220706.11
Page(s)	183-190
Creative Commons	This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright	Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Research Self-Efficacy, Research Interest, Research Productivity, Business Education

References

[1]	Gray, A. (2016). The 10 skills you need to thrive in the Fourth Industrial Revolution. Retrieved on December 28, 2018 from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2016/01/the-10-skills-you-need-to-thrive-in-the-fourth-industrial-revolution/
[2]	Woolf, J. (2014). Integrating research skills training into non-research methods courses. Retrieved on December 29, 2018 from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1060243
[3]	Brewer, G. A., Douglas, J. W., Facer II, R. L., & O’Toole Jr., L. J. (1999). Determinants of graduate research productivity in doctoral programs of Public Administration. Public Administration Review, 59 (5) 373-382.
[4]	Ayala, C. O. J., & Garcia, B. H. (2013). Research productivity and utilization in Higher Education Institutions in CALABARZON Region. MSEUF Research Studies, 15 (1). Retrieved on December 28, 2018 from http://eournals.ph/form/cite.php?id=6751.
[5]	Lambie, G. W., & Vaccaro, N. (2011). Doctoral Counselor Education students’ levels of research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research. Counselor Education & Supervision, 50 (243-258).
[6]	Bandura, A. (1994). Self-efficacy. Retrieved on January 3, 2019 from https://www.uky.edu/~eushe2/Bandura/BanEncy.html
[7]	Akhtar, M. (2018). What is self-efficacy? Bandura’s 4 sources of efficacy beliefs. Retrieved on January 3, 2019 from http://positivepsychology.org.uk/self-efficacy-definition-bandura-meaning/
[8]	McBrayer, J. S., Melton, T. D., Calhoun, D. W., Dunbar, M., & Tolman, S. (2018). The correlation between self-efficacy and time to degree completion of education leadership doctoral students. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 13, 413-439.
[9]	Kuo, P. B., Woo, H. & Bang, N. M. (2017). Advisory relationship as a moderator between research self-efficacy, motivation, and productivity among Counselor education doctoral students. Counselor Education & Supervision, 56, 130-144.
[10]	Lambie, G. W., Hayes, B. G., Griffith, C., Limberg, D., & Mullen, P. R. (2014). An exploratory investigation of the research self-efficacy, interest in research, and research knowledge of PhD in Education students. Innovative High Education, 39, 139-153.
[11]	Alfakih, A. H. (2017). A training program to enhance postgraduate students’ research skills in preparing a research proposal in the field of curriculum and instruction methods of Arabig Language. IOSR Journal of Research & Method in Education, 7 (3), 1-6.
[12]	Dela Cruz, J. (2016). The research capability of Ilocos Sur Polytechnic State College: A basis for a capability enhancement program. International Journal of Management and Social Sciences Research, 5 (7), 39-45.
[13]	Nichaus, E., Garcia, C. E., & Reading, J. (2018). The road to researcher: The development of research self-efficacy in higher education scholars. Journal for the study of postsecondary and tertiary education, 3, 1-20.
[14]	Maschi, T., Wells, M., Slater, G. Y., MacMillan, T., & Ristow, J. (2013). Social Work students’ research-related anxiety and self-efficacy: Research instructor’s perception and teaching innovation. Social Work Education, 32 (6), 800-817.
[15]	Black, M. L., Curran, M. C., Golshan, S., Daly, R., Depp, C., Kelly, C. & Jeste, D. (2013). Summer Research Training for Medical Students: Impact on Research Self-efficacy. Clinical and Translational Science, 6 (6), 487-489.
[16]	Petko, J. T. (2012). Counselor education doctoral students’ level of research self-efficacy, interest in research, and research mentoring: A cross-sectional investigation. Retrieved on December 29, 2018 from http://etd.fcla.edu/CF/CFE0004583/John_Petko_Dissertation_11-16-12.pdf
[17]	Rezael, M. & Zamani-Miandashti, N. (2013). The relationship between research self-eficacy, research anxiety and attitude toward research: A study of agricultural graduate students. Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 3 (4), 69-78.
[18]	Quimbo, M. T., Sulabo, E. (2014). Research productivity and its policy implications in higher education institutions. Studiesin Higher Education, 39 (10), 1955-1971.
[19]	Chesnut, S. R., Siwatu, K. O., Young, H. A., & Tong, Y. (2015). Examining the relationship between the research training environment, course experiences, and graduate students’ research self-efficacy beliefs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 399-418. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume10/IJDSv10p399-418Chesnut0914.pdf
[20]	Burke, K. (2018). Undergradaute research training environments: Impact on research self-efficacy, perceived utility of research, and willingness to engage in research post-graduation. Retrieved on December 29, 2018 from https://lib.driastate.edu/etd/16555.
[21]	Gelso, C. J., Mallinckrodt, B., & Judge, A. B. (1996). Research training environment, attitudes towards research, and research self-efficacy: The revised research training environment scale. The Counseling Psychologist, 24, 304-322. doi: 10.1177/0011000096242010.
[22]	Mizany, M., Khabiri, M, & Sajadi, S. N. (2011). A study of the capabilities of graduate students in writing thesis and the advising quality of faculty members to pursue the thesis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 5-9.
[23]	Demjen, B., & Ciascai, L. (2017). Survey regarding the competence and interest towards research of Romanian University students. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 10 (3), 53-58.
[24]	Mortenius, H. (2014). Creating an interest in research and development as a means of reducing the gap between theory and practice in primary care: An interventional study based on strategic communication. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 11, 8689-8708.
[25]	Mills, J., Birks, M., & Karen, F. (2014). Establishing a learning community to support research and scholarly training: A case study. Academic Leadership Journal in Student Research. Retrieved on December 30, 2018 from https://eric.ed.gov/contentdelivery/servlet/ERICServlet?accno=EJ1055331
[26]	Bacharova, L., Kudaiberdieva, G., MIsak, A., Hakacova, N., Timuralp, B., & Wagner, G. S. (2014). The effect of International Scientific Summer School research training on scientific productivity of trainees. International Journal of Cardiology, 176, 1142-1146.
[27]	Bishop, R. M. & Bieschke, K. J. (1994). Interest in Research Questionnaire. Unpublished scale, The Pennsylvania State University.
[28]	Kerrigan, M. R., & Hayes, K. M., (2016). EdD students’ self-efficacy and interest in conducting research. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 147-162.
[29]	Law, F. M. & Guo, G. J. (2011). Factors influencing interest in research among criminal justice students. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 22 (3), 377-391.
[30]	Baltes, B., Hoffman-Kipp, P., Lynn, L., & Weltzer-Ward, L. (2010). Students’ research self-efficacy during online doctoral research courses. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 3 (3), 51-58.
[31]	Chumwichan, S., & Siriparp, T. (2016). Influence of research training environment on research interest in graduate students. Retrieved on December 29, 2018 from https://ac.els-cdn.com/S1877042816000902/1-s2.0-S1877042816000902-main.pdf?_tid=fc21ac73-c052-4599-b408-6808c0891d30&acdnat=1546064826_2b6a5550a9503f0c7f6adda991e6e577
[32]	Sawitri, D. R., Nurtjahjanti, H., & Prasetyo, A. R. (2018). Social cognitive predictors of interest in research among life sciences academics. Retrieved on December 29, 2018 from http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/116/1/012001/pdf
[33]	Bandura, A. (1989). Social cognitive theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development. Vol. 6. Six theories of child development (pp. 1-60). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
[34]	Williams, S, L. (1995). Self-efficacy, anxiety and phobic disorders. Self-efficacy, adaptation, and adjustment: Theory, research and applications (pp. 69-107). New York: Plenum Press.
[35]	Jiang, Z. & Zhang, Z (2012). Using social cognitive career theory to predict the academic interest and goals of Chinese middle vocational-technical school students. Public Personnel Management, 41 (5), 59-68.
[36]	Marczy, G., DeMatteo, D., & Festinger, D. (2005). Essentials of research design and methodology. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
[37]	Greeley, A. T., Johnson, E., Seem, S., Braver, M., Dias, L., Evans, K., Kincade, E., & Pricken, P. (1989). Research self-efficacy scale. Unpublished scale. Presented at the Association for Women in Psychology Conference, Bethesda MD.
[38]	Bieschke, K. J., Bishop, R. M., & Garcia, V. L. Factor analysis of the research self-efficacy scale. Retrieved on December 29, 2018 from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED370027.pdf
[39]	Foster, M., Kahn, J. H., & Hesson-McInnis, M. S. (2004). Factor structures of three measures of research self-Efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment, 12 (1), 3-16.
[40]	Vaccaro, N. (2009). The relationship between research self-efficacy, perception of the research training environment and interest in research in counselor education doctoral students: An ex-post-facto, cross-sectional correlational investigation. Retrieved on December 29, 2018 from https://stars.library.ucf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?referer=https://www.google.com/&httpsredir=1&article=4844&context=etd
[41]	Büyüköztürk, S., Atalay, K., Sozgun, Z., and Kebapçı, S. (2011). The development of research self-efficacy scale. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 1 (2011), 22-29.
[42]	Kahn, J. H. & Miller, S. A. (2000). Measuring global perceptions of the research training environment using a short form of the RTES-R. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 33 (2). Retrieved on December 29, 2018 from https://go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=AONE&sw=w&u=googlescholar&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA65196836&sid=classroomWidget&asid=b70af652#

Cite This Article

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat. (2022). Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students. Higher Education Research, 7(6), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220706.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat. Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students. High. Educ. Res. 2022, 7(6), 183-190. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20220706.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat. Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students. High Educ Res. 2022;7(6):183-190. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20220706.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.her.20220706.11,
  author = {Marilyn Pasion Gaoat},
  title = {Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students},
  journal = {Higher Education Research},
  volume = {7},
  number = {6},
  pages = {183-190},
  doi = {10.11648/j.her.20220706.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220706.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20220706.11},
  abstract = {Research is essential to the improved practice of a profession and is indispensable in completing a program of study. However, business education students have remarkable difficulty and challenges in conducting research resulting in the inability to complete their research projects on time. This study will examine the relationship between the three research constructs: research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research among business education students. Furthermore, the study will investigate whether business education students differ in research self-efficacy, perception of the research training environment, and interest in research based on their demographic characteristics. Employing a cross-sectional research design and using structured questionnaires administered to 149 business education students, it was revealed that there is no significant difference in the three research constructs in terms of gender and program of study and no significant relationship between gender and program of study and the three research constructs. This study suggests integrating research into coursework to promote interest in research and provide a supportive research training environment that will contribute to a positive research experience among students. Moreover, a recommendation is to conduct a follow-up study employing a longitudinal research design per program to measure the influence of research self-efficacy, research training environment, and interest in research of the students through their program of study.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students
AU  - Marilyn Pasion Gaoat
Y1  - 2022/11/10
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220706.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20220706.11
T2  - Higher Education Research
JF  - Higher Education Research
JO  - Higher Education Research
SP  - 183
EP  - 190
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-935X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220706.11
AB  - Research is essential to the improved practice of a profession and is indispensable in completing a program of study. However, business education students have remarkable difficulty and challenges in conducting research resulting in the inability to complete their research projects on time. This study will examine the relationship between the three research constructs: research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research among business education students. Furthermore, the study will investigate whether business education students differ in research self-efficacy, perception of the research training environment, and interest in research based on their demographic characteristics. Employing a cross-sectional research design and using structured questionnaires administered to 149 business education students, it was revealed that there is no significant difference in the three research constructs in terms of gender and program of study and no significant relationship between gender and program of study and the three research constructs. This study suggests integrating research into coursework to promote interest in research and provide a supportive research training environment that will contribute to a positive research experience among students. Moreover, a recommendation is to conduct a follow-up study employing a longitudinal research design per program to measure the influence of research self-efficacy, research training environment, and interest in research of the students through their program of study.
VL  - 7
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download

Author Information

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat

College of Business Education, University of La Salette, Inc., Santiago City, Philippines

Download PDF

Sections

Plain Text BibTeX RIS

APA Style

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat. (2022). Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students. Higher Education Research, 7(6), 183-190. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220706.11

Copy | Download

ACS Style

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat. Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students. High. Educ. Res. 2022, 7(6), 183-190. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20220706.11

Copy | Download

AMA Style

Marilyn Pasion Gaoat. Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students. High Educ Res. 2022;7(6):183-190. doi: 10.11648/j.her.20220706.11

Copy | Download

@article{10.11648/j.her.20220706.11,
  author = {Marilyn Pasion Gaoat},
  title = {Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students},
  journal = {Higher Education Research},
  volume = {7},
  number = {6},
  pages = {183-190},
  doi = {10.11648/j.her.20220706.11},
  url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220706.11},
  eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.her.20220706.11},
  abstract = {Research is essential to the improved practice of a profession and is indispensable in completing a program of study. However, business education students have remarkable difficulty and challenges in conducting research resulting in the inability to complete their research projects on time. This study will examine the relationship between the three research constructs: research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research among business education students. Furthermore, the study will investigate whether business education students differ in research self-efficacy, perception of the research training environment, and interest in research based on their demographic characteristics. Employing a cross-sectional research design and using structured questionnaires administered to 149 business education students, it was revealed that there is no significant difference in the three research constructs in terms of gender and program of study and no significant relationship between gender and program of study and the three research constructs. This study suggests integrating research into coursework to promote interest in research and provide a supportive research training environment that will contribute to a positive research experience among students. Moreover, a recommendation is to conduct a follow-up study employing a longitudinal research design per program to measure the influence of research self-efficacy, research training environment, and interest in research of the students through their program of study.},
 year = {2022}
}

Copy | Download

TY  - JOUR
T1  - Relationship of Research Self-Efficacy, Perceptions of the Research Training Environment and Interest in Research Among Business Education Students
AU  - Marilyn Pasion Gaoat
Y1  - 2022/11/10
PY  - 2022
N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220706.11
DO  - 10.11648/j.her.20220706.11
T2  - Higher Education Research
JF  - Higher Education Research
JO  - Higher Education Research
SP  - 183
EP  - 190
PB  - Science Publishing Group
SN  - 2578-935X
UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.her.20220706.11
AB  - Research is essential to the improved practice of a profession and is indispensable in completing a program of study. However, business education students have remarkable difficulty and challenges in conducting research resulting in the inability to complete their research projects on time. This study will examine the relationship between the three research constructs: research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research among business education students. Furthermore, the study will investigate whether business education students differ in research self-efficacy, perception of the research training environment, and interest in research based on their demographic characteristics. Employing a cross-sectional research design and using structured questionnaires administered to 149 business education students, it was revealed that there is no significant difference in the three research constructs in terms of gender and program of study and no significant relationship between gender and program of study and the three research constructs. This study suggests integrating research into coursework to promote interest in research and provide a supportive research training environment that will contribute to a positive research experience among students. Moreover, a recommendation is to conduct a follow-up study employing a longitudinal research design per program to measure the influence of research self-efficacy, research training environment, and interest in research of the students through their program of study.
VL  - 7
IS  - 6
ER  -

Copy | Download